Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Problem

There is a continued, well documented disconnect between HRD scholars and practitioners. Specifically, the ‘Implications for HRD Practice’ section in academic articles is often lacking in relevance and meaning. This is harmful for both academia and practice, but especially for the well-being of learners.

Solution

This essay focusses on how to write a meaningful ‘Implications for HRD Practice’ section and suggests five areas to consider: why writing for practice is important; understand who practice is; relate to practitioners’ knowledge; provide evidence-based suggestions and finally, connect with practice.

Stakeholders

HRD scholars who are committed to write for, and connect with, practice.

Keywords

scholars and practitioners writing for practice human resource development

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allied Market Research . (2022). Strategy consulting Market research, 2031. Retrieved from https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/strategy-consulting-market-A31618#:∼:text=Theglobalstrategyconsultingmarket,11.6%25from2022to2031

Booker

D. L.

Williams

M. R.

(2022). An inclusive leadership model insights from the tech industry. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 24(4), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/15234223221118955

Byrd

(2023). HRD practice: Who is doing the work? Advances in Developing Human Resources, 25(1), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/15234223221140162

Cheng

E. W. L.

Hampson

(2008). Transfer of training: A review and new insights. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(4), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00230.x

Clayton

(2015, October 26). The needless complexity of academic writing. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2015/10/complex-academic-writing/412255/

Foucault

(1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795. https://doi.org/10.1086/448181

Gherardi

(2000). Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization, 7(2), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050840072001

Grenfell

M. J.

(2011). Bourdieu, language and linguistics. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Grieves

Redman

(1999). Living in the shadow of OD: HRD and the search for identity. Human Resource Development International, 2(2), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678869900000012

10.

Hughes

Gosney

M. W.

(Eds), (2016). Bridging the scholar-practitioner gap in human resources development. IGI global. Retrieved from, https://doi-org.libezproxy.open.ac.uk/10.4018/978-1-4666-9998-4

11.

Kondrat

M. E.

(1992). Reclaiming the practical: Formal and substantive rationality in social work practice. Social Service Review, 66(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1086/603912

12.

Kroese

I. C.

(2022). Is employee training really gender-neutral? Introducing a sex/gender – sensitive model of training. Human Resource Management Review, 32(4), 100890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100890

13.

Metcalfe

(2019). Comparing science communication theory with practice: An assessment and critique using Australian data. Public Understanding of Science, 28(4), 382–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518821022

14.

Moats

J. B.

McLean

G. N.

(2009). Speaking our language: The essential role of scholar practitioners in HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11(4), 507. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422309337820

15.

Pasmore

W. A.

Woodman

R. W.

(2017). The future of research and practice in organizational change and development. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 25, 1–32. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/open/detail.action?docID=4830671

16.

Pettigrew

A. M.

(2001). Management research after modernism. British Journal of Management, 12(s1), S61–S70. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12.s1.8

17.

Poell

R. F.

(2022). Human resource development should aim to make closed contexts more open: A meta reaction to Wang and doty, Russ-Eft, and Yoon. Human Resource Development Review, 21(4), 465–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843221134654

18.

Simmons

S. V.

Yawson

R. M.

(2022). Developing leaders for disruptive change: An inclusive leadership approach. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 24(4), 242–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/15234223221114359

19.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy . (2023). Kant’s account of reason. Retrieved April 15, 2023, from, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-reason/

20.

Tenhiälä

Giluk

Kepes

Simón

Kim

(2016). The research-practice gap in human resource management: A cross-cultural study. Human Resource Management, 55(2), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21656

21.

Torraco

R. J.

Lundgren

(2020). What HRD is doing—what HRD should be doing: The case for transforming HRD. Human Resource Development Review, 19(1), 39–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484319877058

22.

Van de Ven

A. H.

Johnson

P. E.

(2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–821. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527385

Implications for Practice: How to Write a Meaningful Contribution