Biodiversity loss is one of the principle challenges facing us today. To halt and reverse this loss, conservation practitioners must find ways to change human behaviors which threaten species and ecosystems. Increasingly, it is being recognized that social marketing could be an effective way of achieving voluntary, ethical, and long-lasting behavior change for the benefit of biodiversity. By conducting a global survey of conservation practitioners, the objective of this study was to assess the need for social marketing skills, as well as the demand, supply, and barriers to receiving social marketing training in the conservation sector. From a sample of 322 conservation practitioners from 71 countries, results suggest there is a marked lack of social marketing skills in the conservation sector, with only 16.1% of participants considering their skill level to be expert or advanced. However, 61.5% of participants reported needing advanced or expert social marketing skills to be effective in their current role. In addition, the survey revealed a high demand for training in social marketing, but also that a lack of funds, time, and available courses all present major barriers to conservation practitioners receiving such training. The implications of these results for designing methods of providing conservation practitioners with social marketing skills and removing barriers are discussed.
AndersonT.DronJ. (2014). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12, 80–97.
2.
BarlowA.BarlowC. G.Boddam-WhethamL.RobinsonB. (2016). A rapid assessment of the current status of project management skills in the conservation sector. Journal for Nature Conservation, 34, 126–132.
3.
BennettN. J.RothR.KlainS. C.ChanK.ChristieP.ClarkD. A.…WybornC. (2016). Conservation social science: Understanding and integrating human dimensions to improve conservation. Biological Conservation, 205, 93–108.
4.
BernardH. R. (2011). Research methods in anthropology (5th ed.). Plymouth, England: AltaMira Press.
5.
BiroscakB. J.LefebvreR. C.SchneiderT.MarshallR. J.McDermottR. J.BryantC. A. (2014). Assessment of social marketing education, training, and application in public health settings. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 11, 145–160.
6.
BlickleyJ. L.DeinerK.GarbachK.LacherI.MeekM. H.PorenskyL. M.…SchwartzM. W. (2013). Graduate student’s guide to necessary skills for nonacademic conservation careers. Conservation Biology, 27, 24–34.
7.
BowenW. G.ChingosM. M.LackK. A.NygrenT. I. (2012). Interactive learning online at public universities: evidence from randomized trials. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33, 53.
8.
BraunischV.HomeR.PelletJ.ArlettazR. (2012). Conservation science relevant to action: A research agenda identified and prioritized by practitioners. Biological Conservation, 153, 201–210.
9.
BurgessG. (2016). Powers of persuasion?TRAFFIC Bulletin, 28, 7–9.
10.
CarriganM.MoraesC.LeekS. (2011). Fostering responsible communities: A community social marketing approach to sustainable living. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 515–534.
11.
ClaytonS.MyersG. (2009). Conservation psychology: Understanding and promoting human care for nature. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
12.
CostelloM. J.WieczorekJ. (2014). Best practice for biodiversity data management and publication. Biological Conservation, 173, 68–73.
13.
DeshpandeS.LagardeF. (2008). International survey on advanced-level social marketing training events. Social Marketing Quarterly, 14, 50–66.
14.
DessartF. J.van BavelR. (2017). Two converging paths: Behavioural sciences and social marketing for better policies. Journal of Social Marketing, 7, 355–365. JSOCM-04-2017-0027.
15.
DeWanA. A.GreenK. M.XiaohongL.HaydenD. (2013). Using social marketing tools to increase fuel-efficient stove adoption for conservation results. Conservation Evidence, 10, 32–36.
16.
EagleL.HamannM.LowD. R. (2016). The role of social marketing, marine turtles and sustainable tourism in reducing plastic pollution. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 107, 324–332.
17.
ElliottL.RyanM.WybornC. (2018). Global patterns in conservation capacity development. Biological Conservation, 221, 261–269.
18.
Evans-lackoS.MalcolmE.WestK.RoseD.LondonJ.RuschN.…ThornicroftG. (2013). Influence of time to change’s social marketing interventions on stigma in England 2009 – 2011, The British Journal of Psychiatry, 202, 77–88.
19.
FoxH.ChristianC.NordbyJ. C.PergamsO. R. W.PetersonG. D.PykeC. R. (2006). Perceived barriers to integrating social science and conservation. Conservation Biology, 20, 1817–1820.
20.
FoxK. F. A.KotlerP. (1980). The marketing of social causes: The first 10 years. Journal of Marketing, 44, 24–33.
21.
GameE. T.MeijaardE.SheilD.Mcdonald-MaddenE. (2014). Conservation in a wicked complex world; challenges and solutions. Conservation Letters, 7, 271–277.
22.
GikasJ.GrantM. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18–26.
23.
GrierS.BryantC. A. (2005). Social marketing in public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 26, 319–339.
24.
HalpernB. S.PykeC. R.FoxH. E.HaneyJ. C.SchlaepferA.ZaradicP. (2018). Gaps and mismatches between global conservation priorities and spending. Conservation Biology, 20, 56–64.
25.
HaydenD.FangzhouD. (2013). The science of goal setting: A practitioner’s guide to goal setting in the social marketing of conservation. Social Marketing Quarterly, 19, 13–25.
HockingsK.HumleT. (2009). Best practice guidelines for the prevention and mitigation of conflict between humans and great apes. Retrieved fromhttp://www.hwctf.org/
28.
JenksB.VaughanP. W.ButlerP. J. (2010). The evolution of RARE Pride: Using evaluation to drive adaptive management in a biodiversity conservation organization. Evaluation and Program Planning, 33, 186–190.
29.
JoyceT. J.CrockettS.JaegerD. A.AltindagO.O’ConnellS. (2014). Does classroom time matter? A randomized field experiment of hybrid and traditional lecture formats in economics (NBER Working Paper Series No. 20006). Cambridge, MA: NBER.
30.
KellyK. (2009). Social marketing education: The beat goes on. Social Marketing Quarterly, 15, 129–141.
31.
KempN.GrieveR. (2014). Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates’ opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–11.
32.
KnightA. T.DriverA.CowlingR. M.MazeK.DesmetP. G.LombardA. T.…Von HaseA. (2006). Designing systematic conservation assessments that promote effective implementation: Best practice from South Africa. Conservation Biology, 20, 739–750.
33.
KotlerP.ZaltmanG. (1971). Social marketing: An approach to planned social change. Journal of Marketing, 35, 3–12.
34.
KotlerP.RobertoN.LeeN. (2002). Social marketing: Improving the quality of life (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
LeeN. R.KotlerP. (2011). Social marketing: Influencing behaviors for good. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
LefebvreR. C. (2013). Social marketing and social change: Strategies and tools for improving health, well-being, and the environment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
38.
LotenbergL. D. (2018). Eleven years at social marketing quarterly: Reflections and suggestions for authors. Social Marketing Quarterly, 24, 123–124.
39.
LucasJ.GoraE.AlonsoA. (2017). A view of the global conservation job market and how to succeed in it. Conservation Biology, 31, 1223–1231.
40.
ManutiA.PastoreS.ScardignoA. F.GiancasproM. L.MorcianoD. (2015). Formal and informal learning in the workplace: A research review. International Journal of Training and Development, 19, 1–17.
41.
Mckenzie-MohrD. (2000). Promoting sustainable behavior: An introduction to community-based social marketing. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 543–554.
42.
McKenzie-MohrD. (2011). Fostering sustainable behavior: An introduction to community-based social marketing (3rd ed.). Gabriola Island, BC: New Society.
43.
McKenzie-MohrD.SchultzP. W. (2014). Choosing effective behavior change tools. Social Marketing Quarterly, 20, 35–46.
44.
MuirM. J.SchwartzM. W. (2009). Academic research training for a nonacademic workplace: A case study of graduate student alumni who work in conservation. Conservation Biology, 23, 1357–1368.
45.
MyersN.MittermeierR. A.MittermeierC. G.da FonsecaG. A. B.KentJ. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853–858.
46.
NossR. F. (1997). The failure of universities to produce conservation biologists. Conservation Biology, 11, 1267–1269.
47.
Offord-WoolleyS. (2017). The Chi Initiative: A behaviour change initiative to reduce the demand for rhino horn in Viet Nam. Pachyderm, 58, 144–147.
48.
OliverT. H.HeardM. S.IsaacN. J. B.RoyD. B.ProcterD.EigenbrodF.…BullockJ. M. (2015). Biodiversity and resilience of ecosystem functions. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 30, 673–684.
49.
RARE. (2007). Rare pride handbook: A guide for inspiring conservation in your community. Arlington, Virginia: RARE.
50.
RedfordK. H.TaberA. (2000). Writing the wrongs: Developing a safe-fail culture in conservation. Conservation Biology, 14, 1567–1568.
51.
RobinsonC. C.HullingerH. (2008). New benchmarks in higher education: Student engagement in online learning. Journal of Education for Business, 84, 101–109.
Schoenfeld-TacherR.McConnellS.GrahamM. (2001). Do no harm—A comparison of the effects of on-line vs. traditional delivery media on a science course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 10, 257–265.
54.
SchultzP. W. (2011). Conservation means behavior. Conservation Biology, 25, 1080–1083.
55.
SheehanK. B. (2006). E-mail survey response rates: A review. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6, 0–0.
56.
ShiffmanD. S.HammerschlagN. (2016). Preferred conservation policies of shark researchers. Conservation Biology: The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 30, 805–815.
57.
StaatsH. J.WitA. P.MiddenC. Y. H. (1996). Communicating the greenhouse effect to the public: Evaluation of a mass media campaign from a social dilemma perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 46, 189–203.
TruongD. V. (2014). Social marketing: A systematic review of research 1998-2012. Social Marketing Quarterly, 20, 15–34.
60.
Van DoornJ. R.Van DoornJ. D. (2014). The quest for knowledge transfer efficacy: Blended teaching, online and in-class, with consideration of learning typologies for non-traditional and traditional students. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–14.
61.
VeríssimoD. (2013). Influencing human behaviour: An underutilised tool for biodiversity management. Conservation Evidence, 10, 29–31.
62.
VeríssimoD.BianchessiA.ArrivillagaA.CadizF. C.MancaoR.GreenK. (2018). Does it work for biodiversity? Experiences and challenges in the evaluation of social marketing campaigns. Social Marketing Quarterly, 24, 18–34.
63.
WaldronA.MooersA. O.MillerD. C.NibbelinkN.ReddingD.KuhnT. S.…GittlemanJ. L. (2013). Targeting global conservation funding to limit immediate biodiversity declines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 12144–12148.
64.
WernerS.PraxedesM.Hyun-gyuK. (2007). The reporting of nonresponse analyses in survey research. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 287–295.
65.
WerquinP. (2010). Recognising non-formal and informal learning. Outcomes, policies and practices. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved fromhttp://www.oecd.org/
66.
WhiteL. A. (2018). Social marketing in the Caribbean. Social Marketing Quarterly, 24, 35–44.
67.
Wilhelm-RechmannA.CowlingR. M.DiffordM. (2014). Using social marketing concepts to promote the integration of systematic conservation plans in land-use planning in South Africa. Oryx, 48, 71–79.
68.
WrightA. J.VeríssimoD.PilfoldK.ParsonsE. C. M.VentreK.CousinsJ.…McKinleyE. (2015). Competitive outreach in the 21st century: Why we need conservation marketing. Ocean and Coastal Management, 115, 41–48.
69.
ZhangD. (2005). Interactive multimedia-based e-learning: A study of effectiveness. The American Journal of Distance Learning, 19, 149–162.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
