Though higher education scholars have long known that undergraduate student engagement is associated with student persistence, they have yet to fully unravel its character and how it evolves over time. We argue that this is in part due to the individualistic, static ways engagement is measured even though scholars recognize it as a fundamentally relational concept. In our theoretical exploration, we draw on existing thinking about engagement in higher education and fit it to a social network paradigm that is well suited to conceptualizing and measuring relational, multidimensional, and dynamic phenomena such as student engagement. We conclude with suggestions for research and practice to further explore the longitudinal character of student engagement and how network analysis may be employed to explore the roles of engagement in persistence.
ArmstrongE. A.HamiltonL. T. (2013). Paying for the party: how college maintains inequality. Harvard University Press.
2.
Ben-EliyahuA.MooreD.DorphR.SchunnC. D. (2018). Investigating the multidimensionality of engagement: affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement across science activities and contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 53, 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.002
3.
BensonJ. E.LeeE. M. (2020). Geographies of campus inequality: mapping the diverse experiences of first-generation students. Oxford University Press.
4.
BidartC.DegenneA.GrossettiM. (2020). Living in networks: the dynamics of social relations. Cambridge University Press.
5.
BodaZ.ElmerT.VörösA.StadtfeldC. (2020). Short-term and long-term effects of a social network intervention on friendships among university students. Scientific Reports, 10(2889). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59594-z
6.
BowmanN. A.ParkJ. J. (2014). Interracial contact on college campuses: comparing and contrasting predictors of cross-racial interaction and interracial friendship. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(5), 660–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2014.11777344
7.
BrownM. (2019). The push and pull of social gravity: how peer relationships form around an undergraduate science lecture. Review of Higher Education, 43(2), 603–632. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0112
8.
CeciS. J.PapiernoP. B. (2005). The rhetoric and reality of gap closing: when the “have-nots” gain but the “haves” gain even more. American Psychologist, 60(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.2.149
Deil-AmenR. (2011). Socio-academic integrative moments: rethinking academic and social integration among two-year college students in career-related programs. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(1), 54–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2011.11779085
11.
EcklesJ. EStradleyE. G. (2011). A social network analysis of student retention using archival data. Social Psychology of Education, 15(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-011-9173-z
12.
EggensL.van der WerfM. P. C.BoskerR. J. (2008). The influence of personal networks and social support on study attainment of students in university education. Higher Education, 55(5), 553–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9074-4
13.
FredricksJ. A.BlumenfeldP. C.ParisA. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
14.
HurtadoS.CarterD. (1996). Latino students’ sense of belonging in the college community: rethinking the concept of integration on campus. In StageF. K.AnayaG. L.BeanJ.HosslerD.KuhG. (Eds.), College students: evolving nature of research (pp. 123–136). Simon & Schuster.
15.
IsraelU.KoesterB. P.McKayT. A. (2020). Campus connections: student and course networks in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 45, 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-019-09497-3
16.
JimersonS. R.CamposE.GreifJ. L. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. California School Psychologist, 8(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340893
17.
KassarnigV.MonesE.Bjerre-NielsenA.SapiezynskiP.LassenD. D.LehmannS. (2018). Academic performance and behavioral patterns. EPJ Data Science, 7(10). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-018-0138-8
18.
KuhG. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683–699. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0099
19.
KuhG. D.KinzieJ.BuckleyJ. A.BridgesB. K.HayekJ. C. (2007). Piecing together the student success puzzle: research, propositions, and recommendations. ASHE Higher Education Report (Vol. 32, No. 5). Jossey-Bass.
MayhewM. J.RockenbachA. N.BowmanN. A.SeifertT. A. D.WolniakG. C.PascarellaE. T.TerenziniP. T. (2016). How college affects students: 21st century evidence that higher education works (vol. 3). Jossey-Bass.
22.
McCabeJ. (2016). Connecting in college: how friendship networks matter for academic and social success. The University of Chicago Press.
23.
MuseusS. D.NevilleK. M. (2012). Delineating the ways that key institutional agents provide racial minority students with access to social capital in college. Journal of College Student Development, 53(3), 436–452. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2012.0042
24.
ParkJ. J.DensonN. (2013). When race and class both matter: the relationship between socioeconomic diversity, racial diversity, and student reports of cross-class interaction. Research in Higher Education, 54, 725–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9289-4
25.
PascarellaE. T. (1980). Student-faculty informal contact and college outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 50(4), 545–595. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543050004545
26.
QuayeS. J.HarperS. R.PendakurS. L. (Eds.). (2019). Student engagement in higher education: theoretical perspectives and practical approaches for diverse populations (3rd ed.). Routledge.
ReschlyA. L.ChristensonS. L. (2006). Prediction of dropout among students with mild disabilities: A case for the inclusion of student engagement variables. Remedial and Special Education, 27(5), 276–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932506027005031
29.
ReschlyA. L.ChristensonS. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness. Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S. L. ChristensonA. M. ReschlyC. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3-20). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_1
30.
RizzutoT. E.LeDouxJ.HatalaJ. P. (2009). It’s not just what you know, it’s who you know: testing a model of the relative importance of social networks to academic performance. Social Psychology of Education, 12(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-008-9080-0
31.
SimmonsL. (2013). Factors of persistence for African American men in a student support organization. The Journal of Negro Education, 82(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.7709/jnegroeducation.82.1.0062
32.
SmithR. A. (2011). Learning community transitions in the first year: A case study of academic and social network change. Journal of the First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 23(2), 13–31.
33.
SmithR. A. (2015). Magnets and seekers: A network perspective on academic integration inside two residential communities. The Journal of Higher Education, 86(6), 893–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2015.11777388
34.
SmithR. A.BrownM. G.GradyK. A.SowlS.SchulzJ. M. (2022). Patterns of undergraduate student interpersonal interaction network change during the COVID-19 pandemic. AERA Open, 8(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211073160
35.
SmithR. A.VonhoffC. (2019). Problematizing community: A network approach to conceptualizing campus communities. Journal of College Student Development, 60(3), 255–270. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2019.0025
ThomasS. L. (2000). Ties that bind: A social network approach to understanding student integration and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(5), 591–615. https://doi.org/10.2307/2649261
38.
TintoV. (2015). Through the eyes of students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 19(3), 254–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025621917
39.
TintoV. (2021). Increasing student persistence: Wanting and doing. In H. Huijser, M. Y. C. A. Kek & F. F. Padró Kek (Eds.), Student support services: Their impact on student engagement, experience and learning. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3364-4_33-1
40.
VirtueE. E.MaddoxG.PfaffK. (2019). The lasting effects of learning communities. Learning Communities Research and Practice, 7(2), Article 6.
41.
WassermanS.FaustK. (1994). Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.
42.
WeedenK. A.CornwellB. (2020). The small-world network of college classes: implications for epidemic spread on a university campus. Sociological Science, 7, 222–241. https://doi.org/10.15195/v7.a9
43.
Winkle-WagnerR.McCallumC. M.LuedkeC.Ota-MalloyB. (2019). Instrumental or meaningful friendships: black alumnae perspectives on peer relationships during college. Journal of Women and Gender in Higher Education, 12(3), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/19407882.2019.1593201
44.
ZilvinskisJ.McCormickA.C. (2019). Do working students buy into HIPs? Working for pay and participation in high-impact practices. Journal of College Student Development, 60(5), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2019.0049
