Until recently, the sexual offending literature focused on male perpetrators and neglected to examine the characteristics of female perpetrators. As a result, treatment provision for female sexual abusers has been either nonexistent or inappropriately adapted from programs designed for males. What we do know is that male and female sexual abusers share similarities; however, there remain distinct differences that warrant empirical and theoretical study. The current review systematically examines the literature on offense-supportive cognition in female sexual abusers. The aim of this systematic review is to aid clinical practitioners who work with female sexual abusers by providing an evaluation of current available research regarding implicit theories, rape myth acceptance, violence-supportive cognition, gender stereotypes, beliefs about sex, and empathy. We conclude that further research examining the offense-supportive cognition of female sexual abusers is needed in order to facilitate more effective empirically driven clinical practice.
AbbeyA.McAuslanP.RossL. T. (1998). Sexual assault perpetration by college men: The role of alcohol, misperception of sexual intent, and sexual beliefs and experiences. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 167–195.doi:10.1521/jscp.1998.17.2.167
2.
BarnettG. D.MannR. E. (2013). Cognition, Empathy, and Sexual Offending. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 14, 22–33.
3.
BeckerJ. V.KaplanM. S. (1988). The assessment of adolescent sexual offenders. In PrinzR. J. (Ed.), Advances in behavioral assessment of children & families (pp. 97–118). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
4.
BeckettR. C. (1987). The children and sex questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, The Oxford Clinic, Littlemore Health Centre, Littlemore, Oxford.
5.
BeckettR. C. (2007, July). Female sexual abusers. Paper presented at the third International Congress of Law and Psychology, Adelaide , Australia.
6.
BeckettR. C.FisherD. (1994, November). Assessing victim empathy: A new measure. Paper presented at the 13th Annual Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, San Francisco , CA.
7.
BeechA. R.ParrettN.WardT.FisherD. (2009). Assessing female sexual offenders’ motivations and cognitions: An exploratory study. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15, 201–216. doi:10.1080/10683160802190921
8.
BemS. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354
9.
BumbyK. M. (1996). Assessing the cognitive distortions of child molesters and rapists: Development and validation of the molest and rape scales. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 8, 37–54. doi:10.1007/BF02258015
10.
BurtM. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.217
11.
CheckJ. V. P.MalamuthN. M. (1983). Sex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger versus acquaintance rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 344–356. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.344
12.
CopelloA. G.TataP. R. (1990). Violent behaviour and interpretative bias: An experimental study of the resolution of ambiguity in violent offenders. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29, 417–428. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1990.tb00905.x
13.
CortoniF.GannonT. A. (2011). Female sexual offenders. In BoerD. P.EherR.CraigL. A.MinerM.PhafflinF. (Eds.), International perspectives on the assessment and treatment of sex offenders: Theory, practice and research (pp. 35–54). Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
14.
CortoniF.GannonT. A. (2013). What works with female sexual offenders. In CraigL.DixonL.GannonT. A. (Eds.), What works in offender rehabilitation: An evidence based approach to assessment and treatment. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
15.
DavisM. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85. Retrieved fromhttp://www.uv.es/∼friasnav/Davis_1980.pdf
16.
ElliottI. A.EldridgeH. J.AshfieldS.BeechA. R. (2010). Exploring risk: Potential static, dynamic, protective and treatment factors in the clinical histories of female sex offenders. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 595–602. doi:10.1007/s10896-010-9322-8
17.
EysenckM. W.MoggK.MayJ.RichardsA.MathewsA. (1991). Bias in interpretation of ambiguous sentences related to threat in anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 144–150. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.100.2.144
18.
FernandezY. M.MarshallW. L.LightbodyS.O’SullivanC. (1999). The child molester empathy measure: Description and examination of its reliability and validity. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 17–31. doi:10.1177/107906329901100103
19.
FiskeS. T.TaylorS. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Mcgraw-Hill Book.
20.
FisherD.BeechA.BrowneK. (1999). Comparison of sex offenders to nonoffenders on selected psychological measures. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43, 473–491.
21.
Ford (2010). The treatment needs of female sexual offenders. In GannonT. A.CortoniF. (Eds.), Female sexual offenders: Theory, assessment and treatment. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
22.
FromuthM. E.ConnV. E. (1997). Hidden perpetrators: Sexual molestation in a nonclinical sample of college women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 456–465. doi:10.1177/088626097012003009
GannonT. A.HoareJ. A.RoseM. R.ParrettN. (2012). A re-examination of female child molesters’ implicit theories: Evidence of female specificity?Psychology, Crime & Law, 18, 209–224. doi:10.1080/10683131003752303
25.
GannonT. A.RoseM. R. (2008). Female child sexual offenders: Towards integrating theory and practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 442–461. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2008.07.002
26.
GannonT. A.RoseM. R. (2009). Offense-related interpretative bias in female child molesters: A preliminary study. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 194–207. doi:10.1177/1079063209332236
27.
GannonT. A.RoseM. R.CortoniF. (2010). Developments in female sexual offending and considerations for future research and treatment. In GannonT. A.CortoniF. (Eds.), Female sexual offenders: Theory, assessment, & practice (pp. 181–198). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
28.
GannonT. A.RoseM. R.WilliamsS. E. (2009). Do female child molesters implicitly associate children and sex? A preliminary investigation. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 15, 55–61. doi:10-1080/13552600802452559
29.
GrayN. S.BrownA. S.MacCullochM. J.SmithJ.SnowdenR. J. (2005). An implicit association test of the associations between children and sex in pedophiles. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 304–308. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.114.2.304
30.
GreenwaldA. G.McGheeD. E.SchwartzJ. K. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464
31.
KeownK.GannonT. A.WardT. (2008). What were they thinking? An exploration of child sexual offenders’ beliefs using a lexical decision task. Psychology, Crime and Law, 14, 317–337. doi:10.1080/10683160701770112
32.
KirbyD. (1984). Sexuality in education: An evaluation of programs and their effects. Santa Cruz, CA: Network.
33.
KjellgrenC.PriebeG.SvedinC. G.MossigeS.LangstromN. (2011). Female youth who sexually coerce: Prevalence, risk, and protective factors in two national high school surveys. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8, 3354–3362. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01495
34.
KubikE. K.HeckerJ. E. (2005). Cognitive distortions about sex and sexual offending: A comparison of sex offending girls, delinquent girls, and girls from the community. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 14, 43–69. doi:10.1300/J070v14n04_03
35.
KubikE. K.HeckerJ. E.RighthandS. (2002). Adolescent females who have sexually offended: Comparisons with delinquent adolescent female offenders and adolescent males who sexually offend. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 11, 63–83. doi:10.1300J070v11n03_04
36.
LangeA. (1994). Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory (BDHI). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets en Zeitlinger.
37.
MalamuthN. M.SockloskieR. J.KossM. P.TanakaJ. S. (1991). Characteristics of aggressors against women: Testing a model using a national sample of college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 670–681. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.59.5.670
38.
MarshallW. L.HambleyL. S. (1996). Intimacy and loneliness, and their relationship to rape myth acceptance and hostility toward women among rapists. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 586–592. doi:10.1177/088626096011004009
39.
MarshallW. L.HamiltonK.FernandezY. (2001). Empathy deficits and cognitive distortions in child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 123–130. doi:10.1023/A:1026652321327
40.
MarshallW. L.HudsonS. M.JonesR.FernandezY. M. (1995). Empathy in sex offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 15, 99–113. doi:10.1016/0272-7358(95)00002-7
41.
MihailidesS.DevillyG. J.WardT. (2004). Implicit cognitive distortions and sexual offending. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 333–350. doi:10.1177/107906320401600406
42.
NicholsH. R.MolinderI. (1996). Multiphasic Sex Inventory II. Tacoma, WA: Nichols and Molinder Assessments.
43.
NisbettR.RossL. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
44.
NunesK. L.FirestoneP. (2007). Indirect assessment of cognitions of child sexual abusers with the implicit association test. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 454–475. doi:10.1177/0093854806291703
45.
Ó CiardhaC.GannonT. A.WaughG.BlakeE. (2011). The offense period and modus operandi of female sex offenders. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, Toronto, ON, Canada.
46.
Ó CiardhaC.WardT. (2012). Theories of cognitive distortions in sexual offending: What the current research tells us. Manuscript submitted for publication.
47.
OverholserJ. C.BeckS. (1986). Multimethod assessment of rapists, child molesters, and three control groups on behavioral and psychological measures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 682–687. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.54.5.682
48.
PaulhusD. L. (1998). Paulhus deception scales (PDS): The balanced inventory of desirable responding-7, User’s manual. Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems.
49.
RingL. (2005). Psychometric profiles of female sexual abusers: A preliminary analysis into the differences between sexually abusive and non-offending females. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
50.
SchnabelK.AsendorpfJ. B.GreenwaldA. G. (2008). Assessment of individual differences in implicit cognition. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 210–217. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.24.4.210
51.
SlotboomA.-M.HendriksJ.VerbruggenJ. (2011). Contrasting adolescent female and male sexual aggression: A self-report study on prevalence and predictors of sexual aggression. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17, 15–33. doi:10.1080/13552600.2010.544413
52.
StermacL. E.SegalZ. V. (1989). Adult sexual contact with children: An examination of cognitive factors. Behavior Therapy, 20, 573–584.
53.
StricklandS. M. (2008). Female sex offenders: Exploring issues of personality, trauma, and cognitive distortions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 474–489. doi:10.1177/0886260507312944
54.
WardT. (2000). Sexual offenders’ cognitive distortions as implicit theories. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5, 491–507. doi:10.1016/S1359-1789(98)00036-6
55.
WardT.BeechA. (2004). The etiology of risk: A preliminary model. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 271–284. doi:10.1177/107906320401600402
56.
WardT.BeechA. (2006). An integrated theory of sexual offending. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 44–63. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2005.05.002
