This study investigates the conceptions of citizenship embedded in the K to 6 Social Studies Curriculum of the Philippines through a content analysis of Social Studies learning competencies (n = 119). Employing Westheimer and Kahne's typology of personally responsible, participatory, and justice-oriented citizenship, the study reveals a developmental sequence in citizenship education: Kindergarten centers on character and obedience; Grades 1–3 foreground community participation; and Grades 4–6 emphasize systemic critique and critical analysis. Justice-oriented competencies constitute 56% of the total, followed by participatory (34%) and personally responsible (10%). These findings suggest that the curriculum aspires to scaffold democratic citizenship through developmental sequencing. The study refines existing Philippine literature by offering an empirically grounded map of civic intent within the intended curriculum. However, it cautions that curriculum design alone cannot ensure civic outcomes and recommends embedding all three citizenship orientations across grade levels, enhancing teacher preparation, and supporting implementation with practical and low-cost pedagogical tools. These hold implications for curriculum planners, teacher educators, and future research on the lived enactment of citizenship education in Philippine classrooms.
AdarloGM (2017) (Re)framing citizenship education in the Philippines: A twenty-first-century imperative. The Good Society25(2–3): 256–288.
2.
Advisory Group on Citizenship (1998) Education For Citizenship And The Teaching Of Democracy In Schools (The Crick Report). London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
3.
AgcaoiliCBOshiharaS (2014) Teachers’ pedagogy and conceptions of history: Decolonizing and transforming history in elementary. The SIJ Transactions on Advances in Space Research & Earth Exploration2(6): 6–13.
4.
AkensonJE (1989) The expanding environments and elementary education: A critical perspective. Theory & Research in Social Education17(1): 33–52.
5.
Almonte-AcostaSA (2011) Pedagogical approaches to citizenship education in the varied contexts of secondary schools in the Philippines. In: KennedyKJLeeWOGrossmanDL (eds) Citizenship Pedagogies in Asia and the Pacific. Dordrecht: Springer, 175–201. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-0744-3_9.
6.
ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH (2025) ATLAS.ti, Version 1.1 [Computer software]. Berlin: ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH.
7.
CalingasanLY (2018) Factors that shape and determine the Social Studies curriculum in Philippine basic education 1980s-2010. Asia Pacific Journal on Curriculum Studies1(1): –6.
8.
CloughNHoldenC (1996) Global citizenship, professional competence and the chocolate cake. In: SteinerM (eds) Developing the Global Teacher: Theory and Practice in Initial Teacher Education. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books, 37–48.
9.
CoganJJDerricottR (2000) Citizenship for the 21st Century: An International Perspective on Education. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315880877.
Department of Education DepEd (2023b) Makabansa curriculum guide Grades 1-3, MATATAG curriculum. Available at: https://www.deped.gov.ph/matatag-curriculum/ (accessed 26 September 2025).
12.
Department of Education DepEd (2023c) Araling Panlipunan curriculum guide Grades 4-6, MATATAG curriculum. Available at: https://www.deped.gov.ph/matatag-curriculum/ (accessed 26 September 2025).
13.
Department of Education DepEd (2024) Amendment to DepEd Order No. 010, s. 2024: Policy Guidelines on the Implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum (DepEd Order No. 012, s. 2024). Available at: https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/DO_s2024_010.pdf (accessed 21 Mar 2026).
14.
DizonAG (2022) Citizenship education in the K to 12 junior high school economics curriculum in the Philippines: A content analysis. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education21(2): 136–149.
15.
EnrightEToledoS (2023) What type of citizen am I? Examining the development of preservice teachers’ civic identities through interactive civics activities.Journal of Social Studies Education Research14(1): 83–109. Available at: https://jsser.org/index.php/jsser/article/view/4685
16.
GaliRAC (2024) The status of civic education in the Philippines: A review. In: Book of Abstracts, 1st KaMaG-Aral National Conference: Social Studies Education in the Post-pandemic Era. Baguio City: Katipunan ng mga Mananaliksik at Guro ng Araling Panlipunan, University of the Philippines Baguio, 22.
17.
HalvorsenA-L (2013) A History of Elementary Social Studies: Romance and Reality. New York: Peter Lang.
18.
HoldenC (1998) Education for citizenship: The contribution of social, moral and cultural education. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education3(3): 141–150.
19.
HungC-Y (2013) A critical discussion of the citizenship curriculum in Taiwan and England: Teachers’ voices on liberal and communitarian constructs. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education12(2): 86–100.
20.
HungC-Y (2022) The revival of the process model in curriculum design: Changes and challenges in the new Taiwanese citizenship curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies54(3): 406–422.
21.
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement IEA (2010) ICCS 2009 international report: Civic knowledge, attitudes, and engagement among lower-secondary school students in 38 countries Schulz W, Ainley J, Fraillon J, Kerr D and Losito B, eds. Amsterdam: IEA.
22.
JacabanJO (2024) Larger than themselves: A latent content analysis of students’ success stories journals toward civic identity. In Conference paper, Annual Research Congress for High School and Elementary Teachers, Researchers, and Scholars ARCHERS.
23.
KrippendorffK (2013) Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology, 3rd edThousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
LevinsonM (2014) Action Civics In The Classroom. Silver Spring, MD: Social Education.
25.
ManningM (2023) Citizenship and education in Hong Kong: A review of contemporary academic literature. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs52(3): 542–559.
26.
MarasiganS BSerranoJ V (2012) Citizenship and ecology: A closer look at obligations, rights and expectations to and from nature. Journal of Nature Studies11(1-2): 64–70.
27.
MarshallTH (2009) Citizenship and social class. In: ManzaJSauderM (eds) Inequality and Society: Social Science Approaches to Social Stratification. New York: W. W. Norton, 148–154. Original work published 1950.
28.
McLaughlinTH (1992) Citizenship, diversity and education: A philosophical perspective. Journal of Moral Education21(3): 235–250.
29.
NagahamaHAbulenciaASFerrerJC (2022) Citizenship education in the Philippines: Education for ASEANness. In: HirataT (ed) Citizenship Education in the ASEAN Community. Singapore: Springer, 175–201. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-3692-0_9.
30.
National Council for the Social Studies NCSS (1994) Expectations of Excellence: Curriculum Standards for Social Studies. Bulletin 89. Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED378131 (accessed 26 September 2025).
31.
O’BrienJLSmithJM (2011) Elementary education students’ perceptions of ‘good’ citizenship. Journal of Social Studies Education Research2(1): 21–36. Available at: https://jsser.org/index.php/jsser/article/view/122
Oxfam (2012) Global Citizenship Education School Guide: Concepts, Practice, Experience. Hong Kong: Oxfam Hong Kong.
34.
PattersonNDoppenFMiscoT (2012) Beyond personally responsible: A study of teacher conceptualizations of citizenship education. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice7(2): 191–206.
35.
PrintM (2007) Citizenship education and youth participation in democracy. British Journal of Educational Studies55(3): 325–345.
36.
RamiscalJD (2024) “What kind of citizen?”: Reframing civic education in the Araling Panlipunan 4 of the MATATAG curriculum. Conference abstract. In: Book of Abstracts, 1st KaMaG-Aral National Conference: Social Studies Education in the Post-pandemic Era. Baguio City: Katipunan ng mga Mananaliksik at Guro ng Araling Panlipunan, University of the Philippines Baguio, 21.
37.
RebellMA (2018) Flunking Democracy: Schools, Courts, and Civic Participation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226517579.001.0001.
38.
RiffeDLacySFicoFG, et al. (2019) Analyzing Media Messages: Using Quantitative Content Analysis in Research, 4th edNew York: Routledge.
39.
SchulzWAinleyJFraillonJLositoBAgrustiGDamianiVFriedmanT (eds) (2025) Education for Citizenship In Times Of Global Challenge: IEA International Civic And Citizenship Education Study 2022 International Report. Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-65603-3
Second Congressional Commission on Education EDCOM II (2024) Miseducation: The failed system of Philippine education, EDCOM II year one report. Manila: Second Congressional Commission on Education. Available at: https://edcom2.gov.ph/ (accessed 26 September 2025).
42.
Serafico-Reyes NMSjamsuddinHWiriaatmadjaR, et al. (2019) Araling Panlipunan (Social Studies) in the Philippine Makabayan Learning Area: Problems and prospects in articulating social studies as a discipline. Proceedings of the 3rd Asian Education Symposium (AES 2018)253: 138–143.
43.
SimJB-YKhoE (2024) Social studies and citizenship education in Singapore: Towards a progressive orientation?Citizenship Teaching and Learning19(2): 133–152.
44.
Social Science Data & Software SSDS (2010) Coding rules for qualitative data. Technical manual. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
45.
SteinA (2024) The smallest acts go a long way: Understanding students’ perceptions of citizenship and civic identity. Master’s thesis. Rutgers University.
46.
TahirsylajA (2020) What kind of citizens? Constructing ‘young Europeans’ through loud borrowing in curriculum policy-making in Kosovo. Comparative Education57(1): 115–129.
47.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization UNESCO (2015) Global citizenship education: Topics and learning objectives. Paris: UNESCO. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232993 (accessed 26 September 2025).
48.
WestheimerJKahneJ (2004) What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal41(2): 237–269.
WuiMGLClaudioJSRReyesRTM, et al. (2024) The people deserve better governance”: Examining the letters of Filipino high school students to the next president of the Philippines. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review24(4): 173–195.
51.
ZhaoYHogeJD (2005) What elementary students and teachers say about social studies. The Social Studies96(5): 216–221.
