Participatory budgeting (PB) has been introduced to China at the grass-root level to strengthen the influence of the public in the budgetary decision-making process. Based on a theoretical framework from the perspective of budgetary decision-making, this paper investigates the driving forces for the implementation of PB in Wuxi City, the procedures of citizen participation, the outcomes of participation, and the future challenges in implementing the reform. Field research was conducted to collect data for this case study, which finds that Wuxi has made some progress in enhancing social, political, economic and technical rationalities but not in legal rationality. This paper also discusses the policy implications of this case study for further development of PB in China.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhahAnwar Ed. (c2007) Participatory Budgeting, Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
2.
BermanEvan M. (1997) “Dealing with Cynical Citizens”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 105–112.
3.
BoxRichard C. (1998) Citizen Governance: Leading American Communities into the 21st Century, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
BuchananJames M. and Musgrave, Richard A. (1999) Public Finance and Public Choice: Two Contrasting Visions of the State. Cambridge: MIT Press.
5.
ChenJiagang (2007) “Canyushi Yusuan De Lilun Yu Shijian”, Comparative Economic and Social Systems Vol. 2, No. 130, pp. 52–57.
China Development Research Foundation (2009) Performance Evaluation of Participatory Budgeting in Wuxi and Harbin, http://www.cdrf.org.cn/a/Report/54.pdf.
8.
DiesingPaul (1962) Reason in Society: Five Types of Decisions and Their Social Conditions. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
9.
EbdonCarol (2002a) “Beyond the Public Hearing: Citizen Participation in the Local Government Budget Process”, Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 273–294.
10.
EbdonCarol and Franklin, Aimee L. (2004) “Searching for a Role for Citizens in the Budget Process”, Public Budgeting and Finance Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 32–49.
11.
EbdonCarol and Franklin, Aimee L. (2006) “Citizen Participation in Budgeting Theory”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 66, No. 3, pp. 437–447.
12.
EyestoneRobert (1978) From Social Issues to Public Policy, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
13.
ElsterJon, Ed. (1986) Rational Choice. New York: New York University Press.
14.
Finance Bureau of Wuxi City (2006) Discussion Documents of Experiments on China Participatory Budgeting.
15.
Finance Bureau of Wuxi City (2006) Guidance Suggesting on Management Enhancement of “Participatory Budgeting” Experiment Project.
Finance Bureau of Beitang District (2006) Beitang Participatory Budgeting Experiment Work Data (data collected based on our interview).
18.
HartwigRichard E. (1978) “Rationality and the Problems of Administrative Theory”, Public Administration, Vol. 56, No. 2, pp. 159–180.
19.
HoAlfred Tat-Kei. and ZhaoZaozao (2008) “Performance Budgeting Initiatives In China—Reflections On A Local Experiment”, Annual Conference of the Association of Budgeting and Financial Management. Chicago, IL, USA.
20.
HoAlfred Tat-Kei. and ZhaoZaozao (2011) “The Rationalities of Perfor-mance Budgeting and Management Reforms in China—A Case Study of Jiaozuo City”, The Second Conference of Chinese Scholars in Public Administration. Xi'an, China.
LernerJosh and Van EstairWagner (2006) “Participatory Budgeting in Canada: Democratic Innovations in Strategic Spaces”, Transnational Institute, http://www.tni.org/detail_page.phtml?page=newpol-docs_pbcanada. This is an unedited chapter of the forthcoming book “Progressive Cities”, edited by Daniel Chavez (TNI) and Einaar Braathen. Norwegian Institute for Urban and Regional Research.
27.
LiFan (2006) Grassroots Democracy in China (2005), Intellectual Property Press.
28.
MaJun(2005) Public Budgeting Reform in China: Rationalization and Democratization, Beijing, China: Central Compilation and Translation Press.
29.
MaJun(2007). “The Politics of Chinese Budgetary Reform: Achievement and Dilemma,” Journal of Sun Yat-Sen University (Social Science Edition), Vol. 3, pp. 23–34.
30.
MaJun(2009) “The Dilemma of Developing Financial Accountability with-out Election: A Study of China's Recent Budget Reforms”, The Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 68, No.: Suppl.1, pp. s62–s72.
31.
MaJun and NiuMeili (2007) “Chonggou Zhongguo Gonggong Yusuan Tizhi: Quanli Yu Guanxi—Jiyu Difang De Diaoyan”, China Development Observation, Vol. 2, pp. 13–16.
32.
MaJun, et al. (2008) Reader of Public Budgeting, Beijing: Chinese Development Press.
33.
MaJun and HouYilin (2009) “Budgeting for Accountability: A comparative study of Budget Reforms in the United States during the Progressive Era and in Contemporary China”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 69, No.: Suppl.1, pp. s53–s59.
34.
MaJun and LuoWanping (2006) “Citizen Participation Budgeting: Experiences from American Local Governments and Its Implications”, Journal of Huazhong Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences), Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 25–31.
35.
MedeirosJanann Joslin (2007) “Brazilian Experience with Citizen Participation in the Governmental Budgeting Process”, MaJun, HouYilin and LinShangli (Eds), State Governance and Public Budgeting, Beijing: China Financial and Economic Publishing House, pp. 131–160.
NiuMeili (2007) “Participation on Budgeting: Challenges and Opportunities”, Journal of Huazhong Normal University (Volume of Humanities and Social Sciences), Vol. 1, pp. 14–20.
PierreJon and Peters, B. Guy (2000) Governance, Politics and the State, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan Press.
42.
PolsbyNathan W. (1984) Political Innovation in America: The Politics of Policy Initiation. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
43.
PriceDavid (1971) “Professionals and ‘Entrepreneurs’: Staff Orientations and Policy Making on Three Senate Committees”, The Journal of Politics, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 316–36.
44.
ScottIan (2007) “Legitimacy, Governance and Public Policy in Post-Handover Hong Kong”, The Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 29–49.
45.
SimonHerbert (1947) “The Proverbs of Administration”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 53–67.
46.
ThurmaierK. M. and WilloughbyK. G. (2001) Policy and Politics in State Budgeting. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, Inc.
47.
WalkerJack L. (1974) Performance Gaps, Policy Research, and Political Entrepreneurs. Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 112–16.
WangXiaohu (2001) “Assessing Public Participation in U.S. Cities”, Public Performance and Management Review, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 322–336.
51.
WangXiaohu and Wart VanMontgomery (2007) “When Public Participation in Administration Leads to Trust: An Empirical Assessment of Managers’ Perceptions”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 67, No. 2, pp. 265–278.
52.
WatsonJames, JusterD.R.J. and JohnsonG. W. (1991) “Institutionalized Use of Citizen Surveys in the Budgetary and Policy-Making Processes: A Small-City Case Study”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 232–239.
53.
WildavskyAaron (1964) The Politics of the Budgetary Process. Boston: Little, Brown.
54.
Wuxi Committee of China Association for Promoting Democracy (2009, December). Jiaqiang Hangye Zuzhi Jianshe He Guanli, Fahui Hangye Zuzhi Yingyou De Zuoyong, http://www.wxmj.org.cn/web101/czyz/ztdy/855352.shtml.
