Technology Intervention: Rethinking the Role of Education and Faculty in the Transformative Digital Environment

Abstract

The Problem

Technology has affected almost every aspect of our lives, including education. Higher education is shifting the dynamics of delivery methods from traditional face-to-face to online to blended modes. Many universities are reaching a physical space capacity and therefore are attempting to increase online enrollment and geographical footprint. These changes are shifting the nature of higher education and how faculty are being viewed, evaluated, and, to some degree, hired. This article will focus on highlighting the challenges and opportunities of utilizing technology within universities, especially human resource development (HRD) programs.

The Solution

Technology is transforming higher education. Institutions can serve as an incubator to reimagine and redesign education altogether for the good of society. Online, mobile, and blended learning have become a part of our future. An important step is tracking how these models are actively enriching learning outcomes. Universities must be at the forefront of advancing progressive learning approaches and understanding the impact of technology on faculty and students.

The Stakeholders

The key stakeholders for this article include faculty, students, and university administrators. It will also affect businesses and human resource professionals for talent acquisition.

Keywords

technology human resource development blended and online learning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams Becker

Cummins

Davis

Freeman

Hall Giesinger

Ananthanarayanan

. (2017). NMC horizon report: 2017 higher education edition. The New Media Consortium.

Alam

Kendall

(2018). Five ways artificial intelligence will shape the future of universities. https://theconversation.com/five-ways-artificial-intelligence-will-shape-the-future-of-universities-94706

Allen

I. E.

Seaman

(2013). Changing Course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Babso Survey Research Group. http://faculty.washington.edu/rvanderp/DLData/AllenSeaman2013.pdf

Allen

I. E.

Seaman

Poulin

Straut

T. T.

(2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/onlinereportcard.pdf

Anshari

Alas

Yunus

Sabtu

Hamid

Smith

(2016). Learning management system 2.0: Higher education. In Pinheiro

M. M.

Simões

(Eds.), Handbook of research on engaging digital natives in higher education settings (pp. 265–278). IGI Global.

Bates

A. W.

(2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. https://www.tonybates.ca/teaching-in-a-digital-age/

Bennett

(2014). Introducing new perspectives on virtual human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(3), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422314532091

Bing

J. W.

Kehrhahn

Short

D. C.

(2003). Challenges to the field of human resources development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5, 342–351. https://10.1177/1523422303254671

Biswas

(2018). HR technology in 2018: Opportunities, challenges and the future. https://www.hrtechnologist.com/articles/digital-transformation/hr-technology-in-2018-opportunities-challenges-and-the-future/

10.

Brooks

D. C.

(2016). ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2016 [Research report]. EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research. https://er.educause.edu/~/media/files/library/2016/10/ers1605.pdf?la=en

11.

Brown

Cowan

Green

(2016). Faculty productivity: Using social media and measuring its impact. EDUCAUSE Review of Social Media for Teaching and Learning. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2016/5/faculty-productivity-using-social-media-and-measuring-its-impact

12.

Brown

Dehoney

Millichap

(2015, July/August). What’s next for the LMS? [EDUCAUSE Review]. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2015/6/whats-next-for-the-lms

13.

Dahlstrom

Walker

J. D.

Dziuban

(2013). ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2013 [Research report]. EDUCAUSE Center for Analysis and Research. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2013/9/ecar-study-of-undergraduate-students-and-information-technology-2013

14.

Daniel

B. K.

(2014). Big Data and analytics in higher education: Opportunities and challenges. British Journal Education Technology, 46(5), 904–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12230

15.

Daniel

B. K.

Butson

(2013). Technology enhanced analytics (TEA) in higher education. In Proceedings of the international conference on educational technologies (pp. 89–96).

16.

Delello

J. A.

McWhorter

R. R.

Camp

K. M.

(2015). Integrating augmented reality in higher education: A multidisciplinary study of student perceptions. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 243(3), 209–233.

17.

García-Peñalvo

F. J.

García

Figuerola

Merlo

J. A.

(2010). Open knowledge: Challenges and facts. Online Information Review, 34(4), 520–539. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521011072963

18.

Garrison

D. R.

Vaughan

N. D.

(2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles and guidelines. John Wiley.

19.

Greenhow

Gleason

(2014). Social scholarship: Reconsidering scholarly practices in the age of social media. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 392–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12150

20.

Gruzd

Staves

Wilk

(2012). Connected scholars: Examining the role of social media in research practices of faculty using the UTAUT model. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 2340–2350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.004

21.

Horn

I. S.

Kane

B. D.

Wilson

(2015). Making sense of student performance data: Data use logics and mathematics teachers’ learning opportunities. American Educational Research Journal, 52(2), 208–242. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215573773

22.

Iiyoshi

Kumar

M. S. V.

(2008). Conclusion: New pathways for shaping the collective agenda to open up education. In Iiyoshi

Kumar

M. S. V.

(Eds.), Opening up education: The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge (pp. 429–440). MIT Press.

23.

Joseph

(2012). The barriers of using education technology for optimizing the educational experience of learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 427–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.051

24.

LaBorie

Halperin

(1976). Citation patterns in library science dissertations. Journal of Education for Librarianship, 16(4), 271–283.

25.

Lokken

Mullins

(2014). Trends in e-learning: Tracking the impact of e-learning at community colleges. Instructional Technology Council.

26.

Lynch

(2018). 5 major benefits of blended learning. https://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/education_futures/2018/05/5_major_benefits_of_blended_learning.html

27.

Siau

K. L.

(2018). Artificial intelligence impacts on higher education. In MWAIS Proceedings (p. 42). https://aisel.aisnet.org/mwais2018/42

28.

Masterman

(2016). Bringing open educational practice to a research-intensive university: Prospects and challenges. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 14(1), 31–42.

29.

McWhorter

(2014). A synthesis of new perspectives on virtual HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(3), 391–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422314532126

30.

McWhorter

Bennett

(Eds.). (2014). Introducing new perspectives on virtual human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(3), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422314532126

31.

Moskal

Dziuban

Hartman

(2013). Blended learning: A dangerous idea? The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 15–23.

32.

Online Schools Center. (2018). The state and challenges of online education. https://www.onlineschoolscenter.com/challenges-of-online-education/

33.

Patil

(2015). Predictive analytics in higher education. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 4(12), 138–141. https://doi.org/10.17148/IJARCCE.2015.4123

34.

Petropoulos

(2018). The impact of artificial intelligence on employment. In Work in a digital age. Rowman & Littlefield. https://bruegel.org/2018/07/the-impact-of-artificial-intelligence-on-employment/

35.

Purdue University. (2018). How has technology changed education? https://online.purdue.edu/ldt/learning-design-technology/resources/how-has-technology-changed-education

36.

Rasid

Asghar

H. M.

(2016). Technology use, self-directed learning, student engagement and academic performance: Examining the interrelations. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 604–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.084

37.

Rhode

Richter

Gowen

Miller

Wills

(2017). Understanding faculty use of the learning management system. Online Learning, 21(3), 68–86.

38.

Rosenbusch

Morrison

Shuck

(2018, February 17). The changing of the guard . . . How do we plan for the academy’s future needs [Conference session]. Presented at the Meeting of the Academy of Human Resource Development Conference, Richmond, VA.

39.

Scanlon

(2014). Scholarship in the digital age: Open educational resources, publication and public engagement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45, 12–23.

40.

Schnitzler

Davies

Ross

Harris

(2016). Using Twitter™ to drive research impact: A discussion of strategies, opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 59, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.02.004

41.

Sorcinelli

M. D.

(2007). Faculty development: The challenge going forward. Peer Review, 9(4). https://www.aacu.org/publications-research/periodicals/faculty-development-challenge-going-forward

42.

Swist

Magee

(2017). Academic publishing and its digital binds: Beyond the paywall towards ethical executions of code. Culture Unbound: Journal of Current Cultural Research, 9(3), 240–259. http://www.cultureunbound.ep.liu.se/v9/a17/cu17v9a17.pdf

43.

Weller

(2011). The digital scholar: How technology is transforming scholarly practice. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849666275

44.

Welsh

E. T.

Wanberg

C. R.

Brown

K. G.

Simmering

M. J.

(2003). E-learning: Emerging uses, empirical results and future directions. International Journal of Training and Development, 7, 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-3736.2003.00184.x

45.

Zheng

Wang

Doll

Deng

Williams

(2018). The impact of organisational support, technical support, and self-efficacy on faculty perceived benefits of using learning management system. Journal of Behaviour and Information Technology, 37(4), 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1436590