Women continue to be underrepresented in senior academic and general staff positions in universities internationally, and New Zealand universities are no different. In addition, there is limited empirical research on leadership development programs for women.
The Solution.
This article adds to knowledge in the area by describing and discussing the outcomes of the national New Zealand Women in Leadership (NZWIL) program, which is now in its 5th year of operation. A longitudinal case study approach has been adopted including surveys, phone interviews, and an independent evaluation. The findings suggest that the program has been successful on both an individual and organizational level. Individually, participants have increased their self-confidence and networking skills, enabling them, for example, to apply for promotion and gain it.
The Stakeholders.
Postsecondary leaders, human resource development (HRD), and leadership development professionals can learn from the findings of this program and adapt them to their context.
ArdichviliA.ManderscheidS. V. (2008). Emerging practices in leadership development: An introduction. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10, 619-631.
2.
AiriniCollingsS.ConnerL.McPhersonK.MidsonB.WilsonC. (2011). Learning to be leaders in higher education: What helps or hinders women’s advancement as leaders in universities. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(1), 44-62.
3.
BenschopY.BrounsM. (2003). Crumbling ivory towers: Academic organizing and its gender effects. Gender, Work, and Organization, 10, 194-212.
4.
BilimoriaD.JoyS.LiangX. (2008). Breaking barriers and creating inclusiveness: Lessons of organizational transformation to advance women faculty in academic science and engineering. Human Resource Management, 47, 423-441.
5.
BrowningL. (2008). Leading women: The positive impact of women and leadership programs. In GrenzS.KortendiekM.KriszioM.LotherA. (Eds.), Gender equality programmes in higher education: International perspectives (pp. 179-191). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Publisher of Social Sciences.
6.
CallisterP.NewellJ.PerryM.ScottD. (2006). The gendered tertiary education transition: When did it take place and what are some of the possible policy implications?Policy Quarterly, 2(3), 4-13.
7.
ColemanM. (2010). Women-only (homophilious) networks supporting women leaders in education. Journal of Educational Administration, 48, 769-781.
8.
CresswellJ. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
CrossS.ArmstrongC. (2008). Understanding the role of networks in collective learning processes: The experiences of women. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10, 600-613.
10.
DickersonA.TaylorM. A. (2000). Self-limiting behavior in women: Self-esteem and self-efficacy as predictors. Group & Organization Management, 25, 191-210.
11.
DubrinA.DalglishC.MillerP. (2006). Leadership. Milton, Australia: John Wiley.
12.
EaglyA. H.Johannesen-SchmidtM. C. (2007). Leadership style matters: The small, but important, style differences between male and female leaders. In BilimoriaD.PideritS. K. (Eds.), Handbook on women in business and management (pp. 279-303). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
13.
FalkenburgJ. (2003). Decreasing numbers at increasing levels: An investigation of gender imbalance at NHH. Gender, Work and Organization, 10, 175-193.
14.
FloodC.JohnsonC. W.RossC.WilderJ. (2010). Bridging the gap: 16 years of academic leadership for women. NASPA Journal about Women in Higher Education, 3, 163-181.
15.
FulmerR. M.BleakJ. (2008). What have we learned about strategic leadership development? In WankelC.DeFillippiR. (Eds.), University and corporate innovations in lifetime learning (pp. 161-179). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
16.
GaravanT.McCarthyA. (2008). Collective learning processes and human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10, 451-471.
17.
GibsonS. K. (2008). The developmental relationships of women in career transition: Implications for leader development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10, 651-670.
18.
HamlinB.StewartJ. (2011). What is HRD? A definitional review and synthesis of the HRD domain. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35, 199-220.
19.
HarrisonR.KesselsJ. (2004). Human resource development in a knowledge economy: An organizational view. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
HigginsM. C.KramK. E. (2001). Reconceptualising mentoring at work: A developmental network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26, 264-268.
21.
HigginsM. C.ThomasD. A. (2001). Constellations and careers: Toward understanding the effects of multiple developmental relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 223-247.
22.
HollenbeckG. P.HallD. T. (2004). Self-confidence and leaders performance. Organizational Dynamics, 33, 254-269.
23.
HopkinsM. M.O’NeillD. A.PassarelliA.BilimoriaD. (2008). Women’s leadership development: Strategies for women and organizations. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 60, 348-365.
24.
IbarraH. (1993). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 56-87.
JonesC.ConnollyM.GearA.ReadM. (2006). Collaborative learning with group interactive technology: A case study with postgraduate students. Management Learning, 37, 377-396.
27.
KirkpatrickS. A.LockeE. A. (1995). Leadership: Do traits matter? In WrenJ. T. (Ed.), The leader’s companion: Insights on leadership through the ages (1st ed., pp. 133-143). New York, NY: Free Press.
28.
KlootL. (2004). Women and leadership in universities: A Case study of women academic managers. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17, 470-485.
29.
KnightsD.RichardsW. (2003). Sex discrimination in UK academia. Gender, Work, and Organization, 10, 212-238.
30.
KolbJ. A. (1999). The effect of gender role, attitude toward leadership, and self-confidence on leaders emergence: Implications for leadership development. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10, 305-320.
31.
KraisB. (2002). Academia as a profession and the hierarchy of the sexes: Paths out of research in German universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 56, 407-418.
32.
LeeM. (1997). The developmental approach: A critical reconsideration. In BurgoyneJ.ReynoldsM. (Eds.), Management learning (pp. 199-214). London, UK: SAGE.
33.
LeeM. (2001). A refusal to define HRD. Human Resource Development International, 4, 327-341.
34.
LeonardH. S.GoffM. (2003). Leadership development as an intervention for organizational transformation: A case study. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 55, 58-67.
35.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 162-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
36.
LinehanM. (2001). Networking for female managers’ career development: Empirical evidence. Journal of Management Development, 20, 823-829.
37.
Lumin. (2011). Programme evaluation: New Zealand Women in Leadership programme. Wellington, New Zealand: Author
38.
McCarthyH. (2004). Girlfriends in high places. London, UK: Demos.
McCormickM. J. (2001). Self-efficacy and leadership effectiveness: Applying social cognitive theory to leadership. Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(1), 22-33.
41.
McGregorJ. (2010). New Zealand census of women’s participation. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Human Rights Commission.
42.
NorthouseP. G. (2007). Leadership: Theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
43.
PerritonL. (2006). Does woman + network = career progression?Leadership, 2(1), 101-113.
44.
RiggioR. E. (2008). Leadership development: The current state and future expectations. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 60, 338-392.
45.
RipleyD. (2008). Human resource development. In MackyK. (Ed.), Managing human resources: Contemporary perspectives in New Zealand (pp. 306-338). North Ryde, Australia: McGraw-Hill.
46.
RiveraR.ParadiseA. (2006). State of the industry. Washington, DC: American Society for Training and Development.
47.
SengJ. S. (1998). Praxis as a conceptual framework for participatory research in nursing. Advances in Nursing Science, 20(1), 37-48.
48.
SimpsonR.AltmanY. (2000). The time bounded glass ceiling and young women managers: Career progress and career success—Evidence from the United Kingdom. Journal of European Industrial Training, 24, 190-198.
49.
SinghV.VinnicombeS.TerjesenS. (2007). Women advancing onto the corporate board. In BilimoriaD.PideritS. K. (Eds.), Handbook on women in business and management (pp. 304-329). Cheltenham, UK: Edward.
50.
SmithD. (1990). The dictionary of human resource development. Alexandria, VA: ASTD Press.
ThanacoodyP. R.BartramT.BarkerM.JacobsK. (2006). Career progression among female academics: A comparative study of Australia and Mauritius. Women in Management Review, 21, 536-553.
53.
ThomasK. M.BieremaL.LandauH. (2004). Advancing women’s leadership in academe: New directions for research and HRD practice. Equal Opportunities International, 27(7/8), 62-77.
54.
Van ManenM. (1990). Researching the lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
55.
Van VelsorE.McCauleyC. D. (2004). Our view of leadership development. In McCauleyC. D.Van VelsorE. (Eds.), The center for creative leadership: Handbook of leadership development (2nd ed., pp. 1-11). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
56.
VinnicombeS.SinghV. (2003). Women-only management training: An essential part of women’s leadership development. Journal of Change Management, 3, 294-306.
