Despite significant gains in the number of women leaders in higher education, there are still challenges for developing women leaders in higher education.
The Solution.
Effective collaboration between women’s centers and other campus organizations that support women’s leadership can provide opportunities to overcome these barriers. This article presents leadership development programs offered by the Women’s Center at the University of Minnesota, focusing on those facilitated in partnership with the university’s Office of Human Resources. Several lessons emerged from the review: the value of collaborative relationships, the importance of emphasis on individual and system-level leadership, and the need for ongoing assessment and evaluation of the climate for women leaders within postsecondary institutions.
The Stakeholders.
These lessons, and the principles used in implementing them, reveal practices that may be useful for other Women’s Centers, HR departments, and internal and external entities who seek to develop more women leaders in higher education.
BergerM. T.GuidrozK. (2009). The intersectional approach: Transforming the academy through race, class and gender. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
12.
BielbyW. T. (2000). Minimizing workplace gender and racial bias. Contemporary Sociology, 29(1), 120-129.
13.
BonebrightD. A. (2008). Women’s Leadership Institute: Year 10 evaluation report. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Office of Human Resources.
14.
BudworthM. H.MannS. L. (2010). Becoming a leader: The challenge of modesty for women. Journal of Management Development, 29(2), 177-186.
15.
ChuangI. (2010). Interviews with former and current Women’s Leadership Institute participants. Unpublished raw data.
16.
CollinsP. H. (1991). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.
17.
Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering, National Academy of Sciences National Academy of Engineering, & Institute of Medicine. (2007). Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11741
18.
CottledgeA. D. (2007). Examining leadership conceptualization and enactment in African American female administrators in higher education (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.
19.
DavieS. L. (2002). University and college women’s centers: A journey toward equity. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
EvansS. (2003). Tidal wave: How women changed America at century’s end. New York, NY: Free Press.
22.
FriedanB. (1963). The feminine mystique. New York, NY: Norton.
23.
GallM. D.GallJ. P.BorgW. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
24.
GmeinderG. A.GrimesK.MartenB.TowleM.QuanbeckR. (1999). Women’s Leadership Institute. Minneapolis: Network of Women Administrators and Office for University Women, University of Minnesota.
25.
HagbergJ. O. (1984). Real power: Stages of personal power in organizations. Salem, WI: Sheffield.
26.
HammerS. (1978, September). When women have power over women. Ms. Magazine, 7(3), 49.
27.
HelgesenS. (1990). The female advantage: Women’s ways of leadership. New York, NY: Bantam Doubleday Dell.
28.
HofstedeG. (1980, Summer). Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad?Organizational Dynamics, 9(1), 42-63.
IndvikJ. (2004). Women and leadership. In NorthouseP. G. (Ed.), Leadership: Theory and practice (3rd ed., pp. 265-299). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
31.
KerrC.GadeM. (1986). The many lives of academic presidents: Time, place and character. Washington, DC: Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges.
32.
KirkhamG. (2005). Leading and achieving a learning school through developing middle leaders. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(2), 151-163.
33.
KohlstedtS. G.FischerS. M. (2009). Unstable networks among women in academe: The legal case of Shyamala Rajender. Centaurus, 51(1), 37-62.
34.
LachJ. (1999). Minority women hit a “concrete ceiling.”American Demographics, 21(9), 18.
35.
LehmbergS. E.PflaumA. M. (2001). The University of Minnesota, 1945-2000. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
36.
Martínez AlemánA. M.RennK. A. (2002). Women in higher education: An encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
37.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
38.
NorthouseP. G. (2004). Leadership: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
39.
NicklesE.AshcraftL. (1981). The coming matriarchy: How women will gain the balance of power. New York, NY: Seaview.
40.
OpitzD. L. (1999). Three generations in the life of the Minnesota women’s center: A history, 1960-2000. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Women’s Center.
41.
ReskinB. F. (2000). The proximate causes of employment discrimination. Contemporary Sociology, 29, 319-328.
42.
RiosA.LongnionJ. (Eds.). (2000). Agenda for the 21st century: Improving campus climates and the status of women in higher education. Minneapolis, MN: Office of the Associate Vice President for Multicultural and Academic Affairs and Office for University Women, University of Minnesota.
43.
RosenerJ. B. (1990). Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review, 68(6), 119-125.
44.
RosinH. (2010). The end of men. Atlantic Monthly, 306(1), 56-72.
45.
ShakeshaftC. (1987). Women in educational administration. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
46.
SmithD. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
47.
SmithK.MatkinG.FritzS. (2004). A review of gender and full-range leadership research and suggestions for future research. Journal of Leadership Education, 3(2), 52-68.
48.
SpectorJ. (1993). Guide to improving the campus climate for women. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Commission on Women.
49.
SteeleC. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613.
