This research investigates the incorporation of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) into civic education (CE) from the viewpoints of Turkish social studies teacher candidates. The relationship between national identity and global citizenship, in light of concerns like as globalization, migration, and environmental catastrophes, requires a redefining of CE. This research employs Q technique to investigate teacher candidates’ objectives and attitudes about the alignment of CE with SDGs, uncovering three diverse perspectives: National Identity, Kemalism, and Ecological-Critical Citizenship. Results underscore the necessity for educational reforms that harmonize national and international frameworks, promote environmental consciousness, and improve teaching methodologies to tackle global issues. Integrating CE with SDGs is crucial for cultivating critical, inclusive, and globally competent educators, which is vital for enhancing Turkey's sustainable development efforts and encouraging global citizenship.
AlthusserL (1971) Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In: AlthusserL (ed) Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. Monthly Review Press, pp. 127–186.
2.
Baena-MoralesSGarcía-TaiboOMerma-MolinaG, et al. (2022) Analysing the sustainability competencies of preservice teachers in Spain. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education15(3): 731–744.
3.
BanksJA (2008) Diversity, group identity, and citizenship education in a global age. Educational Researcher37(3): 129–139. (Original work published 2008)
4.
BexellMJönssonK (2016) Responsibility and the united Nations’ sustainable development goals. Forum for Development Studies44(1): 13–29.
5.
BiestaG (2009) Sporadic democracy: Education, democracy, and the question of inclusion. In: KatzMSVerducciSBiestaG (eds) Education, Democracy, and the Moral Life. Dordrecht.Springer, 139–154. 10.1007/978-1-4020-8626-7_8
6.
BonnettM (2002) Education for sustainability as a frame of mind. Environmental Education Research8(1): 9–20.
7.
BrewerGASeldenSCFacerRLII (2000) Individual conceptions of public service motivation. Public Administration Review60: 254–264.
8.
BrownSR (1996) A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity16(3/4): 91–138.
ChungBGParkI (2016) A review of the differences between ESD and GCED in SDGs: Focusing on the concepts of global CE. Journal of International Cooperation in Education18(2): 17–35.
11.
ÇokçalışkanHOkuluHZYorulmazA (2024) Perceptions of sustainable development goals: A Q methodology study with Turkish pre-service teachers. Environmental Education Research30(10): 1729–1747.
12.
CrickB (1998) Education for citizenship and the teaching of democracy in schools: Final report of the advisory group on citizenship. London, UK: QCA.
13.
DanielsonS (2009) Q method and surveys: Three ways to combine Q and R. Field Methods21(3): 219–237.
14.
Dogu B and Kus Z (2022) Identity construction in social studies curriculums from 1968 to the present. TAY Journal 6(2): 462–493.
Eurydice. (2017) CE at school in Europe – 2017. Brussels, Belgium: Publications Office of the European Union. 10.2797/53642
17.
EvansNWhitehouseHHickeyR (2012) Pre-service teachers’ conceptions of education for sustainability. Australian Journal of Teacher Education37(7): 1–12.
18.
FergusonTRoofeCCookLD (2021) Teachers’ perspectives on sustainable development: The implications for education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research27(9): 1–7.
19.
Fukuda-ParrS (2019) Keeping out extreme inequality from the SDG agenda – the politics ofIndicators. Global Policy10(1): 61–69.
20.
GellnerE (1983) Nations and nationalism. London: Blackwell.
21.
GreenA (1990) Education and state formation: The rise of education systems in England, France, and the USA. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.
22.
HayneA (1998) Choose life. Choose a perspective: A Q-methodological analysis of different perceptions of drug education and Trainspotting in small town Scotland (Doctoral dissertation, University of Manchester).
23.
HeaterD (2015) A history of education for citizenship. London, UK: Routledge.
24.
HobsbawmEJ (1990) Nations and nationalism since 1780: Programme, myth, reality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
HoskinsB (2006) Draft framework on indicators for active citizenship. Ispra, Italy: CRELL.
26.
İçduyguADemiryontarB (2022) Türkiye’de devlet ve Suriyeli mülteciler: Çelişkili politikalar ve araçsal rasyonellik. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Türkiye’nin Göç Siyaseti Özel Sayısı21(Özel Sayı): 316–334.
27.
Karaarslan-SemizGIsler-BaykalI (2020) Middle school pre-service mathematics teachers’ opinions related to mathematics education for sustainability. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research20(89): 111–136. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1269768
28.
KeymanEF (1998) Türkiye’de devlet ve toplum: Cumhuriyetin ideolojik temelleri. İstanbul, Türkiye: Doğuş Yayınları.
29.
KhooSJordtN (2021) Intersection and collaborative potentials between global CE and education for sustainable development. Globalisation, Societies and Education19(4): 470–481.
30.
KoehlerG (2016) Assessing the SDGs from the standpoint of eco-social policy: Using the SDGs subversively. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy32(2): 149–164.
31.
KotuľákováKKohutiarováVOrolínováM, et al. (2024) A Q-methodology study to identify Slovak and Czech secondary school teachers’ prioritised features of the sustainable development goals. Environmental Education Research34(2): 1–23. 10.1080/13504622.2024.2335632
32.
KuşZ (2020) Türkiye’de ve Dünyada Vatandaşlık Eğitimi [CE in Turkey and the World]. Ankara, Türkiye: Pegem Yayıncılık.
33.
KuşZ (2022) Sosyal Bilgiler Öğretim Programlarında İdeal Vatandaş ve Toplum [ideal citizen and society in social studies curricula]. In: BektaşÖTuranR (eds) Sosyal Bilgiler Dersi Öğretim Programları. Pegem Yayıncılık, pp. 1–20.
34.
Kuş Z (2024) Teachers' and parents' perspectives on citizenship education in Turkey: Consensus and disagreements. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice 20(2): 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/17461979241240451
35.
KuşZMertH (2021) Geography and identity: An analysis of geography curricula in Turkey. Romanian Review of Geographical Education10(2): 67–87.
36.
KuşZMertH (2023) CE Through high school history in Turkey. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education22(2): 85–99.
37.
KymlickaW (1995) Multicultural Citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
38.
KymlickaW (2007) Multicultural Odysseys: Navigating the new international politics of diversity. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39.
LangfordM (2016) Lost in transformation? The politics of the sustainable development goals. Ethics & International Affairs30(2): 167–176.
40.
McKeownBBThomasD (1988) Q methodology—Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41.
NithlavarnanASinnathambyKGunawardanaI (2013) Student teachers’ perceptions about education for sustainable development (ESD) in secondary science education. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development7(2): 167–183.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2016b) PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, reading, mathematic and financial literacy. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
44.
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2016c) Draft framework of the PISA 2018 global competence assessment. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
45.
OslerAStarkeyH (2005) Changing citizenship: Democracy and inclusion in education. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
46.
Ozan H and Kus Z (2021) Mesrutiyet'ten Cumhuriyet'e Vatandaslik Ögretim Programlarinda Kimlik Insasi. Egitim ve Toplum Arastirmalari Dergisi 8(2): 237–257.
47.
PikeG (2008) CE In global context. Brock Education17(1): 38–49.
48.
ReimersFM (2009) Global competency. Harvard International Review30(4): 24–27.
49.
Sant E, Davies I and Santisteban A (2015) Citizenship and identity: The self-image of secondary school students in England and Catalonia. British Journal of Educational Studies 64(2): 235-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2015.1070789
50.
SmithAD (1995) Nations and nationalism in a global era. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
51.
SpringJ (2018) The American school: From the Puritans to the Trump era (10th ed.)New York, USA: Routledge.
52.
StephensonW (1953) The study of behavior; Q-technique and its methodology. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.
WestheimerJ (2020) Can education transform the world?Kappa Delta Pi Record56(1): 6–12.
59.
WestheimerJKahneJ (2004) What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal41(2): 237–269.
60.
WilsonIB (2005) Person–place engagement among recreation visitors: A Q-method inquiry (Doctoral dissertation). Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK.
