Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is critical for reducing CO2 emissions, but pipeline corrosion caused by impurities in captured CO2 streams poses significant challenges. Impurities such as water (H2O), oxygen (O2), sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and hydrogen sulphide (H2S) increase the corrosivity of the environment, affecting material integrity. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of how these impurities impact pipeline integrity, focusing on their individual and synergistic effects on corrosion behaviour. Special emphasis is placed on corrosion scale formation, the role of water and acidic contaminants and the interactions between impurities under different operating conditions such as temperature and pressure. Additionally, the review highlights critical knowledge gaps and identifies areas where further research is required to develop effective mitigation strategies.
LiuDGuoXXiaoB. What causes growth of global greenhouse gas emissions? Evidence from 40 countries. Sci Total Environ2019; 661: 750–766.
2.
QuadrelliRPetersonS. The energy-climate challenge: recent trends in CO2 emissions from fuel combustion. Energy Policy2007; 35: 5938–5952.
3.
LambWFWiedmannTPongratzJ, et al.A review of trends and drivers of greenhouse gas emissions by sector from 1990 to 2018. Environ Res Lett2021; 16, Epub ahead of print 2021. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abee4e.
4.
WennerstenRSunQLiH. The future potential for Carbon Capture and Storage in climate change mitigation – an overview from perspectives of technology, economy and risk. J Clean Prod2015; 103: 724–736.
5.
MaJLiLWangH, et al.Carbon capture and storage: history and the road ahead. Engineering2022; 14: 33–43.
6.
BuiMAdjimanCSBardowA, et al.Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward. Energy Environ Sci2018; 11: 1062–1176.
7.
Nataly Echevarria HuamanRXiu JunT. Energy related CO2 emissions and the progress on CCS projects: a review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2014; 31: 368–385.
8.
ShahYT. CO2 capture, utilization, and sequestration strategies. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2021, Epub ahead of print 22 October 2021. DOI: 10.1201/9781003229575.
9.
McLaughlinHLittlefieldAAMenefeeM, et al.Carbon capture utilization and storage in review: sociotechnical implications for a carbon reliant world. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2023; 177: 113215.
10.
DavoodiSAl-ShargabiMWoodDA, et al.Carbon dioxide sequestration through enhanced oil recovery: a review of storage mechanisms and technological applications. Fuel2024; 366: 131313.
11.
AduEZhangYLiuD. Current situation of carbon dioxide capture, storage, and enhanced oil recovery in the oil and gas industry. Can J Chem Eng2019; 97: 1048–1076.
12.
KoornneefJvan BreevoortPHamelinckC, et al.Global potential for biomass and carbon dioxide capture, transport and storage up to 2050. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2012; 11: 117–132.
Maroto-ValerM. Developments and innovation in carbon dioxide (CO2) Capture and Storage Technology. Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 2010.
15.
WangZFimbres WeihsGACardenasGI, et al.Optimal pipeline design for CCS projects with anticipated increasing CO2 flow rates. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2014; 31: 165–174.
16.
NordLOBollandO. Carbon dioxide emission management in power generation. Weinheim, Germany: John Wiley & Sons, 2020.
17.
ZhaoCWangJLiX, et al.Progress in corrosion protection research for supercritical CO2 transportation pipelines. Coatings2024; 14, Epub ahead of print 2024. DOI: 10.3390/coatings14111378.
18.
SaxenaAPrakash GuptaJTiwaryJK, et al.Innovative pathways in carbon capture: advancements and strategic approaches for effective carbon capture, utilization, and storage. Sustainability (Switzerland)2024; 16, Epub ahead of print 2024. DOI: 10.3390/su162210132.
19.
LastGVSchmickMT. Identification and selection of major carbon dioxide stream compositions. 2011: 38.
20.
StokesSHaghighiHMckayC. Impact of chemical impurities on the integrity of carbon dioxide transport pipelines. In: Proceedings of the international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering – OMAE, Vol. 3, 2023, pp.1–4.
21.
BarkerRHuaYNevilleA. Internal corrosion of carbon steel pipelines for dense-phase CO2 transport in carbon capture and storage (CCS) – a review. Int Mater Rev2017; 62: 1–31.
22.
RüttersHFischerSHoaLQ, et al.Towards defining reasonable minimum composition thresholds – impacts of variable CO2 stream compositions on transport, injection and storage. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2022; 114: 1–14.
23.
PorterRTJFairweatherMPourkashanianM, et al.The range and level of impurities in CO2 streams from different carbon capture sources. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2015; 36: 161–174.
24.
MondalMKBalsoraHKVarshneyP. Progress and trends in CO2 capture/separation technologies: a review. Energy2012; 46: 431–441.
25.
SonkeJBosWMPatersonSJ. Materials challenges with CO2 transport and injection for carbon capture and storage (IJGGC D21–00389). Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2022; 114: 103601.
26.
SonkeJMorlandBHMoulieG, et al.Corrosion and chemical reactions in impure CO2. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2024; 133: 104075.
27.
SC 26 – Carbon Capture, Alternative Fuels, & Energy Storage. Materials selection and corrosion control for carbon capture & storage (CCS) projects. AMPP, 2025. Epub ahead of print July 2025. DOI: 10.5006/AMPP_SP21632-2025.
28.
LeeJYKeenerTCYangYJ. Potential flue gas impurities in carbon dioxide streams separated from coal-fired power plants. J Air Waste Manage Assoc2009; 59: 725–732.
29.
RodriguesFAJoekesI. Cement industry: sustainability, challenges and perspectives. Environ Chem Lett2011; 9: 151–166.
30.
RajabiHMoslehMHMandalP, et al.Emissions of volatile organic compounds from crude oil processing – global emission inventory and environmental release. Sci Total Environ2020; 727: 138654.
31.
JafarinejadS. Control and treatment of sulfur compounds specially sulfur oxides (SOx) emissions from the petroleum industry: a review. Chem Int2016; 2: 242–253.
32.
SimSColeISChoiYS, et al.A review of the protection strategies against internal corrosion for the safe transport of supercritical CO2 via steel pipelines for CCS purposes. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2014; 29: 185–199.
33.
BenderRFéronDMillsD, et al.Corrosion challenges towards a sustainable society. Mater Corros2022; 73: 1730–1751.
34.
RaganatiFAmmendolaP. CO2 post-combustion capture: a critical review of current technologies and future directions. Energy Fuels2024; 38: 13858–13905.
35.
SifatNSHaseliY. A critical review of CO2 capture technologies and prospects for clean power generation. Energies (Basel)2019; 12, Epub ahead of print 2019. DOI: 10.3390/en12214143.
36.
JansenDGazzaniMManzoliniG, et al.Pre-combustion CO2 capture. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2015; 40: 167–187.
37.
WangYZhaoLOttoA, et al.A review of post-combustion CO2 capture technologies from coal-fired power plants. Energy Procedia2017; 114: 650–665.
38.
KorreANieZDurucanS. Life cycle modelling of fossil fuel power generation with post-combustion CO2 capture. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2010; 4: 289–300.
39.
ScheffknechtGAl-MakhadmehLSchnellU, et al.Oxy-fuel coal combustion-a review of the current state-of-the-art. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2011; 5: S16–S35.
40.
HazraBVishalVSethiC, et al.Impact of supercritical CO2on shale reservoirs and its implication for CO2 sequestration. Energy Fuels2022; 36: 9882–9903.
41.
KearnsDLiuHConsoliC. Technology readiness and costs of CCS. Global CCS Insitute2021, p.50.
42.
KnoopeMMJRamírezAFaaijAPC. A state-of-the-art review of techno-economic models predicting the costs of CO2 pipeline transport. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2013; 16: 241–270.
43.
LuHMaXHuangK, et al.Carbon dioxide transport via pipelines: a systematic review. J Clean Prod2020; 266: 121994.
44.
HalseidMDugstadAMorlandB. Corrosion and bulk phase reactions in CO2 transport pipelines with impurities: review of recent published studies. Energy Procedia2014; 63: 2557–2569.
45.
XiangY. Corrosion issues of carbon capture, utilization, and storage. Mater Performance2018; 57: 32–35.
46.
JiangXQuDSongX, et al.Critical water content for corrosion of X65 mild steel in gaseous, liquid and supercritical CO2 stream. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2019; 85: 11–22.
47.
de VisserEHendriksCBarrioM, et al.Dynamis CO2 quality recommendations. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2008; 2: 478–484.
48.
HuaYBarkerRNevilleA. Comparison of corrosion behaviour for X-65 carbon steel in supercritical CO2-saturated water and water-saturated/unsaturated supercritical CO2. J Supercrit Fluids2015; 97: 224–237.
49.
VitaliMCorvaroFMarchettiB, et al.Thermodynamic challenges for CO2 pipelines design: a critical review on the effects of impurities, water content, and low temperature. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2022; 114: 103605.
50.
FoltranSVosperMESuleimanNB, et al.Understanding the solubility of water in carbon capture and storage mixtures: an FTIR spectroscopic study of H2O + CO2 + N2 ternary mixtures. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2015; 35: 131–137.
51.
MorlandBHTjeltaMNorbyT, et al.Acid reactions in hub systems consisting of separate non-reactive CO2 transport lines. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2019; 87: 246–255.
52.
DugstadAHalseidMMorlandB. Effect of SO2 and NO2 on corrosion and solid formation in dense phase CO2 pipelines. Energy Procedia2013; 37: 2877–2887.
53.
MorlandBHDugstadASvenningsenG. Experimental based CO2 transport specification ensuring material integrity. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2022; 119, Epub ahead of print 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2022.103697.
54.
RaceJMWetenhallBSeevamPN, et al.Towards a CO2 pipeline specification: defining tolerance limits for impurities. J Pipeline Eng2012; 11: 173–190.
55.
SimSColeISBocherF, et al.Investigating the effect of salt and acid impurities in supercritical CO2 as relevant to the corrosion of carbon capture and storage pipelines. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2013; 17: 534–541.
56.
ColeISPatersonDACorriganP, et al.State of the aqueous phase in liquid and supercritical CO2 as relevant to CCS pipelines. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2012; 7: 82–88.
57.
SlavchovRIIqbalMHFarajiS, et al.Corrosion maps: stability and composition diagrams for corrosion problems in CO2 transport. Corros Sci2024; 236, Epub ahead of print 1 August 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2024.112204.
58.
HaririMBSpringerRDAnderkoA, et al. Dense-phase CO2 corrosion: modeling the chemistry of CO2 – rich phases with impurities using the MSE thermodynamic framework. 2024: 1–12.
59.
TjeltaMMorlandBHDugstadA, et al. Corrosion reactions in simulated CO2 ship transport conditions. CORROSION 2020, 2020, NACE-2020-14572.
60.
ZengYLuoJLiK, et al. Impacts of impurities on corrosion of supercritical CO2 transportation pipeline steels. CORROSION 2018, 2018, NACE-2018-11481.
61.
AjayiTGomesJSBeraA. A review of CO2 storage in geological formations emphasizing modeling, monitoring and capacity estimation approaches. Pet Sci2019; 16: 1028–1063.
62.
OrrFM. Storage of carbon dioxide in geologic formations. J Pet Technol2004; 56: 90–97.
63.
RasoolMHAhmadMAyoubM. Selecting geological formations for CO2 storage: a comparative rating system. Sustainability (Switzerland)2023; 15: 1–39.
64.
FentawJWEmadiHHussainA, et al.Geochemistry in geological CO2 sequestration: a comprehensive review. Energies (Basel)2024; 17: 1–35.
65.
ZamaniNRangrizAChalaturnykR, et al. Significance of the Joule-Thomson cooling effect for geological CO2 storage in depleted gas reservoirs.
66.
ZamaniNOldenburgCMSolbakkenJ, et al.CO2 flow modeling in a coupled wellbore and aquifer system: details of pressure, temperature, and dry-out. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2024; 132: 104067.
67.
Darkwah-OwusuVYusofMAMSokama-NeuyamYA, et al.A comprehensive review of remediation strategies for mitigating salt precipitation and enhancing CO2 injectivity during CO2 injection into saline aquifers. Sci Total Environ2024; 950: 175232.
68.
MilletCNéelGLimaL, et al. Material selection for anthropogenic CO2 injection: mechanical and corrosion performances of steels under dense CO2 with impurities. In: AMPP annual conference + expo, 2023, AMPP-2023-18886.
69.
FuLRenZSiW, et al.Research progress on CO2 capture and utilization technology. J CO2 Util2022; 66: 102260.
70.
SunHWangHZengY, et al.Corrosion challenges in supercritical CO2 transportation, storage, and utilization – a review. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev2023; 179: 113292.
71.
WangXYangPLiR, et al.Investigation of supercritical CO2 corrosion behavior of X80 carbon steel in pipelines: an in situ experimental and DFT study. J Supercrit Fluids2024; 213: 106371.
72.
MunkejordSTHammerMLøvsethSW. CO2 transport: data and models – a review. Appl Energy2016; 169: 499–523.
73.
TangYGuoXPZhangGA. Corrosion behaviour of X65 carbon steel in supercritical-CO2 containing H2O and O2 in carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology. Corros Sci2017; 118: 118–128.
74.
HuaYBarkerRNevilleA. Effect of temperature on the critical water content for general and localised corrosion of X65 carbon steel in the transport of supercritical CO2. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2014; 31: 48–60.
75.
ChoiYSNešićS. Determining the corrosive potential of CO2 transport pipeline in high pCO2-water environments. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2011; 5: 788–797.
76.
LiuDAgarwalRLiY, et al.Reactive transport modeling of mineral carbonation in unaltered and altered basalts during CO2 sequestration. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2019; 85: 109–120.
77.
McGrailBPSchaefHTGlezakouV-A, et al.Water reactivity in the liquid and supercritical CO2 phase: has half the story been neglected?Energy Procedia2009; 1: 3415–3419.
78.
NešićSKahyarianAChoiYS. Implementation of a comprehensive mechanistic prediction model of mild steel corrosion in multiphase oil and gas pipelines. CORROSION2019; 75: 274–291.
79.
NešićS. Key issues related to modelling of internal corrosion of oil and gas pipelines – a review. Corros Sci2007; 49: 4308–4338.
80.
FonsecaDTagliariMRGuaglianoniWC, et al.Carbon dioxide corrosion mechanisms: historical development and key parameters of CO2-H2O systems. Int J Corros2024; 2024: 1–23.
81.
RizzoRBaierSRogowskaM, et al.An electrochemical and X-ray computed tomography investigation of the effect of temperature on CO2 corrosion of 1Cr carbon steel. Corros Sci2020; 166: 108471.
82.
GuptaKKHaratianSGuptaS, et al.The effect of cooling rate-induced microstructural changes on CO2 corrosion of low alloy steel. Corros Sci2022; 209: 110769.
83.
GuptaKKHaratianSMishinOV, et al.The impact of minor Cr additions in low alloy steel on corrosion behavior in simulated well environment. Npj Mater Degrad2023; 7: 1–12.
84.
GuptaKKHaratianSMishinOV, et al.CO2 Corrosion resistance of low-alloy steel tempered at different temperatures. Corros Sci2024; 232: 112027.
85.
GuptaKKYazdiRStyrk-GeislerM, et al.Effect of microstructure of low-alloy steel on corrosion propagation in a simulated CO2 environment. J Electrochem Soc2022; 169, Epub ahead of print 2022. DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/aca127.
86.
HaratianSGuptaKKLarssonA, et al.Ex-situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction study of CO2 corrosion-induced surface scales developed in low-alloy steel with different initial microstructure. Corros Sci2023; 222: 111387.
87.
Mora-MendozaJLTurgooseS. Fe3C influence on the corrosion rate of mild steel in aqueous CO2 systems under turbulent flow conditions. Corros Sci2002; 44: 1223–1246.
88.
ZaluskiWEl-KaseehGLeeS-Y, et al.Monitoring technology ranking methodology for CO2-EOR sites using the Weyburn-Midale Field as a case study. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2016; 54: 466–478.
89.
Luna-OrtizEYaoCBarnesJ, et al. Development of a CO2 specification for industrial CCS transport networks: methodology, limitations and opportunities. In: Paper presented at the offshore technology conference,Day 2 Tue, 03 May 2022. Epub ahead of print 25 April 2022. DOI: 10.4043/32103-MS.
90.
PeetKCFreedmanAJEHernandezHH, et al.Microbial growth under supercritical CO2. Appl Environ Microbiol2015; 81: 2881–2892.
91.
KairySKZhouSTurnbullA, et al.Corrosion of pipeline steel in dense phase CO2 containing impurities: a critical review of test methodologies. Corros Sci2023; 214: 110986.
92.
AyelloFEvansKThodlaR, et al. Effect of impurities on corrosion of steel in supercritical CO2. CORROSION 2010, 2010, NACE-10193.
93.
ChoiY-SNešicS. Effect of water content on the corrosion behavior of carbon steel in supercritical CO2 phase with impurities. CORROSION 2011, 2011, NACE-11377.
94.
SunJSunCZhangG, et al.Effect of O2 and H2S impurities on the corrosion behavior of X65 steel in water-saturated supercritical CO2 system. Corros Sci2016; 107: 31–40.
95.
SunJSunCWangY. Effects of O2 and SO2 on water chemistry characteristics and corrosion behavior of X70 pipeline steel in supercritical CO2 transport system. Ind Eng Chem Res2018; 57: 2365–2375.
96.
LiKZengY. Advancing the mechanistic understanding of corrosion in supercritical CO2 with H2O and O2 impurities. Corros Sci2023; 213: 110981.
97.
ZengYPangXShiC, et al. Influence of impurities on corrosion performance of pipeline steels in supercritical carbon dioxide. CORROSION 2015, 2015, NACE-2015-5755.
98.
HuaYBarkerRNevilleA. The effect of O2 content on the corrosion behaviour of X65 and 5Cr in water-containing supercritical CO 2 environments. Appl Surf Sci2015; 356: 499–511.
99.
BurkleDDe MotteRTalebW, et al.In situ SR-XRD study of FeCO3 precipitation kinetics onto carbon steel in CO2-containing environments: the influence of brine pH. Electrochim Acta2017; 255: 127–144.
100.
AzoulayIRémazeillesCRefaitPH. Oxidation of chukanovite (Fe2(OH)2CO3): influence of the concentration ratios of reactants. Corros Sci2015; 98: 634–642.
101.
SarkusTRadziwonA. Coal gasification and advances in clean coal technology. Fossil Fuels, 2016, pp.23–48.
102.
AnthonyEJSymondsRT. Oxy-fuel firing technology for power generation and heat and steam production. In: Handbook of climate change mitigation and adaptation. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp.1625–1651.
103.
ZengYLiK. Influence of SO2 on the corrosion and stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of supercritical CO2 transportation pipelines. Corros Sci2020; 165: 108404.
104.
LiKZengYLuoJ. Effect of impurity SO2 on corrosion and stress corrosion cracking of X65 steel in supercritical CO2 streams. CORROSION 2019, 2019, NACE-2019-13132.
105.
HuaYJonnalagaddaRZhangL, et al.Assessment of general and localized corrosion behavior of X65 and 13Cr steels in water-saturated supercritical CO2 environments with SO2/O2. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2017; 64: 126–136.
106.
WeiLZhangYPangX, et al.Corrosion behaviors of steels under supercritical CO2 conditions. Corros Rev2015; 33: 151–174.
107.
HuaYBarkerRNevilleA. Understanding the influence of SO2 and O2 on the corrosion of carbon steel in water-saturated supercritical CO2. CORROSION2015; 71: 667–683.
108.
ChoiY-SNesicSYoungD. Effect of impurities on the corrosion behavior of CO2 transmission pipeline steel in supercritical CO2−water environments. Environ Sci Technol2010; 44: 9233–9238.
109.
TangSZhuCCuiG, et al.Analysis of internal corrosion of supercritical CO2 pipeline. Corros Rev2021; 39: 219–241.
110.
WangZTangXXueJ, et al. The pitting behavior of stainless steels under SO2 environments with Cl− and F−. CORROSION 2017, 2017, NACE-2017-9241.
111.
YousifMMusaadAAliU, et al. Impact of impurities on the corrosion of CO2 dense phase transmission pipelines. In: AMPP middle east corrosion conference and exhibition, 2023, AMPP-MECC-2023-20236.
112.
YevtushenkoOBä ßlerR. Water impact on corrosion resistance of pipeline steels in circulating supercritical CO2 with SO2− and NO2− impurities. CORROSION 2014, 2014, NACE-2014-3838.
113.
JiangXSongXYuC, et al.Investigation of SO2-induced corrosion of X65 steel in gaseous, liquid, and supercritical CO2 environments through experimental and thermodynamic approaches. J Supercrit Fluids2025; 221: 106574.
114.
MorlandBHNorbyTTjeltaM, et al.Effect of SO2, O2, NO2, and H2O concentrations on chemical reactions and corrosion of carbon steel in dense phase CO2. CORROSION2019; 75: 1327–1338.
115.
XiangYWangZLiZ, et al.Long term corrosion of X70 steel and iron in humid supercritical CO 2 with SO 2 and O 2 impurities. Corros Eng, Sci Technol2013; 48: 395–398.
116.
MammadovSOzbayogluEMBaldinoS. Experimental corrosion study in the presence of NO2 and SO2 impurities on P110 steel grade. 2024. Epub ahead of print 2024. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4977995.
117.
McLeodWRogersRR. Sulfurous acid corrosion of low carbon steel at ordinary temperatures – I. Its nature. Corrosion1966; 22: 143–146.
118.
KiradjievKBNikolakisVGriffithsIM, et al.A simple model for the hygroscopy of sulfuric acid. Ind Eng Chem Res2020; 59: 4802–4808.
119.
SrivastavaRKMillerCAEricksonC, et al.Emissions of sulfur trioxide from coal-fired power plants. J Air Waste Manage Assoc2004; 54: 750–762.
120.
MorlandBHTadesseASvenningsenG, et al.Nitric and sulfuric acid solubility in dense phase CO2. Ind Eng Chem Res2019; 58: 22924–22933.
121.
ChialvoAAVlcekLColeDR. Acid gases in CO2-rich subsurface geologic environments. Rev Mineral Geochem2013; 77: 361–398.
122.
HuaYBarkerRNevilleA. The influence of SO2 on the tolerable water content to avoid pipeline corrosion during the transportation of supercritical CO2. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2015; 37: 412–423.
123.
MigahedMA. Environmental factors affecting corrosion inhibition in oil and gas industry. In: Corrosion inhibitors in the oil and gas industry. Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2020, pp.77–109.
124.
AlabaPAAdedigbaSAOlupinlaSF, et al.Unveiling corrosion behavior of pipeline steels in CO2-containing oilfield produced water: towards combating the corrosion curse. Crit Rev Solid State Mater Sci2020; 45: 239–260.
125.
LiCXiangYLiW. Initial corrosion mechanism for API 5L X80 steel in CO2/SO2-saturated aqueous solution within a CCUS system: inhibition effect of SO2 impurity. Electrochim Acta2019; 321: 134663.
126.
LiCXiangYWangR, et al.Exploring the influence of flue gas impurities on the electrochemical corrosion mechanism of X80 steel in a supercritical CO2-saturated aqueous environment. Corros Sci2023; 211: 110899.
127.
LeeZRZhangSFloresLA, et al.Predicting the formation of sulfur-based Brønsted acids from the reactions of SOx with H2O and H2S. J Phys Chem A2019; 123: 10169–10183.
128.
WangHDalla LanaIGChuangKT. Kinetics of reaction between hydrogen sulfide and sulfur dioxide in sulfuric acid solutions. Ind Eng Chem Res2002; 41: 4707–4713.
129.
ChoiY-SHassaniSVuTN, et al.Effect of H2S on the corrosion behavior of pipeline steels in supercritical and liquid CO2 environments. Corrosion2016; 2026: 999–1009.
130.
WeiLPangXGaoK. Effect of small amount of H 2 S on the corrosion behavior of carbon steel in the dynamic supercritical CO2 environments. Corros Sci2016; 103: 132–144.
131.
SunCDingTSunJ, et al.Insights into the effect of H2S on the corrosion behavior of N80 steel in supercritical CO2 environment. J Mater Res Technol2023; 26: 5462–5477.
132.
WangYWangBHeS, et al.Unraveling the effect of H2S on the corrosion behavior of high strength sulfur-resistant steel in CO2/H2S/Cl− environments at ultra high temperature and high pressure. J Nat Gas Sci Eng2022; 100: 104477.
133.
SuiPSunJHuaY, et al.Effect of temperature and pressure on corrosion behavior of X65 carbon steel in water-saturated CO2 transport environments mixed with H2S. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2018; 73: 60–69.
134.
LiKZengYLuoJ-L. Influence of H2S on the general corrosion and sulfide stress cracking of pipelines steels for supercritical CO2 transportation. Corros Sci2021; 190: 109639.
135.
ChoiY-SHassaniSVuTN, et al.Strategies for corrosion inhibition of carbon steel pipelines under supercritical CO2 /H2S environments. CORROSION2019; 75: 1156–1172.
136.
SuiPSunCHuaY, et al. The influence of flow rate on corrosion behavior of X65 carbon steel in water-saturated supercritical CO2/H2S system. CORROSION 2019, 2019, NACE-2019-13081.
137.
WeiLPangXGaoK. Corrosion of low alloy steel and stainless steel in supercritical CO2/H2O/H2S systems. Corros Sci2016; 111: 637–648.
138.
SmithSNJoostenMW. Corrosion of carbon steel by H2S in CO2 containing oilfield environments – 10 year update. CORROSION 2015, 2015, NACE-2015-5484.
139.
RebakRBPerezTE. Effect of carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide on the localized corrosion of carbon steels and corrosion resistant alloys. CORROSION 2017, 2017, NACE-2017-8933.
140.
PessuFBarkerRChangF, et al.Iron sulphide formation and interaction with corrosion inhibitor in H2S-containing environments. J Pet Sci Eng2021; 207: 109152.
141.
PapavinasamSRevieRWI.FriesenW, et al.Review of models to predict internal pitting corrosion of oil and gas pipelines. Corros Rev2006; 24. Epub ahead of print January 2006. DOI: 10.1515/CORRREV.2006.24.3-4.173.
142.
WangHZhangLMeiK, et al.Recent progress on the research of steel corrosion behavior and corrosion control in the context of CO 2 geological utilization and storage: a review. Corros Rev2024; 42: 435–454.
143.
VakiliMKoutníkPKohoutJ. Addressing hydrogen sulfide corrosion in oil and gas industries: a sustainable perspective. Sustainability2024; 16: 1661.
144.
SantosoRKRahmawatiSDGadesaA, et al.Scale build-up prediction of FeS and FeCO3 in gas production pipes. J Phys Conf Ser2017; 877: 012029.
145.
WoollamRTummalaKVeraJ, et al. Thermodynamic prediction of FeCO3/FeS corrosion product films. CORROSION 2011, 2011, NACE-11076.
146.
GaoSBrownBYoungD, et al. Fe3O4, FeCO3 or FeS – which corrosion product will prevail at high temperature in CO2/H2S environments?CORROSION 2020, 2020, NACE-2020-14413.
ZhengYBrownBNešićS. Electrochemical study and modeling of H2S corrosion of mild steel. CORROSION2014; 70: 351–365.
149.
VidemKKvarekvålJ. Corrosion of carbon steel in carbon dioxide-saturated solutions containing small amounts of hydrogen sulfide. CORROSION1995; 51: 260–269.
150.
MaHChengXLiG, et al.The influence of hydrogen sulfide on corrosion of iron under different conditions. Corros Sci2000; 42: 1669–1683.
151.
ZhangSGaoAMouL, et al.Corrosion response of carbon steel exposed to dynamic H2S aqueous solution in the presence of bicarbonate ions and natural aeration. J Mater Eng Perform2022; 31: 9935–9946.
152.
MenendezCMJovancicevicVZhuZ, et al. New method for assessing corrosion under iron sulfide deposits and CO2/H2S conditions. CORROSION 2011, 2011, NACE-11265.
153.
ShanabargerMRMoorheadRD. H2S adsorption onto clean and oxygen covered iron films. Surf Sci1996; 365: 614–624.
154.
MenendezCMJovancicevicVRamachandranS, et al.Assessment of corrosion under iron sulfide deposits and CO2/H2S conditions. CORROSION2013; 69: 145–156.
155.
MoralesCPascualALeinenD, et al. Reaction mechanism and kinetic model of the transformation of iron monosulfide thin films into pyrite films. J Phys Chem C. 2025. Epub ahead of print 19 February 2025. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c08227.
156.
HanssonEBOdziemkowskiMSGillhamRW. Formation of poorly crystalline iron monosulfides: surface redox reactions on high purity iron, spectroelectrochemical studies. Corros Sci2006; 48: 3767–3783.
157.
ValdezBRosasNSampedroJA, et al.Influence of elemental sulphur on corrosion of carbon steel in geothermal environments. Corros Rev1999; 17: 167–180.
158.
LamprouEStergioudiFSkordarisG, et al.Effect of NOX and SOX contaminants on corrosion behaviors of 304L and 316L stainless steels in monoethanolamine aqueous amine solutions. Coatings2024; 14: 842.
159.
SunCSunJWangY, et al.Effect of impurity interaction on the corrosion film characteristics and corrosion morphology evolution of X65 steel in water-saturated supercritical CO2 system. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control2017; 65: 117–127.
160.
HuaYNevilleABarkerR. Corrosion behaviour of X65 steels in water-containing supercritical CO2 environments with NO2/O2. CORROSION 2018, 2018, NACE-2018-11085.
161.
PaschkeBKatherA. Corrosion of pipeline and compressor materials due to impurities in separated CO2 from fossil-fuelled power plants. Energy Procedia2012; 23: 207–215.
162.
BrownJGraverBGulbrandsenE, et al.Update of DNV recommended practice RP-J202 with focus on CO2 corrosion with impurities. Energy Procedia2014; 63: 2432–2441.
163.
SunCSunJWangY, et al.Synergistic effect of O2, H2S and SO2 impurities on the corrosion behavior of X65 steel in water-saturated supercritical CO2 system. Corros Sci2016; 107: 193–203.
164.
XiangYXuMChoiY-S. State-of-the-art overview of pipeline steel corrosion in impure dense CO 2 for CCS transportation: mechanisms and models. Corros Eng Sci Technol2017; 52: 485–509.
165.
BaiFLuY. Effects of impurities on anthropogenic CO2 pipeline transport. Energy Fuels2024; 38: 9958–9966.
166.
SunCSunJLiuS, et al.Effect of water content on the corrosion behavior of X65 pipeline steel in supercritical CO2-H2O-O2-H2S-SO2 environment as relevant to CCS application. Corros Sci2018; 137: 151–162.
167.
YangWJZhaoXFSunC, et al.Corrosion behavior of X65 steel in gaseous and liquid CO 2 transport environments containing multiple impurities and different H2O content. J Phys Conf Ser2024; 2686: 012018.
168.
Quynh HoaLBaesslerRBettgeD. On the corrosion mechanism of CO2 transport pipeline steel caused by condensate: synergistic effects of NO2 and SO2. Materials (Basel)2019; 12: 364.
169.
XuMChoiY-SNesicS. Influence of impurity adsorption and condensation on the initial corrosion mechanism of CO2 transport pipeline steel. In: AMPP annual conference + expo, 2023, AMPP-2023-19066.
170.
SchmittG. Fundamental aspects of CO2 metal loss corrosion. Part II: influence of different parameters on CO2 corrosion mechanism. CORROSION 2015, 2015, NACE-2015-6033.
171.
ZhangJ. Research progress and risk analysis on internal corrosion of carbon dioxide pipeline steel with the influence of impurities. J Phys Conf Ser2024; 2821: 012022.
172.
ZengYArafinMShiC, et al. Influence of impurity hydrogen sulfide on the corrosion performance of pipeline steels in supercritical carbon dioxide stream. CORROSION 2016, 2016, NACE-2016-7223.
173.
FangHYoungDNesicS. Corrosion of mild steel in the presence of elemental sulfur. CORROSION 2008, 2008, NACE-08637.
174.
DugstadAHalseidMMorlandB. Experimental techniques used for corrosion testing in dense phase CO2 with flue gas impurities. CORROSION 2014, 2014, NACE-2014-4383.
175.
XiangYWangZXuC, et al.Impact of SO2 concentration on the corrosion rate of X70 steel and iron in water-saturated supercritical CO2 mixed with SO2. J Supercrit Fluids2011; 58: 286–294.
176.
LiCXiangYSongC, et al.Assessing the corrosion product scale formation characteristics of X80 steel in supercritical CO2-H2O binary systems with flue gas and NaCl impurities relevant to CCUS technology. J Supercrit Fluids2019; 146: 107–119.
177.
LuisP. Use of monoethanolamine (MEA) for CO2 capture in a global scenario: consequences and alternatives. Desalination2016; 380: 93–99.
178.
ZhouSZhuYXiH, et al.Research on CO2 capture performance and reaction mechanism using newly tetraethylenepentamine (TEPA) + monoethanolamine (MEA) mixed absorbent for onboard application. Chem Eng J2024; 485: 149790.
179.
ChaiSYWNguLHHowBS. Review of carbon capture absorbents for CO2 utilization. Greenhouse Gases: Sci Technol2022; 12: 394–427.
180.
XiangYLongZLiC, et al.Neutralization and adsorption effects of various alkanolamines on the corrosion behavior of N80 steel in supercritical CO2 with impurities. CORROSION2019; 75: 999–1011.
181.
XiangYLiCLongZ, et al. Effect of various alkanolamines on the corrosion behavior of N80 steel in impure supercritical CO2 environments. CORROSION 2018, 2018, NACE-2018-10736.
182.
ChoudharyNNarayanan NairAKChe RuslanMFA, et al.Bulk and interfacial properties of decane in the presence of carbon dioxide, methane, and their mixture. Sci Rep2019; 9: 19784.
183.
AimoliCGMaginnEJAbreuCRA. Transport properties of carbon dioxide and methane from molecular dynamics simulations. J Chem Phys2014; 141, Epub ahead of print 7 October 2014. DOI: 10.1063/1.4896538.
184.
RahmanRKBarakS(Raghu) ManikantachariKRV, et al.Probing the effects of NOx and SOx impurities on oxy-fuel combustion in supercritical CO2: shock tube experiments and chemical kinetic modeling. J Energy Resour Technol2020; 142, Epub ahead of print 1 December 2020. DOI: 10.1115/1.4047314.
