This paper uses the method of measuring tax capacity and tax effort to analyze how well Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries are utilizing their tax capacities, relative to one another. Using panel data for ten CEE countries covering the years 1992–2000, I construct a tax effort index for each country and conclude that there are substantial variations in tax effort among CEE countries and several countries have the potential to increase revenues via increased tax effort.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BahlRoy W.1971. “A Regression Approach to Tax Effort and Tax Ratio Analysis.” IMF Staff Papers.November: pp. 570–608.
2.
ChelliahRaja J.1971. “Trends in Taxation in Developing Countries.” IMF Staff Papers.July: pp. 254–327.
3.
ChelliahRaja J., BassHessell J. and KellyMargaret R.1975. “Tax Ratios and Tax Effort in Developing Countries, 1969–71.” IMF Staff Papers.March: pp. 187–205.
4.
CnossenSjibren1998. “VATs in CEE Countries: A Survey and Analysis.” De Economist.July: pp. 227–255.
5.
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.1999. Transition Report 1999. London: EBRD.
6.
IMF Statistics Department.2001. International Financial Statistics Yearbook. Washington, D.C.: IMF.
IMF Staff Country Report 02/49.2002. “Bulgaria: Requiest for StandBy Arrangement—Staff Report; Staff Statement; and Press Release on the Executive Board Discussion.” http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2002/cr0249.pdf. (June 25, 2002).
IMF Country Report 01/209.2001. “Republic of Croatia: First Review of the Stand-By Arrangement—Staff Report; Staff Supplement; News Brief on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive Director for the Republic of Croatia.” http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2001/cr01209.pdf. (June 24, 2002).
15.
IMF Country Report 02/76.2001. “Republic of Croatia: Second Review Under the Stand-By Arrangement, and Requests for Waiver of Performance Criteria and for Modification of a Performance Criterion—Staff Report; Staff Statement; News Brief on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive Director for the Republic of Croatia.” http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2002/cr0276.pdf. (June 24, 2002).
IMF Country Report 02/111.2002. “Hungary: 2002 Article IV Consultation—Staff Report; Staff Statement; and Public Information Notice on the Executive Board Discussion.” http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2002/cr02111.pdf. (July 18, 2002).
IMF Country Report 01/56.2002. “Poland: 2000 Article IV Consultation—Staff Report; Staff Statement; Public Information Notice on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Authorities of the Republic of Poland.” http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2001/cr0156.pdf. (June 24, 2002).
IMF Country Report 01/76.2001. “Republic of Slovenia: 2001 Article IV Consultation—Staff Report; Staff Statement; Public Information Notice on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Authorities of the Republic of Slovenia.” http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/scr/2001/cr0176.pdf. (June 24, 2002).
IMF Statistics Department.2001. International Financial Statistics Yearbook. Washington, D.C.: IMF.
36.
International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation.2002. “European Taxation: Bulgaria.” August 12, 2002. http://web.lexis-nexis.com. (September 2, 2002).
37.
International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation.2001. “European Taxation: Croatia.” December 11, 2001. http://web.lexis-nexis.com. (September 2, 2002).
38.
International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation.2001. “European Taxation: Czech Republic.” December 13, 2001. http://web.lexis-nexis.com. (September 2, 2002).
39.
International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation.2002. “European Taxation: Hungary.” April 4, 2002. http://web.lexis-nexis.com. (September 2, 2002).
40.
International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation.2001. “European Taxation: Macedonia.” October 8, 2001. http://web.lexis-nexis.com. (September 2, 2002).
41.
International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation.2002. “European Taxation: Poland.” August 13, 2002. http://web.lexis-nexis.com. (September 2, 2002).
42.
International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation.2001. “European Taxation: Romania.” June 26, 2001. http://web.lexis-nexis.com. (September 2, 2002).
43.
International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation.2001. “European Taxation: Slovak Republic.” December 11, 2001. http://web.lexis-nexis.com. (September 2, 2002).
44.
LotzJorgen R. and Elliott R. Morss. 1967. “Measuring ‘Tax Effort’ in Developing Countries.” IMF Staff Papers.November: pp. 478–497
45.
MusgraveRichard1987. “Tax Reform in Developing Countries.” in The Theory of Taxation for Developing Countries. Eds. David Newberry and Nicholas Stern. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 242–263.
StotskyJanet G. and AsegedechWoldeMariam1997. “Tax Effort in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Working Paper of the International Monetary Fund.
48.
TiatAlan A., GratzWilfrid L.M. and EichengreenBarry J.1979. “International Comparisons of Taxation for Selected Developing Countries, 1972–76.” International Monetary Fund Staff Papers.March: pp. 123–156.
49.
TanziVito1968. “Comparing International Tax ‘Burdens’: A Suggested Method.” the Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 76, No. 5: pp. 1078–1084.
50.
TanziVito1992. “Structural factors and tax revenue in developing countries: a decade of evidence.” In open Economies: Structural Adjustment and Agriculture. Eds. Ian Goldin and L. Alan Winters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 267–81.
51.
The World Bank. 2002. Transition: The First Ten Years. Washington, D.C.: the World Bank
