This article investigates how members of the 20th German Bundestag use Instagram during non-campaign periods. Drawing on research on visual political communication, platform affordances, and the professionalization of digital political communication, we introduce the Instagram Complexity Index – a novel measure of how extensively posts leverage Instagram’s interactive and multimedia features. We analyze 1279 posts by 24 MPs across two 2-week periods in 2022 using a standardized codebook and test the Instagram Complexity Index empirically. We demonstrate that participatory posts that address audiences directly are significantly more complex, while posts focusing on constituency-level or international politics, as well as environmental issues, tend to use fewer platform and interactive features. Moreover, younger MPs and MPs from the conservative CDU/CSU and liberal FDP produce more complex Instagram posts, whereas male MPs post slightly less complex content than their female counterparts. We highlight that MPs’ everyday Instagram use reflects deliberate communicative choices rather than uniform platform adoption. The Instagram Complexity Index offers a replicable tool for studying digital political behavior beyond and in campaign periods and contributes to research on platform-specific political communication practices.
AnterLKümpelAS (2025) Young adults’ information needs, use, and understanding in the context of Instagram: A multi-method study. Digital Journalism13(6): 1112–1130. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2023.2211635
2.
BainottiLCaliandroAGandiniA (2021) From archive cultures to ephemeral content, and back: Studying Instagram stories with digital methods. New Media & Society23(12): 3656–3676. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820960071
3.
BastJ (2021) Politicians, parties, and government representatives on Instagram: A review of research approaches, usage patterns, and effects. Review of Communication Research9: 193–246.
4.
BastJ (2024) Managing the image. The visual communication strategy of European right-wing populist politicians on Instagram. Journal of Political Marketing23(1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2021.1892901
5.
BeneM (2017) Go viral on the Facebook! Interactions between candidates and followers on Facebook during the Hungarian general election campaign of 2014. Information, Communication & Society20(4): 513–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1198411
6.
BeneMMaginMHaßlerJ (2024) Political issues in social media campaigns for national elections: A plea for comparative research. Politics and Governance12: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.8727
7.
BossettaM (2018) The digital architectures of social media: Comparing political campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 U.S. Election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly95(2): 471–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018763307
8.
BossettaMSchmøkelR (2023) Cross-platform emotions and audience engagement in social media political campaigning: Comparing candidates’ Facebook and Instagram images in the 2020 US Election. Political Communication40(1): 48–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2128949
9.
BoulianneSLarssonAO (2023) Engagement with candidate posts on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook during the 2019 election. New Media & Society25(1): 119–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211009504
10.
BrandsCKruikemeierSTrillingD (2021) Insta(nt)famous? Visual self-presentation and the use of masculine and feminine issues by female politicians on Instagram. Information, Communication & Society24(14): 2016–2036. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1962942
11.
BroersmaMGrahamT (2012) Social media as beat: Tweets as a news source during the 2010 British and Dutch elections. Journalism Practice6(3): 403–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.663626
12.
ChaMHaddadiHBenevenutoF, et al. (2010) Measuring user influence in Twitter: The million follower Fallacy. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media4(1): 10–17.
EckerlTHahnO (2018) Die Selfie-Seite der Macht: Instagram in der politischen Kommunikation in Deutschland. In: OswaldMJohannM (eds) Strategische Politische Kommunikation im digitalen Wandel: Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven auf ein dynamisches Forschungsfeld. Springer, pp.237–257.
EkmanMWidholmA (2017) Political communication in an age of visual connectivity: Exploring instagram practices among Swedish politicians. Northern Lights15: 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1386/nl.15.15-1
17.
EnliG (2017) Twitter as arena for the authentic outsider: Exploring the social media campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. European Journal of Communication32(1): 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116682802
18.
EnliGSSkogerbøE (2013) Personalized campaigns in party-centred politics: Twitter and Facebook as arenas for political communication. Information, Communication & Society16(5): 757–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.782330
FarahbakhshRCuevasÁCrespiN (2016) Characterization of cross-posting activity for professional users across Facebook, Twitter and Google+. Social Network Analysis and Mining6(1): 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-016-0336-y
21.
FarkasXBeneM (2021) Images, politicians, and social media: Patterns and effects of politicians’ image-based political communication strategies on social media. The International Journal of Press/Politics26(1): 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220959553
22.
FarkasXJacksonDBaranowskiP, et al. (2022) Strikingly similar: Comparing visual political communication of populist and non-populist parties across 28 countries. European Journal of Communication37(5): 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231221082238
23.
FriemelTN (2016) The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media & Society18(2): 313–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814538648
24.
GeiseSMaubachKEliAB (2022) Personalisierung und Emotionalisierung auf Social Media: Multimodale Kampagnenstrategien im Bundestagswahlkampf 2021. In: KorteKRSchiffersMvon SchuckmannA, et al. (eds) Die Bundestagswahl 2021. Springer, pp.1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35758-0_20-1
25.
GerodimosRJustinussenJ (2015) Obama’s 2012 Facebook campaign: Political communication in the age of the like button. Journal of Information Technology & Politics12(2): 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.982266
26.
GibsonR (2015) Party change, social media and the rise of ‘citizen-initiated’ campaigning. Party Politics21(2): 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812472575
HaßlerJKümpelASKellerJ (2023) Instagram and political campaigning in the 2017 German federal election. A quantitative content analysis of German top politicians’ and parliamentary parties’ posts. Information, Communication & Society26(3): 530–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1954974
29.
HaßlerJWurstA-KPohlK (2024) Politicians over issues? Visual personalization in three Instagram election campaigns. Information, Communication & Society27(5): 815–835. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2227684
JacobsKSandbergLSpieringsN (2020) Twitter and Facebook: Populists’ double-barreled gun?New Media & Society22(4): 611–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893991
32.
JungherrA (2016) Four functions of digital tools in election campaigns: The German case. The International Journal of Press/Politics21(3): 358–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216642597
33.
JungherrARivero RodríguezGGayo-AvelloD (2020) Retooling Politics: How Digital Media Are Shaping Democracy. Cambridge University Press.
34.
KissasA (2024) Populist everyday politics in the (mediatized) age of social media: The case of Instagram celebrity advocacy. New Media & Society26: 2766–2785. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221092006
KlingerUSvenssonJ (2015) The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach. New Media & Society17(8): 1241–1257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814522952
37.
KofoedJLarsenMC (2016) A snap of intimacy: Photo-sharing practices among young people on social media. First Monday21. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i11.6905
38.
KönigTSchünemannWJBrandA, et al. (2022) The EPINetz Twitter politicians dataset 2021. A new resource for the study of the German Twittersphere and its application for the 2021 federal elections. Politische Vierteljahresschrift63(3): 529–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-022-00405-7
39.
KrelingRMeierAReineckeL (2022) Feeling authentic on social media: Subjective authenticity across Instagram stories and posts. Social Media + Society8(1): 20563051221086235. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221086235
40.
KrippendorffK (2004) Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd edition Reprint). Sage.
41.
LalancetteMRaynauldV (2019) The power of political image: Justin Trudeau, Instagram, and celebrity politics. American Behavioral Scientist63: 000276421774483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764217744838
42.
LarssonAO (2023) The rise of Instagram as a tool for political communication: A longitudinal study of European political parties and their followers. New Media & Society25: 2744–2762. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211034158
43.
Lorenz-SpreenPOswaldLLewandowskyS, et al. (2022) A systematic review of worldwide causal and correlational evidence on digital media and democracy. Nature Human Behaviour7(1): 74–101. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01460-1
44.
LuchtJUdrisLVoglerD (2017) Politische Inszenierungen: Eine Inhalts- und Resonanzanalyse der Facebook-Seiten bundesdeutscher Parteien. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
45.
MarquartFOhmeJMöllerJ (2020) Following politicians on social media: Effects for political information, peer communication, and youth engagement. Media and Communication8(2): 197–207. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2764
46.
MeeksL (2016) Gendered styles, gendered differences: Candidates’ use of personalization and interactivity on Twitter. Journal of Information Technology & Politics13(4): 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1160268
47.
MetzMKruikemeierSLechelerS (2020) Personalization of politics on Facebook: Examining the content and effects of professional, emotional and private self-personalization. Information, Communication & Society23(10): 1481–1498. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1581244
48.
MoffittB (2024) How do populists visually represent ‘the people’? A systematic comparative visual content analysis of Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders’ Instagram accounts. The International Journal of Press/Politics29(1): 74–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221100418
49.
MuñozCLTownerTL (2017) The image is the message: Instagram marketing and the 2016 Presidential primary season. Journal of Political Marketing16(3–4): 290–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2017.1334254
50.
NavarroCGanapathyDRaynauldV (2023) Visual culture, personalization, and politics: A comparative analysis of political leaders’ Instagram-based image-making and communication in Spain and India. International Journal of Strategic Communication17(4): 381–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2023.2209572
ParmeleeJHPerkinsSCBeasleyB (2023) Personalization of politicians on Instagram: What Generation Z wants to see in political posts. Information, Communication & Society26(9): 1773–1788. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2027500
53.
PeetersJVan AelstPPraetS (2021) Party ownership or individual specialization? A comparison of politicians’ individual issue attention across three different agendas. Party Politics27(4): 692–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819881639
54.
PersilyNTuckerJA (eds) (2020) Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108890960
55.
PetersYNehlsPThimmC (2023) Plattformforschung mit Instagram-Daten–Eine Übersicht über analytische Zugänge, digitale Erhebungsverfahren und forschungsethische Perspektiven in Zeiten der APIcalypse. Publizistik68(2–3): 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11616-023-00786-8
56.
R Core Team (2025) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/
57.
SchmidtJ-H (2021) Facebook- und Twitter-Nutzung der Kandidierenden zur Bundestagswahl 2021. Media Perspektiven12: 639–653.
58.
SchnappK-UBockO (2020) Auswahl von Untersuchungsobjekten: Stichprobe und Vollerhebung. In: WagemannCGoerresASiewertMB (eds) Handbuch Methoden der Politikwissenschaft. Springer, pp.213–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16936-7_14
59.
StierSKirkizhNFroioC, et al. (2020) Populist attitudes and selective exposure to online news: A cross-country analysis combining web tracking and surveys. The International Journal of Press/Politics25(3): 426–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220907018
60.
StierSPopaSATheocharisY, et al. (2026) Online election campaigning in changing political environments: A comparison of the 2014 and 2019 European Parliament elections. Party Politics32: 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688251317855
61.
TarasDDavisR (eds) (2022) Electoral Campaigns, Media, and the New World of Digital Politics. University of Michigan Press.
62.
TownerTLMuñozCL (2018) Picture perfect? The role of Instagram in issue agenda setting during the 2016 Presidential primary campaign. Social Science Computer Review36(4): 484–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317728222
63.
Van AelstPSheaferTStanyerJ (2012) The personalization of mediated political communication: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism13(2): 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427802
64.
WallaschekSAhlhausPKrugR, et al. (2025) Gendered representation of lead candidates in the 2024 EP election campaign on Instagram. In: KaedingMMüllerMHoppeA (eds) The 2024 European Parliament Elections. Springer Nature, pp.219–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-89455-8_21
65.
WallaschekSKaushikKVerbalyteM, et al. (2022) Same same but different? Gender politics and (trans-)national value contestation in Europe on Twitter. Politics and Governance10(1): 146–160. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v10i1.4751
66.
WickhamH (2016) ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd edition). Springer.
67.
WickhamHAverickMBryanJ, et al. (2019) Welcome to the Tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software4(43): 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686
WidholmAEkmanMLarssonAO (2024) A right-wing wave on TikTok? Ideological orientations, platform features, and user engagement during the early 2022 election campaign in Sweden. Social Media + Society10(3): 20563051241269266. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051241269266
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
