Persistence to Graduation for Students With Disabilities: Implications for Performance-Based Outcomes

Abstract

The study sought to determine whether students with disabilities are disadvantaged because of state and institutional performance-based policies providing incentives for 4-year graduation. In a longitudinal study of 32,187 students at a Midwestern Research University, the retention and graduation rates, and mean years to graduation, of students with disabilities were compared with students without disabilities. This study demonstrated that the presence of a disability does not negatively influence eventual graduation, but that it does influence the amount of time to degree completion. However, as the transition to college for students with disabilities can be more difficult, it is important that the institution has interventions in place to assist students with disabilities to assimilate into college. The discussion focuses on policy and practice implications linked to performance-based outcomes related to students with disabilities.

Keywords

performance-based outcomes students with disabilities graduation retention ex post facto design

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA). (1990). PL 101–336, 42 U.S.C., §12101 et seq.

Barnard-Brak

Davis

Tate

Sulak

(2009) Attitudes as a predictor of college students requesting accommodations. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 31: 189–198. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2010-00140-006&site=ehost-live.

Barnard-Brak

Lechtenberger

Lan

W. Y.

(2010) Accommodation strategies of college students with disabilities. The Qualitative Report 15: 411–429. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR15-2/barnard-brak.pdf.

Barnard-Brak

Stevens

Siwatu

Lan

(2008) Diversity beliefs as a mediator to faculty attitudes toward students with disabilities. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 1: 169–175. doi:10.1037/a0012707.

Bogue

E. G.

Johnson

B. D.

(2010) Performance incentives and public college accountability in the United States: A quarter century policy audit. Higher Education Management & Policy 22(2): 9–30. Retrieved from http://proxy.bsu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=55786018&site=ehost-live&scope=site.

Borg

W. R.

Gall

M. D.

(1989) Educational research: An introduction, 5th ed. New York, NY: Longman.

Braxton, J. M. (Ed.). (2000). Reworking the student departure puzzle. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

Braxton

J. M.

Doyle

W. R.

Hartley

H. V.

Hirschy

A. S.

Jones

W. A.

McLendon

M. K.

(2014) Rethinking college student retention, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Braxton

J. M.

Hirschy

A. S.

McClendon

S. A.

(2004) Understanding and reducing college student departure (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 30[3]), San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

10.

Chickering

A. W.

Reisser

(1993) Education and identity, 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

11.

Cobb

R. B.

Lipscomb

Wolgemuth

Schulte

Veliquette

Alwell

Weinberg

(2013) Improving post-high school outcomes for transition-age students with disabilities: An evidence review (NCEE 2013–4011), Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences.

12.

Cook

Rumrill

P. D.

Tankersley

(2009) Priorities and understanding of faculty members regarding college students with disabilities. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 21: 84–96. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ896246&site=ehost-live.

13.

Cotton

S. R.

Wilson

(2006) Student-faculty interactions: Dynamics and determinants. Higher Education 51: 487–519. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-1705-4.

14.

Dougherty

K. J.

Natow

R. S.

Hare

R. J.

Jones

S. M.

Vega

B. E.

(2011) The politics of performance funding in eight states: Origins, demise, and change. Final report to the Lumina foundation for education, New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Columbia University.

15.

Elder

G. H.

Pavalko

E. K.

Clipp

E. C.

(1993) Working with archival data: Studying lives, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

16.

Enright

Conyers

L. M.

Szymanski

(1996) Career and career-related educational concerns of college students with disabilities. Journal of Counseling & Development 75: 103–114. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=1997-02426-003&site=ehost-live.

17.

Fusani

D. S.

(1994) “Extra-class” communication: Frequency, immediacy, self-disclosure, and satisfaction in student-faculty interaction outside the classroom. Journal of Applied Communication Research 22: 232–255. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ufh&AN=9501768&site=ehost-live.

18.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2011). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (10th ed.). Washington, DC: Pearson.

19.

Getzel

Thoma

(2008) Experiences of college students with disabilities and the importance of self-determination in higher education settings. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals 31(2): 77–84. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ802166&site=ehost-live.

20.

HCM

Strategists

(2011a) Performance funding in Indiana: An analysis of lessons from the research and other state models, Washington, DC: Author.

21.

HCM

Strategists

(2011b) Higher education productivity in America, Washington, DC: Author.

22.

Hillman

N. W.

Tandberg

D. A.

Gross

J. P. K.

(2014) Performance funding in higher education: Do financial incentives impact college completion? The Journal of Higher Education 85: 826–857. doi:10.1353/jhe.2014.0031.

23.

Horn

Berktold

Bobbit

(1999) Students with disabilities in postsecondary education: A profile of preparation, participation, and outcomes (NCES 1999–187), Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics.

24.

Hossler

(1996) Associates. From admissions to enrollment management. In: Rentz

(ed.) Student affairs practice in higher education, 2nd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, pp. 56–85.

25.

Indiana Commission for Higher Education. (n.d.). History of IN performance funding. Retrieved from http://www.in.gov/che/files/PBOF_White_Paper_2-22-13_A.pdf.

26.

Jacklin, A., Robinson, C., O’Meara, L., & Harris, A. (2007). Improving the experiences of disabled students in higher education. Retrieved from http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/ assets/York/documents/ourwork/research/jacklin.pdf.

27.

Kiley, K. (2011). Performance anxiety. Inside higher Ed [web post]. Retried from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2011/12/16/indiana-revamps-performance-funding-focusing-first-year-completion.

28.

Kranke

Jackson

S. E.

Taylor

D. A.

Floersch

(2013) College student disclosure of non-apparent disabilities to receive classroom accommodations. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability 26: 35–51.

29.

Lopez

M. J. G.

(2006) Toward decentralized and goal-oriented models of institutional resource allocation: The Spanish case. Higher Education 51: 589–617. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-1905-y.

30.

Madaus

J. W.

(2005) Navigating the college transition maze: A guide for students with learning disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children 37(3): 32–37.

31.

Madaus

J. W.

Shaw

S. F.

(2004) Section 504: Differences in the regulations for secondary and postsecondary education. Intervention in School and Clinic 40: 81–87.

32.

Martinez

M. C.

Nilson

(2006) Assessing the connection between higher education policy and performance. Educational Policy 20: 299–322. doi:10.1177/0895904805285017.

33.

McKay

V. C.

Estrella

(2008) First-generation student success: The role of faculty interaction in service learning courses. Communication Education 57: 356–372. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=32708733&site=ehost-live.

34.

Miao

(2012) Performance-based funding of higher education: A detailed look at best practices in 6 states, Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.

35.

Modry-Caron, I., Knight, W., & Costomiris, R. (2012). Analysis of factors influencing time to degree of baccalaureate degree recipients academic years 2005–06 to 2010–11 (Office of Institutional Effectiveness report No. TTD-S2-2012). Retrieved from http://cms.bsu.edu/-/media/WWW/DepartmentalContent/Effectiveness/pdfs/Survey/Time%20to%20Degree/Time_to_Degree_Summary_Report_FINAL_09302012.pdf.

36.

Noel

Levitz

Saluri

Associates (1985) Increasing student retention: Effective programs and practices for reducing the dropout rate, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

37.

Patrick

Wessel

R. D.

(2013) Faculty mentorship and transition experiences of students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability 26: 105–118.

38.

Scott

McGuire

Foley

(2003) Universal design for instruction: A framework for anticipating and responding to disability and other diverse learning needs in the college classroom. Equity & Excellence in Education 36: 40–49. doi:10.1080/10665680303502.

39.

Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. (1973). 20 U.S.C., §794 et seq.

40.

Shaw

S. F.

(2009) Transition to postsecondary education. Focus on Exceptional Children 42(2): 1–16.

41.

Stumbo

N. J.

Lindahl-Lewis

Blegen

(2008) Two mentorship case studies of high school and university students with disabilities: Milestones and lessons. Journal of Rehabilitation 74(3): 45–51. Retrieved from http://proxy.bsu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cin20&AN=2010062790&site=ehost-live&scope=site.

42.

Tiedemann

C. W.

(2012) College success for students with physical disabilities, Waco, TX: Prufrock.

43.

Tinto

(1993) Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition, 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

44.

Tinto

(2012) Completing college: Rethinking institutional action, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

45.

U. S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (2013) Digest of education statistics, 2012, Washington, DC: Author.

46.

Van Gennep, A. (1960). The rites of passage (M. Vizedon & G. Caffee, Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published in 1909).

47.

Wessel

R. D.

Jones

D. L.

Blanch

C. L.

Markle

(2015) Pre-enrollment considerations of undergraduate wheelchair users and their post-enrollment transitions. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability 28: 57–71.

48.

Wessel

R. D.

Jones

J. A.

Markle

Westfall

(2009) Retention and graduation of students with disabilities: Facilitating student success. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability 21: 116–125.

49.

Wilson

Getzel

Brown

(2000) Enhancing the post-secondary campus climate for students with disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 14: 37–50.