Nested Complexity: A Conceptual Framework for Leveraging AI for Sustainable Organizations and Human Resource Development

Abstract

Problem

Organizations face increasing complexity in implementing artificial intelligence (AI) while maintaining a focus on human resource development. Human Resource Development (HRD) professionals struggle to balance technological advancement with human capital development amidst volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous (VUCA) environments.

Solution

We propose a “nested complexity” framework that conceptualizes AI implementation challenges as multi-layered complexities spanning technological, ethical, and regulatory dimensions, nested within broader environmental complexity. Through a narrative literature review and conceptual integration, we develop practical guidelines for assessing organizational readiness, developing learning strategies, and managing change during AI implementation.

Stakeholders

This framework provides HRD professionals with structured approaches for leading AI initiatives while prioritizing human development. It enables organizations to develop implementation strategies that balance technological advancement with human capabilities, offering practical tools for building organizational capacity that supports successful AI integration while maintaining focus on human capital development.

Keywords

artificial intelligence VUCA organizational learning change management nested complexity digital transformation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adobor

Yawson

(2023). The promise of artificial intelligence in combating public corruption in the emerging economies: A conceptual framework. Science and Public Policy, 50(3), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac068

Agrawal

Gans

Goldfarb

(2018). Prediction machines: The simple economics of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Review Press.

Apostu

S.-A.

Akkaya

(2023). Developing organizational resilience through decreasing artificial intelligence anxiety in VUCA world. In Dima

A. M.

Danescu

E. R.

(Eds.), Fostering recovery through metaverse business modelling (pp. 151–160). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28255-3_11

Ardichvili

(2022). The impact of artificial intelligence on expertise development: Implications for HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 24(2), 78–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/15234223221077304

Benbya

Davenport

T. H.

Pachidi

(2020). Artificial intelligence in organizations: Current state and future opportunities. MIS Quarterly Executive, 19(4), ix–xxi. https://aisel.aisnet.org/misqe/vol19/iss4/4

Bennett

Lemoine

G. J.

(2014). What a difference a word makes: Understanding threats to performance in a VUCA world. Business Horizons, 57(3), 311–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.01.001

Chuang

Graham

C. M.

(2018). Embracing the sobering reality of technological influences on jobs, employment and human resource development. European Journal of Training and Development, 42(7/8), 400–416. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-03-2018-0030

Codreanu

(2016). A VUCA action framework for a VUCA environment. Leadership challenges and solutions. Journal of Defense Resources Management, 7(2), 31–38.

Cowls

Tsamados

Taddeo

Floridi

(2023). The AI gambit: Leveraging artificial intelligence to combat climate change—opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. AI & Society, 38(1), 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01294-x

10.

Davenport

T. H.

(2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard Buisness Review, 96(1), 108–116.

11.

de Fine Licht

(2020). Artificial intelligence, transparency, and public decision-making: Why explanations are key when trying to produce perceived legitimacy. AI & Society, 35(4), 917–926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00960-w

12.

Deranty

J.-P.

Corbin

(2022). Artificial intelligence and work: A critical review of recent research from the social sciences. AI & SOCIETY. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01496-x

13.

Dwivedi

Y. K.

Kshetri

Hughes

Slade

E. L.

Jeyaraj

Kar

A. K.

Baabdullah

A. M.

Koohang

Raghavan

Ahuja

Albanna

Albashrawi

M. A.

Al-Busaidi

A. S.

Balakrishnan

Barlette

Basu

Bose

Brooks

Buhalis

Wright

(2023). Opinion paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

14.

Ekuma

(2024). Artificial intelligence and automation in human resource development: A systematic review. Human Resource Development Review, 23(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843231224009

15.

Floridi

Cowls

(2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1

16.

Goryunova

Hammond

(2020). Unpacking complexity: Seven operational characteristics of complex problem solving. American Journal of Management, 20(3), 46–54.

17.

Hamouche

Rofa

Parent-Lamarche

(2023). Systematic bibliometric review of artificial intelligence in human resource development: Insights for HRD researchers, practitioners and policymakers. European Journal of Training and Development, 49(1/2), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-10-2023-0152

18.

Hanine

Dinar

(2022). The challenges of human capital management in the VUCA era. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 10(03), 503–514. https://doi.org/10.4236/jhrss.2022.103030

19.

Horney

Pasmore

O’Shea

(2010). Leadership agility: A business imperative for a VUCA world. People & Strategy, 33(4), 34.

20.

Huang

M.-H.

Rust

R. T.

(2021). A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00749-9

21.

IEEE . (2017). Ethically aligned design: Version 2 - for public discussion. In IEEE standards. https://standards.ieee.org/industry-connections/ec/ead-v1/

22.

Johnson-Kanda

Yawson

R. M.

(2018). Complex adaptive leadership for organization and human development. In Proceedings of the 55th annual eastern Academy of management conference (pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.31124/advance.7370426.v1

23.

Kaplan

Haenlein

(2019). Siri, siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004

24.

Kar

A. K.

Choudhary

S. K.

Singh

V. K.

(2022). How can artificial intelligence impact sustainability: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 376, 134120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134120

25.

Kulkov

Kulkova

Rohrbeck

Menvielle

Kaartemo

Makkonen

(2024). Artificial intelligence ‐ driven sustainable development: Examining organizational, technical, and processing approaches to achieving global goals. Sustainable Development, 32(3), 2253–2267. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2773

26.

Lanzetta

(2018). Machine learning, deep learning, and artificial intelligence. In Artificial intelligence for autonomous networks (pp. 25–47). Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351130165-2

27.

Yeo

R. K.

(2024). Artificial intelligence and human integration: A conceptual exploration of its influence on work processes and workplace learning. Human Resource Development International, 27(3), 367–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2024.2348987

28.

(2022). Reskilling and upskilling the future-ready workforce for industry 4.0 and beyond. Information Systems Frontiers: A Journal of Research and Innovation, 13, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10308-y

29.

Lilly

Rajkumar

Amudha

(2022). Aggrandizing the human resource development with underpinning artificial intelligence. Journal of Statistics & Management Systems, 25(5), 1083–1094. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720510.2022.2040859

30.

Lynham

S. A.

(2002). The general method of theory-building research in applied Disciplines. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4(3), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422302043002

31.

Mack

Khare

(2016). Perspectives on a VUCA world. In Mack

Khare

Krämer

Burgartz

(Eds.), Managing in a VUCA world (pp. 3–19). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16889-0_1

32.

Mäntymäki

Minkkinen

Birkstedt

Viljanen

(2022). Defining organizational AI governance. AI and Ethics, 2(4), 603–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00143-x

33.

Mehrabi

Morstatter

Saxena

Lerman

Galstyan

(2022). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3457607

34.

Mohamed

Png

M. T.

Isaac

(2020). Decolonial AI: Decolonial theory as sociotechnical foresight in artificial intelligence. Philosophy & Technology, 33(4), 659–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00405-8

35.

Morandín-Ahuerma

(2022). What is artificial intelligence? International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 03(12), 1947–1951. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.2022.31261

36.

Nadkarni

Prügl

(2021). Digital transformation: A review, synthesis and opportunities for future research. In Management review quarterly (Vol. 71, issue. 2). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00185-7

37.

Nikseresht

Hajipour

Pishva

Mohammadi

H. A.

(2022). Using artificial intelligence to make sustainable development decisions considering VUCA: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 29(28), 42509–42538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19863-y

38.

Novelli

Taddeo

Floridi

(2023). Accountability in artificial intelligence: What it is and how it works. AI & Society, 39, (4), 1871, 1882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01635-y

39.

E. G.

Huang

W.-H. D.

(2018). A review of technology research in HRD from a design-based research perspective. Human Resource Development Review, 17(3), 258–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484318784798

40.

Papagiannidis

Enholm

I. M.

Dremel

Mikalef

Krogstie

(2023). Toward AI governance: Identifying best practices and potential barriers and outcomes. Information Systems Frontiers: A Journal of Research and Innovation, 25(1), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-022-10251-y

41.

Peterson

Yawson

R. J. K. E.

Nicholls

(2020). Wicked problems and deliberate leadership: Finding true North. In Promise and perils of social finance:the impact of big finance & tech on the world’s most vulnerable (1st ed., pp. 33–57). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40712-4_2

42.

Peterson

Yawson

R. M.

Sherman

Johnson Kanda

(2018). A systems model of using the Deliberate Leadership® framework for addressing wicked problems. International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 12(3), 262–289. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBSR.2018.091155

43.

Prasad

Dr. B. V.

(2024). The impact of technology on human resource management: Trends and challenges. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 9746–9752. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i5.4635

44.

Rai

Sarker

(2019). Next-generation digital platforms: Toward human-AI hybrids. MIS Quarterly, 43(1), iii–x.

45.

Roberts

Cowls

Morley

Taddeo

Wang

Floridi

(2021). The Chinese approach to artificial intelligence: An analysis of policy, ethics, and regulation. AI & Society, 36(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00992-2

46.

Roche

Wall

P. J.

Lewis

(2023). Ethics and diversity in artificial intelligence policies, strategies and initiatives. AI and Ethics, 3(4), 1095–1115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00218-9

47.

Sambasivan

Kapania

Highfill

Akrong

Paritosh

Aroyo

L. M.

(2021). “Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work”: Data Cascades in High-Stakes AI. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445518

48.

Sartori

Theodorou

(2022). A sociotechnical perspective for the future of AI: Narratives, inequalities, and human control. Ethics and Information Technology, 24(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09624-3

49.

Schmid

Hildesheim

Holoyad

Schumacher

(2021). The AI methods, capabilities and criticality grid. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 35(3–4), 425–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-021-00736-4

50.

Schneider

Somers

(2006). Organizations as complex adaptive systems: Implications of Complexity Theory for leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(4), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.006

51.

Stiehm

Townsend

N. W.

(2002). The U.S. Army war College: Military education in a democracy. Temple University Press.

52.

Swanson

Holton III

(2001). Foundations of human resource development. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=4o4NgR9DM0IC&oi=fnd&pg=PR16&dq=Foundations+of+Human+Resource+Development&ots=_0AdmDvKLO&sig=FXvwa30TjNVvuGHe2-1lV_mgWCU

53.

Swanson

R. A.

(2010). Foundations of human-resource development. In Human resource management international digest (2nd ed.). 18(7). https://doi.org/10.1108/hrmid.2010.04418gae.001

54.

Thite

(2022). Digital human resource development: Where are we? Where should we go and how do we go there? Human Resource Development International, 25(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2020.1842982

55.

Tiwari

(2018). How artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning are radically different? International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 8(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.23956/ijarcsse.v8i2.569

56.

Tsamados

Aggarwal

Cowls

Morley

Roberts

Taddeo

Floridi

(2022). The ethics of algorithms: Key problems and solutions. AI & Society, 37(1), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01154-8

57.

Wang

(2012). Human resource development and technology integration. In Encyclopedia of E-leadership, counseling and training (pp. 391–407). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61350-068-2.ch029

58.

Watkins

K. E.

Marsick

V. J.

(2019). Conceptualizing an organization that learns. In Örtenblad

A. R.

(Ed.), The oxford handbook of the learning organization (pp. 50–66). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198832355.013.3

59.

Wheelen

T. L.

Hunger

J. D.

Hoffman

A. N.

Bamford

C. E.

(2018). Strategic management and business policy: Globalization, innovation and sustainability (15th ed.). Pearson.

60.

Yawson

R. M.

(2016). The importance of multimethods and mixed methods research in understanding complexity in leadership. International Journal of Complexity in Leadership and Management, 3(4), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCLM.2016.10008000

61.

Yawson

R. M.

Greiman

B. C.

(2016). A systems approach to identify skill needs for agrifood nanotechnology: A multiphase mixed methods study. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 27(4), 517–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21266

62.

Yawson

R. M.

Osafo

Yawson

A. M.

(2024). Role of strategic flexibility analysis in organizational adaptation to VUCA. In AHRD (Ed.), Building a better future of work – HRD’s role for a sustainable, human-centered workplace. Proceedings of the 31st AHRD international research conference. (pp. 1–24). Academy of Human Resource Development. https://doi.org/10.31124/advance.171334448.84184510/v1

63.

Yawson

R. M.

Peterson

Johnson-Kanda

(2017). Social sector and business strategies for complex adaptive change: Navigating the changing currents for business education. In Proceedings of the 44th OBTC teaching conference for management educators (pp. 1–8). Management and Organizational Behavior Teaching Society.

64.

Yawson

R. M.

Woldeab

Osafo

(2018). Human resource development and the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Academy of Human Resource Development International Research Conference in the Americas. Vol. 25. https://doi.org/10.31124/advance.9638417.v1