The two-step process of scenario building and action planning that constitutes scenario planning enables methodological rigor, theory testing, and good inquiry to be demonstrated by researchers through established criteria. This article focuses on the philosophical underpinnings of scenario planning that have not been addressed in the human resource development literature and that are treated as problematic from a theoretical perspective because of the conjectural nature of the future. This article categorizes these underpinnings and reviews the claims that can be made with respect to their ontological and epistemological status. A pragmatic perspective that builds on critical realist and constructivist—interpretive paradigms to emphasize decision-making utility as the outcome of inquiry rather than testable knowledge production is proposed.
Allen, R. E. (Ed.). (1991). The concise Oxford dictionary. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
2.
Anscombe, G.E.M. (1958). On brute facts. Analysis, 18(3), 69-72.
3.
Aristotle. (1991). On rhetoric: A theory of public discourse. ( G. A. Kennedy, Trans. & Ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 5th century B.C.).
4.
Bell, W. (2003). Foundations of futures studies: History, purposes and knowledge (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction .
5.
Bhaskar, R. (1997). A realist theory of science (2nd ed.). New York: Verso.
6.
Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matters in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195-203.
7.
Börjeson, L., Höjer, M., Dreborg, K.-H., Ekvall, T., & Finnveden, G. (2006). Scenario types and techniques: Towards a user's guide. Futures, 38(7), 723-739.
8.
Burnside, R. (1991). Visioning: Building pictures of the future. In J. Henry & D. Walker (Eds.), Managing innovation (pp. 177-190). London: Sage.
9.
Chermack, T. (2004). A theoretical model of scenario planning. Human Resource Development Review, 3(4), 301-325.
10.
Chermack, T., & Walton, J.S. (2006). Scenario planning as a development and change intervention. International Journal of Agile Systems and Management , 1(1), 46-59.
11.
Collins, S.L., & Walton, J.S. (2006, February). Career development and the future world of work for executive women. Paper presented at the AHRD 2006 Conference Research and Theory Symposium, Columbus, OH.
12.
Daft, R.L. (1999). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sydney, Australia : Harcourt Brace.
Dewey, J. (1938). Logic—The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt.
15.
Dewey, J. (1979). The quest for certainty. New York: Paragon.
16.
Emcc. (2006). Future stories—Using scenarios to anticipate change. Retrieved October 15, 2006, from http://www.emcc.eurofound.eu.int/exchange.htm
17.
Ernst, P. (1995). The one and the many. In L. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 459-486). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Fahey, L., & Randall, R.M. (1998). Learning from the future: Competitive foresight scenarios. New York: John Wiley .
19.
Fowles, J. (1978). Handbook of futures research. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
20.
Godet, M. (2001). Creating futures: Scenario planning as a strategic management tool. London: Economica .
21.
Habermas J. (1987). Knowledge and human interests. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
22.
Hammersley, M. (1990). Reading ethnographic research: A critical guide . London: Longman.
23.
Heisenberg, W. (1983). On the physical content of quantum kinematics and mechanics. In A. Wheeler & H. Zurek (Eds. & Trans.), Quantum theory and measurement (pp. 62-84). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1927 )
24.
Helfrich, G. (2002). Pragmatism with Richard Rorty, professor of comparative literature and philosophy, Stanford University, James Conant, professor in Department of Philosophy, University of Chicago, Hilary Putnam, professor emeritus, Department of Philosophy, Harvard University from Odyssey USA [Radio broadcast]. Retrieved June 6, 2006, from http://www.chicagopublicradio.org
25.
Hideg, E. (2006). Implications of two new paradigms for futures studies. In R. Slaughter (Ed.), Knowledge base of futures studies [CD-ROM]. Indooroopilly , Australia: Foresight International.
26.
Honderich, T. (Ed.). (1995). The Oxford companion to philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
Inayatollah, S. (2002). Pedagogy, culture and future studies. In J. A. Dator (Ed.), Advancing future studies in higher education (pp. 109-122). Westport, CT : Praeger.
28.
James, W. (1907). What pragmatism means? Lecture 2 from pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking. New York: Longman Green.
29.
Kleiner A. (1994). Creating Scenarios. In P. M. Senge, A. Kleiner, C. Roberts, R. B. Ross , & B. J. Smith (Eds.), The fifth discipline field handbook (pp. 275-278). London: Nicholas Brealey.
30.
Lynham, S.A. (2002). The general method of theory-building in applied disciplines. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4(3), 221-241.
31.
Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Meadows, D. (2005). Limits to growth. London: Earthscan.
32.
Mitchell, T.D., & Hulme, M. (1999). Predicting global climate change: Living with uncertainty. Progress in Physical Geography, 23(1), 57-78.
33.
Moore, M.S. (2002). Legal reality: A naturalist approach to legal ontology. Law and Philosophy, 21(6), 619-705.
34.
Moyer, K. (1996). Scenario planning at British Airways—A case study. Long Range Planning, 29(2), 172-181.
35.
Parsons, A. (2005). The mundane computer: Non-technical design challenges facing ubiquitous computing and ambient intelligence. Tangentium , 2(2).
36.
Patomaki, H., & Wight, C. (2000). After postpositivism? The promises of critical realism. International Studies Quarterly, 44(2), 213-237.
37.
Polya, G. (1990). How to solve it? A new aspect of mathematical method. London: Penguin. (Original work published 1945).
38.
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
Rothwell, W.J., & Kazanas, H.C. (1989). Strategic human resource development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
40.
Ruona, W.E.A., & Lynham, S.A. (2004). A philosophical framework for thought and practice in human resource development. Human Resource Development , 7(2), 151-164.
41.
Schneider, S.H. (1983). CO2, climate and society: A brief overview. In R. S. Chen, E. Boulding, & S. H. Schneider (Eds.), Social sciences research and climate change: An interdisciplinary appraisal (pp. 9-16). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: D. Reidel.
42.
Schwartz, P. (1991). The art of the long view. New York: Doubleday.
43.
Searle, J.R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.
44.
Short, D. C., & Bing, J. W. (Eds.). (2003). Shaping the future of HRD [Special issue]. Advances in Developing Human Resources , 5(3).
45.
Skinner, D., Tagg, C., & Holloway, J. (2000). Managers and research: The pros and cons of qualitative approaches. Management Learning, 31(2), 163-179.
46.
Slaughter, R.A. (1993). The substantive knowledge base of future studies , Futures, 25(3), 227-233.
47.
Slaughter, R.A. (1996). The knowledge base of futures studies as an evolving process. Futures, 28, 799-812.
48.
Smith, J.K., & Deemer, D.K. (2003). The problem of criteria in the age of relativism . In N. K. Denzin & Y. S Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (2nd ed., pp. 427-457). London: Sage.
49.
Tapio, P., & Hitanen, O. (2002). Epistemology and public policy: Using a new typology to analyse the paradigm shift in Finnish transport futures studies. Futures, 34(7), 597-620.
50.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Sensory experience, abstraction and teaching. In L. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 3-16). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
51.
Walton, J. (1999). Strategic human resource development. Harlow, UK: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
52.
Ward, E., & Schriefer, A.E. (1998). Dynamic scenarios: Systems thinking meets scenario planning. In L. Fahey & R. M. Randall (Eds.), Learning from the future: Competitive foresight scenarios (pp. 140-156). New York: John Wiley.
53.
Wicks, C.A., & Freeman, R.E. (1998). Organization studies and the new pragmatism: Positivism, anti-positivism, and the search for ethics. Organization Science , 9(2), 123-140.
54.
Wikipedia. (2006). Futurology . Retrieved October 28, 2006, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futurology
55.
Wilkinson, H. (2002). The future of careers in a mobile work culture . In I. Daniels & J. Schramm (Eds.), The future of careers (pp. 7-17). London: CIPD.
56.
Wilson, D., & Purushothaman, R. (2003). Dreaming with BRICs: The path to 2050 (Global Economics Paper 99). New York : Goldman Sachs.
57.
Wilson, I. (1998). Mental maps of the future: An intuitive logics approach to scenarios. In L. Fahey & R. M. Randall (Eds.), Learning from the future: Competitive foresight scenarios (pp. 81-108). New York: John Wiley.
58.
Zúñiga, G.L. (1999). An ontology of economic objects: An application of Carl Menger's ideas. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 58(2), 299-312.
