The problem and the solution. Studies tracking the performance impact of progressive human resource management (HRM) practices have invariably included management training as a key element. By definition, such research explains much about the collective impact of HRM practices but does not allow us to assess the specific contribution of management training and development practices. Furthermore, the field is dominated by studies conducted in the United States. Here, the key messages emerging from the current study of management training and development in a European context are summarized. In so doing, implications for future research and professional practice are outlined.
Becker, B.,& Gerhart, B. (1996). The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 779-801.
2.
Becker, B., & Huselid, M. (1998). High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications. In G. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resource management(Vol. 6, pp. 53-101). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
3.
Bournois, F., Chauchat, J. C.,& Rousillon, S. (1993). Training and management development in Europe. In C. Brewster & A. Hegewisch (Eds.), Policy and practice in European human resource management(pp. 122-138). London: Routledge.
4.
Brewster, C., & Hegewisch, A. (1994). Policy and practice in European HRM. London: Routledge.
5.
Brewster, C., Marhofer, W., & Morley, M. (2004). HRM in Europe: Evidence of convergence?Oxford, UK: Butterworth Heinemann.
6.
Centre for Training Policy Studies. (1994). Continuing training in enterprises: Facts and figures. Sheffield, UK: Centre for Training Policy Studies, University of Sheffield.
7.
Centre for Training Policy Studies. (1997). Continuing training in enterprises: Facts and figures. Sheffield, UK: Centre for Training Policy Studies, University of Sheffield.
8.
Espedal, B. (2004). Management and leadership development in Norway: Discrepancies between talk and action. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6(4), 470-485.
9.
Evans, P., Lank, E.,& Farquar, A. (1989). The dualistic organization. In P. Evans, Y. Doz, & A. Laurent (Eds.), Human resource management in international firms: Change, globalization and innovation(pp. 113-143). London: Macmillan.
10.
Gray, C. (2004). Management development in European small and medium enterprises. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6(4), 451-469.
11.
Lane, C. (1989). Management and labor in Europe. London: Edward Elgar.
12.
Larsen, H. (2000). In search of management development in Europe: From self-fulfilling prophecies to organizational competence. In C. Brewster, W. Mayrhofer, & M. Morley (Eds.), New challenges in European HRM(pp. 168-196). London: Macmillan.
13.
Larsen, H. H. (2004). Experiential learning as management development: Theoretical perspectives and empirical illustrations. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6(4), 486-503.
14.
Mabey, C. (2004). Developing managers in Europe: Policies, practices, and impact. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6(4), 404-427.
15.
Purcell, J., Kinnie, N., Hutchinson, S., Rayton, B.,& Swart, J. (2003). Understanding the people and performance link: Unlocking the black box. London: Chartered Institute of People Development.
16.
Ramirez, M. (2004). Comparing European approaches to management education, training and development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 6(4), 428-450.
17.
Sambrook, S., & Stewart, J. (2000). Factors influencing learning in European learning oriented organizations: Issues for management. Journal of European Industrial Training, 24, 209-219.
18.
Sparrow, P. (1998). Reappraising psychological contracting: Lessons for the field of human resource development from cross-cultural and occupational psychology research. International Studies of Management and Organization, 28(1), 30-63.
19.
Tregaskis, O. (1997). The role of national context and HRstrategy in shaping training and development practice in UK and French organizations. Organization Studies, 18, 839-856.
