Following executive students in a series of choral conducting workshops, this article explores the growing practice of arts-based leadership development. Based in experiential learning, arts-based learning claims to have great potential in connecting intellect and emotions, to meaningfully challenge norms and assumptions, and to value the relational and subjective aspects of human experience. However, to date, there is a lack of empirical, participant-focused work exploring the “what” and “how” of arts-based leadership development as well as its impact on professional practice.
The Solution
Through observational and interview data gathered at a European business school, this research takes a grounded, participant-centered approach to exploring the experiences of participants in three choral conducting masterclasses. The findings support the effectiveness of arts-based methods for leadership development; potent learning emerges. Moreover, nuance is added to understandings of how and what learning takes place, describing a process of learning as sensemaking to aesthetic knowing. The development outcomes centered on relational dynamics of leadership and the aesthetics of power and responsibility, with longer-term data showing positive impact on the professional practice of participants.
The Stakeholders
This article speaks to HRD researchers, professionals, and development practitioners. Of interest for all three groups, the study overviews the growing trend of arts-based methods in leadership development while providing insights into how learning gets done,what is learned, and sheds light on longer-term impacts of this form of experiential learning.
AdlerN. J. (2006). The arts & leadership: Now that we can do anything, what will we do?Management Learning, 5, 486-499.
2.
AdlerN. J. (2011). Leading beautifully: The creative economy and beyond. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20, 208-221.
3.
BarrettF. J. (1998). Managing and improvising: Lessons from jazz. Career Development International, 3, 283-286.
4.
BarryD.MeisiekS. (2010a). Seeing more and seeing differently: Sensemaking, mindfulness, and the workarts. Organization Studies, 31, 1505-1530.
5.
BarryD.MeisiekS. (2010b). The art of leadership and its fine art shadow. Leadership, 6, 331-349.
6.
BeyesT.MichelsC. (2011). The production of educational space: Heterotopia and the business university. Management Learning, 42, 521-536.
7.
Biehl-MissalB. (2011). Business is show business: Management presentations as performance. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 619-645.
8.
BoldenR. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 251-269.
9.
CarrollB.LevyL.RichmondD. (2008). Leadership in practice: Challenging the competency paradigm. Leadership, 4, 363-379.
10.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: SAGE.
11.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3-21.
12.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: SAGE.
13.
CunliffeA. L. (2002). Reflexive dialogical practice in management learning. Management Learning, 33, 35-61.
14.
CunliffeA. L. (2009). The philosopher leader: On relationalism, ethics and reflexivity—A critical perspective to teaching leadership. Management Learning, 40, 87-101.
15.
CunliffeA. L.EriksenM. (2011). Relational leadership. Human Relations, 64, 1425-1449.
16.
DarsøL. (2004). Artful creation: Learning-tales of arts-in-business. Frederiksberg, Denmark: Samfundslitteratur.
17.
De CiantisC. (1995). Using an art technique to facilitate leadership development. Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
18.
DeweyJ. (1934). Art as experience. New York, NY: Perigee (Puntam’s Sons).
19.
DonaldsonL. (2002). Damned by our own theories: Contradictions between theories and management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1, 96-106.
20.
EdwardsG.ElliottC.Iszatt-WhiteM.SchedlitzkiD. (2013). Critical and alternative approaches to leadership learning and development. Management Learning, 44, 3-10.
21.
Gaya-WicksP.RippinA. (2010). Art as experience: An inquiry into art and leadership using dolls and doll-making. Leadership, 6, 259-278.
22.
GhoshalS. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75-91.
23.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24.
GiddensA. (2003). Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives. New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
GioiaD. A.ChittipeddiK. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 433-448.
26.
GrayD. E. (2007). Facilitating management learning: Developing critical reflection through reflective tools. Management Learning, 38, 495-517.
27.
GreyC.MitevN. (1995). Management education: A polemic. Management Learning, 26, 73-90.
28.
GronnP. (2008). The future of distributed leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 46, 141-158.
29.
HansenH.RopoA.SauerE. (2007). Aesthetic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 544-560.
30.
HatchM. J. (1999). Exploring the empty spaces of organizing: How improvisational jazz helps redescribe organizational structure. Organization Studies, 20, 75-100.
31.
HoltR.MacphersonA. (2010). Sensemaking, rhetoric and the socially competent entrepreneur. International Small Business Journal, 28, 20-42.
32.
KhuranaR. (2007). From higher aims to hired hands: The social transformation of American business schools and the unfulfilled promise of management as a profession. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
KoivunenN.WennesG. (2011). Show us the sound! Aesthetic leadership of symphony orchestra conductors. Leadership, 7, 51-71.
34.
KolbA. Y.KolbD. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4, 193-212.
35.
KolbD. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
36.
LadkinD. (2008). Leading beautifully: How mastery, congruence and purpose create the aesthetic of embodied leadership practice. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 31-41.
37.
LakoffG.JohnsonM. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
38.
MainemelisC.BoyatzisR. E.KolbD. A. (2002). Learning styles and adaptive flexibility: Testing experiential learning theory. Management Learning, 33, 5-33.
39.
MantereS.SillinceJ.HämäläinenV. (2007). Music as a metaphor for organizational change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20, 447-459.
40.
MintzbergH. (2004). Managers not MBAs. New York, NY: Harlow.
41.
MirvisP. H. (2005). Large group interventions: Change as theatre. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41, 122-138.
42.
NissleyN. (2010). Arts-based learning at work: Economic downturns, innovation upturns, and the eminent practicality of arts in business. Journal of Business Strategy, 31(4), 8-20.
43.
PalmerI.DunfordR. (1996). Conflicting uses of metaphors: Reconceptualizing their use in the field of organizational change. The Academy of Management Review, 21, 691-717.
44.
PetriglieriG.PetriglieriJ. L. (2010). Identity workspaces: The case of business schools. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9, 44-60.
45.
RaelinJ. (2011). From leadership-as-practice to leaderful practice. Leadership, 7, 195-211.
46.
ReynoldsM. (1998). Reflection and critical reflection in management learning. Management Learning, 29, 183-200.
47.
RopoA.SauerE. (2008). Dances of leadership: Bridging theory and practice through an aesthetic approach. Journal of Management & Organization, 14, 560-572.
StratiA. (1992). Aesthetic understanding of organizational life. Academy of Management Review, 17, 568-581.
50.
SutherlandI. (2013). Arts-based methods in leadership development: Affording aesthetic workspaces, reflexivity and memories with momentum. Management Learning, 44, 25-43.
51.
SutherlandI.LadkinD. (2013). Creating engaged executive learning spaces: The role of aesthetic agency. Organizational Aesthetics, 2, 105-124.
52.
SutherlandI.PurgD. (2011). Arts-based leadership development at the IEDC-Bled School of Management. Business Leadership Review, 7(4), 38-41.
53.
TaylorS. S. (2002). Overcoming aesthetic muteness: Researching organizational members’ aesthetic experience. Human Relations, 55, 821-840.
54.
TaylorS. S. (2008). Theatrical performance as unfreezing: Ties that bind at the Academy of Management. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17, 398-406.
55.
TaylorS. S.FisherD.DufresneR. L. (2002). The aesthetics of management storytelling: A key to organizational learning. Management Learning, 33, 313-330.
56.
TaylorS. S.HansenH. (2005). Finding form: Looking at the field of organizational aesthetics. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1211-1231.
57.
TaylorS. S.LadkinD. (2009). Understanding arts-based methods in managerial development. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8, 55-69.
58.
TaylorS. S.LadkinD. (2010). Leadership as art: Variations on a theme. Leadership, 6, 235-241.
59.
Uhl-BienM. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 654-676.
60.
Uhl-BienM.MarionR.McKelveyB. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 298-318.
61.
VinceR. (1996). Experiential management education as the practice of change. In FrenchR.GreyC. (Eds.), Rethinking management education. London, England: SAGE. 111-131.
62.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. London, England: SAGE.
63.
WeickK. E. (2007). Drop your tools: On reconfiguring management education. Journal of Management Education, 31, 5-16.
64.
WeickK. E.SutcliffeK. M.ObstfeldD. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16, 409-421.
65.
WoodwardJ.FunkC. (2010). Developing the artist leader. Leadership, 6, 295-309.
