Adult student persistence in online programs is lower than in traditional college classrooms, but more adult learners are enrolling in online programs. Little research is available on students’ needs and expectations for their success in online courses. A quantitative correlational study was conducted on student expectations of online learning using persistence factors of time, technological skills, and difficulty. Nontraditional students experience unique challenges to academic development stemming from problems at home, low-socioeconomic status, minimal off-campus support, and isolating discourse of academia. The intent of this article is to present new data on connections between student expectations and their persistence. Data were collected from 205 participants, 24 years or older, enrolled in at least one course in a series of online courses. Two factors were identified as significant correlations with student persistence: (a) difficulty level of course content and (b) time commitment.
AagardM. C.AntunezM. Y.SandJ. N. (2015).
Learning from degree-seeking older adult students in a university library. Reference Services Review,
43(2), 215–230. doi:10.1108/RSR-06-2014-0017
AllenT. O.ZhangY. (2016).
Dedicated to their degrees: Adult transfer students in engineering baccalaureate programs. Community College Review,
44(1), 70–86. doi:10.1177/0091552115617018
4.
BaturayM. H.TokerS. (2017).
Self-esteem shapes the impact of GPA and general health on Facebook addiction: A mediation analysis. Social Science Computer Review,
35(5), 555–575. doi:10.1177/0894439316656606
BelfieldC. R.BaileyT. (2011).
The benefits of attending community college: A review of the evidence. Community College Review,
39(1), 46–68. doi:10.1177%2F0091552110395575
BoudD.WalkerD. (1991). Experience and learning: Reflection at Work. EAE600 Adults Learning in the Workplace: Part A. Adult and Workplace Education. Faculty of Education, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED384696.pdf
11.
BovillC. (2017).
A framework to explore roles within student-staff partnerships in higher education: Which students are partners, when, and in what ways?International Journal for Students as Partners,
1(1). doi:10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3062
12.
BraxtonJ. M.HirschyA. S. (2005). Theoretical developments in the study of college student departure. In SeidmanA. (Ed.), College student retention: Formula for student success (pp. 61–87).
Westport, CT.
Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.
13.
Campbell, S. V., Baronina, T., & Reider, B. P. (2003). Using expectancy theory to assess Group-Level Differences in Student Motivation: A Replication in the Russian Far East. Issues in Accounting Education, 18(2): 125–136. doi:10.2308/iace.2003.18.2.125
14.
ChingosM. M.GriffithsR. J.MulhernC. (2017).
Can low-cost online summer math programs improve student preparation for college-level math? Evidence from randomized experiments at three universities. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness,
10(4), 794–816. doi:10.1080/19345747.2017.1300362
15.
ChoiH. J.ParkJ. H. (2018).
Testing a path-analytic model of adult dropout in online degree programs. Computers & Education,
116, 130–138. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.005
16.
ChungE.TurnbullD.Chur-HansenA. (2017).
Differences in resilience between ‘traditional’ and ‘non-traditional’ university students. Active Learning in Higher Education,
18(1), 77–87. doi:10.1177/1469787417693493
17.
CleggS.KonradJ.TanJ. (2000).
Preparing academic staff to use ICTs in support of student learning. International Journal for Academic Development,
5(2), 138–148. doi:10.1080/13601440050200743
18.
CochranJ. D.CampbellS. M.BakerH. M.LeedsE. M. (2014).
The role of student characteristics in predicting retention in online courses. Research in Higher Education,
55(1), 27–48. doi:10.1007/s11162-013-9305-8
19.
De SanctisG. (1983).
Expectancy theory as an explanation of voluntary use of a decision-support system. Psychological Reports,
52(1), 247–260. doi:10.2466/pr0.1983.52.1.247
FitzgeraldR.HuijserH.MethD.NeilanK. (2019). Student-staff partnerships in academic development: The course design studio as a model for sustainable course-wide impact. International Journal for Academic Development. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2019.1631170
22.
FrankT. H. J.CastekJ. (2017).
From digital literacies to digital problem solving: Expanding technology-rich learning opportunities for adults. Journal of Research and Practice for Adult Literacy, Secondary, and Basic Education,
6(2), 66–70.
23.
GravettK.KinchinI. M.WinstoneN. E. (2019).
More than customers’: Conceptions of students as partners held by students, staff, and institutional leaders. Studies in Higher Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1623769
24.
GuidryK. (2015).
Does course delivery method impact performance in subsequent courses? Evidence from a financial management course. Business Education & Accreditation,
17(2), 1. Retrieved from http://www.theibfr.com/ARCHIVE/BEA-V7N2-2015.pdf
25.
HarasimL. (2017). Learning theory and online technologies.
London, England:
Taylor & Francis.
26.
HasselH.GiordanoJ. B. (2013).
Occupy writing studies: Rethinking college composition for the needs of the teaching majority. College Composition and Communication,
65(1), 117–139. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1444162118?accountid=35812
27.
HoytW. T.ImelZ. E.ChanF. (2008).
Multiple regression and correlation techniques: Recent controversies and best practices. Rehabilitation Psychology,
53(3), 321–339. doi:10.1037/a0013021
28.
IlgazH.GülbaharY. (2015).
A snapshot of online learners: E-readiness, e-satisfaction and expectations. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning,
16(2), 171–187. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i2.2117
29.
KilburnA.KilburnB.CatesT. (2014).
Drivers of student retention: System availability, privacy, value and loyalty in online higher education. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal,
18(4), 1. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1645851174?accountid=35812
30.
KnowlesM. S. (1978).
Andragogy: Adult learning theory in perspective. Community College Review,
5(3), 9–20.
31.
KnowlesM. S. (1984). Andragogy in action.
San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
32.
KnowlesM. S.HoltonE. F.IIISwansonR. A. (2005). The adult learner (6th ed.).
London, England:
Elsevier.
33.
LeedsE. M.CampbellS. M.BakerH.AliR.BrawleyD.CrispJ. (2013).
The impact of student retention strategies: An empirical study. International Journal of Management in Education,
7(1), 22–43. doi:10.1504/IJMIE.2013.050812
34.
LoizzoJ.ErtmerP. A.WatsonW. R.WatsonS. L. (2017).
Adult MOOC learners as self-directed: Perceptions of motivation, success, and completion. Online Learning,
21(2), n2. doi:10.24059/olj.v21i2.889
35.
MatternK. D.MariniJ. P.ShawE. J. (2015).
Identification of multiple nonreturner profiles to inform the development of targeted college retention interventions. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice,
17(1), 18–43. doi:10.1177/1521025115571091
36.
Mayfield-JohnsonS.MohnR. S.MitraA. K.YoungR.McCullersE. M. (2014).
Attitudes on barriers and benefits of distance education among Mississippi Delta Allied Health Community College faculty, staff, and students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice,
38(6), 551–563.
37.
McLoughlinC. (2000).
Creating partnerships for generative learning and systemic change: Redefining academic roles and relationships in support of learning. International Journal for Academic Development,
5(2), 116–128. doi:10.1080/13601440050200725
38.
Mercer-MapstoneL. (2019). The student–staff partnership movement: Striving for inclusion as we push sectorial change. International Journal for Academic Development. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2019.1631171
39.
MoranteA.DjenidiV.ClarkH.WestS. (2017).
Gender differences in online participation: Examining a history and a mathematics open foundation online course. Australian Journal of Adult Learning,
57(2), 266–293. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1148628.pdf
40.
NabahoL.AgutiJ. N.OonyuJ. (2017).
Making sense of an elusive concept: Academics’ perspectives of quality in higher education. Higher Learning Research Communications,
7(2), n2. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1159619.pdf
41.
OreopoulosP.PattersonR. W.PetronijevicU.PopeN. G. (2018). Lack of study time is the problem, but what is the solution? Unsuccessful attempts to help traditional and online college students (No. w25036).
Cambridge, MA:
National Bureau of Economic Research.
42.
ParkC. L.BomanJ.CareW. D.EdwardsM.PerryB. (2009).
Persistence and attrition: What is being measured?Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice,
10(2), 223–233. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/101635/
43.
ParkC. L.PerryB.EdwardsM. (2011).
Minimising attrition: Strategies for assisting students who are at risk of withdrawal. Innovations in Education and Teaching International,
48(1), 37–47. doi:10.1080/14703297.2010.543769
44.
PutulowskiJ. R.CrosbyR. G.III. (2019).
Effect of personalized instructor-student e-mail and text messages on online students’ perceived course quality, social integration with faculty, and institutional commitment. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice,
21(2), 184–201. doi:10.1177/1521025117696823
45.
QuinnanT. W. (1997). Adult students “at-risk”: Culture bias in higher education.
Westport, CT:
Greenwood Publishing Group.
46.
RapchakM. E.LewisL. A.MotykaJ. K.BalmertM. (2015).
Information literacy and adult learners: Using authentic assessment to determine skill gaps. Adult Learning,
26(4), 135–142. doi:10.1177/1045159515594155
47.
RogersK. S. (2018).
Retaining adult learners: What academic leaders and faculty need to know. Recruiting & Retaining Adult Learners,
20(5), 6–7. doi:10.1002/nsr.30318
48.
RovaiA. P. (2003).
In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs. The Internet and Higher Education,
6(1), 1–16. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00158-6
StevensM.MoraP. (2017). Factors influencing academic help seeking by college students. Learning from the learners: Successful college students share their effective learning habits (p. 213).
Lanham, MD:
Rowan & Littlefield.
51.
TaylorP. G. (2000).
Changing expectations: Preparing students for flexible learning. International Journal for Academic Development,
5(2), 107–115. doi:10.1080/13601440050200716
52.
TisdellC. C.ShekhawatG. S. (2019).
An applied e-mentoring model for academic development, reflection, and growth. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning,
13(2), 1–7. doi:10.20429/ijsotl.2019.130206
53.
VianoS. L. (2018).
At-risk high school students recovering course credits online: What we know and need to know. American Journal of Distance Education,
32(1), 16–26. doi:10.1080/08923647.2018.1412554
54.
VogtP. W. (2007). Quantitative research methods for professionals.
Boston, MA:
Allyn and Bacon.
55.
VroomV. H. (1964). Work and motivation.
New York, NY:
Wiley.
56.
WebbJ. M. (2002).
Gender, age, ethnicity, and interest in taking an online course. Academic Exchange Quarterly,
6(2), 172–177. Retrieved from http://rapidintellect.com/AEQweb/
57.
WladisC.HacheyA. C.ConwayK. M. (2015).
The representation of minority, female, and non-traditional STEM majors in the online environment at community colleges: A nationally representative study. Community College Review,
43(1), 89–114. doi:10.1177%2F0091552114555904
58.
WoodwardA. T.FreddolinoP. P.WishartD. J.BakkL.KobayashiR.TupperC.Blaschke-ThompsonC. (2013).
Outcomes from a peer tutor model for teaching technology to older adults. Ageing and Society,
33(8), 1315–1338. doi:10.1017/S0144686X12000530
59.
YezbickE.TuttyJ. I. (2017).
Rapport, perceptions of effectiveness, and course grade expectations, a correlational analysis. I-Manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology,
11(1), 14.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
