The problem and the solution. Since the events of September 11, 2001, and Hurricane Katrina during the summer of 2005, the words crisis and disaster evoke images of families stranded on causeways turned islands, surrounded by what little property they could carry; houses smashed by killing winds; and skyscrapers crumbling out of the sky. Disastrous events, such as fires, tornadoes, hurricanes, terrorist incidents, and chemical spills, cause the loss of resources, destruction of property, financial hardship, and death. During these events, local, state, and federal governments commit large numbers of resources, time, and money to mitigate the consequences of the disaster.To manage the response to these events, leaders of public safety organizations and agencies such as fire and police departments, emergency medical services, and health-care organizations, public works departments, private industry, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) descend on the disaster site.These leaders are required to make high consequence decisions with incomplete or inaccurate information, ill-defined goals, and the pressures of time and a constantly changing situation by drawing on their training and experience. This article positions scenario planning and scenario-based training as two cutting-edge methods for organizational leaders to understand better their environments so as to avoid disastrous events and to put in place efficient and effective plans for coping if disaster should strike.
Alby, F., & Zucchermaglio, C. (2006). Afterwards we can understand what went wrong, but now let's fix it: How situated work practices shape group decision making. Organization Studies, 27(7), 943-966.
2.
Babicz, G. (2003). Simulation: Making it real. Quality , 42(4), 90-91.
3.
Bartlett, C., & Ghoshal, S. (2002). Building competitive advantage through people . MIT Sloan Management Review, 43(2), 34-41.
4.
Bloom, M.J., & Menefee, M.K. (1994). Scenario planning and contingency planning. Productivity and Management Review, 17(2), 223-230.
5.
Boin, A., Kofman-Bos, C., & Overdijk, W. (2004). Crisis simulations: Exploring tomorrow's vulnerabilities and threats. Simulation & Gaming, 35(3), 378-393.
6.
Borodzicz, E. (2004). The missing ingredient is the value of flexibility . Simulation & Gaming, 35(5), 414-426.
7.
Borodzicz, E., & van Haperen, K. (2002). Individual and group learning in crisis simulations. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 10(3), 139-147.
8.
Chermack, T.J. (2004). Improving decision-making with scenario planning . Futures, 36(3), 295-309.
9.
Chermack, T.J. (2008). Exploring the impact of scenario planning on participant decision-making styles. In T. J. Chermack , J. Storberg-Walker, & C. Graham (Eds.), Academy of Human Resource Development Conference Proceedings (pp. 799-807). Bowling Green, OH: Academy of Human Resource Development.
10.
Chermack, T.J., & Lynham, S.A. (2002). Definitions and outcome variables of scenario planning. Human Resource Development Review, 1(3), 366-383.
11.
Chermack, T.J., Lynham, S.A., & Ruona, W.E.A. (2001, Summer). A review of scenario planning literature . Futures Research Quarterly, 7-31.
12.
Chermack, T.J., Lynham, S.A., & van der Merwe, L. (2006). Exploring the relationship between scenario planning and perceptions of learning organization characteristics . Futures, 38(7), 767-777.
13.
Chermack, T.J., & van der Merwe, L. (2003). The role of constructivist learning in scenario planning. Futures, 35(5), 445-460.
14.
Chermack, T.J., van der Merwe, L., & Lynham, S.A. (2007). Exploring the relationship between scenario planning and perceptions of strategic conversation quality. Technological Forecasting and Social Change74(3), 379-390.
15.
Cranton, P. (2002). Teaching for transformation. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 93, 63-71.
16.
D'arcy, M., O'Hanlong, M., Orszag, P., Shapiro, J., & Steinberg, J. (2006). Protecting the homeland. New York: Brookings Institution Press.
17.
Davis, P. (2002, July 24, Wednesday). Report calls response at Pentagon successful. Washington Post, p. B.01.
18.
de Geus, A. (1988). Planning as learning. Harvard Business Review, 66(2), 70-74.
19.
de Geus, A.P. (1999). The living company. New York : John Wiley.
20.
Diehl, B.J. (1991). CRISIS: A process evaluation. Simulation & Gaming, 22(3), 293-307.
21.
Dooley, L.M. (2002). Case study research and theory building. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4(3), 335-354.
22.
Dugdale, J., Pallamin, N., & Pavard, B. (2006). An assessment of a mixed reality environment: Toward an ethnomethodological approach. Simulation & Gaming , 37(2), 226-244.
23.
Ellis, S., Mendel, R., & Nir, M. (2006). Learning from successful and failed experience: The moderating role of kind of after-event review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 669-680.
24.
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. (1986).
25.
Encyclopedia Britannica online. (2007). Retrieved February 3, 2007, from http://www.britannica.com/dictionary?hdwd=crisis&book=Dictionary&jump=crisis&list=crisis%3D240388%3Bidentity+crisis%3D524377%3Bmidlife+crisis%3D673836a
26.
Freidman, T. (2005). The world is flat. New York : Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
27.
Funke, J. (1998). Computer-based testing and training with scenarios from complex problem-solving research: Advantages and disadvantages. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6(2), 90-96.
28.
Gore, J., Banks, A., Millward, L., & Kyriakidou, O. (2006). Naturalistic decision making and organizations: Reviewing pragmatic science. Organization Studies, 27(7), 925-942.
29.
Greenhom & O'Mara, Incorporated. (2002 ). World Trade Center building performance study: Data collection, preliminary observations and recommendations. Washington, DC: FEMA.
30.
Helsloot, I. (2005). Bordering on reality: Findings on the Bonfire crisis management simulation. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 13(4), 159-169.
31.
Hermann, M.G. (1997). In conclusion: The multiple pay-offs of crisis simulations. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management , 5(4), 241-243.
32.
Hoffman, B. (2002). Lessons of 9/11: Testimony before the United States Joint September 11, 2001 Inquiry Staff of the House and Senate Select Committees on Intelligence on October 8, 2002. Arlington, VA: Rand Corporation. (Rand Corporation Document No. CT-201)
33.
Holton, E.F., Bates, R.A., & Ruona, W.E.A. (2000). Development of a generalized learning transfer system inventory. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11(4), 333-360.
34.
The Homeland Security Act of 2002, 107-296 6 U.S.C. § 101 (2002).
35.
Issenberg, S.B., Gordon, M.S., Gordon, D.L., & Safford, R.E. (2001). Simulation and new learning technology. Medical Teacher, 23(1), 16-23.
36.
Jenvald, J., & Morin, M. (2004). Simulation-supported live training for emergency response in hazardous environment. Simulation & Gaming , 35(3), 363-377.
37.
Kahane, A. (1992). The Mont Fleur scenarios: What will South Africa be like in the year 2002? (Supplement to the Weekly Mail and The Guardian Weekly). Bellville, South Africa: Global Business Network.
38.
Kahn, H., & Wiener, A.J. (1967). The next thirty-three years: A framework for speculation . Daedalus, 96(3), 705-732.
39.
Kirkley, S.E., & Kirkley, J.R. (2005). Creating next generation blended learning environments using mixed reality, video games and simulations. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 49(3), 42-89.
40.
Klein, G.A. (1999). Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41.
Klein, G.A. (2004). The power of intuition: How to use your gut feelings to make better decisions at work. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
42.
Klein, G.A., & Calderwood, R. (1990). Investigations of naturalistic decision making and the recognition-primed decision model (No. KATR8802Z, ARIRN9059, ADA2260065). Alexandria, VA: Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
43.
Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Korte, R.F., & Chermack, T.J. (2007). Changing organizational culture: Using scenario planning to change the collective mind of the organization . Futures, 39(2), 645-656.
46.
Lebow, D.G., & Wager, W.W. (1994). Authentic activity as a model for appropriate learning activity: Implications for design of computer-based simulations. Paper presented at the 1994 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Nashville, TN.
47.
Lederman, L.C. (1992). Debriefing: Toward a systematic assessment of theory and practice. Simulation & Gaming, 23(2),145-160.
48.
Lindell, M.K., & Perry, R.W. (1992). Behavioral foundations of community emergency planning. Washington, DC: Hemisphere .
49.
Lindell, M.K., Prater, C.S., & Perry, R.W. (2007). Introduction to emergency management. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
50.
Lipshitz, R., Klein, G., & Carroll, J.S. (2006). Introduction to the special issue. Naturalistic decision making and organizational decision making: Exploring the intersections . Organization Studies, 27(7), 917-923.
51.
Lynch, M.D. (2005). Developing a scenario-based training program. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 74(10), 1-8.
52.
Lynham, S.A., & Cunningham, P.W. (2006). HRD in transitioning societies in the developing world: A model and synthesis of perspectives. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 8(1), 116-135.
53.
McKinsey & Company. (2002). Increasing FDNY's preparedness. New York: New York City Fire Department.
54.
McLean, G.N. (2004). National human resource development: What in the world is it? Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6(3), 269-275.
Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult Learning and Continuing Education, 74, 5-12.
59.
Mezirow, J. (2003). Transformative learning as discourse. Journal of Transformative Education, 1(1), 58-63.
60.
Mezirow, J., & Associates. (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
61.
Mintzberg, H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning. London: Prentice Hall.
62.
Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., & Lampel, J. (1998). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. New York: Free Press.
63.
Mirabella, A., & Macpherson, D. (1995). Computer-supported simulation at the National Fire Academy: Lessons learned for incident command training . Washington, DC: U.S. Army Research Institute. (Research Report 1673)
64.
Mitroff, I.I. (2002). Crisis learning: The lessons of failure. The Futurist, 36(5), 19-21.
65.
Mitroff, I.I. (2005a). Disaster planning is an unmitigated disaster: Planning for the next disaster may already be too late. Unpublished manuscript , University of Southern California.
66.
Mitroff, I.I. (2005b). Why some companies emerge stronger and better from a crisis: 7 essential lessons for surviving disaster. New York: American Management Association.
67.
Mitroff, I.I., & Alpasian, M.C. (2003). Coping with a crisis century . USA Today Magazine, 131(2694), p. 18.
Montgomery, H.,Lipshitz, R., & Brehmer, B. (Eds.). (2005). How professionals make decisions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
70.
National Weather Service. (2006). Post-tropical cyclone report for Hurricane Katrina. New Orleans, LA: National Weather Service Forecast Office .
71.
/11 Commission. (2004). The 9/11 commission report. Washington, DC: National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States.
72.
Noe, R.A. (2005). Employee training and development (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
73.
O'Reilly, D.J., & Brandenburg, D.C. (2006, February). Simulation and learning in disaster preparedness: A research and theory review. Paper presented at the AHRD 2006 International Conference, Columbus, OH.
74.
Pearson, C.M., & Clair, J.A. (1998). Reframing crisis management. The Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 59-76.
75.
Phillips, Z. (2006). Emergency preparedness exercises remain an imperfect science. GovExec.com. Retrieved March 4, 2008, from http://www.govexec.com/features/1106-01/1106-01s1.htm
76.
Quanjel, M.M.H., Willems, A.J., & Talen, A.N. (1998). CRISISLAB: Evaluation and improvement of crisis management through simulation/gaming. Simulation & Gaming , 29(4), 450-455.
77.
Reilly, A. (1998). Exploring human resources issues in organizational crises: A preliminary analysis of the banking industry. Current Topics in Management, 3, 283-298.
78.
Reston, M. (2005, September 10). Santorum criticizes weather service . Post-gazette. Retrieved March 4, 2008, from http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05253/569133-84.stm
79.
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 100-707 42 U.S.C. § 5121-5207 (2007).
Sachs, A. (2007, April 30). The crisis doctors. Time Pacific South, 16, pp. 53-54.
82.
Schoemaker, P. (1995). Scenario planning: A tool for strategic thinking . Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 25-40.
83.
Schwartz, P. (1991). The art of the long view. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
84.
Simon, H.A. (1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1-19.
85.
Smith, D. (2004). For whom the bell tolls: Imagining accidents and the development of crisis simulation in organizations. Simulation & Gaming, 35(3), 347-362.
86.
Soy, S.K. (1996). The case study as a research method [Electronic version]. University of Texas, Graduate School of Library and Information Science web site. Retrieved December 1, 2001, from http://www.gslis.utexas.edu/~ssoy/usesusers/l391d1b.htm
87.
Stake, R.E. (1994). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. E. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 236-246). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
88.
Strohschneider, S., & Gerdes, J. (2004). MS ANTWERPEN: Emergency management training for low-risk environments. Simulation & Gaming, 36(3), 394-413.
89.
Swanson, R.A. (2007). Analysis for improving performance: Tools for diagnosing organizations and documenting workplace expertise (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
90.
Taylor, E.W. (1997). Building upon the theoretical debate: A critical review of the empirical studies of Mezirow's transformative learning theory . Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 34-59.
91.
Texas Engineering Extension Service. (2005 ). E IMUC course information. Retrieved March 4, 2008, from http://www.teex.com/teex-third.cfm?area=NERRTC&templateid=176
92.
Titan Systems. (2002). Arlington County after action report on the response to the September 11 terrorist attack on the Pentagon. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
93.
Townsend, F.F. (2006). The federal response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons learned. Washington, DC: The White House.
94.
U.S. Congress. (2006). A failure of initiative: Final report of the select bipartisan committee to investigate the preparation for and response to Hurricane Katrina. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
95.
U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2004 ). National incident management system. Washington, DC: Author.
96.
van der Heijden, K. (2002). Sixth sense: Accelerating organizational learning with scenarios. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
97.
Wack, P. (1985a). Scenarios: Shooting the rapids. Harvard Business Review, 63(5), 139-150.
98.
Wack, P. (1985b). Scenarios: Uncharted waters ahead. Harvard Business Review, 63(5), 73-89.
99.
Wagner, C.G. (2005). Proactive crisis management. The Futurist, 39(2), 6-6.
100.
Walton, J. (1999). Strategic human resource development. London: Financial Times Hall.
101.
Whitcomb, C. (1999). Scenario-based training at the F.B. I. Training and Development, 53(6), 42-46.
102.
Wilson, I., & Ralston, W. (2006). Scenario planning handbook: Developing strategies in uncertain times. Belmont, CA: South-Western Educational.
103.
Yin, R.K. (1981). The case study crisis: Some answers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 58-65.
104.
Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed., Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
105.
Yorks, L. (2004). Toward a political economy model for comparative analysis of the role of strategic human resource development leadership. Human Resource Development Review, 3(3), 198-208.
106.
Yusko, K.P., & Goldstein, H.W. (1997). Selecting and developing crisis leaders using competency-based simulations. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 5(4), 216-223.
