The problem and the solution . Rational self-interest economic behavior of individuals may lead to undesirable outcomes for the institution. The principal—agent problem and its potential solutions deal with the ways that organizations must pay close attention in the relationships to optimize their physical and human resources for organizational success. Human resource development can play a significant role in facilitating a positive principal—agent relationship.
Akdere, M., & Azevedo, R.E. (2004). Agency theory: Implications for human resource development. In T. M. Egan & M. L. Morris (Eds.), Academy of Human Resource Development 2004 International Conference Proceedings (pp. 827-833). Bowling Green, OH: Academy of Human Resource Development .
2.
Akdere, M., & Azevedo, R.E. (2005). Agency theory from the perspective of human resource development. International Journal of Human Resource Development and Management, 5, 318-332.
3.
Akdere, M., & Azevedo, R.E. (2006). Agency theory implications for efficient contracts in organization development. Organization Development Journal , 24(2), 43-54.
4.
Akdere, M., & Yilmaz, T. (2006). Team performance based compensation plans: Implications for human resources and quality improvement from agency theory perspective . International Journal of Human Resource Development and Management, 6, 77-91.
5.
Arce, D.G. (2007). Is agency theory self-activating? Economic Inquiry, 45, 708-720.
6.
Argyris, C. (1960). Understanding organizational behavior. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
7.
Boyd, G.K. (1994). Board control and CEO compensation. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 335-344.
8.
Cadsby, C.B., Song, F., & Tapon, F. (2007). Sorting and incentive effects of pay for performance: An experimental investigation. Academy of Management Journal , 50, 387-405.
9.
Chang, C.J., & Yen, S.H. (2007). The effects of moral development and adverse selection conditions on managers' project continuance decisions: A study in the Pacific-Rim region. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 347-360.
10.
Conway, N., & Briner R. B. (2005). Understanding psychological contracts at work: A critical evaluation of theory and research. Oxford, UK : Oxford University Press.
Donaldson, L., & Davis, J.H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management , 16, 49-64.
13.
Dougherty, C. (2008, May 26). Siemens bribery case moves to trial in Germany. International Herald Tribune. Retrieved July 21, 2008, from http://www.iht.com
14.
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14, 57-74.
15.
Fama, E., & Jensen, M. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301-325.
16.
Fogarty, T.J., & Dirsmith, M.W. (2001). Organizational socialization as instrument and symbol: An extended institutional theory perspective. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12, 247-266.
17.
Grote, D. (2000). Secrets of performance appraisal: Lessons from the best. Across the Board, 37(5), 14-21.
18.
Hendry, J. (2002). The principal's other problems: Honest incompetence and the specification of objectives. Academy of Management Review, 27, 98-113.
19.
Holmstrom, B. (1979). Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 74-91.
20.
Inside the growing Enron scandal. (2002, January 13). Time Magazine. Retrieved July 23, 2008, from http://www.time.com/time . (With reporting by M. Weisskopf, A. Zagorin, & J. Carney in Washington; C. B. Thomas in Dallas; and B. Baumohl, U. Kher in Philadelphia; and J. Rawe in New York)
21.
Irvin, L. (2002). Ethics in organizations: A chaos perspective. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15, 359-381.
22.
Jensen, M., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics , 11, 5-50.
23.
Joyce, W.B. (2000). Aligning stockholders and manager interests. Journal of Compensation and Benefits, 16, 37-40.
24.
Keser, C., & Willinger, M. (2007). Theories of behavior in principal-agent relationships with hidden action. European Economic Review, 51, 1514-1533.
25.
King, W.R., & Marks, P.V. (2005). Motivating knowledge sharing through a knowledge management system. International Journal of Management Science , 36, 131-146.
26.
Kuchinke, K.P. (2000). The role of feedback in management training settings . Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11, 381-401.
27.
Leeson, N.W., & Whitley, E. (1996). Rogue trader: How I brought down Barings Bank and shook the financial world. Boston: Little, Brown.
28.
Mello, J.A. (2006). Strategic human resource management (2nd ed.). Mason, OH: Thomson Southwestern.
29.
McLean, G.N. (1998). HRD: A three-legged stool, an octopus, or a centipede?Human Resource Development International, 1, 375-377.
30.
Milliman, J., Nason, S., Zhu, C., & Cieri, H.D. (2002). An exploratory assessment of the purposes of performance appraisals in North and Central America and the Pacific Rim. Human Resource Management, 41, 87-102.
31.
The Minnesota Public Radio. (2007, 11 November). Retrieved on June 25, 2008, from http://minnesota.publicradio.org
32.
Nilakant, V., & Rao, H. (1994). Agency theory and uncertainty in organizations: An evaluation. Organization Studies, 15, 649-672.
33.
Pandey, V.K., & Chermack, T.J. (2008). Game theory and strategic human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources . 10, 834-847.
34.
Pennings. J. M. E., & Smidts, A. (2003). The shape of utility functions and organizational behavior. Management Science , 49, 1251-1263.
35.
Reina, D.S., & Reina, M.L. (1999). Trust and betrayal in the workplace. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
36.
Reio, T.G., Jr., & Wiswell A. (2000). Field investigation of the relationship among adult curiosity, workplace learning, and job performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11, 5-30.
37.
Rockenbach, B., Sadrieh, A., & Mathauschek, B. (2007). Teams take the better risks . Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63, 412-422.
38.
Rousseau, D.M. (1996). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39.
The Societe Generale scandal. (2008, February 2). The Financial Express. Retrieved on July 23, 2008, from http://www.financialexpress.com.
40.
Sprenger, R.K. (2004). Trust: The best way to manage (G. Linker, Trans.). London: Cyan Communications.
41.
Sterngold, J. (1990, October 8). Sumitomo chief quits over scandal. The New York Times. Retrieved July 22, 2008, from http://www.nytimes.com.
42.
Swanson, R.A. (1995). Human resource development: Performance is the key. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 6, 207-213.
43.
Swanson, R.A. (1999). HRD theory, real or imagined? Human Resource Development International, 2, 2-5.
44.
Swanson, R.A., & Holton, E.F., III. (2001). Foundations of human resource development. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler .
45.
Turnley, W.H., & Feldman, D.C. (1999). The impact of psychological contract violations on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect. Human Relations, 52, 895-922.
46.
Welbes, J. (2007, December 8). Papers settle suit; Ridder resigns . St. Paul Pioneer Press. Retrieved June 26, 2008, from http://www.twincities.com/mld/pioneerpress
47.
World-class scandal at WorldCom. (2002, June 26). CBS News. Retrieved July 24, 2008, from http://www.cbsnews.com
Zajac, E.J., & Westphal, J.D. (1994). The costs and benefits of managerial incentives and monitoring in large US corporations: When is more not better? Strategic Management Journal, 15, 121-142.
