Social identity diversity is a concept that links an individual to the social world and to other contexts where interactions occur. However, issues that emerge from social identity diversity may not necessarily be viewed as mono-causal, or based on a single form of difference. Because some individuals may experience simultaneously multiple forms of difference that causes oppression, frameworks are needed to critically analyze how these individuals navigate the complexities of their social identities to gain acceptance, satisfaction, and high levels of performance.
The Solution
Intersectionality will be used as an analytical tool to highlight multiple, interlocking forms of societal oppression experienced by historically marginalized groups and to serve as a means of making sense of these experiences.
Key Stakeholders
Human resource development (HRD) scholars and practitioners who are committed to social justice advocacy.
AckerJ. (2012). Gendered organizations and intersectionality: Problems and possibilities. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 31, 214-224. doi:10.1108/02610151211209072
AlfredM. V.ChlupD. T. (2010). Making the invisible, visible: Race matters in human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12, 332-351.
4.
Association for Women’s Rights in Development. (2004). Intersectionality: A tool for gender and economic justice. Women’s Rights and Economic Change, 9, 1-8.
5.
BantonM. (2000). The idiom of race: A critique of presentation. In BackL.SolomosJ. (Eds.), Racialization (pp. 51-58). London, England: Oxford University Press.
6.
BellE. L.NkomoS. (2001). Our separate ways: Black and White women and the struggle for professional identity. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
7.
BellL. A. (2007). Theoretical foundations for social justice education. In AdamsM.BellL. A.GriffinP. (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice (pp. 1-14). New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
BellM. P.ÖzbilginM. F.BeauregardT. A.SürgevilO. (2011). Voice, silence, and diversity in 21st century organizations: Strategies for inclusion of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender employees. Human Resource Management, 50, 131-146. doi:10.1002/hrm.20401
9.
BendlR.FleischmannA.HofmannR. (2009). Queer theory and diversity management: Reading codes of conduct from a queer perspective. Journal of Management & Organization, 15, 625-638. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/233255881?accountid=14665
BieremaL. L. (2001). Women, work, and learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2001, 53-62. doi:10.1002/ace.40
12.
BieremaL. L. (2010). Resisting HRD’s resistance to diversity. Journal of European Industrial Training, 34, 565-576.
13.
BonnerF. B. (2001). Addressing gender issues in historically Black college and university community: A challenge and call to action. Journal of Negro Education, 70(3), 176-192.
14.
BoogaardB.RoggebandC. (2010). Paradoxes of intersectionality: Theorizing inequality in the Dutch police force through structure and agency. Organization, 17, 53-75. doi:10.1177/1350508409350042
15.
BowlegL. (2008). When Black + lesbian + woman ≠ Black lesbian woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, 59, 312-325.
16.
BowlegL. (2012). The problem with the phrase women and minorities: Intersectionality- an important theoretical framework for Public Health. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 1267-1273. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.300750
17.
ByrdM. Y. (2009). Telling our stories: If we don’t tell them they won’t be told. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 582-605.
18.
ByrdM. Y. (2012). Critical race theory: A framework for examining social identity diversity of black women in positions of leadership. In ScottC.ByrdM. (Eds.), Handbook of research on workforce diversity in a global society: Technologies and concepts (pp. 426-439). Hershey, PA: Business Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-1812-1
19.
ByrdM. Y. (2014). Organizational culture and diversity in the workforce. In ByrdM. Y.ScottC. L. (Eds.), Diversity in the workforce (pp. 59-71). New York, NY: Routledge.
20.
ChooH. Y.FerreeM. M. (2010). Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities. Sociological Theory, 28, 129-149.
21.
CollinsJ. (2012). Identity matters: A critical exploration of lesbian, gay, and bisexual identity and leadership in HRD. Human Resource Development Review, 11, 349-379. doi:10.1177/1534484312446810
22.
CollinsP. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
23.
CongdonM. B. (2009). Sexual minority issues in human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11(6), 3-6.
24.
CoxT. (2001). Creating the multicultural organization: A strategy for capturing the power of diversity. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
25.
CrenshawK. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 140, 139-167.
26.
CrenshawK. (1993). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, andviolence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241-1299.
27.
DavisD. (2009). Transgender issues in the workplace: HRD’s newest challenge/opportunity. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 109-120.
28.
GedroJ. (2012). Leveraging workforce diversity through a critical examination of intersectionalities and divergences between racial minorities and sexual minorities. In ScottC.ByrdM. (Eds.), Handbook of research on workforce diversity in a global society: Technologies and concepts (pp. 56-72), Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
29.
GithensR. P.AragonS. R. (2009). LGBT employee groups: Goals and organizational structures. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 121-135.
30.
GopaldasA. (2013). Intersectionality 101. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 32, 90-94.
31.
GrantJ. M.KoskovichG.FrazerS.BjerkS., National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (U.S.), Services and Advocacy for Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual & Transgender Elders, & National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (U.S.). (2010). Outing age 2010: Public policy issues affecting gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender elders. Washington, DC: National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.
32.
GrantJ. M.MottetL. A.TanisJ.HarrisonJ.HermanJ. L.KeislingM. (2011). Injustice at every turn: A report of the National Transgender Discrimination Survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Transgender Equality and National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.
33.
GriffinP. (2007). Sexism, heterosexism, and transgender oppression. In AdamsM.BellL. A.GriffinP. (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice (pp. 169-172). New York, NY: Routledge.
34.
Hays-ThomasR. (2004). Why now? The contemporary focus on managing diversity. In StockdaleM. S.CrosbyF. J. (Eds.), The psychology and management of workplace diversity (pp. 3-30). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
35.
Holdgreve-ResendezK. D.LarkinM. (2012). I am Black, male, spiritual, an athlete, gay, dyslexic, working full time, a veteran, a son. . . CONFUSED. Campus Activities Programming, 44(7), 7-9.
36.
hooksb. (1984). Feminist theory: From the margin to center. Boston, MA: South End Press.
IngramI. L.WaltersT. S. (2007). A critical reflection model to teach diversity and social justice. Journal of Praxis in Multicultural Education, 2(1), 23-41.
39.
Jean-MarieG.WilliamsV. A.ShermanS. L. (2009). Black women’s leadership experiences: Examining intersectionality of race and gender. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 562-581.
40.
JohnsonL. N.ThomasK. M. (2012). A similar, marginal place in the Academy: Contextualizing the leadership strategies of Black women in the United States and South Africa. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 14(2), 156-171.
41.
KingD. K. (1988). Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a Black feminist ideology. Signs, 14, 42-72.
42.
KnudsenS. V. (2006). Intersectionality: A theoretical inspiration in the analysis of minority cultures and identities in textbooks. In BruillardÉ.AamotsbakkenB.KnudsenS. V.HorsleyM. (Eds.), Caught in the web or lost in the textbook (pp. 61-76). Eighth International Conference on Learning and Educational Media [Caen, October 2005], IARTEM, Australia. Retrieved from http://iartemblog.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/8th_iartem_2005-conference.pdf
43.
KormanikM. B. (2009). Sexuality as a diversity factor: An examination of awareness. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 24-36.
44.
LanehartS. L. (2009). Diversity and intersectionality. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Symposium About Language and Society, Texas Linguistic Forum (Vol. 53, pp. 1-7). Austin, TX: University of Texas.
45.
McCallL. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 1771-1800.
46.
MehrotraG. R. (2013). Diasporic intersectionalities: Exploring south Asian women’s narratives of race, ethnicity, and gender through a community-based performance project. Dissertations Abstract International, 74(2-A) E, 2013.
47.
MeyerD. (2012). An intersectional analysis of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people’s evaluations of anti-queer violence. Gender & Society, 26, 849-873.
48.
MillJ. S.BenthamJ. (1987). Utilitarianism and other essays (RyanA., Ed.) New York, NY: Penguin Group.
49.
MyersL. W. (2002). A broken silence: Voices of African American women in the academy. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
50.
NafukhoF.RoesslerR.KacirekK. (2010). Disability as diversity factor: Implications for human resource practices. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 12, 395-406.
51.
PalG. C. (2011). Disability, intersectionality and deprivation: An excluded agenda. Psychology and Developing Societies, 23, 159-176.
52.
ParentM. C.DeBlaereC.MoradiB. (2013). Approaches to research on intersectionality: Perspectives on gender, LGBT, and racial/ethnic identities. Sex Roles, 68, 639-645. doi:10.1007s11199-013-0283-2
ReicherS.SpearsR.HaslamS. (2010). The social identity approach in social psychology. In WetherellM.MohantyC. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of identities (pp. 45-63). London, England: SAGE. doi:10.4135/9781446200889.n4
56.
RoccoT. S.LandorfH.DelgadoA. (2009). Framing the issue/Framing the question: A propose framework for organizational perspectives on sexual minorities. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 7-23.
57.
RouseS. M.WilkinsonB. C.GarandJ. C. (2010). Divided loyalties? Understanding variation in Latino attitudes toward immigration. Social Science Quarterly, 91, 856-882.
58.
SawyerK.SalterN.ThoroughgoodC. (2013). Studying individual identities is good, but examining intersectionality is better. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6, 80-84.
SpataroS. E. (2005). Diversity in context: How organizational culture shapes reactions to workers with disabilities and others who are demographically different. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23, 21-38. doi:10.1002/bsl.623
61.
SwankE.FahsB. (2013). Intersectional analysis of gender and race for sexual minorities who engage in gay and lesbian rights activism. Sex Roles, 68, 660-674.
62.
SyedM. (2010). Disciplinarity and methodology in intersectionality theory and research. American Psychologist, 65, 61-62. doi:10.1037/a0017495
63.
SymingtonA. (2004). Intersectionality: A tool for gender and economic justice. Women’s Rights & Economic Change, 9, 1-7.
64.
WarnerL. R. (2008). A best practices guide to intersectional approaches in psychological research. Sex Roles, 59, 454-463. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9504-5
65.
WarnerL. R.ShieldsS. A. (2013). The intersection of sexuality, gender, and race: Identity research at the crossroads. Sex Roles, 68, 803-810. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0281-4
66.
WingfieldA. H. (2009). Racializing the glass escalator: Reconsidering men’s experiences with women’s work. Gender & Society, 23, 5-26. doi:10.1177/0891243208323054
