With its direct impact on admissions procedures and (in)direct impact on campus climate, affirmative action bans can potentially influence student retention. This study uses a national dataset to examine the relationship between affirmative action bans in Oklahoma and New Hampshire and retention rates at public colleges and universities. Our findings indicate that the adoption of affirmative action bans is not associated with the average full-time or part-time retention rates for treated institutions relative to those institutions without affirmative action bans. We discuss the implications with respect to admissions policy changes, students’ college choices, and alternative policies to increase student diversity, equity, and inclusion.
AllenW. R.SolórzanoD. (2000). Affirmative action, educational equity and campus racial climate: A case study of the University of Michigan Law School. Berkeley La Raza Law Journal, 12, 237–320. http://doi.org/10.15779/Z388D40
3.
AllisonP. D. (2009). Fixed effects regression models. Sage.
4.
AntonovicsK.BackesB. (2013). Were minority students discouraged from applying to University of California campuses after the affirmative action ban?Education Finance and Policy, 8(2), 208–250. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00090
5.
AntonovicsK.BackesB. (2014). The effect of banning affirmative action on college admissions policies and student quality. Journal of Human Resources, 49(2), 295–322. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.49.2.295
6.
AntonovicsK. L.SanderR. H. (2013). Affirmative action bans and the “chilling effect”. American Law and Economics Review, 15(1), 252–299. https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahs020
7.
AttewellP.HeilS.ReiselL. (2012). What is academic momentum? And does it matter?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0162373711421958
8.
BackesB. (2012). Do affirmative action bans lower minority college enrollment and attainment? Evidence from statewide bans. Journal of Human Resources, 47(2), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.47.2.435
9.
BakerD. J. (2019). Pathways to racial equity in higher education: Modeling the antecedents of state affirmative action bans. American Educational Research Journal, 56(5), 1861–1895. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831219833918
10.
BertrandM.DufloE.MullainathanS. (2004). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 249–275. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355304772839588
11.
BlackwellM.IacusS.KingG.PorroG. (2009). CEM: coarsened exact matching in Stata. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 9(4), 524–546. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0900900402
12.
BleemerZ. (2022). Affirmative action, mismatch, and economic mobility after California’s Proposition 209. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 137(1), 115–160. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjab027
13.
BlumeG. H.LongM. C. (2014). Changes in levels of affirmative action in college admissions in response to statewide bans and judicial rulings. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(2), 228–252. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0162373713508810
14.
BoboL.KluegelJ. R.SmithR. A. (1997). Laissez-faire racism: The crystallization of a kinder, gentler, antiblack ideology. In TuchS. A.MartinJ. K. (Eds.), Racial attitudes in the 1990s: Continuity and change (pp. 15–42). Praeger.
15.
BrennanJ.NaidooR. (2008). Higher education and the achievement (and/or prevention) of equity and social justice. Higher Education, 56(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9127-3
16.
BrownS. K.HirschmanC. (2006). The end of affirmative action in Washington state and its impact on the transition from high school to college. Sociology of Education, 79(2), 106–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/003804070607900202
17.
ByrdD. (2019). The diversity distraction: A critical comparative analysis of discourse in higher education scholarship. The Review of Higher Education, 42(5), 135–172. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0048
18.
ByrdW. C. (2021). Behind the diversity numbers: Achieving racial equity on campus. Harvard Education Press.
CardD.KruegerA. B. (2005). Would the elimination of affirmative action affect highly qualified minority applicants? Evidence from California and texas. ILR Review, 58(3), 416–434. https://doi.org/10.3386/w10366
21.
ChanJ.EysterE. (2003). Does banning affirmative action lower college student quality?American Economic Review, 93(3), 858–872. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322157124
22.
ChenX. (2007). Part-time undergraduates in postsecondary education: 2003–04 (NCES 2007-165). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED497213.pdf
23.
ClarkeC. G.AntonioA. L. (2012). Rethinking research on the impact of racial diversity in higher education. The Review of Higher Education, 36(1), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2012.0060
24.
CookT. D.ShadishW. R.WongV. C. (2008). Three conditions under which experiments and observational studies produce comparable causal estimates: New findings from within-study comparisons. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27(4), 724–750. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20375
25.
CortesK. E. (2010). Do bans on affirmative action hurt minority students? Evidence from the Texas top 10% plan. Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 1110–1124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.004
26.
DeAngeloL.FrankeR. (2016). Social mobility and reproduction for whom? College readiness and first-year retention. American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 1588–1625. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0002831216674805
27.
DicksonL. M. (2006). Does ending affirmative action in college admissions lower the percent of minority students applying to college?Economics of Education Review, 25(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.11.005
FurquimF.CorralD.HillmanN. (2020). A primer for interpreting and designing difference-in-differences studies in higher education research. In PernaL. W. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 35, pp. 1–58). Springer.
30.
Gansemer-TopfA. M.SchuhJ. H. (2005). Institutional grants: Investing in student retention and graduation. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 35(3), 5–20.
31.
Gansemer-TopfA. M.SchuhJ. H. (2006). Institutional selectivity and institutional expenditures: Examining organizational factors that contribute to retention and graduation. Research in Higher Education, 47(6), 613–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9009-4
32.
GarcesL. M.BilyalovD. (2019). Navigating the quicksand: How postsecondary administrators understand the influence of affirmative action developments on racial diversity work. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 121(3), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F016146811912100305
33.
GarcesL. M.Mickey-PabelloD. (2015). Racial diversity in the medical profession: The impact of affirmative action bans on underrepresented student of color matriculation in medical schools. The Journal of Higher Education, 86(2), 264–294. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2015.0009
34.
GlasenerK. M.MartellC. A.PosseltJ. R. (2019). Framing diversity: Examining the place of race in institutional policy and practice post-affirmative action. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 12(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/DHE0000086
HavemanR.SmeedingT. (2006). The role of higher education in social mobility. The Future of Children, 16(2), 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2006.0015
37.
HernandezJ. C.LopezM. A. (2004). Leaking pipeline: Issues impacting Latino/a college student retention. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 6(1), 37–60. https://doi.org/10.2190%2FFBLY-0UAF-EE7W-QJD2
38.
HerzogS. (2005). Measuring determinants of student return vs. Dropout/stopout vs. Transfer: A first-to-second year analysis of new freshmen. Research in Higher Education, 46(8), 883–928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-6933-7
HinrichsP. (2012). The effects of affirmative action bans on college enrollment, educational attainment, and the demographic composition of universities. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(3), 712–722. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00170
HinrichsP. L. (2020). Do affirmative action bans cause students to move across state lines to attend college?Economic Commentary, 4, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.26509/frbc-ec-202004
43.
HirschmanD.BerreyE. (2017). The partial deinstitutionalization of affirmative action in US higher education, 1988 to 2014. Sociological Science, 4, 449–468. https://doi.org/10.15195/v4.a18
44.
HowellJ. (2010). Assessing the impact of eliminating affirmative action in higher education. Journal of Labor Economics, 28(1), 113–166. https://doi.org/10.1086/648415
45.
HurtadoS. (2013). Diverse learning environments: Assessing and creating conditions for student success. The Ford Foundation.
46.
HurtadoS.AlvarezC. L.Guillermo-WannC.CuellarM.ArellanoL. (2012). A model for diverse learning environments. In SmartJ. C.PaulsenM. B. (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 41–122). Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2950-6_2
47.
HurtadoS.MilemJ. F.Clayton-PedersenA. R.AllenW. R. (2010). Enhancing campus climates for racial/ethnic diversity: Educational policy and practice. In BrownM. C. (Ed.), Organization and governance in higher education (pp. 295–309). Pearson. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1998.0003
48.
HurtadoS.RuizA. (2012). The climate for underrepresented groups and diversity on campus. Higher Education Research Institute.
49.
IacusS. M.KingG.PorroG. (2009). Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr013
KerbyM. B. (2015). Toward a new predictive model of student retention in higher education: An application of classical sociological theory. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 17(2), 138–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115578229
54.
KidderW. C.GándaraP. (2016). Two decades after the affirmative action ban: Evaluating the University of California’s race-neutral efforts. The Civil Rights Project. Educational Testing Service. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/55j5z74v
55.
KingG.NielsenR. (2019). Why propensity scores should not be used for matching. Political Analysis, 27(4), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2019.11
56.
LairdT. F. N.CruceT. M. (2009). Individual and environmental effects of part-time enrollment status on student-faculty interaction and self-reported gains. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(3), 290–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2009.11779014
LiuH. (2020). How do affirmative action bans affect the racial composition of postsecondary students in public institutions?Educational Policy, advance online publication, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904820961007
59.
LohfinkM. M.PaulsenM. B. (2005). Comparing the determinants of persistence for first-generation and continuing-generation students. Journal of College Student Development, 46(4), 409–428. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2005.0040
LongM. C.BatemanN. A. (2020). Long-run changes in underrepresentation after affirmative action bans in public universities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(2), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373720904433
62.
LongM. C.TiendaM. (2008). Winners and losers: Changes in Texas university admissions post-Hopwood. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(3), 255–280. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373708321384
63.
LutzA.BennettP. R.WangR. (2019). How affirmative action context shapes collegiate outcomes at America’s selective colleges and universities. Journal of Law and Social Policy, 31(4), 71–91. https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/jlsp/vol31/iss1/4/
64.
MarshG. (2014). Institutional characteristics and student retention in public 4-year colleges and universities. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 16(1), 127–151. https://doi.org/10.2190%2FCS.16.1.g
65.
MeyerB. D. (1995). Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13(2), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.2307/1392369
66.
MickeyD. (2019). A structural investigation of laissez faire racism: The intended and unintended consequences of affirmative action bans (Order No. 27614323). [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Michigan. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
67.
MiddaughM. F. (2007). Creating a culture of evidence: Academic accountability at the institutional level. New Directions for Higher Education, 2007(140), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.277
68.
MosesM. S. (2016). Living with moral disagreement: The enduring controversy about affirmative action. The University of Chicago Press.
69.
MustaffaJ. B.DawsonC. (2021). Racial capitalism and the Black student loan debt crisis. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 123(6), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F016146812112300601
OrtagusJ. C.KelchenR.RosingerK.VoorheesN. (2020). Performance-based funding in American higher education: A systematic synthesis of the intended and unintended consequences. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 42(4), 520–550. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737209
72.
OsegueraL.RheeB. S. (2009). The influence of institutional retention climates on student persistence to degree completion: A multilevel approach. Research in Higher Education, 50(6), 546–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9134-y
73.
O’tooleD. M.StrattonL. S.WetzelJ. N. (2003). A longitudinal analysis of the frequency of part-time enrollment and the persistence of students who enroll part time. Research in Higher Education, 44(5), 519–537. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025491208661
74.
PalmerR. T.MarambaD. C.DancyT. E. (2011). A qualitative investigation of factors promoting the retention and persistence of students of color in STEM. The Journal of Negro Education, 80(4), 491–504. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41341155
75.
ParkJ. J.DensonN.BowmanN. A. (2013). Does socioeconomic diversity make a difference? Examining the effects of racial and socioeconomic diversity on the campus climate for diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 50(3), 466–496. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212468290
76.
Perkins-HoltsclawK. J.LampleyJ. (2018). Relationships between institutional characteristics and student retention and graduation rates at SACSCOC level III institutions. Journal of Academic Administration in Higher Education, 14(2), 1–8.
77.
PikeG. R.GraunkeS. S. (2015). Examining the effects of institutional and cohort characteristics on retention rates. Research in Higher Education, 56(2), 146–165. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-014-9360-9
78.
PotterH. (2014). Transitioning to race-neutral admissions: An overview of experiences in states where affirmative action has been banned. In KahlenbergR. D. (Ed.), The future of affirmative action: New paths to higher education diversity after Fisher v. University of Texas (pp. 75–90). The Century Foundation Press.
SkrentnyJ. D. (1996). The ironies of affirmative action: Politics, culture, and justice in America. University of Chicago Press.
83.
SólorzanoD. G.VillalpandoO.OsegueraL. (2005). Educational inequities and Latina/o undergraduate students in the United States: A critical race analysis of their educational progress. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 4(3), 272–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192705276550
84.
StewartD.-L. (2020). Twisted at the roots: The intransigence of inequality in U.S. higher education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 52(2), 13–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2020.1732753
85.
StrattonL. S.O’TooleD. M.WetzelJ. N. (2007). Are the factors affecting dropout behavior related to initial enrollment intensity for college undergraduates?Research in Higher Education, 48(4), 453–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-006-9033-4
86.
StulbergL. M.ChenA. S. (2014). The origins of race-conscious affirmative action in undergraduate admissions: A comparative analysis of institutional change in higher education. Sociology of Education, 87(1), 36–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040713514063
87.
TeranishiR. T.BriscoeK. (2008). Contextualizing race: African American college choice in an evolving affirmative action era. The Journal of Negro Education, 77(1), 15–26.
88.
TintoV. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89–125. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F00346543045001089
89.
TintoV. (1989). Theories of student departure revisited. In StageF. K.AnayaG. L.BeanJ. P.HosslerD.KuhG. D. (Eds.), College students: The evolving nature of research (pp. 239–258). Ginn.
90.
VaccaroA. (2010). What lies beneath seemingly positive campus climate results: Institutional sexism, racism, and male hostility toward equity initiatives and liberal bias. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(2), 202–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680903520231
91.
WazinA. (2019). Relevant and current issues faced by American institutions of higher education as they attempt to design and implement affirmative action plans vis-à-vis admissions and faculty/staff hiring policies and practices. Journal of Underrepresented & Minority Progress, 3(2), 66–98. https://doi.org/10.32674/jump.v3i2.1395
92.
WebsterA. L.ShowersV. E. (2011). Measuring predictors of student retention rates. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 3(2), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajebasp.2011.301.311
93.
WellsR. (2008). Social and cultural capital, race and ethnicity, and college student retention. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 10(2), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.2190%2FCS.10.2.a
94.
WilliamsJ.KaneD. (2010). The part-time student’s experience 1996-2007: An issue of identity and marginalisation?Tertiary Education and Management, 16(3), 183–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2010.497342
95.
WrightD. K.GarcesL. M. (2018). Understanding the controversy around race-based affirmative action in American higher education. In BlanchardJ. (Ed.), Controversies on campus: Debating the issues confronting American universities in the 21st century (pp. 3–21). Praeger.
