Our study focuses on the funded status of local public pension plans. We use data from Indiana to examine the determinants of unfunded local pension liabilities. We test three hypotheses considered in the literature. The first is that declining economic conditions and corresponding demographic changes decrease funds available for pension liabilities leading to greater unfunded liabilities. The second hypothesis is that conditions related to differences in local fiscal environment contribute to unfunded pension liability. The third hypothesis is that special interests create pressure to maintain higher levels of public services while deferring costs to future taxpayers. We find limited support for each hypothesis. Economic and demographic factors such as per capita income and migration, fiscal factors such as the average tax levy and state aid, and broad interest group influences such as per capita retirement income are the major determinants of pension underfunding among local governments in Indiana.
ChaneyB., CopleyP. and StoneM. (2002) “The effect of fiscal stress and balanced budget requirements on the funding and measurement of state pension obligations”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 21(4–5):287–313.
3.
CollinsC. & RettenmaierA.J. (2010) Policy Report No. 329: Unfunded liabilities of state and local government employee retirement benefit plans. National Center for Policy Analysis.
4.
CourantP.N., GramlichE.M., & RubinfeldD.L. (1979) “Public employee market power and the level of government spending”, The American Economic Review, 69(5):806–817.
FaulkD.2013. The impact of property tax rate caps on local property tax revenue in Indiana, Ball State University Center for Business and Economic Research Policy Brief.
Government Accountability Office (2012) State and Local Government Pension Plans: Economic Downturn Spurs Efforts to Address Costs and Sustainability. Washington: GAO.
InmanR. (1982) “Public employee pensions and the local labor market”, Journal of Public Economics, 19(1):49–71.
19.
InmanR. (1986) “Appraising the funding status of teacher pensions: An econometric approach”, National Tax Journal, 39(1):21–33.
20.
IppolitoR.A. (1985) “The economic function of underfunded pension plans”, Journal of Law and Economics. 69(5):611–651.
21.
JohnsonR.W. (1997) “Pension underfunding and Liberal retirement benefits among state and local government workers”, National Tax Journal, 50(1):113–142.
22.
KelleyD.G. (2014) “The political economy of unfunded public pension liabilities”, Public Choice, 158(1):21–38.
23.
KhumawalaS., MarloweJ., & NeelyD.G. (2014) “Accounting & financial management”, Journal of Public Budgeting, 26(2):292–312.
LongS. (1997) Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables, Series: Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
26.
LyonsK. and LavI.J. (2007) The problems with property tax revenue caps, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Accessed April 29, 2015 (http://www.cbpp.org/files/6-21–07sfp.pdf).
27.
MaddalaG.S. (1983) Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
MarksB.R. & RamanK.K. (1996) “The behavior of interperiod equity-related performance measures over time”, Accounting Horizons, 10(4):52–66.
29.
MarksB., RamanK. and WilsonE. (1988) “Toward understanding the determinants of pension underfunding in the public sector,” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 7(3):157–183.
30.
Moodys Investor Services (2012) US State and Local Governments Face Risks with Pension Funding Bonds.
31.
Moodys Investors Services (2013) Adjusted Pension Liability Medians for US States.
MunnellA.H., AubryJ.P., & CafarelliM. (2015) How Did State/Local Plans Become Underfunded?Boston: Center for Retirement Research, Boston College.
35.
MunnellA.H., HaverstickK., SassS.A., & AubryJ.P. (2008) The Miracle of Funding by State and Local Pension Plans, Boston: Center for Retirement Research, Boston College.
36.
Novy-MarxR., and RauhJ. (2011) The crisis in local government pensions in the United States. In Growing old: Paying for retirement and institutional money management after the financial crisis, LitanRobert and HerringRichard, eds., 47–74. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
RauhJ. (2011) NBER Reporter 2011 Number 1: Research summary. The impact of employee pension promises on state and local public finance, Accessed February 27, 2015 (http://www.nber.org/reporter/2011number1/rauh.html).
39.
RichK. & ZhangJ. (2014) “Unfunded public pension liabilities and local citizen oversight”, Accounting Horizons, 29(1):23–39.
40.
United States Congress, House Committee on Education and Labor (1978) Pension Task Force Report on Public Employee Retirement Systems. Washington, DC.
41.
VermeerT., StylesA. and PattonT. (2010) “Are local governments adopting optimistic actuarial methods and assumptions for defined benefit pension plans?” Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 22(4):511–542.
42.
VermeerT., StylesA. and PattonT. (2012) “Do local governments present required disclosures for defined benefit pension plans?” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31(1):44–68.
43.
WhiteHalbert. (1980) “A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity”, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 48(4):817–838.
