Successful conservation in the United States relies on collective stewardship by millions of private landowners, challenging those agencies and nongovernment organizations tasked with engagement and outreach. Perennially limited resources compound this challenge, highlighting a deep need for efficient social marketing. In the following research, we test the efficacy of two social marketing strategies—microtargeting and normative appeals—through a randomized controlled trial of an integrated social marketing campaign targeting riparian landowners in the Pennsylvania portion of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. We used a microtargeting algorithm to predict landowners’ likelihood of responding to a conservation outreach campaign to create treatment groups of high-likelihood prospects versus random prospects (i.e., no microtargeting). A normative appeal was also included as an experimental factor in the campaign communicating that forested riparian buffer investments were common among similar landowners. Among microtargeted landowners, we observed a 66% increase in response to a riparian restoration survey compared to the control group. Additionally, we found a significant influence of a normative message among random (nonmicrotargeted) prospects, increasing response by 23% over the control group. We conclude conservation outcomes may be more efficiently achieved by deploying these marketing techniques on a wider scale to a variety of conservation challenges.
AldenD. L.MichaelD. B.DeshpandeS. (2011). Communications in social marketing. In HastingsG.AngusK.BryantC. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social marketing (pp. 167–177). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
2.
AndrejczykK.ButlerB. J.TyrrellM. L.LangerJ. (2016). Hansel and Gretel walk in the forest, landowners walk in the woods: A qualitative examination of the language used by family forest owners. Journal of Forestry, 114, 52–57.
3.
BerryM. J.LinoffG. (1997). Data mining techniques: For marketing, sales, & customer support. New York, NY: John Wiley.
4.
BowermanK.DeLormeD. (2013). Boaters’ perceptions of a mobile app for a marine conservation social marketing campaign. Social Marketing Quarterly, 20, 47–65.
5.
CialdiniR. B.KallgrenC. A.RenoR. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 2012–2234.
6.
DibbS. (2001). Banks, customer relationship management and barriers to the segment of one. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 6, 10–23.
7.
EppsteinM. J.GroverD. K.MarshallJ. S.RizzoD. M. (2011). An agent-based model to study market penetration of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Energy Policy, 39, 3789–3802.
8.
ErevellesS.FukawaN.SwayneL. (2016). Big Data consumer analytics and the transformation of marketing. Journal of Business Research, 69, 897–904.
9.
FlanaganS.PatrickD. A.LeonardD. J.StaceyP. (2017). Buffer options for the Bay: Exploring the trends, the science, and the options of buffer management in the Great Bay Watershed, key findings from available literature. PREP Reports & Publications, 380. Retrieved fromhttps://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1382&context=prep
10.
FreyB. J.DueckD. (2007). Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science, 315, 972–976.
11.
GlassmanT. J.BraunR. E. (2010). Confusion surrounding social marketing strategies and social norm theory: To prevent high-risk drinking among college students. Social Marketing Quarterly, 16, 94–103.
12.
GoldsteinN. J.CialdiniR. B.GriskeviciusV. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 472–482.
13.
GriskeviciusV.CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J. (2008). Social norms: An underestimated and underemployed lever for managing climate change. International Journal of Sustainability Communication, 3, 5–13.
14.
HobsonK. (2017). Why the devil does not have the best tunes: A response to Veríssimo & McKinley. Oryx, 51, 21.
15.
IssockP. B.IssokM. M.DuhH. (2017). Segmenting and profiling South African households’ electricity conservation behavior. Social Marketing Quarterly, 23, 249–265.
16.
JaworskaJ.SydowM. (2008). Behavioural targeting in on-line advertising: An empirical study. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 5175, 2–76. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85481-4_7
17.
JenkinsC. N.Van HoutanK. S.PimmS. L.SextonJ. O. (2015). US protected lands mismatch biodiversity priorities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 5081–5086.
18.
KamalS.Grodzińska-JurczakM.BrownG. (2015). Conservation on private land: A review of global strategies with a proposed classification system. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58, 576–597.
KneeshawK.VaskeJ. J.BrightA. D.AbsherJ. D. (2010). Situational influences of acceptable wildland fire management actions. Society and Natural Resources, 17, 477–489.
21.
LiuY.RamS.LuschR. F.BruscoM. (2010). Multicriterion market segmentation: A new model, implementation, and evaluation. Marketing Science, 29, 880–894.
22.
LloydS. P. (1982). Least squares quantization in PCM. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 28, 129–137.
23.
LowranceR.AltierL. W.NewboldJ. D.SchnableR. R.GroffmanP. M.DenverJ. M.…StaverK. W. (1997). Water quality functions of riparian forest buffers in Chesapeake Bay Watersheds. 21, 687–712. Retrieved from ///D:/Global Environmental Processes (GEOG1020 UNMC)/GEP_2_COURSEWORK/4) Water Quality Functions of Riparian Forest Buffers.pdf
24.
LubchencoJ.Cerny-ChipmanE. B.ReimerJ. N.LevinS. A. (2016). The right incentives enable ocean sustainability successes and provide hope for the future. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 14507–14514.
25.
MagidsonJ. (1988). Improved statistical techniques for response modeling: Progression beyond regression. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2, 6–18.
26.
MaibachE.Roser-RenoufC.LeiserowitzA. (2009). Global warming’s six Americas 2009: An audience segmentation analysis. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change.
27.
ManningR. (2007). Parks and carrying capacity: Commons without tragedy. Washington, DC: Island Press.
28.
MetcalfA. L.GruverJ. B.FinleyJ. C.LuloffA. E. (2015). Segmentation to focus outreach: Behavioral intentions of private forest landowners in Pennsylvania. Journal of Forestry, 114, 466–473.
29.
MetcalfA. L.MetcalfE. C.KhumaloK.GudeJ.KujalaQ.LewisM. S. (2017). Public wildlife management on private lands: Reciprocity, population status, and stakeholders’ normative beliefs. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 22, 564–582.
30.
MironA. M.BrehmJ. W. (2006). Reactance theory—40 years later. Social Psychology, 27, 9–18.
31.
MorzilloA. T.NeedhamM. D. (2015). Landowner incentives and normative tolerances for managing beaver impacts. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 20, 514–530.
32.
MurrayG. R.ScimeA. (2010). Microtargeting and electorate segmentation: Data mining the American National Election Studies. Journal of Political Marketing, 9, 143–166.
33.
OnelN. (2017). Pro-environmental purchasing behavior of consumers: The role of norms. Social Marketing Quarterly, 23, 103–121.
34.
PynegarE. L.GibbonsJ. M.AsquithN. M.JonesJ. P. (2018). What role should randomised control trials play in providing the evidence base underpinning conservation?PeerJ PrePrints, 6, e26929v1.
35.
ReddyS. M.MontambaultJ.MasudaY. J.KeenanE.ButlerW.FisherJ. R.…GneezyA. (2017). Advancing conservation by understanding and influencing human behavior. Conservation Letters, 10, 248–256.
36.
RustR. T.VerhoefP. C. (2005). Optimizing the marketing interventions mix in intermediate-term CRM. Marketing Science, 24, 477–489.
37.
SchultzP. W.NolanJ. M.CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J.GriskeviciusV. (2018). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms: Reprise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 249–254.
38.
ShelbyB.VaskeJ. J.DonnellyM. P. (1996). Norms, standards, and natural resources. Leisure Sciences, 18, 103–123.
39.
SundstromB. (2014). Breaking women’s health taboos: Integrating diffusion of innovations theory with social marketing. Social Marketing Quarterly, 20, 87–102.
40.
TabiA.HilleS. L.WüstenhagenR. (2014). What makes people seal the green power deal? Customer segmentation based on choice experiment in Germany. Ecological Economics, 107, 206–215. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.004
41.
VaskeJ. J.WhittakerD. (2004). Normative approaches to natural resources. In ManfredoM. J.VaskeJ. J.BruyereB. L.FieldD. R.BrownP. J. (Eds.), Society and natural resources: A summary of knowledge (pp. 283–294). Jefferson, MO: Modern Litho. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1061/40569(2001)166
42.
VellidoA. (1999). Neural networks in business: A survey of applications (1992–1998). Expert Systems With Applications, 17, 51–70.
43.
VeríssimoD.BianchessiA.ArrivillagaA.CadizF. C.MancaoR.GreenK. (2018). Does it work for biodiversity? Experiences and challenges in the evaluation of social marketing campaigns. Social Marketing Quarterly, 24, 18–34.
44.
VeríssimoD.McKinleyE. (2017). Understanding conservation marketing and focusing on the best available evidence: A reply to Hobson. Oryx, 51, 22.
45.
WallenK. E.DautE. F. (2018). The challenge and opportunity of behavior change methods to reduce demand for illegal wildlife. Nature Conservation, 26, 55–75.
46.
WallenK. E.RomuloC. L. (2017). Social norms: More details, please. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, E5283–E5284.
47.
WhiteK.SimpsonB. (2013). When do (and don’t) normative appeals influence sustainable consumer behaviors?Journal of Marketing, 77, 78–95.
48.
Yom-TovE.ShembekarJ.BarclayS.MuennigP. (2018). The effectiveness of public health advertisements to promote health: A randomized-controlled trial on 794,000 participants. npj Digital Medicine, 1, 24.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
