This study uses data from the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System and Delta Cost Project to identify institutional predictors of bachelor’s degree completion rates for Pell Grant recipients and nonrecipients at public and private not-for-profit 4-year institutions. Descriptive analyses show that Pell recipients are relatively concentrated in institutions with demographic and structural characteristics associated with lower completion rates, including lower SAT scores, enrollment, and residential intensity. Multivariate analyses show that controlling for demographic and structural characteristics explains the observed negative relationship between an institution’s representation of Pell Grant recipients and its completion rates for Pell recipients. At public 4-year institutions, per full-time equivalent expenditures on instruction and institutional grants are positively related to Pell completion rates, while net price for low-income students is negatively related, after controlling for demographic and structural characteristics.
BergerJ.MilemJ. (2000). Organizational behavior in higher education and student outcomes. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (
Vol. 15, pp. 268–338).
New York, NY:
Agathon.
4.
BoundJ.LovenheimM. F.TurnerS. (2010).
Why have college completion rates declined? An analysis of changing student preparation and collegiate resources. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics,
2, 129–157.
5.
BoundJ.TurnerS. (2007).
Cohort crowding: How resources affect collegiate attainment. Journal of Public Economics,
91, 877–899.
6.
BowenW. G.ChingosM. M.McPhersonM. S. (2009). Crossing the finishline: Completing college at America’s public universities.
Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
7.
BrykA. S.RaudenbushS. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models.
Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE.
ChenR. (2012).
Institutional characteristics and college student dropout: A multilevel event history analysis. Research in Higher Education,
53, 487–505.
11.
DynarskiS. M. (2003).
Does aid matter? Measuring the effect of student aid on college attendance and completion. American Economic Review,
93(1), 279–288.
12.
Gansemer-TopfA. M.SchuhJ. H. (2006).
Institutional selectivity and institutional expenditures: Examining organizational factors that contribute to retention and graduation. Research in Higher Education,
47, 613–642.
13.
GinderS. A.Kelly-ReidJ. E.MannF. B. (2017). Graduation rates for selected cohorts, 2008–13; Outcome measures for cohort year 2008; Student financial aid, academic year 2015–16; and admissions in postsecondary institutions, fall 2016: First Look (preliminary data) (NCES 2017-150).
Washington, DC:
National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
14.
HamrickF. A.SchuhJ. H.ShelleyM. C. (2004).
Predicting higher education graduation rates from institutional characteristics and resource allocation. Education Policy Analysis Archives,
12(19), n19. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ852303.pdf
KuhG. D.KinzieJ.BuckleyJ. A.BridgesB. K.HayekJ. C. (2006, July). What matters to student success: A review of the literature (Commissioned report). Washington, DC: National Postsecondary Education Cooperative.
19.
MarshG. (2014).
Institutional characteristics and student retention in public 4-year colleges and universities. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, & Practice,
16(1), 127–151.
20.
MayhewM. J.RockenbachA. N.BowmanN. A.SeifertT. A. D.WolniakG. C.PascarellaE. T.TerenziniP. T. (2016). How college affects students: 21st century evidence that higher education works (
Vol. 3).
San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
21.
MelguizoT. A. (2011). Review of the theories developed to describe the process of college persistence and attainment. In SmartJ. C.PaulsenM. B. (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of Theory and Research (
Vol. 26, pp. 395–424).
New York, NY:
Springer.
22.
MullinC. M. (2013).
Past, present, and possibilities for the future of the Pell Grant Program. Journal of Education Finance,
39(1), 3–14.
23.
NicholsA. H. (2015, September). The Pell partnership: Ensuring a shared responsibility for low-income student success.
Washington, DC:
The Education Trust.
Office of the Under Secretary. (2016). Fulfilling the promise, serving the need: Advancing college opportunity for low-income students.
Washington, DC:
U.S. Department of Education.
26.
OsegueraL. (2006).
Four and six-year baccalaureate degree completion by institutional characteristics and racial/ethnic groups. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice,
7, 19–59.
27.
PowellK. K.ReyM. P. (2015).
Exploring a resource dependency perspective as an organizational strategy for building resource capacity: Implications for public higher education universities. Management in Education,
29(3), 94–99.
28.
RyanJ. F. (2004).
The relationship between institutional expenditures and degree attainment at baccalaureate colleges. Research in Higher Education,
45, 97–114.
29.
SchuddeL. T. (2011).
The causal effect of campus residency on college student retention. Review of Higher Education,
34(4), 581–610.
30.
ScottM.BaileyT.KienzlG. (2006).
Relative success? Determinants of college graduation rates in public and private colleges in the U.S. Research in Higher Education,
47, 249–279.
31.
TarranB. (2019, August).
The s word and what to do about it. Significance,
16(4), 14–22.
32.
TintoV. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition.
Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
33.
TitusM. A. (2004).
An examination of the influence of institutional context on student persistence at 4-year colleges and universities: A multilevel approach. Research in Higher Education,
45, 673–699.
34.
TitusM. A. (2006).
Understanding college degree completion of students with low socioeconomic status: The influence of the institutional financial context. Research in Higher Education,
45, 371–398.
35.
WebberD. A. (2012).
Expenditures and postsecondary graduation: An investigation using individual-level data from the state of Ohio. Economics of Education Review,
31, 615–618.
36.
WebberD. A.EhrenbergR. G. (2010).
Do expenditures other than instructional expenditures affect graduation and persistence rates in American higher education?Economics of Education Review,
29, 947–958.
37.
Wei, C. C., & Horn, L. (2009) A Profile of Successful Pell Grant Recipients: Time to Bachelor’s Degree and Early Graduate School Enrollment (NCES 2009-156). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.
38.
ZiskinM.HosslerD.KimS. (2009).
Institutional level catalysts and constraints: The study of institutional practices related to student persistence. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, & Practice,
11(1), 101–121.
