Child sexual abuse often elicits strong negative reactions from the public and sensationalized portrayal in media. Prior research has examined how gender influences perceptions of teenage sexual victimization committed by adults in authority roles. However, only a few studies have examined public reactions to actual cases covered in the media. To address this gap, we coded and analyzed 532 public comments on 36 online news stories reporting cases of teenage sexual abuse published between January 1st, 2009 and December 31st, 2019. We identified four major themes that encompassed the comments examined in this study: negative reactions to the adult responsible, comments about the punishment, positive reactions to the adult responsible, and comments focused on the child who was harmed. Many comments encompassed the expected emotions of anger and disgust toward the adult who engaged in abuse and sympathy toward the person who experienced it. Several comments were positive in nature, however, deviating from the “typical” response toward such cases, particularly in cases regarding abuse committed by a woman. Further, commenters had strong reactions to the criminal justice response to the abuse, but these reactions were also patterned by gender. We close with a discussion of findings and implications for future research.
BantonO.WestK. (2020). Gendered perceptions of sexual abuse: Investigating the effect of offender, victim and observer gender on the perceived seriousness of child sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 29(3), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2019.1663967
2.
BareketO.FiskeS. T. (2023). A systematic review of the ambivalent sexism literature: Hostile sexism protects men’s power; benevolent sexism guards traditional gender roles. Psychological Bulletin, 149(11-12), 637–698. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000400
3.
BeauregardE.LeclercB. (2007). An application of the rational choice approach to the offending process of sex offenders: A closer look at the decision-making. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19(2), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/107906320701900204
4.
BradburyP.MartellozzoE. (2021). ‘Lucky Boy!’; Public perceptions of child sexual offending committed by women. Journal of Victimology and Victim Justice, 4(2), 160–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/25166069211060091
BroussardS.WagnerW. G.KazelskisR. (1991). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of child sexual abuse: The impact of victim sex, perpetrator sex, respondent sex, and victim response. Journal of Family Violence, 6(3), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00980533
7.
CainC. M.SampleL. L.AndersonA. L. (2017). Public opinion of the application of sex offender notification laws to female sex offenders: Why it is important to examine. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 28(2), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403415572253
8.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Publications.
9.
ChristensenL. S.DarlingA. J. (2020). Sexual abuse by educators: A comparison between male and female teachers who sexually abuse students. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 26(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2019.1616119
10.
ClaytonE.JonesC.BrownJ.TaylorJ. (2018). The aetiology of child sexual abuse: A critical review of the empirical evidence. Child Abuse Review, 27(3), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.2517
11.
CochranJ. C.TomanE. L.ShieldsR. T.MearsD. P. (2021). A uniquely punitive turn? Sex offenders and the persistence of punitive sanctioning.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 58(1), 74–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427820941172.
12.
ColemanR.ThorsonE.WilkinsL. (2011). Testing the effect of framing and sourcing in health news stories. Journal of Health Communication, 16(9), 941–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.561918
13.
CortoniF.BabchishinK. M.RatC. (2017). The proportion of sexual offenders who are female is higher than thought: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854816658923
14.
CubellisM. A.EvansD. N.FeraA. G. (2019). Sex offender stigma: An exploration of vigilantism against sex offenders. Deviant Behavior, 40(2), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2017.1420459
15.
DenovM. S. (2003). The myth of innocence: Sexual scripts and the recognition of child sexual abuse by female perpetrators. The Journal of Sex Research, 40(3), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490309552195
DollarK. M.PerryA. R.FromuthM. E.HoltA. E. (2004). Influence of gender roles on perceptions of teacher/adolescent student sexual relations. Sex Roles, 50(1-2), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000011075.91908.98
18.
DongM.GilesW. H.FelittieV. J.DubeS. R.AndaR. F.ChapmanD. P. (2004). Insights into causal pathways for ischemic heart disease: Adverse childhood experiences study. Circulation, 110(13), 1761–1766. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000143074.54995.7F
19.
DöringN.WalterR. (2020). Media coverage of child sexual abuse: A framework of issue-specific quality criteria. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 29(4), 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2019.1675841
20.
FinkelhorD.TurnerH.ColburnD. (2024). The prevalence of child sexual abuse with online sexual abuse added. Child Abuse & Neglect, 149, 106634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106634
21.
FixR. L.BussoD. S.MendelsonT.LetourneauE. J. (2021). Changing the paradigm: Using strategic communications to promote recognition of child sexual abuse as a preventable public health problem. Child Abuse & Neglect, 117, 105061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105061
22.
FromuthM. E.KellyD. B.BrallierC.WilliamsM.BensonK. (2016). Effects of duration on perceptions of teacher sexual misconduct. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 25(2), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2016.1122692
23.
GakhalB. K.BrownS. J. (2011). A comparison of the general public’s, forensic professionals’ and students’ attitudes towards female sex offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2010.540678
24.
Gewirtz-MeydanA.FinkelhorD. (2019). Sexual abuse and assault in a large national sample of children and adolescents. Child Maltreatment, 25(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559519873975
25.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.x
GrantB. J.ShakeshaftC.MuellerJ. (2019). Sexual abuse and exploitation of preK-12 students by school personnel. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 28(1), 2–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2019.1567139
28.
HarperC. A.HogueT. E. (2014). The emotional representation of sexual crime in the national British press. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X14544474
29.
HarperC. A.HogueT. E. (2016). Press coverage as a heuristic guide for social decision-making about sexual offenders. Psychology, Crime and Law, 23(2), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2016.1227816
30.
HarrisA. J.SociaK. M. (2016). What’s in a name? Evaluating the effects of the “sex offender” label on public opinions and beliefs. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 28(7), 660–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063214564391
31.
HowellJ. L.EganP. M.GiulianoT. A.AckleyB. D. (2011). The reverse double standard in perceptions of student-teacher sexual relationships: The role of gender, initiation, and power. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151(2), 180–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903510837
32.
KatzJ.MooreJ. A.TkachukS. (2007). Verbal sexual coercion and perceived victim responsibility: Mediating effects of perceived control. Sex Roles, 57(3), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9253-x
33.
KavanaughA.Perez-QuinonesM. A.TedescoJ. C.SandersW. (2009). Toward a virtual town square in the era of Web 2.0. In HunsingerJ.KlastrupL.AllenM. (Eds.), International handbook of internet research (pp. 279–294). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9789-8_17
KohmS. A. (2009). Naming, shaming and criminal justice: Mass-mediated humiliation as entertainment and punishment. Crime, Media, Culture: International Journal, 5(2), 188–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659009335724
36.
LetourneauE. J.EatonW. W.BassJ.BerlinF. S.MooreS. G. (2014). The need for a comprehensive public health approach to preventing child sexual abuse. Public Health Reports, 129(3), 222–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/003335491412900303
37.
LevensonJ. S.BrannonY. N.FortneyT.BakerJ. (2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7(1), 137–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2007.00119.x
38.
LiuJ.McLeodD. M. (2021). Pathways to news commenting and the removal of the comment system on news websites. Journalism, 22(4), 867–881. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919849954
39.
MalinenS.WillisG. M.JohnstonL. (2014). Might informative media reporting of sexual offending influence community members’ attitudes towards sex offenders?Psychology, Crime and Law, 20(6), 535–552. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2013.793770
40.
McLeodD. A. (2015). Female offenders in child sexual abuse cases: A national picture. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 24(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2015.978925
41.
MearsD. P. (2010). American criminal justice policy: An evaluation approach to increasing accountability and effectiveness. Cambridge University Press.
42.
MejiaP.CheyneA.DorfmanL. (2012). News coverage of child sexual abuse and prevention, 2007–2009. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 21(4), 470–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2012.692465
43.
MellorD.DeeringR. (2010). Professional response and attitudes toward female-perpetrated child sexual abuse: A study of psychologists, psychiatrists, probationary psychologists and child protection workers. Psychology, Crime and Law, 16(5), 415–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160902776850
44.
MolnarB. E.BukaS. L.KesslerR. C. (2001). Child sexual abuse and subsequent psychopathology: Results from the national comorbidity survey. American Journal of Public Health, 91(5), 753–760. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.91.5.753
45.
MunizC. N.PowersR. A. (2021). The influence of authority role and victim gender on perceptions of female-perpetrated child sexual abuse. Child Maltreatment, 27(4), 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775595211033537
46.
NollJ. G.ZellerM. H.TrickettP. K.PutnamF. W. (2007). Obesity risk for female victims of childhood sexual abuse: A prospective study. Pediatrics, 120(1), e61–e67. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-3058
47.
OatesR. K.JonesD. P.DensonD.SirotnakA.GaryN.KrugmanR. D. (2000). Erroneous concerns about child sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24(1), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(99)00108-8
48.
O’DonohueW.CummingsC.WillisB. (2018). The frequency of false allegations of child sexual abuse: A critical review. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 27(5), 459–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2018.1477224
49.
OlafsonE.CorwinD. L.SummitR. C. (1993). Modern history of child sexual abuse awareness: Cycles of discovery and suppression. Child Abuse & Neglect, 17(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(93)90004-O
PickettJ. T.ManciniC.MearsD. P. (2013). Vulnerable victims, monstrous offenders, and unmanageable risk: Explaining public opinion on the social control of sex crime. Criminology, 51(3), 729–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12018
RobertsC. (2019). All news is “Glocal?” Considerations of community and personal privacy with global publication of local news. Journal of Media Ethics, 34(4), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/23736992.2019.1671844
54.
SampleL. L.KadleckC. (2008). Sex offender laws: Legislators’ accounts of the need for policy. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 19(1), 40–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403407308292
55.
SandlerJ.FreemanN. J. (2011). Female sex offenders and the criminal justice system: A comparison of arrests and outcomes. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2010.537380
56.
ShieldsR. T.CochranJ. C. (2020). The gender gap in sex offender punishment. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 36(1), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-019-09416-x
SoothillK.WalbyS. (1991). Sex crime in the news. Taylor & Francis.
59.
StaffordM. C.VandiverD. M. (2017). Public perceptions of sex crimes and sex offenders. In SandersT. (Ed.), The oxford handbook of sex offences and sex offenders (pp. 463–481). Oxford University Press.
60.
SulerJ. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology and Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295
61.
SulerJ. (2005). The online disinhibition effect. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 2(2), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/aps.42
62.
ThomasD. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
63.
TurchikJ. A.EdwardsK. M. (2012). Myths about male rape: A literature review. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 13(2), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023207
VandiverD. M.WalkerJ. T. (2002). Female sex offenders: An overview and analysis of 40 cases. Criminal Justice Review, 27(2), 284–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/073401680202700205
66.
WalfieldS. M. (2021). “Men cannot be raped”: Correlates of male rape myth acceptance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(13-14), 6391–6417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518817777
67.
WalkerJ.ArcherJ.DaviesM. (2005). Effects of rape on men: A descriptive analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34(1), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-005-1001-0
YoungA. M.GreyM.BoydC. J. (2009). Adolescents’ experiences of sexual assault by peers: Prevalence and nature of victimization occurring within and outside of school. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(8), 1072–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9363-y
70.
ZackE.LangJ. T.DirksD. (2018). “It must be great being a female pedophile!”: The nature of public perceptions about female teacher sex offenders. Crime, Media, Culture: International Journal, 14(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659016674044
71.
ZatkinJ.SitneyM.KaufmanK. (2022). The relationship between policy, media, and perceptions of sexual offenders between 2007 and 2017: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(3), 953–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020985568
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
