The present paper explores sources of technical (in)efficiency of Flemish municipalities in their production of local public goods (in the year 2000). in assessing inefficiency derivation, we focus on socio-economic and political characteristics of the municipalities as potential source. Our main findings indicate that while the socio-economic make-up of the population (i.c. income, income inequality, education and unemployment) appears to bear little relation to local (in)efficiency, the reverse holds for the municipal financial situation (i.c. grants, historical debt and fiscal surplus) as well as population size and density. Also, different types of communities – i.e. agricultural, residential, industrial, touristic or urbanized – are generally found to achieve comparable performance levels in providing ‘core’ public services. While indicative, the limitations of our dataset imply that further work is vital before definitive conclusions (as well as causal inferences) can be made.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AignerD.J.LovellC.A.K. and SchmidtP. (1977) “Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 21–37.
2.
BatteseG.E. and CoelliT.J. (1995) “A Model for Technical Efficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function with Panel Data”, Empirical Economics, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 325–332.
3.
BauerP.W. (1984) “A Technique for Estimating a Cost System that allows for Inefficiency”, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Working Paper, nr. 8704.
4.
BoyneG.A. (2002) “Concepts and Indicators of Local Authority Performance: An Evaluation of the Statutory Frameworks in England and Wales”, Public Money and Management, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 17–24.
5.
CoelliT.J. (1996) “A Guide to FRONTIER Version 4.1: A Computer Program for Stochastic Frontier Production and Cost Function Estimation”, CEPA Working papers, No. 7/96.
6.
De BorgerB., KerstensK., MoesenW. and VannesteJ. (1990) “Efficiency and Equity in Block Grant Design: Simulating Some Alternatives for Flemish Municipalities”, Cahiers Economiques de Bruxelles, Vol. 128, No. 2–3, pp. 399–421.
7.
De BorgerB., KerstensK., MoesenW. and VannesteJ. (1994) “Explaining Differences in Productive Efficiency: An Application to Belgian Municipalities”, Public Choice, Vol. 80, No. 3–4, pp. 339–358.
8.
De BorgerB. and KerstensK. (1996) “Cost Efficiency of Belgian Local Governments: A Comparative Analysis of FDH, DEA and Econometric Approaches”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 145–170.
9.
De BorgerB. and KerstensK. (2000) “What is Known about Municipal Efficiency? the Belgian Case and Beyond”, in Public Provision and Performance: Contributions from Efficiency and Productivity Measurement, J. Blank (ed.), pp. 299–330. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
10.
De PrinsD., SimarL. and TulkensH. (1984) “Measuring Labour Efficiency in Post Offices”, in The Performance of Public Enterprises: Concepts and Measurement, MarchandM., PestieauP. and TulkensH. (eds.), pp. 243–267. Amsterdam, North Holland.
11.
DeschouwerK. (1996) “Nationale Partijen en Gemeenteraadsverkiezingen”, in De dorpsstraat is de wetstraat niet, BuelensJ. and DeschouwerK. (eds.), pp. 13–25. Brussels, VUBPress.
12.
DessoyA. (1998) “Sociaal-Economische Typologie van de Gemeenten”, Tijdschrift van het Gemeentekrediet, Vol. 205, No. 3, pp. 17–43.
13.
Dexia (2006) De Financiële Uitdagingen voor de Nieuwe Gemeentebesturen, Brussels, Dexia Bank.
14.
DiPasqualeD. and GlaeserE.L. (1999) “Incentives and Social Capital: Are Homeowners better Citizens?”, Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 354–384.
15.
DunnW.N. (2004) Public Policy Analysis: An Introduction, New Jersey, Pearson Prentice Hall.
16.
FariaA.FennP. and BruceA. (2005) “Production Technologies and Technical Efficiency: Evidence from Portuguese Manufacturing Industry”, Applied Economics, Vol. 37, No. 9, pp. 1037–1046.
17.
FarrellM. (1957) “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A: General, Vol. 120, No. 3, pp. 253–281.
18.
GeysB. (2006a) “Looking across Borders: A Test of Spatial Policy Interdependence using Local Government Efficiency Ratings”, Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 443–462.
19.
GeysB. (2006b) “District Magnitude, Social Heterogeneity and Local Party System Fragmentation”, Party Politics, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 281–297.
20.
GeysB.HeinemannF. and KalbA. (2008) “Voter Involvement, Fiscal Autonomy and Public Sector Efficiency: Evidence from German Municipalities”, ZEW Discussion Paper, No. 08-024.
21.
GeysB. and VermeirJ. (2008a) “Taxation and Presidential Approval: Separate Effects from Tax Burden and Tax Structure Turbulence?” Public Choice, Vol. 135, No. 3–4, pp. 301–317.
22.
GeysB. and VermeirJ. (2008b) “The Political Cost of Taxation: New Evidence from German Popularity Ratings” WZB Discussion Paper, No. SPII2008–06, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.
23.
GoeminneS. and SmoldersC. (2005) “Impact van de Politiehervorming op de lokale financiën”, Publiek Domein, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 41–48.
24.
GreenR.K. and WhiteM.J. (1997) “Measuring the Benefits of Homeowning: Effects on Children”, Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 441–461.
25.
GrossmanP.J.MavrosP. and WassmerR.W. (1999) “Public Sector Technical Inefficiency in Large US Cities”, Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 278–299.
26.
HibbsD (1977) “Political Parties and Macro-Economic Policy”, American Political Science Review, Vol. 71, No. 4, pp. 1467–1487.
27.
HindriksJ. and GerardF. (2005) “Le Palmares des Villes et Communes en Wallonie: Une Approche en Termes d'Efficacité”, Regards Économiques, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 1–16.
28.
JondrowJ.LovellC.A.K.MaterovI. and SchmidtP. (1982) “On the Estimation of Technical Inefficiency in the Stochastic Frontier Production Function Model”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 19, No. 2–3, pp. 233–238.
29.
KnackS. (2002) “Social Capital and the Quality of Government: Evidence from the States”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 772–785.
30.
KumbhakarS.C.GoshS. and McGuckinJ.T. (1991) “A Generalized Production Frontier Approach for estimating Determinants of Inefficiency in US Dairy Firms”. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 279–286.
31.
Lago PenasI. (2004) “Cleavages and Thresholds: the Political Consequences of Electoral Laws in the Spanish Autonomous Communities 1980–2000”, Electoral Studies, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 23–43.
32.
LatruffeL.BalcombeK.DavidovaS. and ZaawalinskaK. (2004) “Determinants of Technical Efficiency of Crop and Livestock Farms in Poland”, Applied Economics, Vol. 36, No. 12, pp. 1255–1263.
33.
LevittM. and JoyceM. (1987) The Growth and Efficiency of Public Spending, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
34.
LindbladM.R. (2006) “Performance Measurement in Local Economic Development”, Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 646–672.
35.
LovellC.A.K. (1993) “Production Frontiers and Productive Efficiency”, in The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications, FriedH., C.A.K. Lovell and SchmidtS. (eds.), pp. 3–67, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
36.
MeeusenW. and J. van den Broeck (1977) “Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error”, International Economic Review, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 435–444.
37.
MéonP.-G. and WeillL. (2005) “Does Better Governance foster Efficiency? An Aggregate Frontier Analysis”, Economics of Governance, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 75–90.
38.
MoesenW. (2005) Gemeentelijk Goed en Rekenschappelijk Bestuur. Leuven, Centrum voor Economische Studiën.
39.
MoesenW. and StevensT. (2003) “Een Projectie voor de Gemeentefinanciën: Samenstelling en Samenspel”, Documentatieblad van FOD Financien, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 113–151.
40.
MusgraveR.M. (1959) The Theory of Public Finance, New York, McGraw-Hill.
41.
NiskanenW.A. (1975) “Bureaucrats and Politicians”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 617–643.
42.
OatesW.E. (1969) “The Effect of Property Taxes and Local Public Spending on Property Values: An Empirical Study of Tax Capitalization and the Tiebout Hypothesis”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 77, No. 6, pp. 957–971.
43.
OatesW.E. (1972) Fiscal Federalism, New York, Har-court Brace Jovanovich.
44.
OatesW.E. (1999) “An Essay on Fiscal Federalism”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 1120–1149.
45.
PittM.M. and LeeL.F. (1981) “Measurement and Sources of Technical Inefficiency in the Indonesian Weaving Industry” Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 43–64.
46.
RebackR. (2005) “Housing Prices and the Provision of Local Public Services: Capitalization under School Choice Programs”, Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 275–301.
47.
ReifschneiderD. and StevensonR. (1991) “Systematic Departures from the Frontier: A Framework for the Analysis of Firm Inefficiency”, International Economic Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 715–723.
48.
RevelliF., and TovmoP. (2007) “Revealed Yardstick Competition: Local Government Efficiency Patterns in Norway” Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 62, No. 1, pp. 121–134.
49.
Sampaio De SousaC.C. and StosicB. (2005) “Technical Efficiency of the Brazilian Municipalities: Correcting Non-Parametric Frontier Measurements for Outliers” Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 157–181.
50.
SmoldersC. and GoeminneS. (2005) De Impact van Bovenbestuurlijke Beslissingen op de Lokale Fiscaliteit in Vlaanderen. Gent, SBOV.
51.
StevensP.A. (2004) “Accounting for Background Variables in Stochastic Frontier Analysis”, NIESR Discussion Paper, No. 239.
52.
TavaresJ. (2004) “Does Right or Left matter? Cabinets, Credibility and Fiscal Adjustments”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 88, No. 12, pp. 2447–2468.
53.
TulkensH. (1993) “On FDH Efficiency Analysis: Some Methodological Issues and Applications to Retail Banking, Courts and Urban Transit”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 4, No. 1–2, pp. 183–210.
54.
TullockG. (1969) “Federalism: Problems of Scale”, Public Choice, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 19–29.
55.
Vanden EeckhautP., TulkensH. and JamarM. (1993) “Cost Efficiency in Belgian Municipalities”, in The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications, FriedH., C.A.K. Lovell and SchmidtS. (eds.), pp. 300–334. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
56.
VermeirJ. and HeyndelsB. (2006) “Tax Policy and Yardstick Voting in Flemish Municipal Elections”, Applied Economics, Vol. 38, No. 19, pp. 2285–2298.
57.
VVSG (2004) Gemeentefiscaliteit in het Verdomhoekje: Analyse, Bedreigingen en remedies. Brussel, VVSG vzw.
58.
WorthingtonA.C. (1999) “Performance Indicators and Efficiency Measurement in Public Libraries”, Australian Economic Review, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 31–42.
59.
WorthingtonA.C. (2000) “Cost Efficiency in Australian Local Government: A Comparative Analysis of Mathematical Programming and Econometric Approaches”, Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 201–223.
