The Effects of Tax and Expenditure Limitations (Tels) on Municipal Fiscal Outcomes during A Period of Fiscal Distress

Abstract

We propose to expand the theoretical understanding of cutback strategies by investigating the effects of institutional constraints on fiscal outcomes during a period of severe fiscal distress. To test our research hypothesis, this study focuses on a cross-section of municipalities throughout the U.S. during and shortly after the 2008–09 recession. Using multiple data sources from the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) and American Community Survey (ACS), we employ a panel data from 2008 to 2011 which covers the period of the Great Recession to best capture cutback strategies during a period of severe fiscal distress. We observed differences in fiscal outcomes based on the severity of the municipal TELs. Municipalities constrained by more stringent TELs received more intergovernmental aid, incurred higher debt service expenditures and experienced less net capital investment during the most recent recessionary period. These findings support the argument that TELs, which are often neglected in discussions of cutback strategies, should be given greater consideration. This study helps shed light on the theoretical and empirical investigations of cutback strategies by offering the concept of institutional constraints and its impact on cutback strategies.

Keywords

TELs cutback strategy the Great Recession fiscal distress

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amiel

, Deller

and Stallmann

J.I.

(2009) The Construction of a Tax And Expenditure Limitation Index for the US, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics Staff Paper No. 536, accessed May 16, 2016 (http://www.aae.wisc.edu/pubs/sps/pdf/stpap536.pdf).

Baltagi

(2008) Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (4th), John Wiley & Sons.

Bell

G.A.

(1975) “How States Manage Expenditures in an Inflationary-Recessionary Economy”, Public Administration Review, 35(5):534–537.

Blom-Hansen

, Bækgaard

and Serritzlew

(2014) “Tax Limitations and Revenue Shifting Strategies in Local Government”, Public Budgeting & Finance, 34(1):64–84.

Bozeman

(2010) “Hard Lessons from Hard Times: Reconsidering and Reorienting the ‘Managing Decline’ Literature”, Public Administration Review, 70(4):557–563.

Brennan

and Buchanan

(1979) “The Logic of Tax Limits: Alternative Constitutional Constraints on the Ppower to Tax”, National Tax Journal, 32(2): 11–22.

Brown

(1993) “The 10–Point Test of Financial Condition: Toward an Easy-To-Use Assessment Tool for Smaller Cities”, Government Finance Review, (9): 1–21.

Brown

(2000) “Constitutional Tax and Expenditure Limitation in Colorado”, Public Budgeting & Finance, 20(3):29–50.

Brown

(2006) The Effects of TABOR on Municipal Revenues and Spending in Colorado. Center for Colorado Policy Studies, accessed May 20 2016 (http://www.uccs.edu/Documents/ccps/).

10.

Chapman

and Gorina

(2012) “Effects of the Form of Government and Property Tax Limits on Local Finance in the Context of Revenue and Expenditure Simultaneity”, Public Budgeting & Finance, 32(4):19–45.

11.

Clair

T.S.

(2012) “The Effect of Tax and Expenditure Limitations on Revenue Volatility: Evidence from Colorado”, Public Budgeting & Finance, 32(3):61–78.

12.

Cutler

D.M.

, Elmendorf

D.W.

and Zeckhauser

(1999) “Restraining the Leviathan: property tax limitation in Massachusetts”, Journal of Public Economics, 71(3):313–334.

13.

Deller

and Stallman

J.I.

(2006) “Tax and Expenditure Limitations and Economic Growths”, Marquette Law Review, 90(1):497–554.

14.

Deller

, Amiel

, Stallmann

J.I.

and Maher

C.S.

(2013) “Do Tax and Expenditure Limitations Hinder the Condition of Public Infrastructure? The Case of the Nation's System of Bridges”, Public Works Management & Policy, 18(4):379–397.

15.

Dye

R.F.

and McGuire

T. J.

(1997) “The Effect of Property Tax Limitation Measures on Local Government Fiscal Behavior”, Journal of Public Economics, 66(3):469–487.

16.

Dye

R.F.

, McGuire

T. J.

and McMillen

D.P.

, (2005) “Are Property Tax Limitations More Binding over Time?”, National Tax Journal, 58(2):215–225.

17.

Fisher

R.C.

, and Gade

M.N.

(1991) “Local Property Tax and Expenditure Limits”, in: McGuire

T. J.

and Naimark

D.W.

(eds) State and Local Finance for the 1990s: A Case Study of Arizona, Arizona State University.

18.

Greenhalgh

and McKersie

(1980) “Reduction in Force: Cost Effectiveness of Alternative Strategies”, in: Levine

(ed) Managing Fiscal Stress: the Crisis in the Public Sector, pp. 306–313, Chatham House Publishers.

19.

Grusky

, Western

and Wimer

(2011) The Great Recession, Russell Sage Foundation.

20.

Hendrick

(2011) Managing the Fiscal Metropolis: the Financial Policies, Practices, and Health of Suburban Municipalities, Georgetown University Press.

21.

Hendrick

, Luby

and Terzakis

J.M.

(2010) “The Great Recession's impact on the City of Chicago”, Municipal Finance Journal, 32(1):33–69.

22.

Hoene

(2004) “Fiscal Structure and the Post-Proposition 13 Fiscal Regime in California's Cities”, Public Budgeting & Finance, 24(4):51–72.

23.

Jacob

and Hendrick

(2013) “Assessing the Financial Condition of Local Governments: What Is Financial Condition and How Is It Measured?”, in Levine

, Scorsone

and Justice

(eds) Handbook of Local Government Fiscal Health, pp. 11–40, Jones & Bartlett Learning.

24.

Jimenez

B. S.

(2014) “Raise Taxes, Cut Services, or Lay Off Staff: Citizens in the Fiscal Retrenchment Process”, Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 24(4):923–953.

25.

Johnston

J. M.

, Pagano

M.A.

and Russo

P.A.

Jr , (2000) “State Limits and State Aid: An Exploratory Analysis of County Revenue Structure”, State & Local Government Review, 32(2): 86–97.

26.

Kiefer

, Hartley

, Conway

and Briner

.B.

(2014) “Feeling the Squeeze: Public Employees' Experiences of Cutback- and Innovation-Related Organizational Changes Following a National Announcement of Budget Reductions”, Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory. 25(4): 1279–1305.

27.

Ladd

H.F.

and Wilson

J. B.J. B.

, (1982) “Why Voters Support Tax Limitations: Evidence from Massachusetts' Proposition 2–1/2”, National Tax Journal, 35(2): 121–148.

28.

Levine

(1980) Managing Fiscal Stress: the Crisis in the Public Sector, Chatham House Publishers.

29.

Levine

, Rubin

and Wolohojian

(1981a) The Politics of Retrenchment: How Local Governments Manage Fiscal Stress, SAGE Publications.

30.

Levine

, Rubin

and Wolohojian

(1981b) “Resource Scarcity and the Reform Model: The Management of Retrenchment in Cincinnati and Oakland”, Public Administration Review, 41(6):619–628.

31.

Lewis

G.B.

(1984) “Municipal Expenditures through Thick and Thin”, Publius, 14(2):31–39.

32.

Lowry

R. C.

(2001) “A Visible Hand? Bond Markets, Political Parties, Balanced Budget Laws, and State Government Debt”, Economics & Politics, 13(1):49–72.

33.

Maher

C.S.

and Deller

(2007) “Municipal Responses to Fiscal Stress”, International Journal of Public Administration, 30(12):1549–1572.

34.

Maher

C.S.

and Deller

(2013) “Measuring the Impact of TELs on Municipal Financial Condition”, in Levine

, Scorsone

and Justice

(eds) Handbook of Local Government Fiscal Health, pp. 405–426, Jones & Bartlett Learning.

35.

Maher

C S.

and Nollenberger

(2009) “Revisiting Kenneth Brown's 10-point test”, Government Fnance Review, 25(5):61–66.

36.

Maher

C.S.

, Deller

and Amiel

(2011) “Property Tax Limits and Fiscal Burdens: The Role of Organizational Structure”, Public Administration Quarterly, 35(2):205–240.

37.

Maher

C.S.

, Park

and Harrold

(2016) “The Effects of Tax and Expenditure Limits on Municipal Pension and OPEB Funding during the Great Recession”, Public Finance & Management, 16(2):121–146.

38.

Malowe

(2011) “Beyond 5 Percent: Optimal Municipal Slack Re-sources and Credit Ratings”, Public Budgeting & Finance, 31(4):93–108.

39.

Marschall

M.J.

, and Ruhil

A.V.

, (2005) “Fiscal effects of the voter initiative reconsidered: Addressing endogeneity”, State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 5(4): 327–355.

40.

Matsusaka

J.G.

(1995) “Fiscal effects of the voter initiative: Evidence from the last 30 years”, Journal of political Economy, 103(3):587–623.

41.

Morgan

D.R.

and Pammer

W.J.

(1988) “Coping with Fiscal Stress: Predicting the Use of Financial Management Practices among U.S. Cities”, Urban Affairs Review, 24(1):69–86.

42.

Morrison

(1980) “Identifying Alternative Resources for Local Government”, in: Levine

(ed) Managing Fiscal Stress: the Crisis in the Public Sector, pp. 222–234, Chatham House Publishers.

43.

Mullins

D.R.

(2004) “Tax and Expenditure Limitations and the Fiscal Response of Local Government: Asymmetric Intra-Local Fiscal Effects”, Public Budgeting & Finance, 24(4):111–147.

44.

Mullins

D.R.

and Joyce

P. G.

(1996) “Tax and Expenditure Limitations and State and Local Fiscal Structure: An Empirical Assessment”, Public Budgeting & Finance, 16(1):75–101.

45.

Mullins

D.R.

and Wallin

B.A.

(2004) “Tax and Expenditure Limitations: Introduction and Overview”, Public Budgeting & Finance, 24(4):2–15.

46.

Mushkin

and Vehorn

(1980) “User Fees and Charges”, in: Levine

(ed), Managing Fiscal Stress: the Crisis in the Public Sector, pp. 213–221, Chatham House Publishers.

47.

Pammer

(1990) Managing Fiscal Strain in Major American Cities: Understanding Retrenchment in the Public Sector, Greenwood Press.

48.

Patton

and Khan

(2003) “Financial Analysis of the City of Mesquite Falls, Texas, using Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports”, in: Khan

and Hildreth

W.B.

(eds) Case Studies in PublicBbudgeting and Financial Management (2nd edition), pp. 441–469, CRC Press.

49.

Peters

and Rose

(1980) “The Growth of Government and the Political Consequences of Economic Overload”, in: Levine

(ed) Managing Fiscal Stress: the Crisis in the Public Sector, pp. 33–51, Chatham House Publishers.

50.

Plummer

and Pavur

R.J.

(2009) “The Effects of Rate Limits on Property Tax Revenues and School Expenditures: Evidence from Texas”, Journal of the American Taxation Association, 31(2):81–107.

51.

Poterba

and Rueben

K.S.

(1999) “State Fiscal Institutions and the US Municipal Bond Market”, in: Poterba

and von Hagen

(eds) Fiscal Institutions and Fiscal Performance, pp. 181–209, University of Chicago Press.

52.

Poterba

and von Hagen

(2008) Fiscal Institutions and Fiscal Performance, University of Chicago Press.

53.

Poulson

(2005) Grading the States' Tax and Expenditure Limits: A Fiscal Discipline Report Card, Americans for Prosperity Foundation, accessed June 6, 2016 “http://www.americansforprosperity.org/includes/filemanager/files/pdf/afp_telrank_0705.pdf“.

54.

Preston

A.E.

and Ichniowski

(1991) “A National Perspective on The Nature and Effects of the Local Property Tax Revolt, 1976–1986”, National Tax Journal, 44(2):123–145.

55.

Rubin

(1980) “Universities in Stress: Decision Making Under Conditions of Reduced Resources”, in: Levine

(ed) Managing Fiscal Stress: the Crisis in the Public Sector, pp. 167–178, Chatham House Publishers.

56.

Schachter

H.L.

(1983) “Retroactive Seniority and Agency Retrenchment”, Public Administration Review, 43(1):77–81.

57.

Scorsone

and Plerhoples

(2010) “Fiscal Stress and Cutback Management Amongst State and Local Governments What Have We Learned and What Remains to Be Learned?”, State and Local Government Review, 42(2):176–187.

58.

Shadbegian

R.J.

(1998) “Do Tax and Expenditure Limitations Affect Local Government Budgets? Evidence from Panel Data”, Public Finance Review, 26(2):118–136.

59.

Shadbegian

R.J.

(1999) “The Effect of Tax and Expenditure Limitations on The Revenue Structure of Local Governments, 1962–1987”, National Tax Journal, 52 (2):221–237.

60.

Simonsen

and Robbins

M.D.

(2000) Citizen Participation in Resource Allocation, Westview Press.

61.

Skidmore

(1999) “Tax and Expenditure Limitations and the Fiscal Relationships between State and Local Governments”, Public Choice, 99(1): 77–102.

62.

Springer

J.D.

, Lusby

A.K.

, Leatherman

J.C.

and Featherstone

A.M.

(2009) “An Evaluation of Alternative Tax and Expenditure Limitation Policies on Kansas Local Governments”, Public Budgeting & Finance, 29(2)48–70.

63.

Stock

J.H.

and Watson

M.W.

(2007) Introduction to Econometrics (2nd edition), Pearson/Addison Wesley.

64.

Sun

(2014) “Reevaluating the Effect of Tax and Expenditure Limitations: An Instrumental Variable Approach”, Public Finance Review, 42(1):92–116.

65.

von Hagen

(2002) “Fiscal Rules, Fiscal Institutions, and Fiscal Performance”, Economic & Social Review, 33(3):263–284.

66.

Wagner

G.A.

(2004) “The Bond Market and Fiscal Institutions: Have Budget Stabilization Funds Reduced State Borrowing Costs?”, National Tax Journal, 57(4):785–804.

67.

Walker

(1980) “The New System of Intergovernmental Relations: More Fiscal Relief and More Governmental Instructions”, in: Levine

(ed) Managing Fiscal Stress: the Crisis in the Public Sector, pp. 195–212, Chatham House Publishers.

68.

Wolman

(1980) “Local Government Strategies to Cope With Fiscal Pressure”, in: Levine

and Rubin

(eds) Fiscal Stress and Public Policy, pp. 231–248, SAGE Publications.

69.

Yakovlev

P.A.

, Tosun

M.S.

and Lewis

W.P.

(2012) Lesgislative Lerm Limits and State Aid to Local Governments, Discussion Paper Series, The Istitiute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany; IZA DP No. 6456.