Social presence theory (SPT) is the degree to which a person is perceived to be a “real person” in their computer-mediated communication or virtual environments. The level of social presence influences the quality of virtual interactions and outcomes. SPT has not been examined within human resource development (HRD) or virtual human resource development (VHRD); therefore, it is not known if increased social presence could improve virtual teams/organizations and online instruction.
The Solution
Designing online environments and practices to increase social presence could enhance VHRD within virtual teams, online instructional design, and educational settings. Application of Community of Inquiry (CoI), Social Presence Model, and SPT-inspired instructional design through Gagne’s nine events are discussed with recommendations to improve HRD/VHRD by fostering trust, communication, collaboration, personal relationships, and learning within virtual resources and teams.
The Stakeholders
The literature and application of SPT would benefit HRD/VHRD researchers, HR practitioners, educators, and team leaders/managers.
ArgyleM.DeanJ. (1965). Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry, 28, 289-304.
2.
AritzJ.WalkerR.CardonP. W. (2018). Media use in virtual teams of varying levels of coordination. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 81, 222-243. doi:10.1177/2329490617723114
3.
AusburnL. J.AusburnF. B. (2014). Technical perspectives on theory in screen-based virtual reality environments: Leading from the future in VHRD. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16, 371-390. doi:10.1177/1523422314532125
4.
BennettE. E. (2009). Virtual HRD: The intersection of knowledge management, culture, and intranets. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 362-374. doi.10.1177/1523422309339724
5.
BennettE. E. (2014). Introducing new perspectives on virtual human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16, 263-280. doi:10.1177/1523422314532091
6.
BennettE. E.McWhorterR. R. (2017). Reaction—Organizational learning, community, and virtual HRD: Advancing the discussion. New Horizons in Adult Education & Human Resource Development, 29(3), 19-27. doi:10.1002/nha3.20188
7.
BioccaF.HarmsC.BurgoonJ. K. (2003). Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12, 456-480. doi:10.1162/105474603322761270
8.
BrownS. A.DennisA. R.VenkateshV. (2010). Predicting collaboration technology use: Integrating technology adoption and collaboration research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(2), 9-54. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222270201
9.
ChapmanD. D.StoneS. J. (2010). Measurement of outcomes in virtual environments. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12, 665-680. doi:10.1177/1523422310394792
10.
CroesE. A. J.AntheunisM. L.SchoutenA. P.KrahmerE. J. (2016). Teasing apart the effect of visibility and physical co-presence to examine the effect of CMC on interpersonal attraction. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 468-476. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.037
11.
CuiG.LockeeB.MengC. (2013). Building modern online social presence: A review of social presence theory and its instructional design implications for future trends. Education and Information Technologies, 18, 661-685. doi:10.1007/s10639-012-9192-1
12.
DijkstraS.SchottF.SeelN.TennysonR. D.SeelN. M. (2013). Instructional design: International perspectives I: Vol. I: Theory, research, and models: Vol. II: Solving instructional design problems. New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
DoloriertC.SambrookS.StewartJ. (2012). Power and emotion in doctoral supervision: Implications for HRD. European Journal of Training and Development, 36, 732-750. doi:10.1108/03090591211255566
14.
DunlapJ. C.LowenthalP. R. (2014). The power of presence: Our quest for the right mix of social presence in online courses. In PiñaA. A.MizellA. P. (Eds.), Real life distance education: Case studies in practice (pp. 41-66). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
15.
ElwoodS.McCalebK.FernandezM.KeengweJ. (2014). A theoretical framework and model towards media-rich social presence design practices. Education and Information Technologies, 19, 239-249. doi:10.1007/s10639-012-9212-1
16.
FranklinJ. L. (2017). MVP and instructional systems design in online courses. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2017(152), 39-52. doi:10.1002/tl.20267
17.
GagnéR. M.BriggsL. J.WagerW. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Forth Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College.
18.
GarrisonD. R. (2016). E-learning in the 21st century (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
GarrisonD. R.AndersonT.ArcherW. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87-105. doi:10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00016-6
20.
GermainM.-L.McGuireD. (2014). The role of swift trust in virtual teams and implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16, 356-370. doi:10.1177/1523422314532097
21.
GibsonC. B.GibbsJ. L.StankoT. L.TeslukP.CohenS. G. (2011). Including the “I” in virtuality and modern job design: Extending the job characteristics model to include the moderating effect of individual experiences of electronic dependence and copresence. Organization Science, 22, 1481-1499. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0586
22.
GilsonL. L.MaynardM. T.Jones YoungN. C.VartiainenM.HakonenM. (2015). Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41, 1313-1337. doi:10.1177/0149206314559946
23.
GunawardenaC. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1, 147-166. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/15156/
24.
GustafsonK. L.BranchR. M. (2002). What is instructional design? In ReiserR. A.DempseyJ. A. (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 16-25). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
25.
HanS. H.ChaeC.HanS. J.YoonS. W. (2017). Conceptual organization and identity of HRD: Analyses of evolving definitions, influence, and connections. Human Resource Development Review, 16, 294-319. doi:10.1177/1534484317719822
26.
HodgesC. B.CowanS. F. (2012). Preservice teachers’ views of instructor presence in online courses. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28, 139-145. doi:10.1080/21532974.2012.10784694
27.
KauppilaO.-P.RajalaR.JyrämäA. (2011). Knowledge sharing through virtual teams across borders and boundaries. Management Learning, 42, 395-418. doi:10.1177/1350507610389685
28.
KeF. (2010). Examining online teaching, cognitive, and social presence for adult students. Computers & Education, 55, 808-820. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.013
29.
KorzynskiP. (2015). Online networking and employee engagement: What current leaders do?Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30, 582-596. doi:10.1108/JMP-10-2013-0344
30.
KreijnsK.KirschnerP. A.JochemsW.van BuurenH. (2004). Determining sociability, social space, and social presence in (a)synchronous collaborative groups. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 155-172. doi:10.1089/109493104323024429
31.
KumarS.RitzhauptA. D. (2014). Adapting the community of inquiry survey for an online graduate program: Implications for online programs. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11, 59-71. doi:10.2304/elea.2014.11.1.59
32.
KuoE. W.ThompsonL. F. (2014). The influence of disposition and social ties on trust in new virtual teammates. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 41-48. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.030
33.
LowryP. B.RobertsT. L.RomanoN. C.CheneyP. D.HightowerR. T. (2006). The impact of group size and social presence on small-group communication: Does computer-mediated communication make a difference?Small Group Research, 37, 631-661. doi:10.1177/1046496406294322
34.
LuanW. S.FungN. S.NawawiM.HongT. S. (2005). Experienced and inexperienced Internet users among pre-service teachers: Their use and attitudes toward the Internet. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 8, 90-103.
35.
MadukaN. S.EdwardsH.GreenwoodD.OsborneA.OlusolaS. (2018). Analysis of competencies for effective virtual team leadership in building successful organisations. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25, 696-712. doi:10.1108/BIJ-08-2016-0124
36.
MerrillM. D.DrakeL.LacyM. J.PrattJ., & the ID2 Research Group. (1996). Reclaiming instructional design. Educational Technology, 36(5), 5-7. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/44428356
37.
MyersK. K.SadaghianiK. (2010). Millennials in the workplace: A communication perspective on millennials’ organizational relationships and performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 225-238. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9172-7
38.
NafukhoF. M.GrahamC. M.MuyiaH. M. A. (2010). Harnessing and optimal utilization of human capital in virtual workplace environments. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12, 648-664. doi:10.1177/1523422310394791
PrasadA.DeRosaD.BeyerleinM. (2017). Dispersion beyond miles: Configuration and performance in virtual teams. Team Performance Management, 23, 186-204. doi:10.1108/TPM-06-2016-0026
41.
QureshiI.FangY.HaggertyN.CompeauD. R.ZhangX. (2018). IT-mediated social interactions and knowledge sharing: Role of competence-based trust and background heterogeneity. Information Systems Journal, 28, 929-955. doi:10.1111/isj.12181
42.
RapantaC.MainaM.LotzN.BacchelliA. (2013). Team design communication patterns in e-learning design and development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61, 581-605. doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9306-5
43.
RichardsonJ. C.KoehlerA. A.BesserE. D.CaskurluS.LimJ.MuellerC. M. (2015). Conceptualizing and investigating instructor presence in online learning environments. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16, 256-297. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2123
44.
RichardsonJ. C.LowenthalP. (2017). Instructor social presence: Learners’ needs and a neglected component of the community of inquiry framework. In WhitesideA. L.DikkersA. G.SwanK. (Eds.), Social presence in online learning: Multiple perspectives on practice and research (pp. 86-98). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
45.
ShenK. N.YuA. Y.KhalifaM. (2010). Knowledge contribution in virtual communities: Accounting for multiple dimensions of social presence through social identity. Behaviour & Information Technology, 29, 337-348. doi:10.1080/01449290903156622
ShinH. K.KimK. K. (2010). Examining identity and organizational citizenship behaviour in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Information Science, 36, 114-126. doi:10.1177/0165551509353376
48.
ShortJ.WilliamsE.ChristieB. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London, England: John Wiley.
49.
SilberK. H. (2007). A principle-based model of instructional design: A new way of thinking about and teaching ID. Educational Technology, 47(5), 5-19.
50.
SuhA.ShinK.AhujaM.KimM. S. (2011). The influence of virtuality on social networks within and across work groups: A multilevel approach. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28, 351-386. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-122228011
51.
SungE.MayerR. E. (2012). Five facets of social presence in online distance education. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1738-1747. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.014
52.
SwanK.DayS. L.BogleL. R.MatthewsD. B. (2014). A collaborative, design-based approach to improving an online program. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 74-81. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.006
53.
SwanK.RichardsonJ. (2017). Social presence and the community of inquiry framework. In WhitesideA. L.DikkersA. G.SwanK. (Eds.), Social presence in online learning: Multiple perspectives on practice and research (pp. 64-76). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
54.
SzetoE.ChengA. Y. N. (2016). Towards a framework of interactions in a blended synchronous learning environment: What effects are there on students’ social presence experience?Interactive Learning Environments, 24, 487-503. doi:10.1080/10494820.2014.881391
55.
TuC. H.McIsaacM. S. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 16, 131-150. doi:10.1207/S15389286AJDE1603_2
56.
WhitesideA. L. (2015). Introducing the social presence model to explore online and blended learning experiences. Online Learning, 19(2). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1062945
57.
WhitesideA. L.DikkersA. G.SwanK. (Eds.). (2017). Social presence in online learning: Multiple perspectives on practice and research (1st ed.). Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
58.
WienerM.MehrabianA. (1968). Language within language: Immediacy, a channel in verbal communication. New York, NY: Ardent Media.
59.
YildizS. (2008). Social presence in the web-based classroom: Implications for intercultural communication. Journal of Studies in International Education, 13, 44-65. doi:10.1177/1028315308317654
