Extensive scholarly attention is devoted to citizens’ preferences for alternative models of political decision-making. However, few efforts were made to identify who these citizens are and why they display a certain preference. To address this void in the literature, our article analyzes the determinants of preferences for citizens as decision-makers. It uses individual-level data from a 2014 survey on a probability representative sample in Germany and tests the effects of political attitudes toward institutions of representative democracy, interest in politics, and civic involvement. It controls for consumption of political news, education, and age.
AltmanD (2011) Direct Democracy Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AndersonCGoodyear-GrantE (2010) Why Are Highly Informed Citizens Sceptical of Referenda?Electoral Studies29 (2): 227–238.
3.
ArnoldFFreierRPallaufMet al. (2014) Voting for Direct Democracy: Evidence from a Unique Popular Initiative in Bavaria. Discussion Paper 1435, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), Berlin.
4.
BaviskarSMaloneMFT (2004) What Democracy Means to Citizens—And Why It Matters. Revista Europea de Estudios Latinoamericanos y del Caribe76 (1): 3–23.
5.
BengtssonÅ (2012) Citizens’ Perceptions of Political Processes. A Critical Evaluation of Preference Consistency and Survey Items. Revista Internacional de Sociología70 (2): 45–64.
6.
BengtssonÅChristensenH (2016) Ideals and Actions: Do Citizens’ Patterns of Political Participation Correspond to Their Conceptions of Democracy?Government and Opposition51 (2): 234–260.
7.
BengtssonÅMattilaM (2009) Direct Democracy and Its Critics: Support for Direct Democracy and “Stealth” Democracy in Finland. West European Politics32 (5): 1031–1048.
8.
BovensMWilleA (2010) The Education Gap in Participation and Its Political Consequences. Acta Politica45 (4): 393–422.
9.
BowlerSDenemarkDDonovanTet al. (2017) Right-Wing Populist Party Supporters: Dissatisfied but Not Direct Democrats. European Journal of Political Research56 (1): 70–91.
10.
BowlerSDonovanTKarpJA (2007) Enraged or Engaged? Preferences for Direct Citizen Participation in Affluent Democracies. Political Research Quarterly60 (3): 351–362.
11.
CainBE (2015) Democracy More or Less: America’s Political Reform Quandary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
ChristensenH (2017) Knowing and Distrusting: How Political Trust and Knowledge Shape Direct-Democratic Participation. European Societies20: 572–594.
13.
CofféHMichelsA (2014) Education and Support for Representative, Direct and Stealth Democracy. Electoral Studies35: 1–11.
14.
DaltonRJBurklinWDrummondA (2001) Public Opinion and Direct Democracy. Journal of Democracy12 (4): 141–153.
15.
DonovanTKarpJA (2006) Popular Support for Direct Democracy. Party Politics12 (5): 671–688.
16.
DonovanTTolbertCJSmithDA (2009) Political Engagement, Mobilization, and Direct Democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly73 (1): 98–118.
17.
DrewDWeaverD (2006) Voter Learning in the 2004 Presidential Election: Did the Media Matter?Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly83 (1): 25–42.
18.
EastonD (1965) A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: John Wiley.
19.
EliasophN (1998) Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
ElsässerLHenseSSchäferA (2017) “Dem Deutschen Volke”? Die ungleiche Responsivität des Bundestags. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft27 (1): 161–180.
21.
EsaiassonPGilljamMPerssonM (2012) Which Decision-Making Arrangements Generate the Strongest Legitimacy Beliefs? Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment. European Journal of Political Research51 (6): 785–808.
22.
FerrinMKriesiH (eds) (2016) How Europeans View and Evaluate Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
FontJWojcieszakMNavarroCJ (2015) Participation, Representation and Expertise: Citizen Preferences for Political Decision-Making Processes. Political Studies63 (Suppl. 1): 153–172.
24.
GabrielOW (2013) Repräsentationsschwächen und die zweite Transformation der Demokratie: Wer will in Deutschland direkte Demokratie?Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen44 (3): 592–612.
25.
GeisselB (2011) Politische Kritik—Gefahr oder Ressource für die Demokratie?Berlin: Campus Verlag.
26.
GherghinaSGeisselB (2017) Linking Democratic Preferences and Political Participation: Evidence from Germany. Political Studies65 (Suppl. 1): 24–42.
27.
HibbingJRTheiss-MorseE (2001) Process Preferences and American Politics: What the People Want Government to Be. American Political Science Review95 (1): 145–153.
28.
HibbingJRTheiss-MorseE (2002) Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
JacobsLRCookFLCarpiniMXD (2009) Talking Together: Public Deliberation and Political Participation in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
30.
LeighleyJ (1996) Group Membership and the Mobilization of Political Participation. Journal of Politics58 (2): 447–463.
31.
LeiningerA (2015) Popular Support for Direct Democracy in Europe. Paper Presented at ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Warsaw, 29 March–2 April 2015.
32.
McLeodJMScheufeleDAMoyP (1999) Community, Communication, and Participation: The Role of Mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation. Political Communication16 (3): 315–336.
33.
MendelsohnMParkinA (2001) Referendum Democracy Citizens, Elites and Deliberation in Referendum Campaigns. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
NicholsonSP (2005) Voting the Agenda: Candidates, Elections, and Ballot Propositions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
NorrisP (2000) A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
PutnamRD (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
40.
PutnamRD (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
41.
QvortrupM (2014) Referendums around the World: The Continued Growth of Direct Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
42.
RapeliL (2016) Public Support for Expert Decision-Making: Evidence from Finland. Politics36: 142–152.
43.
RoseRBorzG (2013) What Determines Demand for European Union Referendums?Journal of European Integration35 (5): 619–633.
44.
RosenstoneSJHansenJM (1993) Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
45.
SchäferASchönH (2013) Mehr Demokratie, aber nur für wenige? Der Zielkonflikt zwischen mehr Beteiligung und politischer Gleichheit. Leviathan41 (1): 94–120.
46.
ScheufeleDA (2002) Examining Differential Gains from Mass Media and Their Implications for Participatory Behavior. Communication Research29 (1): 46–65.
47.
SchuckARTDe VreeseCH (2011) Public Support for Referendums: The Role of the Media. West European Politics34 (2): 181–207.
48.
SetalaM (2009) Introduction. In: SetalaMSchillerT (eds) Referendums and Representative Democracy: Responsiveness, Accountability and Deliberation. London and New York: Routledge/ECPR, pp.1–10.
49.
SetalaMSchillerT (eds) (2012) Citizens’ Initiatives in Europe: Procedures and Consequences of Agenda-Setting by Citizens. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
50.
VerbaSNieN (1972) Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
51.
VerbaSSchlozmanKLBradyH (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
WebbP (2013) Who Is Willing to Participate? Dissatisfied Democrats, Stealth Democrats and Populists in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Political Research52 (6): 747–772.
