Many states in the US impose taxes on hazardous waste. This paper conducts an empirical evaluation of the determinants of these taxes and reviews earlier research on their effects on hazardous waste. Earlier studies have shown that the taxes affect waste management, but my results and other evidence suggest that the tax-induced changes may not have improved welfare.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlberiniAnna and ShelbyFrost1999. “Forcing Firms to Think About the Future: Economic Incentives and the Fate of Hazardous Waste.” University of Colorado Working Paper.
2.
AlberiniAnna and JohnBartholomew1999. “The Determinants of Hazardous Waste Disposal Choice: An Empirical Analysis of Halogenated Solvent Waste Shipments.” Contemporary Economic Policy.17(3) pp. 309–20.
3.
BaumolWilliam J. and Wallace E. Oates. 1988. The Theory of Environmental Policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Congressional Budget Office.1985. Hazardous Waste: Recent Changes and Policy Alternatives. Washington, DC: U.S. Congress.
5.
DinanTerry1993. “Economic Efficiency Effects of Alternative Policies for Reducing Waste Disposal.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.25(3) pp. 242–56.
6.
Environmental Law Institute.1998. An Analysis of State Superfund Programs: 50 State Study, 1998 Update. Washington, DC: Environmental Law Institute.
7.
FullertonDon1996. “Why Have Separate Environmental Taxes?” in Tax Policy and Economy the, Volume 10. Ed. James M. Poterba. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 33–70.
8.
FullertonDon and ThomasKinnaman1995. “Garbage, Recycling, and Illicit Burning or Dumping.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.29(1) pp. 78–91.
9.
FullertonDon and ThomasKinnaman1996. “Household Responses to Pricing Garbage by the Bag.” American Economic Review.86(4) pp. 971–84.
10.
FullertonDon and AnnWolverton1999. “The Case for a Two-Part Instrument: Presumptive Tax and Environmental Subsidy.” In Environmental and Public Economics: Essays in Honor of Wallace E. Oates. Eds. A. Panagariya, PortneyP., and R. Schwab, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 32–57.
11.
HallBob and Mary Lee Kerr. 1991. the 1991–92 Green Index. Washington, DC: Island Press.
12.
LevinsonArik 1999a. “NIMBY Taxes Matter: the Case of State Hazardous Waste Disposal Taxes,” Journal of Public Economics.74(1) pp. 31–51.
13.
LevinsonArik 1999b. “State Taxes and Interstate Hazardous Waste Shipments.” American Economic Review.89(3) pp. 666–677.
14.
LevinsonArik2001. “An Industry-Adjusted Index of State Environmental Compliance Costs.” In Behavioral and Distributional Effects of Environmental Policy. Eds. Carlo Carraro and Gilbert E. Metcalf. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 131–158.
15.
LevinsonArik2003. “Environmental Regulatory Competition: A Status Report and Some New Evidence.” National Tax Journal, 56(1) pp. 91–106.
16.
PalmerKaren and WallsMargaret, 1997. “Optimal Policies for Solid Waste Disposal and Recycling: Taxes, Subsidies and Standards.” Journal of Public Economics.65(2) pp. 193–205.
17.
SigmanHilary1995. “A Comparison of Public Policies for Lead Recycling.” RAND Journal of Economics.26: 452–478.
18.
SigmanHilary 1996a. “Cross-Media Pollution: Responses to Restrictions on Chlorinated Solvent Releases.” Land Economics.72(3) pp. 298–312.
19.
SigmanHilary 1996b. “The Effects of Hazardous Waste Taxes on Waste Generation and Disposal.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.30(2) pp. 199–217
20.
SigmanHilary1998. “Midnight Dumping: Public Policies and Illegal Disposal of Used Oil.” RAND Journal of Economics.29: pp. 157–178.
21.
SigmanHilary2000. “Hazardous Waste and Toxic Substance Policies.” In Public Policies for Environmental Protection, Second Edition. Eds. Paul R. Portney and Robert N. Stavins. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, pp. 215–260.
22.
SigmanHilary, 2003. “Letting States Do the Dirty Work: State Responsibility for Federal Environmental Regulation.” National Tax Journal.56 (1): pp. 107–122.
23.
StavinsRobert N.2003. “Experience with Market-based Environmental Policy Instruments.” In Handbook of Environmental Economics. Eds. Karl-Göran Mäler and Jeffrey Vincent. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
U.S. Bureau of Census.1996. Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1996.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
26.
U.S. Bureau of Census.2000. Statistical Abstract of the United States, 2000. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
27.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.1993. Draft Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Rulemaking on Corrective Action for Solid Waste Management Units. Washington, DC: US EPA.
