Achieving a sustainable future will require that people do things differently. Community-based social marketing (CBSM) provides a framework for fostering sustainable behavior, and the approach is being increasingly utilized across a range of domains including energy conservation, recycling, reducing water consumption, promoting sustainable seafood consumption, and many others. This article provides guidance to practitioners about the optimal use of specific behavior change tools. The article summarizes commitment strategies, social diffusion, goal setting, social norms, prompts, incentives, feedback, and convenience as effective tools for encouraging changes in behavior. For each, we summarize the basic approach and provide recommendations regarding when each tool is most appropriate, depending on the existing levels of barriers and benefits associated with the target behavior. The article concludes with three examples of CBSM to illustrate this selection process.
AllcottH.RogersT. (2012). The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: Experimental evidence from energy conservation (Working paper). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nber.org/papers/w18492.
2.
AyresI.RasemanS.ShihA. (2009). Evidence from two large field experiments that peer comparison feedback can reduce residential energy use (Working Paper). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nber.org/papers/w15386
3.
BemD. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 63–108). New York, NY: Academic.
4.
BurgerJ. M. (1999). The foot-in-the-door compliance review: A multi-process analysis and review. Personality and Psychology Review, 3, 303–325.
5.
CialdiniR. B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 105–109. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.01242
6.
DeciE.KoestnerR.RyanR. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards in intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668.
7.
GellerE. S. (1981). Evaluating energy conservation programs: Is verbal report enough?Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 331–335.
8.
GollwitzerP. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493–503.
9.
JonickT.AndersonE.LinS.BruniC.SchultzW.GronerS.OrralaF. (2010). What’s the catch? Reducing consumption of contaminated fish among anglers. Social Marketing Quarterly, 16, 33–51.
10.
LipsitzA.KallmeyerK.FergusonM.AbasA. (1989). Counting on blood donors: Increasing the impact of reminder calls. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19, 1057–1067.
11.
McKenzie-MohrD. (2011). Fostering sustainable behavior: An introduction to community-based social marketing (3rd ed.). Gabriola Island, BC: New Society.
12.
McKenzie-Mohr & Associates & Lura Consulting (2001). Turn it off: Reducing vehicle engine idling. Ottawa, Canada: Environment Canada.
13.
McKenzie-MohrD.LeeN.SchultzW.KotlerP. (2011). Social marketing to protect the environment: What works. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
McKenzie-MohrD.NemiroffL. S.BeersL.DesmaraisS. (1995). Determinants of responsible environmental behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 139–156.
15.
Natural Resources Canada. (2010). Toward and idle-free nation: The evolution of Canada’s idle-free initiative. Ottawa, Canada: Natural Resources Canada.
16.
NolanJ.SchultzP. W.CialdiniR. B.GriskeviciusV.GoldsteinN. (2008). Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 913–23.
17.
OrbellS.SheeranP. (2000), Motivational and volitional processes in action initiation: A field study of the role of implementation intentions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 780–797.
18.
PallakM. S.CookD. A.SullivanJ. J. (1980). Commitment and energy conservation. In BickmanL. (Ed.), Applied social psychology annual (pp. 235–253). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
19.
PardiniA. U.KatzevR. D. (1983-84). The effects of strength of commitment on newspaper recycling. Journal of Environmental Systems, 13, 245–254.
20.
Phase 5 Consulting Group. (1998). Research related to behavior that impacts fuel consumption. Ottawa, Canada: Natural Resources Canada.
21.
SchultzP. W. (2002). Knowledge, education, and household recycling: Examining the knowledge-deficit model of behavior change. In DietzT.SternP. (Eds.), New tools for environmental protection (pp. 67–82). Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences.
22.
SchultzP. W. (2010). Making energy conservation the norm. In Ehrhardt-MartinezK.LaitnerJ. (Eds.), People-centered initiatives for increasing energy savings. Retrieved fromhttp://www.aceee.org/people-centered-energy-savings
23.
SchultzP. W. (2013). Strategies for promoting proenvironmental behavior: Lots of tools but few instructions. European Psychologist[Special Issue on Sustainability]. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000163
24.
SchultzP. W.KaiserF. G. (2012). Promoting proenvironmental behavior. In ClaytonS. (Ed.), Handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 556–580). New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
TabanicoJ.SchultzP. W. (2008). Community-based social marketing and behavior change. In CabanissA. (Ed.), Handbook on household hazardous waste (pp. 133–157). Lanham, MD: Government Institutes Press.
26.
TabanicoJ. J.SchultzP. W.SchmittJ. (In Press). Driving change: Applying theoretical models in social marketing. In StuartD. (Ed.), Handbook of persuasion and social marketing (Vol. 2). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
