Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Problem

Despite the longstanding popularity of generational analysis, its validity is still questionable, and potential methodological flaws, such as conflating age and life cycle effects, remain unresolved. In HRD research, there is a tendency to unquestioningly adopt established generation-based thinking, which imposes risks of oversimplification and stereotyping.

Solution

HRD researchers and practitioners should be mindful of the dangers and difficulties associated with generalization and stereotyping based on generation. They should apply generational categories with greater caution, understanding the confounding influence of age and life cycle and preserving the original aim of generational research: to understand individual differences.

Stakeholders

Human resource development researchers and practitioners, and broadly, scholars from other disciplines who research topics related to generation.

Keywords

generations generational differences intersectionality life-stage

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amayah

A. T.

Gedro

(2014). Understanding generational diversity: Strategic human resource management and development across the generational “divide”. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource. Development, 26(2), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20061

Arksey

O’malley

(2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International journal of social research methodology, 8(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Barhate

Dirani

K. M.

(2022). Career aspirations of generation Z: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(1/2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-07-2020-0124

Barhate

Winton

B. G.

Maugh Funderburk

(2024). The mediating role of career resilience on Gen Z’s emotional intelligence and career outcomes. European Journal of Training and Development, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-01-2024-0014

Bogdanowicz

M. S.

Bailey

E. K.

(2002). The value of knowledge and the values of the new knowledge worker: generation X in the new economy. Journal of European Industrial Training, 26(2/3/4), 125–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590210422003

Callanan

G. A.

Greenhaus

J. H.

(2008). The baby boom generation and career management: A call to action. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422307310113

Chaudhuri

Park

Kim

(2019). The changing landscape of women’s leadership in India and Korea from cultural and generational perspectives. Human Resource Development Review, 18(1), 16–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484318809753

Chillakuri

(2020). Understanding Generation Z expectations for effective onboarding. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 33(7), 1277–1296. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-02-2020-0058

Chuang

(2019). Generation Xers’ performance and development in midlife transition. Human Resource Development International, 22(1), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2018.1440130

10.

Climek

Henry

Jeong

(2024). Integrative literature review on employee turnover antecedents across different generations: Commonalities and uniqueness. European Journal of Training and Development, 48(1/2), 112–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-05-2021-0058

11.

Coates

T. K. L.

(2017). Hearing the voices of generation Y employees: A hermeneutic phenomenological study. Human Resource Development International, 20(1), 37–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2016.1222486

12.

Collins

P. H.

(2015). Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology, 41(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142

13.

Council

L. D.

Johnson

Santellano

Yazdiha

(2020). Linking contexts, intersectionality, and generations: Toward a multidimensional theory of millennials and social change. Sociological Perspectives, 63(3), 486–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121420914294

14.

Dimock

(2019). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/01/17/where-millennials-end-and-generation-z-begins/

15.

Dimock

(2023). 5 things to keep in mind when you hear about Gen Z, Millennials, Boomers and other generations. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/05/22/5-things-to-keep-in-mind-when-you-hear-about-gen-z-millennials-boomers-and-other-generations/

16.

Eversole

B. A. W.

Venneberg

D. L.

Crowder

C. L.

(2012). Creating a flexible organizational culture to attract and retain talented workers across generations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 14(4), 607–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422312455612

17.

Ghosh

Chaudhuri

(2009). Inter-generational differences in individualism/collectivism orientations: Implications for outlook towards HRD/HRM practices in India and the United States. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 23(4), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.10356

18.

Kalleberg

A. L.

Marsden

P. V.

(2019). Work values in the United States: Age, period, and generational differences. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 682(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218822291

19.

Nimon

(2008). The importance of recognizing generational differences in HRD policy and practices: A study of workers in Qinhuangdao, China. Human Resource Development International, 11(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860801932980

20.

Loring

Wang

(2022). Engaging Gen Z in professional selling: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(5/6), 413–433. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-07-2020-0120

21.

Lyons

Kuron

(2014). Generational differences in the workplace: A review of the evidence and directions for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S139–S157. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1913

22.

Lyons

S. T.

E. S.

Schweitzer

(2014). Changing demographics and the shifting nature of careers: Implications for research and human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 13(2), 181–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484314524201

23.

Fang

(2024). Exploring Generation Z’s expectations at future work: the impact of digital technology on job searching. European Journal of Training and Development, 48(9), 933–953. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-05-2023-0076

24.

Mannheim

(1952). The problem of generations. In Kecskemeti

(Ed.), Essays on the sociology of knowledge (pp. 276–320). Routledge and Kegan Paul.

25.

McDonald

K. S.

Hite

L. M.

(2008). The next generation of career success: Implications for HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422307310116

26.

McGuire

Todnem By

Hutchings

(2007). Towards a model of human resource solutions for achieving intergenerational interaction in organisations. Journal of European Industrial Training, 31(8), 592–608. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590710833651

27.

Nelson

Duxbury

(2021). Breaking the mold: Retention strategies for generations X and Y in a prototypical accounting firm. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 32(2), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21414

28.

Parker

(2023). How Pew Research Center will report on generations moving forward. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/05/22/how-pew-research-center-will-report-on-generations-moving-forward/

29.

Park

R.E.

(1950). The nature of race relations. In Back

Solomos

(Eds.), Theories of Race and Racism: A Reader. New York, NY: Routledge.

30.

Park

(2018). Exploring the generation gap in the workplace in South Korea. Human Resource Development International, 21(3), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2017.1306769

31.

Park

(2024). Generational differences in work values in the Korean Government sector. European Journal of Training and Development, 48(1–2), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-05-2022-0057

32.

Parry

Urwin

(2011). Generational differences in work values: A review of theory and evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2010.00285.x

33.

Parry

Urwin

(2021). Generational categories: A broken basis for human resource management research and practice. Human Resource Management Journal, 31(4), 857–869. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12353

34.

Ropes

(2013). Intergenerational learning in organizations. European Journal of Training and Development, 37(8), 713–727. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-11-2012-0081

35.

Rudolph

C. W.

Rauvola

R. S.

Costanza

D. P.

Zacher

(2021). Generations and generational differences: Debunking myths in organizational science and practice and paving new paths forward. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36(6), 945–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09715-2

36.

Sagan

(1997). The demon-haunted world: Science as a candle in the dark (1st Ballantine Books ed.). Ballantine Books.

37.

Singh

Chaudhuri

Sihag

Shuck

(2023). Unpacking generation Y’s engagement using employee experience as the lens: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development International, 26(5), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2023.2170210

38.

Smola

K. W.

Sutton

C. D.

(2002). Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.147

39.

Tambe

Cappelli

Yakubovich

(2019). Artificial intelligence in human resources management: Challenges and a path forward. California Management Review, 61(4), 15–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619867910

40.

Tung

L. C.

Comeau

J. D.

(2014). Demographic transformation in defining Malaysian generations: The seekers (Pencari), the buiders (Pembina), the developers (Pemaju), and Generation Z (Generasi Z). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v4-i4/809

41.

Twenge

J. M.

Campbell

S. M.

Hoffman

B. J.

Lance

C. E.

(2010). Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1117–1142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352246

42.

Van Rossem

(2021). Introducing a cognitive approach in research about generational differences: The case of motivation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(14), 2911–2951. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2019.1616592

43.

Wang

(2019). Demystifying literature reviews: what I have learned from an expert? Human Resource Development Review, 18(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484319828857

44.

Williams

Armistead

Rude

D. A.

(2022). Leading for innovation: A new model for 21st–century leadership. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource. Development, 34(4), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.20366

45.

Williams

Turnbull

(2015). Developing the next generation of globally responsible leaders: Generation Y perspectives and the implications for Green HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 17(4), 504–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422315599623

46.

Wong

S. C.

Mohd

Rasdi. R.

(2019). Influences of career establishment strategies on Generation Y’s self-directedness career: Can gender make a difference? European Journal of Training and Development , 43(5/6), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-08-2018-0082

47.

Woodward

Vongswasdi

(2015). Generational diversity at work: A systematic review of the research. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2630650

48.

Yogamalar

Samuel

A. A.

(2016). Shared values and organizational citizenship behavior of generational cohorts: A review and future directions. Management: Journal of Contemporary Management Issues, 21(2), 249–271. https://doaj.org/article/61f67e6ddb58488dba9456558cdc1f15.

Generational Differences Under Scrutiny: Issues and Implications for HRD

Abstract

Problem

Solution

Stakeholders

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References