During the 1990s the Dutch government has reduced its financial support of social housing. the abolition of ‘brick-and-mortar’ subsidies and government loans has left housing associations with the challenge to fully finance their investments with capital-market loans and own resources. This paper discusses how housing associations respond to the diminished government support, focusing in particular on the problems related to the financial ‘mismatch’ of tasks and means between housing associations. Evidence from recent years shows that this problem cannot easily be solved.
CFV.2002b. Het vermogen en de opgave van woningcorporaties: spanning tussen behoefte en middelen [The financial capital and the tasks of housing associations: tension between need and means]. Naarden: Central Housing Fund.
6.
DerksenG.2004. “‘We moeten veel effectiever tot matchen komen’” [‘We must get to matching far more effectively']. Aedes-Magazine. (1): pp. 14–18.
7.
DielemanF.M. 1999. “The impact of housing policy changes on housing associations: experiences in the Netherlands.” Housing Studies.14(2) pp. 251–260.
8.
GruisV. 1997, “Overdracht van eigen vermogen door corporaties [Transfer of net worth between housing associations].” Tijdschrift voor de Volkshuisvesting 3(8) pp. 23–27.
9.
GruisV.2000. “How to determine the financial possibilities of Dutch housing associations.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment.15 (4): pp. 367–376.
10.
GruisV.2002. “Portfolio management in the social rented sector: valuation, risk analysis and strategy development.” Housing Studies.17(2) pp. 245–265.
11.
Ministry of VROM.1989. Volkshuisvesting in de jaren negentig [Memorandum on Housing in the Nineties]. The Hague: SDU Uitgeverij.
12.
Ministry of VROM. 1994–2002. Cijfers over wonen [Housing in figures]. The Hague: Ministry of VROM.
13.
PriemusH.1996. “Recent changes in the social rented sector in the Netherlands.” Urban Studies.33 (10): pp. 1891–1908.
14.
PriemusH.2001. “Social Housing as a transitional tenure? Reflections on the Netherlands’ new housing memorandum 2000–2010.” Housing Studies 16(2) pp. 243–256.
15.
Ministry of VROM.2000. Mensen-Wensen-Wonen: wonen in de 21e eeuw [What people want, where people live: housing in the 21st century]. The Hague: Ministry of VROM.
16.
SmithJ. and OxleyM.1997. “Housing investment and social housing: European comparisons.” Housing Studies.12 (4): pp. 489–507.
17.
VeghelM. van. 1999. Fusies en samenwerking van woningcorporaties; een impressie van dynamiek en motieven [Mergers and cooperation between housing associations; an impression of dynamics and motives]. Delft: Delft University Press.
18.
VoseD.1996. Quantitative risk analysis: a guide to Monte Carlo simulation modelling. Chichester: Wiley.
19.
VROM-raad.2002. Haasten en onthaasten in de stedelijke herstructurering [Hurrying up and slowing down in urban restructurering]. The Hague: VROM-raad.
20.
VROM-raad.2003. Omgaan met overmaat. De vermogens van woningcorporaties als sturingsopgave [Dealing with the surplus. the housing associations’ financial surplusses as a subject of regulation]. The Hague: VROM-raad.
