The problem and the solution. In this conceptual study, social capital theories are used to illuminate the practice of borrowing theories for HRD research and practice. “Borrowing” from other disciplines is an implicit, taken-for-granted practice in HRD theory development that has avoided scrutiny. Since HRD is a multiparadigm discipline, borrowing theories from monoparadigm disciplines can cause theoretical and logical inconsistencies. This study offers a way to organize borrowed social capital theories by categorizing them by paradigm and, ultimately, by the goal of the research and the desired HRD outcome. The article then offers a six-step process for borrowing theories from other disciplines. Ultimately, the article seeks an answer to the question: How can/should HRD borrow social capital theories to help achieve various (and contested) HRD outcomes?
Acker, J. (2006). Class questions: Feminist answers. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
2.
Adler, P.S., & Kwon, S.W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17—40.
3.
Aguilera, M.B., & Massey, D.S. (2003). Social capital and the wages of Mexican migrants: New hypotheses and tests. Social Forces, 82(2), 671—701.
4.
Argyris, C., & Schön, D.A. (1978). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Baron, S., Field, J., & Schuller, T. (2000). Social capital: Critical perspectives. London: Oxford University Press.
6.
Borgatti, S.P., & Foster, P.C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991—1013.
7.
Brass, D.J., Butterfield, K.D., & Skaggs, B.C. (1998). Relationships and unethical behavior: A social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), p. 14—31.
8.
Brass, D.J., & Labianca, G. (1999). Social capital, social liabilities, and social resources management. In R. J. Leenders & S. M. Gabbay (Eds.), Corporate social capital and liability (pp. 323—340). Boston: Kluwer.
9.
Brown, P., & Lauder, H. (2000). Human capital, social capital, and collective intelligence. In S. Baron, J. Field, & T. Schuller (Eds.), Social capital: Critical perspectives (pp. 226—242). London: Oxford University Press.
10.
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis . Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
11.
Burt, R. (1987). Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 92(6), 1287—1335.
12.
Burt, R., Hogarth, R.M., & Michaud, C. (2000). The social capital of French and American managers . Organization Science11(2), 123—147.
13.
Cohen, D., & Prusak, L. (2001). In good company: How social capital makes organizations work. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
14.
Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital . American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95—121.
15.
Contu, A., & Willmott, H. (2003). Re-embedding situatedness: The importance of power relations in learning theory. Organization Science, 14(3), 283—296.
16.
Cross, R., & Cummings, J.N. (2003). Relational and structural network correlates of individual performance in knowledge intensive work. Academy of Management Annual Conference Best Papers, 2003.
17.
Cross, R., & Parker, A. (2004). The hidden power of social network: Understanding how work really gets done in organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
18.
Cross, R., & Sproull, L. (2004). More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organization Science15(4), 446—462.
19.
Dess, G.G., & Shaw, J.D. (2001). Voluntary turnover, social capital, and organizational performance. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 446—456.
20.
Dubin, R. (1978). Theory building. New York: Free Press.
21.
Emirbayer, M., & Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. The American Journal of Sociology, 99(6), 1411-1454.
22.
Erickson, B.H. (1996). Culture, class, connections. American Journal of Sociology, 102(1), 217—251.
23.
Fenwick, T. (2005). Conceptions of critical HRD: Dilemmas for theory and practice. Human Resource Development International, 8(2), 225—238.
24.
Fevre, R. (2000). Socializing social capital: identity, the transition to work, and economic development. In S. Baron , J. Field, & T. Schuller (Eds.), Social capital: Critical perspectives. London: Oxford University Press.
25.
Field, J., Schuller, T., & Baron, S. (2000). Social capital and human capital revisited. In S. Baron, J. Field, and T. Schuller (Eds.), Social capital: Critical perspectives (pp. 243—263). London : Oxford University Press.
26.
Fine, B. (2001). Social capital versus social theory: Political economy and social science at the turn of the millennium. London: Routledge.
27.
Fine, B. (2002). They f**k you up those social capitalists. Antipode, 34(4), 786—799.
28.
Fine, B., & Green, F. (2000). Economics, social capital, and the colonization of the social sciences. In S. Baron, J. Field, and T. Schuller (Eds.), Social capital: Critical perspectives (pp. 78—93). London: Oxford University Press.
29.
Gabbay, S.M., & Zuckerman, E.W. (1998). Social capital and opportunity in corporate RD: The contingent effect of contact density on mobility expectations . Social Science Research, 27, 189—217.
30.
Gant, J., Ichniowski, C., & Shaw, K. (2002). Social capital and organizational change in high-involvement and traditional work organizations. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 11(2), 289—328.
31.
Gioia, D.A., & Pitre, E. (1989). Multiple perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584—602.
32.
Hansen, M.T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly,44(1), 82—111.
33.
Hatcher, T. (2002). Ethics and HRD: A new approach to leading responsible organizations. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books Group.
34.
Hodson, R. (2005). Management behavior and social capital: A systematic analysis of organizational ethnographies. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43(1), 41—65.
35.
Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 422—447.
36.
Ibarra, H. (1995). Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 673—703.
37.
Kelly, M. (2003). The divine right of capital: Dethroning the corporate aristocracy. San Francisco: Berrett-Kohler .
38.
Kogut, B. (2000). The network as knowledge: Generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 405—425.
39.
Korten, D.C. (1999). The post-corporate world: Life after capitalism . San Francisco: Berrett-Kohler .
40.
Korten, D.C. (2006). The great turning: From empire to earth community . San Francisco: Berrett-Kohler .
41.
Kozlowski, S.W.J., & Klein, K.J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal and emergent processes. In K. Klien & S. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3—91). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42.
Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohria & R. C. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 216-239). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
43.
Krackhardt, D., & Hansen, J.R. (1993). Informal networks: The company behind the chart . Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 104—111.
44.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation . New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Leana, C.R., & Van Buren, H.J. , III (1999). Organizational social capital and employment practices. Academy of Management Review , 24(3), 538—555.
46.
Lewis, M.W., & Grimes, A.J. (1999). Metatriangulation: Building theory from multiple perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 672—690.
47.
Lin, N. ( 2000). Inequality in social capital. Contemporary Sociology, 29(6), 785—795.
48.
Lin, N. ( 2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action . New York: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Lin, N., & Dumin, M. (1986). Access to occupations through social ties. Social Networks, 8, 365—385.
50.
Lin, N., Ensel, W.M., & Vaughn, J.C. (1981). Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational attainment. American Sociological Review, 46, 393—405.
51.
Loscocco, K.A., & Spitze, G. (1990). Working conditions, social support, and the well-being of females and male factory workers. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 31(4), 313—327.
52.
Lynham, S. (2002). The general method of applied theory building research. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4(3), 221—241.
53.
Lyons, T.S. (2002). Building social capital for rural enterprise development: Three case studies in the United States. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 7(2), 193—216.
54.
Maloney, W.A., Smith, G., & Stoker, G. (2000). Social capital and associated life. In S. Baron, J. Field, & T. Schuller (Eds.), Social capital: Critical perspectives (pp. 212—225). London: Oxford University Press.
55.
Marshall, C. (2002). Teacher unions and gender equity policy for education . Educational Policy, 16(5), 707—730.
56.
Maskell, P. (2000). Social capital, innovation, and competitiveness . In S. Baron, J. Field, & T. Schuller (Eds.). Social capital: Critical perspectives (pp. 111—123). London: Oxford University Press.
57.
McGoldrick, J., Stewart, J., & Watson, S. (2001). Theorizing human resource development. Human Resource Development International, 4(3), 343—356.
58.
Merton, R.K. (1968). Social theory and social structure (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
59.
Mollica, K.A., Gray, B. & Trevinó, L.K. (2003). Racial homophily and its persistence in newcomers' social networks. Organization Science14(2), 123—136.
60.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242—266.
61.
Padgett, J.F., & Ansell, C.K. (1993). Robust action and the rise of the Medici. American Journal of Sociology98, 1259—1319.
62.
Paechter, C. (2006). Power, knowledge and embodiment in communities of sex/gender practice. Women's Studies International Forum29, 13—26.
63.
Patterson, L. (2000). Civil society and democratic renewal. In S. Baron, J. Field, & T. Schuller (Eds.), Social capital: Critical perspectives (pp. 39—55). London : Oxford University Press.
64.
Poole, M.S., & Van de Ven, A.H. (1989). Using paradox to build management and organization theories. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 562—578.
65.
Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1—24.
66.
Portes, A. (2000). The two meanings of social capital. Sociological Forum, 15(1), 1—12.
67.
Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
68.
Reagans, R., & Zuckerman, E.W. (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organization Science, 12(4), 502—517.
69.
Rob, R., & Zemsky, P. (2002). Social capital, corporate culture, and incentive intensity. RAND Journal of Economics33(2), 243—257.
70.
Schuller, T., Baron, S., & Field, J. (2000). Social capital: A review and critique. In S. Baron, J. Field, & T. Schuller (Eds.), Social capital: Critical perspectives (pp. 1—38). London: Oxford University Press.
71.
Silvey, R., & Elmhirst, R. (2003). Engendering social capital: Women workers and rural-urban networks in Indonesia's crisis. World Development , 31(5), 865—879.
72.
Sparrowe, R.T., Liden, R.C., Wayne, S.J., & Kraimer, M.L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 316—325.
73.
Stevenson, W.B., & Greenberg, D. (2000). Agency and social networks: Strategies of action in a social structure of position, opposition, and opportunity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 651—678.
74.
Stoloff, J.A., Glanville, J.L., & Bienenstock, E.J. (1999). Women's participation in the labor force: The role of social networks. Social Networks , 21, 91—108.
75.
Storberg, J. (2002). The evolution of capital theory: A review of a theory of social capital and implications for HRD. Human Resource Development Review, 1(4), 468-499.
76.
Storberg-Walker, J. (2006). From imagination to application: Making the case for the general method of theory building research in applied disciplines . Human Resource Development International, 9(2), 227—259.
77.
Straits, B.C. (1996). Ego-net diversity: Same- and cross-sex coworker ties. Social Networks, 18, 29—45.
78.
Suitor, J., & Keeton, S. (1997). Once a friend, always a friend? Effects of homophily on women's support networks across a decade. Social Networks , 19, 51—62.
79.
Sullivan, M.I. (1989). Getting paid: Youth crime and work in the inner city. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
80.
Szreter, S. (2000). Social capital, the economy, and education in historical perspective. In S. Baron, J. Field, & T. Schuller (Eds.), Social capital: Critical perspectives (pp. 56—77). London: Oxford University Press.
81.
Tenkasi, R.V., & Chesmore, M.C. (2003). Social networks and planned organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science , 39(3), 281—300.
82.
Torraco, R.J. (1997). Theory-building research methods. In R. A. Swanson & E. F. Holton III (Eds.), Human resource development handbook: Linking research and practice (pp. 114—137). San Francisco : Barrett-Koehler.
83.
Torraco, R.J. (2002). Research methods for theory building in applied disciplines: A comparative analysis. Advances in DevelopingHuman Resources, 4(3), 355—376.
84.
Torraco, R.J. (2004). Challenges and choices for theoretical research in human resource development. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 15(2), 171—188.
85.
Torraco, R.J. (2005). Theory building research methods. In R. A. Swanson & E. F. Holton III (Eds.), Research in organizations: Foundations and methods of inquiry (pp. 351—374). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
86.
Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464—476.
87.
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in inter-firm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 35—67.
88.
Wacquant, L.J.D., & Wilson, W.J. (1989). The cost of racial and class exclusion in the inner city. Annals of the American Academy of PoliticalSocial Science, 501, 8—26.
89.
Waldinger, R. (1995). The “other side” of embeddedness: A case study of the interplay between economy and ethnicity. Ethnographic Racial Studies18, 555—580.
90.
Watkins, K.E., & Marsick, V.J. (1993). Sculpting the learning organization: Lessons in the art and science of systemic change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
91.
Weick, K.E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination . Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 516—531.
92.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
93.
Woolcock, M. & Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), 225—249.
