Looking beyond duty hours: Offering a balanced quantitative-qualitative approach to resident burnout

Abstract

Burnout, stress and overwork are highly prevalent amongst junior training physicians worldwide, which explains the widespread phenomenon of physicians leaving the field and organised protests/strikes for better working conditions. Back in 2003, the mandatory duty hour restriction was a landmark intervention rolled out by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education that formally mandated limiting working hours of trainee residents to no more than 80 h per week, and not exceeding 24-h shifts with 6 added hours for education and handover. Nonetheless, 20 years later, this measure continues to be subject to multiple debates on its purported efficacy in achieving its intended objectives and fails to adequately prevent physician burnout and exodus. In our view, the current duty hour restriction model is, in and of itself, inadequate for combating burnout amongst medical residents for several reasons, including insignificant reduction in duty hours with suboptimal adherence/reporting, failure to account for off-site clinical and non-clinical duties, as well as nature of clinical work which typically involves high work intensity in less-than-optimal/unconducive work environments and significant psychoemotional stress. In this article, we offer our perspectives on pursuing a balanced approach towards both meaningful quantitative reduction in working hours as well as practical qualitative improvement in nature of clinical and non-clinical work that could collectively address resident burnout and improve work and training outcomes.