Cultivating not Weeding: STEM First Year Learning Community Fosters Student Persistence and Engagement

Abstract

Regional comprehensive universities with access-oriented missions provide critical pathways for increasing the number and diversity of STEM graduates. The BOND program at California State University, Fresno supports the transition to college for first-time, full-time freshmen in selected STEM majors. BOND incorporates a learning community, active learning, and early course-based research experiences. Compared to comparison groups, students that participate in BOND are 1.93 times more likely to persist in STEM into their fourth year despite similar academic achievement in introductory STEM courses. A higher proportion of BOND students also engage with campus resources that support their first and second year on campus, which suggests that appropriate support builds persistence through the challenges of a STEM degree. This study highlights the importance of providing support strategies and resources in the first year for STEM retention, counter to the traditional narrative of “weeding out” students in their first year on campus.

Keywords

STEM engagement learning community first year experience wraparound support

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bai

Pan

. (2009). A multilevel approach to assessing the interaction effects on college student retention. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 11(2), 287–301 https://doi.org/10.2190/CS.11.2.g

Bailey

T. R.

Alfonso

Calcagno

J. C.

Jenkins

P. D.

Kienzl

G. S.

Leinbach

D. T.

(2004). Improving student attainment in community colleges: institutional characteristics and policies. Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.

Bangera

Brownell

S. E

. (2014). Course-based undergraduate research experiences can make scientific research more inclusive. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(4), 602–606. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14060099

Bollen

K. A.

Hoyle

R. H

. (1990). Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination. Social Forces, 69(2), 479–504. https://doi.org/10.2307/2579670

Carlone

H. B.

Johnson

. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237

Chang

M. J.

Sharkness

Hurtado

Newman

C. B

. (2014). What matters in college for retaining aspiring scientists and engineers from underrepresented racial groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5), 555–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21146

Chism Schmidt

, & Graziano

. (Eds.) (2016). Building synergy for high-impact educational initiatives: first-year seminars and learning communities. National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience and Students in Transition.

Coladarci

Willett

M. B.

Allen

. (2013). Tutor program participation: effects on GPA and retention to the second year. Learning Assistance Review (TLAR), 18(2), 79–96. https://nclca.wildapricot.org/resources/Documents/Publications/TLAR/Issues/18_2.pdf

Cooper

. (2010). Tutoring center effectiveness: the effect of drop-in tutoring. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 40(2), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2010.10850328

10.

Dagley

Georgiopoulos

Reece

Young

. (2016). Increasing retention and graduation rates through a STEM learning community. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 18(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025115584746

11.

Engle

Tinto

(2008). Moving beyond access: college success for low-income, first-generation students. Washington, DC: Pell Institute for the Study of Opportunity in Higher Education.

12.

Finley

Kuh

G. D.

(2016). The case for connecting first-year seminars and learning communities. In Chism Schmidt

Graziano

(Eds.), Building synergy for high-impact educational initiatives: first-year seminars and learning communities (pp. 3–18). National Resource Center for the First Year Experience and Students in Transition and the Washington Center for Improving the Quality of Undergraduate Education.

13.

Freeman

Eddy

S. L.

McDonough

Smith

M. K.

Okoroafor

Jordt

Wenderoth

M. P.

(2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

14.

Graham

M. J.

Frederick

Byars-Winston

Hunter

A. B.

Handelsman

. (2013). Increasing persistence of college students in STEM. Science (New York, N.Y.), 341(6153), 1455–1456. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240487

15.

Hernandez

Paul R

Schultz

P. Wesley

Estrada

Mica

Woodcock

Anna

Chance

Randie C

(2013). Sustaining optimal motivation: A longitudinal analysis of interventions to broaden participation of underrepresented students in STEM. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029691

16.

D. E.

Imai

King

Stuart

E. A.

(2011). Matchit: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. Journal of Statistical Software, 42(8), 1–28.

17.

Hurtado

Carter

D. F

. (1997). Effects of college transition and perceptions of the campus racial climate on latino college students’ sense of belonging. Sociology of Education, 70(4), 324–345. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673270

18.

Kezar

Holcombe

(2017). Creating a unified community of support: increasing success for underrepresented students in STEM. A final report on the CSU STEM Collaboratives project. Pullias Center for Higher Education.

19.

Knight

W. E

. (2002). Learning communities, first year programs and their effectiveness: the role of the IR office. AIR 2002 Forum Paper.

20.

Kot

F. C

. (2014). The impact of centralized advising on first-year academic performance and second-year enrollment behavior. Research in Higher Education, 55(6), 527–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-013-9325-4

21.

Kuh

G. D

. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE: benchmarks for effective educational practices. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 35(2), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380309604090

22.

Kuh

G. D

. (2008). Excerpt from high-impact educational practices: what they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Association of American Colleges and Universities, 14(3), 28–29.

23.

Kuh

G. D.

Cruce

T. M.

Shoup

Kinzie

Gonyea

R. M

. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2008.11772116

24.

Kuh

G. D.

O’Donnell

. (2013). Ensuring quality and taking high-impact practices to scale. Peer Review, 15(2), 32–33.

25.

Laursen

Hunter

A. B.

Seymour

Thiry

Melton

. (2010). Undergraduate research in the sciences: engaging students in real science. John Wiley & Sons.

26.

Light

Micari

(2013). Making scientists: six principles for effective college teaching. Harvard University Press.

27.

Lopatto

Alvarez

Barnard

Chandrasekaran

Chung

H. M.

Eckdahl

Goodman

A. L.

Hauser

Jones

C. J.

Kopp

O.R.

Kuleck

G.A.

McNeil

Morris

Myka

J.L.

Nagengast

Overvoorde

P.J.

Post

J.L.

Reed

.,,… & Elgin

S. C

. (2008). Genomics education partnership. Science (New York, N.Y.), 322(5902), 684–685. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165351

28.

Lundberg

C. A.

Kim

Y. K.

Andrade

L. M.

Bahner

D. T

. (2018). High expectations, strong support: faculty behaviors predicting Latina/o community college student learning. Journal of College Student Development, 59(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2018.0004

29.

McGuire

S. Y

. (2006). The impact of supplemental instruction on teaching students how to learn. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2006(106), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.228

30.

Nagda

B. A.

Gregerman

S. R.

Jonides

Von Hippel

Lerner

J. S

. (1998). Undergraduate student-faculty research partnerships affect student retention. The Review of Higher Education, 22(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1998.0016

31.

National Science Board . (2015). Revisiting the STEM workforce: A companion to science and engineering indicators 2014. Arlington: http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/372086.

32.

Nora

Barlow

Crisp

(2005). Student persistence and degree attainment beyond the first year in college. In Seidman

(Ed.), College Student Retention: Formula for Success (pp. 129–153). Greenwood Press.

33.

Permzadian

Credé

. (2016). Do first-year seminars improve college grades and retention? A quantitative review of their overall effectiveness and an examination of moderators of effectiveness. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 277–316. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315584955

34.

President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2012). Report to the President—Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.

35.

Rabitoy

E. R.

Hoffman

J. L.

Person

D. R

. (2015). Supplemental instruction: the effect of demographic and academic preparation variables on community college student academic achievement in stem-related fields. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 14(3), 240–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192714568808

36.

Reinheimer

McKenzie

. (2011). The impact of tutoring on the academic success of undeclared students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 41(2), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2011.10850340

37.

Seymour

Elaine

Hunter

Anne-Barrie

Laursen

Sandra L

DeAntoni

Tracee

(2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study. Science Education, 88(4), 493–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X

38.

Swecker

H. K.

Fifolt

Searby

. (2013). Academic advising and first-generation college students: A quantitative study on student retention. NACADA Journal, 33(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.12930/NACADA-13-192

39.

Terenzini

P. T

., Cabrera

A. F

., & Bernal

E. M

. (2001). Swimming against the tide: The poor in American higher education. (Research Report No. 2001–1). College Entrance Examination Board.

40.

The International Center for Supplemental Instruction. (n.d.). What is Supplemental Instruction? https://info.umkc.edu/si/

41.

Theobald

E. J.

Hill

M. J.

Tran

Agrawal

Arroyo

E. N.

Behling

Chambwe

Cintrón

D. L.

Cooper

Dunster

Grummer

Hennessey

Hsiao

Iranon

Jones

II Jordt

Keller

Lacey

M.E.

Littlefield

C. E.

… & Freeman

(2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(12), 6476–6483. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117

42.

U.S. Census Bureau (2019). Education attainment 2019 American community survey 1-year estimates. Retrieved from: https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?q=Educational%20Attainment&g=0100000US_0400000US06_0500000US06019&tid=ACSST1Y2019.S1501&hidePreview=true

43.

U.S. Department of Education. (2019). National center for education statistics. Indicator 26: STEM Degrees. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/raceindicators/indicator_reg.asp

44.

U.S. Department of Education. (2019). National center for education statistics, integrated postsecondary education data system (IPEDS), Fall Enrollment Component. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data

45.

Watkins

Mazur

. (2013). Retaining students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 36–41. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43631580

46.

Webber

K. L.

Krylow

R. B.

Zhang

. (2013). Does involvement really matter? Indicators of college student success and satisfaction. Journal of College Student Development, 54(6), 591–611. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2013.0090

47.

Yeager

D. S.

Dweck

C. S

. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: when students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722805

48.

Young-Jones

A. D

., Burt

T. D

., Dixon

., & Hawthorne

M. J

. (2013). Academic advising: does it really impact student success? Quality Assurance in Education. 21(1). 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881311293034

49.

Yue

Rico

R. S.

Vang

M. K.

Giuffrida

T. A

. (2018). Supplemental instruction: helping disadvantaged students reduce performance gap. Journal of Developmental Education, 41(2), 18–25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44987748

50.

Zhao

C. M.

Kuh

G. D

. (2004). Adding value: learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RIHE.0000015692.88534.de