While there is still hunger in the world, a significant amount of food is wasted, which harms the environment. This study focuses on food waste at the consumer level and investigates the role of personality traits on food-waste-aversion.
Focus of the Article:
Segmentation with personality traits for food waste reduction campaigns.
Research Question:
Is there a link between personality traits and food-waste-aversion? Are there any associations among consumers’ levels of food-waste-aversion, frugality, conscientiousness, and religiosity?
Importance to the Social Marketing Field:
Segmentation is a neglected marketing tool in designing campaigns against food waste. This study identifies possible market segments of social marketing campaigns against food waste. In addition, associations among food-waste-aversion and personality traits of conscientiousness, frugality, and religiosity are shown in this study.
Methods:
This study adopts a cross-sectional research design. A convenience sample of 301 consumers in Turkey is surveyed via an online questionnaire.
Results:
Results of Chi-Square Automatic Interaction Detector (CHAID) analysis indicate five distinct consumer segments, namely frugal believers, frugal seculars, conscientious individuals, casual females, and casual males. Moreover, positive associations (p < 0.001) among food-waste-aversion and personality traits of conscientiousness, frugality, and religiosity are shown.
Recommendations for Research or Practice:
This study provides a segmentation procedure with the trait perspective. Frugality, conscientiousness, and religiosity traits can play an essential role in food waste reduction. Targeting individuals with communications fit with their personality is likely to increase the success of food waste reduction interventions.
Limitations:
Due to a lack of behavioral data, this study investigates food waste at the attitudinal level. Further study could use behavioral measures. In addition, the majority of participants in the survey are Muslim. In order to validate research findings across different cultures, it should be carried out in other countries.
AbiadM. G.MehoL. I. (2018). Food loss and food waste research in the Arab world: A systematic review. Food Security, 10(2), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-018-0782-7
3.
AgarwalaR.MishraP.SinghR. (2019). Religiosity and consumer behavior: A summarizing review. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, 16(1), 32–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14766086.2018.1495098
4.
AllportG. W.RossJ. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021212
5.
Aschemann-WitzelJ.de HoogeI.AmaniP.Bech-LarsenT.OostindjerM. (2015). Consumer-related food waste: Causes and potential for action. Sustainability, 7(6), 6457–6477. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7066457
6.
AwaisM.SaminT.GulzarM. A.HwangJ.ZubairM. (2020). Unfolding the association between the big five, frugality, e-mavenism, and sustainable consumption behavior. Sustainability, 12(2), 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020490
7.
BellemareM. F.ÇakirM.PetersonH. H.NovakL.RudiJ. (2017). On the measurement of food waste. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 99(5), 1148–1158. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aax034
8.
BoveL. L.NagpalA.DorsettA. D. S. (2009). Exploring the determinants of the frugal shopper. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16(4), 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2009.02.004
9.
Calvo-PorralC.MedínA. F.Losada-LópezC. (2017). Can marketing help in tackling food waste?: Proposals in developed countries. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 23(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2017.1244792
10.
ChapmanB. P.HampsonS.ClarkinJ. (2014). Personality-informed interventions for healthy aging: Conclusions from a National Institute on Aging work group. Developmental Psychology, 50(5), 1426–1441. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034135
11.
ConrodP. J. (2016). Personality-targeted interventions for substance use and misuse. Current Addiction Reports, 3(4), 426–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40429-016-0127-6
12.
DietrichT.Rundle-ThieleS.SchusterL.DrennanJ.Russell-BennettR.LeoC.ConnorJ. P. (2015). Differential segmentation responses to an alcohol social marketing program. Addictive Behaviors, 49, 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.05.010
13.
FacchiniE.IacovidouE.GronowJ.VoulvoulisN. (2018). Food flows in the United Kingdom: The potential of surplus food redistribution to reduce waste. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 68(9), 887–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2017.1405854
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
16.
GaoZ. (2018). Mapping the official discourse of frugality in China between 1979 and 2015. Journal of Historical Research in Marketing, 10(2), 151–174. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHRM-05-2017-0013
17.
GoharyA.HanzaeeK. H. (2014). Personality traits as predictors of shopping motivations and behaviors: A canonical correlation analysis. Arab Economic and Business Journal, 9(2), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aebj.2014.10.001
18.
GoldsmithR. E.Reinecke FlynnL.ClarkR. A. (2014). The etiology of the frugal consumer. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.11.005
19.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E., etal. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th, Pearson new international ed. ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson.
20.
HallK. D.GuoJ.DoreM.ChowC. C. (2009). The progressive increase of food waste in america and its environmental impact. PLoS One, 4(11), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007940
21.
HenningsgaardJ. M.ArnauR. C. (2008). Relationships between religiosity, spirituality, and personality: A multivariate analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(8), 703–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.004
22.
HirshJ. B.KangS. K.BodenhausenG. V. (2012). Personalized persuasion: Tailoring persuasive appeals to recipients’ personality traits. Psychological Science, 23(6), 578–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611436349
23.
JavarasK. N.WilliamsM.Baskin-SommersA. R. (2019). Psychological interventions potentially useful for increasing conscientiousness. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 10(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000267
24.
KellyE. V.NewtonN. C.StapinskiL. A.ConrodP. J.BarrettE. L.ChampionK. E.TeessonM. (2020). A novel approach to tackling bullying in schools: Personality-targeted intervention for adolescent victims and bullies in Australia. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 59(4), 508–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2019.04.010
25.
KimJ.Rundle-ThieleS.KnoxK. (2019). Systematic literature review of best practice in food waste reduction programs. Journal of Social Marketing, 9(4), 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-05-2019-0074
26.
KummuM.de MoelH.PorkkaM.SiebertS.VarisO.WardP. J. (2012). Lost food, wasted resources: Global food supply chain losses and their impacts on freshwater, cropland, and fertiliser use. Science of The Total Environment, 438, 477–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.092
LastovickaJ. L.BettencourtL. A.HughnerR. S.KuntzeR. J. (1999). Lifestyle of the tight and frugal: Theory and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1086/209552
29.
MalhotraN. K.BirksD. F. (2007). Marketing research: An applied approach (3rd European ed.). Harlow, UK: FT Prentice Hall.
30.
McDanielS. W.BurnettJ. J. (1990). Consumer religiosity and retail store evaluative criteria. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02726426
31.
MokhlisS. (2009). Relevancy and measurement of religiosity in consumer behavior research. International Business Research, 2(3), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v2n3p75
32.
MoraesC.CarriganM.SzmiginI. (2012). The coherence of inconsistencies: Attitude–behaviour gaps and new consumption communities. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(1–2), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2011.615482
33.
MusiatP.ConrodP.TreasureJ.TyleeA.WilliamsC.SchmidtU. (2014). Targeted prevention of common mental health disorders in university students: Randomised controlled trial of a transdiagnostic trait-focused web-based intervention. PLoS One, 9(4), e93621. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093621
34.
NewtonJ. D.NewtonF. J.TurkT.EwingM. T. (2013). Ethical evaluation of audience segmentation in social marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 47(9), 1421–1438. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-09-2011-0515
35.
ÖzerG.ÖzbekV.ElçiM.AydınK. (2013). Concurrent validity of different religiosity scales used in researches of marketing ethics and a proposal for a new religiosity scale. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 13(4), 15–28.
36.
PapargyropoulouE.LozanoR.SteinbergerJ. K.WrightN.UjangZ. b. (2014). The food waste hierarchy as a framework for the management of food surplus and food waste. Journal of Cleaner Production, 76, 106-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.020
37.
PearsonD.MirosaM.AndrewsL.KerrG. (2016). Reframing communications that encourage individuals to reduce food waste. Communication Research and Practice, 3(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2016.1209274
38.
PearsonD.PereraA. (2018). Reducing food waste: A practitioner guide identifying requirements for an integrated social marketing communication campaign. Social Marketing Quarterly, 24(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500417750830
39.
PepperM.JacksonT.UzzellD. (2011). An examination of christianity and socially conscious and frugal consumer behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 43(2), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510361573
40.
PittC. S.BalA. S.PlanggerK. (2020). New approaches to psychographic consumer segmentation: Exploring fine art collectors using artificial intelligence, automated text analysis and correspondence analysis. European Journal of Marketing, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-01-2019-0083
41.
PlanteT. G. (2010). The santa clara strength of religious faith questionnaire: Assessing faith engagement in a brief and nondenominational manner. Religions, 1(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel1010003
42.
PlanteT. G.BoccacciniM. T. (1997). The santa clara strength of religious faith questionnaire. Pastoral Psychology, 45(5), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02230993
43.
PlanteT. G.VallaeysC. L.ShermanA. C.WallstonK. A. (2002). The development of a brief version of the santa clara strength of religious faith questionnaire. Pastoral Psychology, 50(5), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014413720710
44.
Puente-DiazR.Cavazos ArroyoJ. (2015). The influence of personality dimensions on material and frugal values. [La influencia de dimensiones de personalidad en valores materiales y frugales]. Anales de Psicología, 31(1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.31.1.167401
45.
QuestedT. E.MarshE.StunellD.ParryA. D. (2013). Spaghetti soup: The complex world of food waste behaviours. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 79, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.04.011
46.
RaghunathanR.ChandrasekaranD. (2020). The association between the attitude of food-waste-aversion and bmi: An exploration in India and the United States: Food-waste-aversion and bmi. Journal of Consumer Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1168
47.
RavalD.SubramanianB. (2004). Cultural values driven segmentation in social marketing. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 12(2), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1300/J054v12n02_04
48.
Reinecke FlynnL.GoldsmithR. E. (2017). Filling some gaps in market mavenism research: Market mavenism. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 16(2), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1623
49.
RibeiroJ. d. A.VeigaR. T.HiguchiA. K. (2016). Personality traits and sustainable consumption. Brazilian Journal of Marketing, 15(3), 297–313. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2894879
50.
RoodhuyzenD. M. A.LuningP. A.FoglianoV.SteenbekkersL. P. A. (2017). Putting together the puzzle of consumer food waste: Towards an integral perspective. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 68, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.07.009
51.
SaroglouV. (2002). Religion and the five factors of personality: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00233-6
52.
SenfK.LiauA. K. (2013). The effects of positive interventions on happiness and depressive symptoms, with an examination of personality as a moderator. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(2), 591–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9344-4
53.
ShahjehanA.QureshiJ. A. (2019). Personality and impulsive buying behaviors. A necessary condition analysis. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 1060–1072. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1585268
54.
ShohamA.GavishY.AkronS. (2017). Hoarding and frugality tendencies and their impact on consumer behaviors. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 29(4), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2017.1310646
55.
StancuV.HaugaardP.LähteenmäkiL. (2016). Determinants of consumer food waste behaviour: Two routes to food waste. Appetite, 96, 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.08.025
56.
StefanV.van HerpenE.TudoranA. A.LähteenmäkiL. (2013). Avoiding food waste by Romanian consumers: The importance of planning and shopping routines. Food Quality and Preference, 28(1), 375–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.11.001
57.
StoltzS.PrinzieP.De HaanA.van LondenM.De CastroB. O.DekovićM. (2013). Child personality as moderator of outcome in a school–based intervention for preventing externalising behaviour. European Journal of Personality, 27(3), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1892
58.
SwamiV.Chamorro-PremuzicT.SnelgarR.FurnhamA. (2011). Personality, individual differences, and demographic antecedents of self-reported household waste management behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(1), 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.08.001
59.
ThøgersenJ. (2018). Frugal or green? Basic drivers of energy saving in European households. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 1521–1530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.282
60.
ThompsonE. R. (2008). Development and validation of an international english big-five mini-markers. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(6), 542–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.06.013
61.
TiemanM.HassanF. H. (2015). Convergence of food systems: Kosher, christian and halal. British Food Journal, 117(9), 2313–2327. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-02-2015-0058
62.
TruongV. D. (2014). Social marketing: A systematic review of research 1998–2012. Social Marketing Quarterly, 20(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500413517666
63.
VisschersV. H. M.WickliN.SiegristM. (2016). Sorting out food waste behaviour: A survey on the motivators and barriers of self-reported amounts of food waste in households. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.007
64.
WalshG.HassanL. M.ShiuE.AndrewsJ. C.HastingsG. (2010). Segmentation in social marketing: Insights from the European Union’s multi‐country, antismoking campaign. European Journal of Marketing, 44(7/8), 1140–1164. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561011047562
65.
WilliamsH.WikströmF.OtterbringT.LöfgrenM.GustafssonA. (2012). Reasons for household food waste with special attention to packaging. Journal of Cleaner Production, 24, 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.044
66.
WitkowskiT. H. (2010). A brief history of frugality discourses in the United States. Consumption Markets & Culture, 13(3), 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253861003786975
YeniarasV.AkarsuT. N. (2015). Frugal doesn’t mean ordinary: A religious perspective. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 8(2), 204-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-06-2015-0046.
