The US is currently experiencing a shortage of K-12 science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) teachers, especially in high-poverty communities. The shortage can be explained by both low teacher recruitment and high teacher turnover; however, the reasons why teachers leave the profession are complex.
The Solution
We argue that teacher professional development programs are often focused on how teachers can meet the needs of their students but ignore how teachers can build their own professional resilience. We draw from research in both teacher self-efficacy and ecological adaptive capacity to propose a revised Teacher-Centered Systemic Reform Model that identifies adaptive capacity as an outcome goal for individuals and school systems. School environments are dynamic (e.g., new policies, student needs, and changing administrators), and as a result, teachers need skills to adapt, enabling them to be resilient while still meeting students’ needs.
The Stakeholders
Professional development, teacher educators, human resource development (HRD) practitioners, K-12 STEM teachers.
AbelM. H.SewellJ. (1999). Stress and burnout in rural and urban secondary school teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 287-293.
2.
AchinsteinB.OgawaR. T.SextonD.FreitasC. (2010). Retaining teachers of color: A pressing problem and a potential strategy for “hard-to-staff” schools. Review of Educational Research, 80, 71-107.
3.
AlsupJ. (2006). Teacher identity discourses: Negotiating personal and professional spaces. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.
4.
BalgopalM. M. (2014). Learning and intending to teach evolution: Concerns of pre-service biology teachers. Research in Science Education, 44, 27-52.
5.
BalgopalM. M.CornwallS. (2010, April). Stakeholder discourse dynamics: A case study of an elementary school reform effort. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Association of Researchers in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA.
6.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
7.
BeijaardD.VerloopN.VermuntJ. D. (2000). Teachers’ perceptions of professional identity: An exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 749-764.
8.
BerkesF.ColdingJ.FolkeC. (Eds.). (2008). Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BerkesF.FolkeC.ColdingJ. (Eds.). (1998). Linking social and ecological systems: Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BhamraR.DaniS.BurnardK. (2011). Resilience: The concept, a literature review and future directions. International Journal of Production Research, 49, 5375-5393.
11.
BormanG. D.DowlingN. M. (2008). Teacher attrition and retention: A meta-analytic and narrative review of research. Review of Educational Research, 78, 367-409.
12.
BoxallP.MackyK. (2009). Research and theory on high-performance work systems: Progressing the high-involvement stream. Human Resource Management Journal, 19, 3-23.
13.
BoydD.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2005). The draw of home: How teachers’ preferences for proximity disadvantage urban schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24, 113-132.
14.
BrendelW.BennettC. (2016). Learning to embody leadership through mindfulness and somatics practice. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 18, 409-425.
15.
ChapinF. S.FolkeC.KofinasG. (2009). A framework for understanding change. In ChapinF. S.KofinasG.FolkeC. (Eds.), Principles of ecosystem stewardship: Resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world (pp. 3-28). New York, NY: Springer.
16.
ClappF. N. (2017). Teachers’ and researchers’ beliefs of learning and the use of learning progressions (Doctoral dissertation). Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
17.
CowanJ.GoldhaberD.HayesK.TheobaldR. (2016). Missing elements in the discussion of teacher shortages. Educational Researcher, 45, 460-462.
18.
Darling-HammondL. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.
19.
Darling-HammondL. (2010). Recruiting and retaining teachings: Turning around the race to the bottom in high-needs schools. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 4, 16-32.
20.
Darling-HammondL.BransfordJ. (Eds.). (2007). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
21.
FalkJ. H.DierkingL. D. (2018). Viewing science learning through an ecosystem lens: A story in two parts. In CorriganD.BunttingC.JonesA.LoughranJ. (Eds.), Navigating the changing landscape of formal and informal science learning opportunities (pp. 9-29). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
FolkeC.CarpenterS.ElmqvistT.GundersonL.HollingC. S.WalkerB. (2002). Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 31, 437-440.
FouadN. A.SmithP. L. (1996). A test of a social cognitive model for middle school students: Math and science. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 338-346.
26.
FouadN. A.SmithP. L.ZaoK. E. (2002). Across academic domains: Extensions of the social-cognitive career model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49, 164-171.
27.
GibbonsR. E.VillafañeS. M.StainsM.MurphyK. L.RakerJ. R. (2018). Beliefs about learning and enacted instructional practices: An investigation in postsecondary chemistry education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55, 1111-1133. doi:10.1002/tea.21444
28.
GibsonS. K. (2004). Social learning (cognitive) theory and implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6, 193-210.
29.
GistC. D. (2018). Human resource development for racial/ethnic diversity: Do school systems value teachers of color?Advances in Developing Human Resources, 20, 345-358.
30.
GoodpasterK. P.AdedokunO. A.WeaverG. C. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions of rural STEM teaching: Implications for rural teacher retention. Rural Educator, 33(3), 9-22.
31.
GravesL. A.HughesH.BalgopalM. M. (2016). Teaching STEM through agriculture: Implementation of an edible plant curriculum at an elementary school. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57, 192-207.
32.
GuQ.DayC. (2007). Teachers resilience: A necessary condition for effectiveness. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 1302-1316.
33.
GuQ.DayC. (2013). Resilient teachers, resilient schools: Building and sustaining quality in testing times. New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
GuarinoC. M.SantibanezL.DaleyG. A. (2006). Teacher recruitment and retention: A review of the recent empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 76, 173-208.
35.
HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.RivkinS. G. (1999). Do higher salaries buy better teachers? (Working Paper No. 7082). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
36.
HaynesM. (2014). On the path to equity: Improving the effectiveness of beginning teachers. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. Retrieved from http://all4ed.org/reports-factsheets/path-to-equity/
37.
HenkeR.ChenX.GeisS. (2000). Progress through the teacher pipeline: 1992-93 college graduates and elementary/secondary school teaching as of 1997. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
38.
HillC.CorbettC.St. RoseA. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.
39.
HollingC. S.GundersonL. H. (2002). Resilience and adaptive cycles. In GundersonL. H.HollingC. S. (Eds.), Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems (pp. 25-62). Washington, DC: Island Press.
40.
HutchisonL. F. (2012). Addressing the STEM teacher shortage in American schools: Ways to recruit and retain effect STEM teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 34, 541-550.
41.
IngersollR. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 499-534.
42.
IngersollR. M. (2002). The teacher shortage: A case of wrong diagnosis and wrong prescription. NASSP Bulletin, 86, 16-31.
43.
IngersollR. M. (2003). Is there really a teacher shortage?Seattle: University of Washington, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
44.
IngersollR. M.MayH. (2011). The minority teacher shortage: Fact or fable?Phi Delta Kappan, 93, 62-65.
45.
IngersollR. M.SirinidesP.DoughertyP. (2018). Leadership matters: Teachers’ roles in school decision making and school performance. American Educator, 42, 13-17.
46.
JacobB. A. (2007). The challenges of staffing urban schools with effective teachers. The Future of Children, 17, 129-153.
47.
KaigherA. (2011). Beginning teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the first through third waves of the 2007-08 beginning teacher longitudinal study. First Look (NCES 2011-318). National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED523821
48.
KilroyS.FloodP. C.BosakJ.ChênevertD. (2017). Perceptions of high-involvement work practices, person-organization fit, and burnout: A time-lagged study of health care employees. Human Resource Management, 56, 821-835.
49.
KirbyS. N.GrissmerD. W. (1991). Sources of teacher supply: Some new evidence from Indiana. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13, 256-268.
50.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2000). Fighting for our lives: Preparing teachers to teach African American students. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 206-214.
51.
LangdonD.McKittrickG.BeedeD.KhanB.DomsM. (2011). STEM: Good jobs now and for the future (ESA Issue Brief# 03-11). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
LeeO.Maerten-RiveraJ.PenfieldR. D.LeRoyK.SecadaW. G. (2008). Science achievement of English language learners in urban elementary schools: Results of a first-year professional development intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 31-52.
54.
Lengnick-HallC. A.BeckT. E.Lengnick-HallM. L. (2011). Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 243-255.
55.
LittleM. A. (1995). Adaptation, adaptability, and multidisciplinary research. In BoazN. T.WolfeL. D. (Eds.), Biological anthropology: The state of the science (pp. 121-148). Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
56.
LuthansF.VogelgesangG. R.LesterP. B. (2006). Developing the psychological capital of resiliency. Human Resource Development Review, 5, 25-44.
57.
LuthansF.YoussefC. M.AvolioB. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge (Vol. 198). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
58.
MalteseA. V.TaiR. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among US students. Science Education, 95, 877-907.
59.
McLeskeyJ.BillingsleyB. S. (2008). How does the quality and stability of the teaching force influence the research-to-practice gap? A perspective on the teacher shortage in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 29, 293-305.
60.
MoranE. F.BrondizioE. S. (2013). Introduction to human-environment interactions research. In BrondízioE. S.MoranE. F. (Eds.), Human-environment interactions: Current and future directions (pp. 1-24). New York, NY: Springer.
61.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Author.
62.
NelsonD. R. (2011). Adaptation and resilience: Responding to a changing climate. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2, 113-120.
63.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
64.
OlsonS.RiordanD. G. (2012). Report to the president: Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Executive Office of the President. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED541511.pdf
65.
ParisD. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93-97.
66.
PitotL. N. (2014). Determining the alignment between what teachers are expected to teach, what they know, and how they assess scientific literacy (Doctoral dissertation). Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
RichardsonG. E. (2002). The meta-theory of resilience and resiliency. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 307-321.
69.
ShowalterD.KleinR.JohnsonJ.HartmanS. L. (2015). Why rural matters 2015-2016: Understanding the changing landscape innovation and practice in rural education. Washington, DC: Rural School and Community Trust. Retrieved from http://www.ruraledu.org/user_uploads/file/WRM-2015-16.pdf
70.
SjaastadJ. (2012). Sources of Inspiration: The role of significant persons in young people’s choice of science in higher education. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 1615-1636.
71.
SkaalvikE. M.SkaalvikS. (2011). Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 1029-1038.
72.
SoutherlandS. A.SowellS.BlanchardM.GrangerE. M. (2011). Exploring the construct of pedagogical discontentment: A tool to understand science teachers’ openness to reform. Research in Science Education, 41, 299-317.
TaitM. (2008). Resilience as a contributor to novice teacher success, commitment, and retention. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(4), 57-75.
75.
ThomasK. M.TranN. M.DawsonB. L. (2010). An inclusive strategy of teaching diversity. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12, 295-311.
76.
WilsonS. M. (2013). Professional development for science teachers. Science, 340, 310-313.
77.
WoodburyS.Gess-NewsomeJ. (2002). Overcoming the paradox of change without difference: A model of change in the arena of fundamental school reform. Educational Policy, 16, 763-782.
78.
XueY.LarsonR. (2015). STEM crisis or STEM surplus? Yes and yes. Monthly Labor Review, 138, 1-14. doi:10.21916/mlr.2015.14
