Technology is creating immersive digital ecosystems that will radically transform the way humans communicate, collaborate, and create. Virtual human resource development (VHRD) is an example of this phenomenon in the field of HRD. With the emergence of VHRD, HRD scholars need to develop more robust conceptualizations of technology, and HRD practitioners need to play a larger role in technology development. Enhanced theoretical perspectives on technology are needed to support these endeavors.
The Solution
A sociomaterial perspective on technology, which is being used for the study and development of phenomena such as virtual worlds in other disciplines, can help HRD practitioners and scholars develop a more robust understanding of VHRD and participate more effectively in technology development.
The Stakeholders
HRD practitioners and scholars can use a sociomaterial perspective on technology to facilitate their engagement in VHRD development and scholarship.
ArnoldD. E. (1996). The role of HRD in the successful implementation of information systems. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 7, 271-278. doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920070307
2.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
3.
BennettE. E. (2009). Virtual HRD: The intersection of knowledge management, culture, and intranets. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 362-374.
4.
BennettE. E. (2010). The coming paradigm shift: Synthesis and future directions in virtual HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12, 728-741.
5.
BennettE. E. (2014b). How an intranet provides opportunities for learning organizational culture: Implications for virtual HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(3), 296-319.
6.
BennettE. E. (2014a). Introducing new perspectives on virtual human resource department. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(3), 263-280.
7.
BennettE. E.BieremaL. L. (2010). The ecology of virtual human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12, 632-647. doi:10.1177/1523422310394789
8.
BennettE. E.McWhorterR. R. (In press). Virtual human resource development. In ChalofskyN. E.RoccoT. F.MorrisM. L. (Eds.), The handbook of human resource development: The discipline and the profession. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
CastellsM. (2011). The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, society, and culture (Vol. 1). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
10.
DeryK.HallR.WailesN.WiblenS. (2013). Lost in translation? An actor-network approach to HRIS implementation. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 22, 225-237. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2013.03.002
11.
FarajS.AzadB. (2012). The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. In LeonardiP. M.NardiB. A.KallinikosJ. (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 237-258). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
GermainM.McGuireD. (2014). The role of swift trust in virtual teams and implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources,16(3), 356-370.
14.
GithensR. P.DiraniK.GitongaJ.TengY. (2008). Technology-related research in HRD publications: An analysis of content and metaperspectives from 2000-2006. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 19, 185-215.
15.
HansethO.LyytinenK. (2010). Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: The case of building internet. Journal of Information Technology, 25, 1-19.
JohriA. (2011). The socio-materiality of learning practices and implications for the field of learning technology. Research in Learning Technology, 19, 207-217.
18.
KaplanB.Harris-SalamoneK. D. (2009). Health IT success and failure: Recommendations from literature and an AMIA workshop. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 16, 291-299.
19.
LatourB. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
LeonardiP. M. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35, 147-167.
21.
LeonardiP. M. (2012). Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they related? Do we need them? In LeonardiP. M.NardiB. A.KallinikosJ. (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 25-48). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
22.
LeonardiP. M. (2013). Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality. Information and Organization, 23, 59-76. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2013.02.002
23.
LeonardiP. M.NardiB. A.KallinikosJ. (Eds.). (2012). Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24.
McClernonT. (2006). Rivals to systematic training. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 8, 442-459. doi:10.1177/1523422306292944
25.
McWhorterR. R. (2010). Exploring the emergence of virtual human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12, 623-631. doi:10.1177/1523422310395367
26.
McWhorterR. R. (2014). A synthesis of new perspectives on virtual HRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(3), 391-401.
27.
McWhorterR. R.BennettE. E. (Eds.). (2010). Exploring the construct of virtual human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12, 619-741.
28.
McWhorterR. R.BennettE. E. (2014, February14-16). When high-profile technology fails: Making the case for technology development in HRD. Paper presented at the Academy of Human Resource Development International Conference, Houston, TX.
29.
McWhorterR. R.LynhamS. (2014). An initial conceptualization of virtual scenario planning. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(3), 335-355.
NolanR. L.WetherbeJ. C. (1980). Toward a comprehensive framework for MIS research. MIS Quarterly, 4(2), 1-19.
32.
OliverM. (2013). Learning technology: Theorising the tools we study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 31-43. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01283.x
33.
OrlikowskiW. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28, 1435-1448. doi:10.1177/0170840607081138
34.
OrlikowskiW. J. (2010). The sociomateriality of organisational life: Considering technology in management research. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 125-141. doi:10.1093/cje/bep058
35.
OrlikowskiW. J.ScottS. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 433-474.
36.
ParéG.BourdeauS.MarsanJ.NachH.ShuraidaS. (2008). Re-examining the causal structure of information technology impact research. European Journal of Information Systems, 17, 403-416. doi:10.1057/ejis.2008.34
37.
RuonaW. E. A.GilleyJ. W. (2009). Practitioners in applied professions: A model applied to human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 438-453. doi:10.1177/1523422309344719
38.
SchultzeU.OrlikowskiW. J. (2010). Research commentary—Virtual worlds: A performative perspective on globally distributed, immersive work. Information Systems Research, 21, 810-821.
39.
StarS. L.RuhlederK. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7, 111-134.
40.
SwansonR. A. (2001). Human resource development and its underlying theory. Human Resource Development International, 4, 299-312.
41.
ThomasK. (2014). Workplace technology and the creation of boundaries: The role of VHRD in a 24/7 work environment. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(3), 281-295.
42.
TristE. L.BamforthK. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting. Human Relations, 4, 3-38.
43.
VesseyI.WardK. (2013). The dynamics of sustainable IS alignment: The case for IS adaptivity. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14, 283-311.
44.
WeickK. E. (1993). Organizational redesign as improvisation. In HuberG. P.GlickW. H. (Eds.), Organizational change and redesign: Ideas and insights for improving performance (pp. 346-379). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
