The recent discourse connected to the notion of scholar-practitioner in human resource development commonly uses the metaphor of a “gap” between these two binaries that must somehow be bridged or that otherwise requires linking. This article examines the contemporary expression of this gap in the AHRD literature and the nature of the duality it implies.An alternative metaphor based on Anzaldúa’s borderlands and the mestiza consciousness that emerges there is suggested. This reframing and its implications are explored with an eye toward the possibilities of prompting new dialogue and creative responses across the many types of work, interests, and personas that comprise and enrich HRD as a field.
Anzaldúa, G. ( 1987). Borderlands/La frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.
2.
Diner, B.M., Carpenter, C.R., O’Connell, T., & Pang, P. ( 2007). Graduate medical education and knowledge translation: Role models, information pipelines, and practice change thresholds. Academic Emergency Medicine, 14, 1008-1014.
3.
Francis, H. ( 2007). Discursive struggle and the ambiguous world of HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9, 83-96.
4.
Hamlin, R.G. ( 2002). Towards evidence-based management and research informed HRD practice: An empirical study. International Journal of Human Resource Development and Management Special Edition, 2, 160-169.
5.
Hutt, M.D. ( 2008). Engaging corporate partners to bridge the theory-practice gap. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 4, 68-71.
6.
Keefer, J., & Yap, R. ( 2007). Is HRD research making a difference in practice ? Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18, 440-455.
7.
Kuchinke, K.P. ( 2004). Theorizing and practicing HRD: Extending the dialogue over the roles of scholarship and practice in the field. Human Resource Development International, 7, 535-539.
8.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. ( 1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
9.
Lucas, C. (n.d.). Synergy and complexity science. Retrieved January 12, 2009, from www.calresco.org/wp/synergy.htm
10.
MacGillivray, A. ( 2006). Learning at the edge-Part 1: Transdisciplinary conceptions of boundaries. Emergence: Complexity and Organization , 8, 92-104.
11.
MacGillivray, A. ( 2007). Learning at the edge-Part 2: Scholar-practitioner reflections on boundaries. Emergence: Complexity and Organization , 9, 44-55.
12.
McGoldrick, J., Stewart, J., & Watson, S. ( 2001). Researching HRD: Philosophy, process and practice . In J. McGoldrick (Ed.), Understanding human resource development: A research-based approach (pp. 1-17). New York: Routledge.
13.
McGuire, D., Garavan, T.N., O’Donnell, D., & Watson, S. ( 2007). Metaperspectives and HRD: Lessons for research and practice . Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9, 120-139.
14.
Moisander, J., & Stenfors, S. ( 2009). Exploring the edges of theory-practice gap: Epistemic cultures in strategy-tool development and use. Organization , 16, 227-247.
15.
Morgan, G. ( 1986). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Morgan, G. ( 2006). Images of organization (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
17.
Murray, C.E. ( 2009). Diffusion of innovation theory: A bridge for the research-practice gap in counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development, 87, 108-116.
18.
Reuman, A.E. ( 2000). Coming into play: An interview with Gloria Anzaldúa . Melus, 25(2), 3-45.
19.
Rynes, S.L., Giluk, T.L., & Brown, K.G. ( 2007). The very separate worlds of academci and practitioner periodicals in human resource management: Implications for evidence-based management. Academy of Management Journal. Briarcliff Manor: Oct 2007. 50(5). pp. 987-1008
20.
Saari, L. ( 2007). Bridging the worlds. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1043-1045.
21.
Shindell, T. ( 2005). Seeing it from both sides: Bridges in research-to-practice . Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16, 153-155.
22.
Short, D.C. ( 2006). Closing the gap between research and practice . Human Resource Development Quarterly, 17, 343-350.
23.
Short, D.C., Brandenburg, D.C., May, G.L., & Bierema, L.L. ( 2002). HRD: A voice to integrate the demands of system changes, people, learning, and performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13, 237-242.
24.
Short, D.C., Cassidy, M., Dewey, J.D., & Van Buren, M.E. (2000). Ten roles to support research to practice in organizations. Human Resource Development Quarterly , 11, 209-211.
25.
Short, D.C., Sherlock, J.J., & Sugrue, B. ( 2004). Time to recognize and reward those who link research and practice. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15, 259-262.
26.
Swanson, R. ( 1997). HRD research: Don’t go home without it. In R. A. Swanson & E. F. Holton III (Eds.), Human resource development handbook: Linking research and practice (pp. 3-20). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
Swanson, R., & Holton, E. F., III. (Eds.). (2005). Research in organizations: Foundations and methods of inquiry. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
28.
Tenkasi, R.V., & Hay, G.W. ( 2004). Actionable knowledge and scholar-practitioners: A process model of theory-practice linkages. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 17, 177-206.
29.
Tyler, J.A. ( 2006). Re-searching research models: What is emergent, elastic, and nonlinear all over?Human Resource Development Review , 5, 494-503.
30.
Tyler, J.A. ( 2008). Read, talk, play, watch: How HRD practitioners like to learn. In T. J. Chermack & J. Storberg-Walker (Eds.), 2008 Academy of human resource development (AHRD) conference proceedings. Bowling Green, OH: AHRD. Retrieved January 8, 2009, from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sqlcontent_storage_01/0000019b/80/3d/e8/86.pd
31.
Wenger, E. ( 1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity . New York: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Yorks, L. ( 2005). Nothing so practical as a good theory. Human Resource Development Review, 4, 111-113.
33.
Yorks, L., & Nicolaides, A. (2006). Complexity and emergent communicative learning: An opportunity for HRD scholarship. Human Resource Development Review, 5, 143-147.
