Planning for an uncertain future is problematic yet necessary for organizations to remain viable. Scenario planning helps organizations to increase their capacity to learn and adapt as the future unfolds and results in strategies that more effectively help organizations prepare for an uncertain future. Because organizations are complex, multilevel systems, scenario planners must also focus the complexities of learning across multiple levels of analysis. Fostering the learning processes that support effective implementation of strategy across multiple levels of analysis requires attention to the elements and relationships that drive learning from one level to the next. Few strategies for learning fully articulate and integrate the characteristics of learning at different levels of analysis.This article identifies key elements and relationships constituting learning at multiple levels of analysis—individual, group, organization, and industry—and provides an integrated view of multilevel learning in organizational settings to guide and support strategic planning and implementation.
Ackermann, F., Eden, C., & Brown, I. (2005). The practice of making strategy: A step-by-step guide. London: Sage.
2.
Andrews, K.R. (1971). The concept of corporate strategy. Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin.
3.
Argote, L., & Ophir, R. (2005). Intraorganizational learning. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to organizations (pp. 208-232). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Austin, J.R. (2003). Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance . Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 866-878.
6.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective . Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.
9.
Barr, P. (1998). Adapting to unfamiliar environmental events: A look at the evolution of interpretation and its role in strategic change. Organization Science, 9, 644-699.
10.
Baum, J.A.C., & Ingram, P. (2000). Interorganizational learning and network organization: Toward a behavioral theory of the interfirm. University of Toronto Rotman School of Management, Working Papers, pp. 1-44.
11.
Billett, S. (2002). Critiquing workplace learning discourses: Participation and continuity at work. Studies in the Education of Adults , 34, 56-68.
12.
Burgelman, R.A. (1996). Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. In J. F. Porac, J. R. Meindl, & C. Stubbart (Eds.), Cognition within and between organizations (pp. 405-440). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Carlile, P.R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15, 555-568.
14.
DiBella, A.J., & Nevis, E.C. (1998). How organizations learn: An integrated strategy for building learning capability. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15.
Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383.
16.
Elkjaer, B. (1999). In search of a social learning theory. In M. Easterby-Smith, J. Burgoyne, & L. Araujo (Eds.), Organizational learning and the learning organization: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 75-91). London: Sage.
17.
Fiol, C.M. (1995). Consensus, diversity, and learning in organizations . In J. F. Porac, J. R. Meindl, & C. Stubbart (Eds.), Cognition within and between organizations (pp. 173-206). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Galer, G.S., & van der Heijden, K. (2001). Scenarios and their contribution to organizational learning: From practice to theory. In M. Dierkes, A. B. Antal , J. Child, & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge (pp. 849-864). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
19.
Gilley, J.W., & Maycunich, A. (2000). Organizational learning, performance, and change: An introduction to strategic human resource development. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
Grant, R.M., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2004). A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management Studies , 41, 61-84.
22.
Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C.R. (1993). Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1052-1081.
23.
Greve, H.R. (2005). Interorganizational learning and heterogeneous social structure. Organization Studies, 26, 1025-1047.
24.
Hodgkinson, G.P. (2003). The interface of cognitive and industrial, work and organizational psychology. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 1-25.
25.
House, R., Rousseau, D.M., & Thomas-Hunt, M. (1995). The meso paradigm: A framework for the integration of micro and macro organizational behavior. In L. L. Cummings & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 71-114). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
26.
Huber, G.P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2, 88-115.
27.
Huysman, M. (1999). Balancing biases: A critical review of the literature on organizational learning. In M. Easterby-Smith , J. Burgoyne, & L. Araujo (Eds.), Organizational learning and the learning organization: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 59-74). London: Sage.
28.
Illeris, K. (2002). The three dimensions of learning. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
29.
Ingram, P. (2005). Interorganizational learning. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to organizations (pp. 642-663). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
30.
Janis, I.L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes (2nd ed.). Dallas, TX: Houghton Mifflin.
31.
Kahane, A. (1992). The Mont Fleur scenarios: What will South Africa be like in the year 2002? Deeper News, 7, 1-5. Retrieved December 21, 2007, from www.gbn.com/ArticleDisplayServlet.srv.aid=455
32.
Kasl, E., Marsick, V.J., & Dechant, K. (1997). Teams as learners: A research-based model of team learning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 33, 227-246.
33.
Katzenbach, J.R., & Smith, D.K. (1993). The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
34.
Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. (1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor. Journal of Management, 20, 403—437.
35.
Kozlowski, S.W., & Klein, K.J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 3-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
36.
Lant, T.K., Milliken, F.J., & Batra, B. (1992). The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistence and reorientation: An empirical exploration. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 585-608.
37.
Lubatkin, M., Florin, J., & Lane, P. (2001). Learning together and apart: A model of reciprocal interfirm learning. Human Relations, 54, 1353-1382.
38.
Merriam, S.B., & Caffarella, R.S. (1999). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39.
Mintzberg, H., & McHugh, A. (1985). Strategy formation in an adhocracy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 160-197.
40.
Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J.A. (1985). Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6, 257-272.
41.
Narayanan, V.K., & Fahey, L. (2006). Institutional evolution as an emerging focus in scenario planning. Futures, 38, 972-992.
42.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
43.
Pfeffer, J. (2001). Fighting the war for talent is hazardous to your organization's health. Organizational Dynamics, 29, 248-259.
44.
Porac, J.F., Meindl, J.R., & Stubbart, C. (1996). Introduction. In J. F. Porac, J. R. Meindl, & C. Stubbart (Eds.), Cognition within and between organizations (pp. ix-xxiii). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
Porter, M.E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.
46.
Prahalad, C.K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). The future of competition: Co-creating unique value with customers. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
47.
Prahalad, C.K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, May-June, 79-91.
48.
Prange, C. (1999). Organizational learning: Desperately seeking theory? In M. Easterby-Smith, J. Burgoyne, & L. Araujo (Eds.), Organizational learning and the learning organization: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 23-43). London: Sage.
49.
Ritter, T., & Gemunden, H.G. (2003). Interorganizational relationships and networks: An overview. Journal of Business Research, 56, 691-697.
50.
Rivera, M.A., & Rogers, E.M. (2006). Innovation diffusion, network features, and cultural communication variables. Problems and Perspectives in Management4, 126-135.
51.
Rummler, G.A., & Brache, A.P. (1995). Improving performance: How to manage the white space on the organization chart (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
52.
Schein, E. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
53.
Schulz, M. (2001). The uncertain relevance of newness: Organizational learning and knowledge flows. Academy of Management Journal , 44, 661-681.
54.
Schulz, M. (2005). Organizational learning. In J. A. C. Baum (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to organizations (pp. 415-441). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
55.
Schwartz, P. (1996). The art of the long view: Paths to strategic insight for yourself and your company. New York: Currency Doubleday.
56.
Schweiger, D.M., Sandberg, W.R., & Rechner, P. (1989). Experiential effects of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus approaches to strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 745-772.
57.
Scott, W.R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
58.
Senge, P.M. (1991). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday Currency.
59.
Simons, T., Pelled, L.H., & Smith, K.A. (1999). Making use of difference: Diversity, debate and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 662-673.
60.
Swanson, R.A. (1996). Analysis for performance: Tools for diagnosing organizations & documenting workplace expertise. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
61.
Swanson, R.A., & Holton, E.F., III. (2001). Foundations of human resource development. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler .
62.
Tennant, M. (2006). Psychology and adult learning (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
63.
Van der Heijden, K. (2005). Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation (2nd ed.). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley.
64.
Van der Heijden, K., Bradfield, R., Burt, G., Cairns, G., & Wright, G. (2002). The sixth sense: Accelerating organizational learning with scenarios. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley.
65.
Weick, K.E., & Roberts, K.H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 357-381.
66.
Weick, K.E., & Sutcliffe, K.M. (2001). Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
67.
Yang, B. (2003). Toward a holistic theory of knowledge and adult learning. Human Resource Development Review, 2, 106-129.
68.
Yorks, L. (2005). Strategic human resource development. Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western.
