The Moderating Effect of Ideological Identification on How Economic News and Economic Growth Impact Individual Economic Perceptions: Evidence From Chile
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2025
The Moderating Effect of Ideological Identification on How Economic News and Economic Growth Impact Individual Economic Perceptions: Evidence From Chile
Previous literature argues that macroeconomic conditions and economic news impact socio-tropic assessments. Others find that ideological identification or ideological affinity with the government impact socio-tropic economic views. Here, we test the moderating effect of ideological identification on how economic growth and economic news shape economic perceptions. We test this hypothesis using a dataset that combines monthly polls in Chile (2014–2018), economic news, and economic growth indicators. We find that ideological affinity with the government intensifies the positive impact of good macroeconomic indicators on current and prospective perceptions and, surprisingly, induces more positive current perceptions when negative economic news increases. In turn, ideological affinity with the government is associated with a slightly negative impact of good macroeconomic indicators on current (but not prospective) economic perceptions and a negative impact of negative economic news on current and prospective perceptions. Ideology moderates the effect of macroeconomic indicators and economic news on economic perceptions.
AltJELassenDDMarshallJ (2016) Credible Sources and Sophisticated Voters: When Does New Information Induce Economic Voting?The Journal of Politics78 (2): 327–342.
2.
BakerSRBloomNDavisSJ (2016) Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics131 (4): 1593–1636.
3.
BargstedMAMaldonadoL (2018) Party Identification in an Encapsulated Party System: The Case of Postauthoritarian Chile. Journal of Politics in Latin America10 (1): 29–68.
4.
BolsenTDruckmanJNCookFL (2014) The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion. Political Behavior36 (2): 235–262.
5.
CabezasJM (2015) Presidential Support in Latin America 2010–2012: Economic Vote and Political Preferences. Política. Revista de Ciencia Política53 (1): 15–35.
6.
CabezasJMNaviaP (2019) Presidential Approval in Chile, 1990–2018: Variance in U-Shaped Curves. Revista Latinoamericana de Opinión Pública8 (2): 63–87.
7.
CampbellAConversePEMillerWE, et al. (1980) The American Voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
8.
CarlinREHellwigTLoveGJ, et al. (2021) When Does the Public Get It Right? The Information Environment and the Accuracy of Economic Sentiment. Comparative Political Studies54 (9): 1499–1533.
9.
CarlinREHellwigTLoveGJ, et al. (2022) When Growth Is Not Enough: Inequality, Economic Gains, and Executive Approval. Political Science Research and Methods10 (2): 298–316.
10.
CarlinRESingerMZeichmeisterEJ (2015) The Latin American Voter: Pursuing Representation and Accountability in Challenging Contexts. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
11.
CerdaRSilvaAValenteJT (2016) Economic Policy Uncertainty Indices for Chile. Economic Policy Uncertainty Working Paper. Santiago, Chile: CLAPES-UC, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile.
12.
ChzhenKEvansGPickupM (2014) When Do Economic Perceptions Matter for Party Approval?Political Behavior36 (2): 291–313.
13.
DamstraABoukesM (2021) The Economy, the News, and the Public: A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Economic News on Economic Evaluations and Expectations. Communication Research48 (1): 26–50.
14.
De BoefSKellstedtPM (2004) The Political (and Economic) Origins of Consumer Confidence. American Journal of Political Science48 (4): 633–649.
15.
De VriesCEHoboltSBTilleyJ (2018) Facing Up to the Facts: What Causes Economic Perceptions?Electoral Studies51: 115–122.
16.
DevineCJ (2015) Ideological Social Identity: Psychological Attachment to Ideological In-Groups as a Political Phenomenon and a Behavioral Influence. Political Behavior37 (3): 509–535.
17.
DonovanKKellstedtPMKeyEM, et al. (2020) Motivated Reasoning, Public Opinion, and Presidential Approval. Political Behavior42 (4): 1201–1221.
18.
EvansGAndersenR (2006) The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions. The Journal of Politics68 (1): 194–207.
19.
EvansGPickupM (2010) Reversing the Causal Arrow: The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions in the 2000–2004 U.S. Presidential Election Cycle. The Journal of Politics72 (4): 1236–1251.
20.
GamboaRLópezMÁBaezaJ (2013) La Evolución Programática de los Partidos Chilenos 1970–2009: De la Polarización al Consenso. Revista de Ciencia Política33 (2): 443–467.
21.
GelmanAHillJ (2006) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
GonthierF (2021) When Ideological Lenses Crack. The Joint Effect of the Great Recession and Clarity of Government Responsibility on Economic Assessments. Acta Politica56 (1): 108–129.
23.
GonzalezRLe FoulonC (2020) The 2019–2020 Chilean Protests: A First Look at Their Causes and Participants. International Journal of Sociology50 (3): 227–235.
24.
HealyAJPerssonMSnowbergE (2017) Digging into the Pocketbook: Evidence on Economic Voting From Income Registry Data Matched to a Voter Survey. American Political Science Review111 (4): 771–785.
25.
JonkmanJBoukesMVliegenthartR (2020) When Do Media Matter Most? A Study on the Relationship Between Negative Economic News and Consumer Confidence Across the Twenty-Eight EU States. The International Journal of Press/Politics25 (1): 76–95.
26.
KayserMAWlezienC (2011) Performance Pressure: Patterns of Partisanship and the Economic Vote. European Journal of Political Research50 (3): 365–394.
27.
KitscheltHHawkinsKALunaJP, et al. (2010) Latin American Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
KundaZ (1990) The Case for Motivated Reasoning. Psychological Bulletin108 (3): 480–498.
29.
LenzG (2012) Follow the Leader? How Voters Respond to Politicians’ Policies and Performance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30.
Lewis-BeckMSNadeauREliasA (2008) Economics, Party, and the Vote: Causality Issues and Panel Data. American Journal of Political Science52 (1): 84–95.
LunaJP (2014) Segmented Representation: Political Party Strategies in Unequal Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33.
LunaJPAltmanD (2011) Uprooted But Stable: Chilean Parties and the Concept of Party System Institutionalization. Latin American Politics and Society53 (2): 1–28.
34.
LunaJPToroSValenzuelaS (2022) Amplifying Counter-Public Spheres on Social Media: News Sharing of Alternative Versus Traditional Media After the 2019 Chilean Uprising. Social Media + Society8 (1): 20563051221077308.
35.
MainwaringS (2018) Party System Institutionalization in Contemporary Latin America. In: MainwaringS (ed.) Party Systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.34–70.
36.
MutzDC (1992) Mass Media and the Depoliticization of Personal Experience. American Journal of Political Science36 (2): 483–508.
37.
NadeauRLewis-BeckMSBélangerÉ (2013) Economics and Elections Revisited. Comparative Political Studies46 (5): 551–573.
38.
NadeauRLewis-BeckMSBélangerE, et al. (2017) Latin American Elections: Choice and Change. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
39.
NaviaPOsorioR (2015) El Mercurio Lies, and La Tercera Lies More. Political Bias in Newspaper Headlines in Chile, 1994–2010. Bulletin of Latin American Research34 (4): 467–485.
40.
NaviaPPerelloL (2019) One-Night Stands and Long-Term Commitments: Presidential Approval for Sebastián Piñera in Chile, 2009–2014. Revista de Ciencia Politica39 (1): 49–73.
41.
NaviaPSotoI (2015) It’s Not the Economy, Stupid. ¿Qué Tanto Explica El Voto Económico Los Resultados En Elecciones Presidenciales En Chile, 1999–2013?Política53 (1): 161–186.
42.
PorathWSuzukiJ-JRamdohrT-M, et al. (2015) Newspaper Coverage of Three Presidential Campaigns in Chile: Personalisation and Political Strategies. Bulletin of Latin American Research34 (4): 451–466.
43.
SaieghSM (2015) Using Joint Scaling Methods to Study Ideology and Representation: Evidence from Latin America. Political Analysis23 (3): 363–384.
44.
SorokaSN (2014) Negativity in Democratic Politics: Causes and Consequences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
SorokaSNSteculaDAWlezienC (2015) It’s (Change In) the (Future) Economy, Stupid: Economic Indicators, the Media, and Public Opinion. American Journal of Political Science59 (2): 457–474.
46.
TaberCSLodgeM (2006) Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science50 (3): 755–769.
47.
ValenzuelaA (1978) The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Chile. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
48.
Van der EijkCFranklinMDemantF, et al. (2007) The Endogenous Economy: “Real” Economic Conditions, Subjective Economic Evaluations and Government Support. Acta Politica42 (1): 1–22.
49.
ViscontiG (2021) Reevaluating the Role of Ideology in Chile. Latin American Politics and Society63 (2): 1–25.
50.
YagciAHOyvatC (2020) Partisanship, Media and the Objective Economy: Sources of Individual-Level Economic Assessments. Electoral Studies66: 102135.
51.
ZallerJR (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52.
ZechmeisterEJ (2015) Left-right Identifications and the Latin American Voter. In CarlinRESingerMMZechmeisterEJ. (Eds.), The Latin American voter: Pursuing Representation and Accountability in Challenging Contexts (pp. 195–225). University of Michigan Press.
