Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Success Central is a peer mentoring program developed at a mid-size regional university to support the persistence of college students. Success Central peer mentors use college life coaching techniques to help mentees build the skills necessary for college success. This paper will begin with an introduction to issues affecting the persistence of residential versus commuter students. The differential impact that Success Central has on residential versus commuter student success will be examined via statistical analyses. The paper will end with a discussion of the results and case examples illustrating the model.

Keywords

persistence retention peer mentoring peer coaching resident students commuter students

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anft

(2018, July 1). Student needs have changed. Advising must change, too. Chronicle of Higher Education, 64(37), 24.

Astin

A. W.

(1993). Diversity and multiculturalism on the campus: How are students affected? Change, 25(2), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1993.9940617

Bettinger

E. P.

Baker

R. B.

(2013). The effects of student coaching: An evaluation of a randomized experiment in student advising. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713500523

Bozick

(2007). Making it through the first year of college: The role of students’ economic resources, employment, and living arrangements. Sociology of Education, 80(3), 261–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070708000304

Coleman Tucker

(2014, March 8). First generation. Chronicle of Higher Education, 60, 24–28.

Dennis

J. M.

Phinney

J. S.

Chuateco

L. I.

(2005). The role of motivation, parental support, and peer support in the academic success of ethnic minority first-generation college students. Journal of College Student Development, 46(3), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2005.0023

López Turley

R. N.

Wodtke

(2010). College residence and academic performance: Who benefits from living on campus? Urban Education, 45(4), 506–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085910372351

J. R.

Pender

Welch

(2019). Education pays 2019: The benefits of higher education for individuals and society. College Board.

Melendez

M. C.

(2019). The influence of residential status on the adjustment to college at four urban universities. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 20(4), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025116678853

10.

Mitchell

B. O.

(2013). Relationship of peer mentoring to academic success and social engagement for first year college students [Doctoral dissertation]. North Carolina Agricultural and Technical University.

11.

National Student Clearinghouse Research Center . (2021). Snapshot report: Persistence and retention. Retrieved from https://nscresearchcenter.org/persistence-retention/.

12.

Schwartz

S. E.

Kanchewa

S. S.

Rhodes

J. E.

Gowdy

Stark

A. M.

Horn

J. P.

Spencer

(2018). I’m having a little struggle with this, can you help me out?”: Examining impacts and processes of a social capital intervention for first-generation college students. American Journal of Community Psychology, 61(1–2), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12206

13.

Secreti

(2018). Extension of a commuter advisor and engagement program. Higher Education Student Work, 27, 1–58.

14.

Servies

C. M.

(1999). Mentoring and retention at a commuter campus (Order No. 3017681). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (276354310). Retrieved from https://ccsu.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/mentoring-retention-at-commuter-campus/docview/276354310/se-2?accountid=9970.

15.

Simmons

Castillo

(2018). Peer coaching: A model for supporting the persistence of first- generation college students. In Whalen

(Ed.), Proceedings of the 14^th national symposium on student retention (pp. 296–305). The University of Oklahoma.

16.

Simmons

Castillo

Wallington

Pasion

(2019). Success central: Using peer coaching to support the persistence of first-year college students. In Whalen

(Ed.), Proceedings of the 15^th national symposium on student retention (pp. 389–398). The University of Oklahoma.

17.

Simmons

Shea Smith

(2020). Success central: Addressing the persistence of African-American and latinx college students using a peer success coaching intervention. Innovative Higher Education, 45(5), 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-020-09516-8

18.

Simpson

D. B.

Burnett

(2017). Commuters versus residents: The effects of living arrangement and student engagement on academic performance. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 21(3), 286–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025117707516

19.

Switzer

(1988, November). Commuter and residential campuses: Academic and co-curricular implications for speech communication faculty. Paper presented at Speech Communication Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 301-892).

20.

Tinto

(1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125 https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543045001089

Success Central: Examining the Relationship Between Peer Coaching and Success of Residential vs. Commuter College Students

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References