The study utilized data from the Beginning Postsecondary Students Longitudinal Study (BPS:04/09) to examine factors that affect 4-year college students’ likelihoods of completing a science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM) bachelor’s degree within 6 years of entering college. Results highlight the lasting influence of high school academic achievement, the importance of declaring a STEM major early in a student’s college career, and disparate effects of academic performance and levels of social and academic integration. The findings suggest that students who initially may not be oriented toward STEM fields upon entering college may particularly benefit from receiving information on and encouragement toward STEM programs of study during their first year of college.
AndersonE.KimD. (2006) Increasing the success of minority students in science and technology, Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
3.
AstinA. W. (1993) What matters in college: Four critical years revisited, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
4.
BanduraA. (2001) Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology52: 1–26.
5.
BeckerG. S. (1993) Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education, New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
6.
BeilC.ReisenC. A.ZeaM. C.CaplanR. C. (1999) A longitudinal study of the effects of academic and social integration and commitment on retention. NASPA Journal37: 376–385.
7.
BergerM. C. (1988) Predicted future earnings and choice of college major. Industrial & Labor Relations Review41: 418–429.
8.
BergerJ.MilemJ. (1999) The role of student involvement and perceptions of integration in a causal model of student persistence. Research in Higher Education40: 641–664.
9.
BowenW. G.BokD. (1998) The shape of the river: Long term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
10.
BraxtonJ. M.MilemJ. F.SullivanA. S. (2000) The influence of active learning on the college student departure process. Journal of Higher Education71: 569–590.
11.
ChangM. J.EaganM. K.LinM. H.HurtadoS. (2011) Considering the impact of racial stigmas and science identity: Persistence among biomedical and behavioral sciences aspirants. Journal of Higher Education82: 564–596.
12.
ChenX.WekoT. (2009) Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education NCES, 2009–161. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009161.pdf.
13.
CobleC.AllenM. (2005) Keeping America competitive: Five strategies to improve mathematics and science education, Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States Retrieved from http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/62/19/6219.pdf.
14.
CrispG.NoraA.TaggartA. (2009) Student characteristics, pre-college, college, and environmental factors as predictors of majoring in and earning a STEM degree: An analysis of students attending a Hispanic serving institution. American Educational Research Journal46: 924–942.
15.
DowdA. C.MalcomL. E.BensimonE. M. (2009) Benchmarking the success of Latina and Latino students in STEM to achieve national graduation goals, Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California Retrieved from http://cue.usc.edu/news/NSF-Report.pdf.
16.
FenskeR. H.PorterJ. D.DuBrockC. P. (2000) Tracking financial aid and persistence of women, minority, and needy students in science, engineering, and mathematics. Research in Higher Education41: 67–94.
17.
FreehillL. M. (1997) Education and occupational sex segregation: The decision to major in engineering. The Sociological Quarterly38: 225–249.
18.
GasiewskiJ. A.EaganM. K.GarciaG. A.HutadoS.ChangM. J. (2012) From gatekeeping to engagement: A multicontextual, mixed method study of student academic engagement in introductory STEM courses. Research in Higher Education53: 229–261.
19.
George-Jackson, C. E., Kienzl, G. S., & Trent, W. T. (2008, November). Underrepresented students entering STEM fields. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Jacksonville, FL.
20.
GriffithA. L. (2010) Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: Is it the school that matters?Economics of Education Review29: 911–922.
21.
GrilichesZ. (1977) Estimating the returns to schooling: Some econometric problems. Econometrica45(1): 1–21.
22.
HagedornL. S.NoraA.PascarellaE. T. (1996) Preoccupational segregation among first-year college students: An application of the duncan dissimilarity index. Journal of College Student Development37: 425–437.
23.
Hahs-VaughD. L. (2005) A primer for using and understanding weights with national datasets. Journal of Experimental Education73: 221–248.
24.
HallC.DickersonJ.BattsD.KauffmannP.BosseM. (2011) Are we missing opportunities to encourage interest in STEM fields?Journal of Technology Education23: 32–46.
25.
HansonS. L. (2004) African American women in science: Experiences from high school through the post-secondary years and beyond. National Women’s Study Association Journal16: 96–115.
26.
HathawayR.NagdaB.GregermanS. (2002) The relationship of undergraduate research participation to graduate and professional education pursuit: An empirical study. Journal of College Student Development43: 614–631.
27.
HiltonT. L.LeeV. E. (1988) Student interest and persistence in science: Changes in the education pipeline in the last decade. Journal of Higher Education59: 510–526.
28.
HuS.WolniakG. C. (2010) Initial evidence on the influence of college student engagement on early career earnings. Research in Higher Education52: 750–766.
29.
HuS.WolniakG. C. (2013) College student engagement and early career earnings: Differences by gender, race/ethnicity, and academic preparation. Review of Higher Education36: 211–233.
30.
Huang, G., Salvucci, S., Peng, S., & Owings, J. (1996). National educational longitudinal study of 1988 (NELS:88) research framework and issues (Working Paper No. 96–03). Arlington, VA: Synetics for Management Decisions.
31.
HunterA. B.LaursenS.SeymourE. (2007) Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal and professional development. Science Education91: 36–74.
32.
HurtadoS.EaganM. K.TranM. C.NewmanC. B.ChangM. J.VelascoP. (2011) We do science here: Underrepresented students’ interactions with faculty in different college contexts. Journal of Social Issues67: 553–579.
KienzlG. S.George-JacksonC. E.TrentW. (2009) Underrepresented students entering STEM fields, San Diego, CA: American Education Research Association.
35.
Kreft, I. G. (1996). Are multilevel techniques necessary? An overview including simulation studies (Unpublished manuscript). Los Angeles, CA: California State University.
36.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.HacketG. (1994) Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior45: 79–122.
37.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.HacketG. (2000) Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology47: 36–49.
38.
LeslieL. L.McClureG. T.OaxacaR. L. (1998) Women and minorities in science and engineering: A life sequence analysis. Journal of Higher Education69: 239–276.
39.
LevineJ.WyckoffJ. (1991) Predicting persistence and success in baccalaureate engineering. Education111: 461–468.
40.
LocksA. M.HurtadoS.BowmanN. A.OsegueraL. (2008) Extending notions of campus climate and diversity to students’ transition to college. Review of Higher Education31: 257–285.
41.
MapleS. A.StageF. K. (1991) Influences on the choice of math/science major by gender and ethnicity. American Educational Research Journal28: 37–60.
42.
MelguizoT.WolniakG. C. (2012) The earnings benefits of majoring in STEM fields among high achieving minority students. Research in Higher Education53: 383–405.
43.
MilemJ.BergerJ. (1997) A modified model of college student persistence: Exploring the relationship between Astin’s theory of involvement and Tinto’s theory of student departure. Journal of College Student Development38: 387–400.
44.
MontmarquetteC.CanningsK.MahseredjianS. (2002) How do young people choose college majors?Economics of Education Review21: 543–556.
45.
OakesJ. (1990) Opportunities, achievement, and choice: Women and minority students in science and mathematics. Review of Research in Education16: 153–222.
46.
PaulsenM. B. (2001) The economics of human capital and investment in higher education. In: PaulsenM. B.SmartJ. C. (eds) The finance of higher education: Theory, research, policy, and practice, New York, NY: Agathon Press, pp. 55–94.
47.
PaulsenM. B.St. JohnE. P. (2002) Social class and college costs: Examining the financial nexus between college choice and persistence. Journal of Higher Education73: 189–236.
48.
PernaL. W.GasmanM.GaryS.Lundy-WagnerV.DreznerN. D. (2010) Identifying strategies for increasing degree attainment in STEM: Lessons from minority-serving institutions. In: HarperS. R.NewmanC. B. (eds) Students of color in STEM: An evolving research agenda, New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 148. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 41–51.
49.
RaskK. (2010) Attrition in STEM fields at a liberal arts college: The importance of grades and pre-collegiate preferences. Economics of Education Review29: 892–900.
50.
ReynoldsC. L.DesjardinsS. L. (2009) The use of matching methods in higher education: Answering whether attendance at a 2-year institution results in differences in educational attainment. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Practice24: 47–97.
51.
RichardsonN.BernsB. B.SandlerJ. O.MarcoL. (2009) Implementation strategies for improving STEM education and workforce development in Massachusetts: A survey of key policy makers, Newton, MA: Center for Science Education, Education Development Center.
52.
RosenbaumP.RubinD. (1984) Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association79: 516–524.
53.
SaxL. J. (2000) Undergraduate science majors: Gender differences in who goes to graduate school. The Review of Higher Education24: 153–172.
54.
SaxL. J.BryantA. N. (2006) The impact of college on sex-atypical career choices of men and women. Journal of Vocational Behavior68: 52–63.
55.
SchaferJ. L.KangJ. (2008) Average causal effects from nonrandomized studies: A practical guide and simulated example. Psychological Methods13: 279–313.
56.
SeymourE.HunterA. B.LaursenS. L.DeantoniT. (2004) Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study. Science Education88: 493–534.
57.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
58.
SmartJ. C. (1988) College influences on graduates’ income levels. Research in Higher Education29: 41–59.
59.
SmartJ. C.FeldmanK. A.EthingtonC. A. (2000) Academic disciples: Holland’s theory and the study of college students and faculty, Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
60.
SongC.GlickJ. E. (2004) College attendance and choice of college majors among Asian-American students. Social Science Quarterly (Blackwell Publishing Limited)85: 1401–1421.
61.
St. JohnE. P.HuS.SimmonsA.CarterD. F.WeberJ. (2004) What difference does a major make? The influence of college major field on persistence by African American and white students. Research in Higher Education45: 209–232.
62.
ThomasS. L.HeckR. H. (2001) Analysis of large-scale secondary data in higher education research: Potential perils associated with complex sampling designs. Research in Higher Education42: 517–540.
63.
TintoV. (1975) Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research45: 89–125.
64.
TrustyJ. (2002) Effects of high school course-taking and other variables on choice of science and mathematics college majors. Journal of Counseling & Development80: 464.
65.
TurnerS. E.BowenW. G. (1999) Choice of major: The changing (unchanging) gender gap. Industrial and Labor Relations Review52: 289–313.
66.
Wang, X. (2012). Modeling student choice of STEM fields of postsecondary study: Testing a conceptual framework of motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529700.pdf.
67.
WangX. (2013) Modeling entrance into STEM fields of study among students beginning at community colleges and four-year institutions. Research in Higher Education54: 664–692.
68.
Wine, J., Janson, N., & Wheeless, S. (2011). 2004/09 Beginning postsecondary students longitudinal study (BPS:04/09) full-scale methodology report (NCES 2012–246). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch.
69.
WolniakG. C.MayhewM. J.EngbergM. E. (2012) Learning’s weak link to persistence. Journal of Higher Education83: 795–823.
70.
YangJ. D. Y.SchaferJ. L. (2007) Demystifying double robustness: A comparison of alternative strategies for estimating a population mean from incomplete data. Statistical Science22: 523–539.
