The Anthropocene denotes a socio-ecological crisis event marked by complex biogeochemical and socio-politico-cultural interactions. This paper investigates the distinctive aspects of the educationalization of the Anthropocene, perceived as a socio-ecological challenge, and examines how various pedagogical discourses reflect or perpetuate broader power dynamics. The study examines three distinct pedagogical discourses within the educationalization of the Anthropocene: the prevailing discourse of neoliberalism, the counter-discourse of ecopedagogy, and the hybrid discourse associated with UNESCO. Pedagogical discourses, crucial for implementing and supporting these reforms, are adaptable to specific socio-political contexts. The critical examination of pedagogical discourses related to the educationalization of the Anthropocene highlights various methods of integrating socio-ecological issues into educational frameworks. OECD’s discourse emphasizes global competencies and employability, while UNESCO’s hybrid approach combines educational humanism with postmodern and postcolonial critiques. Ecopedagogy adopts a critically and emancipatory perspective, rooted in political and postcolonial analysis. Navigating these competing discourses requires educators and policymakers to balance practical effectiveness with critical awareness, recognizing the Anthropocene crisis as a matter of justice, power, and values. The diversity of these discourses suggests that the future of Anthropocene education resides in the tensions and negotiations among these competing orientations, reflecting a profound reorientation of education as a field of political, ethical, and cultural struggle.
Anderson-LevittKGardinierM-P (2021) Introduction contextualising global flow of competency based education: polysemy, hybridity and silences. Comparative Education57(1): 1–18.
2.
AuldEMorrisP (2019) Science by streetlight and the OECD’s measure of global competence: a new yardstick for internationalisation?Policy Futures in Education17(6): 677–698.
3.
BenolielPBerkovichI (2021) Ideal teachers according to TALIS: societal orientations of education and the global diagnosis of teacher self-efficacy. European Educational Research Journal20(2): 143–158.
4.
Boufoy-BastickB (2015) Rescuing language education from the neoliberal disaster: culturometric predictions and analyses of future policy. Policy Futures in Education13(4): 439–467.
5.
BournD (2018) Understanding Global Skills for 21st Century Professions. Palgrave Macmillan, 201–219.
6.
BryanA (2022) From ‘the conscience of humanity’ to the conscious human brain: UNESCO’s embrace of social-emotional learning as a flag of convenience. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education54: 1–15.
7.
CarusiFTSzkudlarekT (2020) Education is society… and there is no society: the ontological turn of education. Policy Futures in Education18(7): 907–921.
8.
ChwałczykF (2020) Around the Anthropocene in eighty names—considering the urbanocene proposition. Sustainability12(11): 4458.
9.
CobbDCouchD (2022) Locating inclusion within the OECD’s assessment of global competence: an inclusive future through PISA 2018?Policy Futures in Education20(1): 56–72.
10.
du PreezPSimmondsSle GrangeL (2022) Re/thinking curriculum inquiry in the posthuman condition: a critical posthumanist stance. Education as Change26(1): 1–20.
11.
ElfertM (2023) Humanism and democracy in comparative education. Comparative Education59: 1–18.
12.
EngelLCRutkowskiDThompsonG (2019) Towards an international measure of global competence? A critical look at the PISA 2018 framework. Globalisation, Societies and Education17(2): 117–131.
13.
FassbinderSD (2020) Paulo Freire and a curriculum for the Capitalocene. Towards Critical Environmental Education: Current and Future Perspectives. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 17–34.
14.
FrandjiDVitaleP (2011) Knowledge, pedagogy and society. In: International Perspectives on Basil Bernstein’s Sociology of Education. Routledge.
15.
GibbardPWalkerMBauerA, et al. (2022a) The Anthropocene as an event, not an epoch. Journal of Quaternary Science37(3): 395–399.
16.
GibbardPLBauerAMEdgeworthM, et al. (2022b) A practical solution: the Anthropocene is a geological event, not a formal epoch. Episodes45(4): 349–357.
17.
GrotlüschenA (2018) Global competence–does the new OECD competence domain ignore the global south?Studies in the Education of Adults50(2): 185–202.
18.
GunnellJG (2021) Cognitive neuroscience and the theory and practice of social and political inquiry. In: Routledge International Handbook of Contemporary Social and Political Theory. Routledge, 373–381.
19.
JagodzinskiJ (2022) Cosmology and the Anthropocene: speculative-educative-artistic practices for a planetary consciousness. In: Pedagogy in the Anthropocene: Re-Wilding Education for a New Earth. Springer International Publishing, 147–174.
20.
JandrićPJaldemarkJHurleyZ, et al. (2021) Philosophy of education in a new key: who remembers Greta Thunberg? Education and environment after the coronavirus. Educational Philosophy and Theory53(14): 1421–1441.
21.
JicklingBSterlingS (2017) Post-sustainability and environmental education: framing issues. In: Post-Sustainability and Environmental Education: Remaking Education for the Future. Springer International Publishing, 1–11.
22.
KahnR (2006) The educative potential of ecological militancy in an age of big oil: towards a Marcusean ecopedagogy. Policy Futures in Education4(1): 31–44.
23.
KuchtaEC (2022) The epistemological possibilities of love: relearning the love of land. In: Pedagogy in the Anthropocene: Re-Wilding Education for a New Earth. Springer International Publishing, 53–69.
24.
KumarA (2019) Curriculum in International Contexts: Understanding Colonial, Ideological, and Neoliberal Influences. Springer.
25.
MansillaVBJacksonAJacobsIH (2013) Educating for Global Competence: Learning Redefined for an Interconnected World. Mastering global literacy, contemporary perspectives. New york: Solution Tree1–23.
26.
MathouC (2018) Recontextualizing curriculum policies: a comparative perspective on the work of mid-level actors in France and Quebec. Journal of Curriculum Studies50(6): 789–804.
27.
MattaC (2024) The explanatory power of discourse analysis. Philosophy of the Social Sciences54(5): 363–386.
28.
McKnightL (2021) Curriculum design in the Anthropocene: challenges to human intentionality. Curriculum Challenges and Opportunities in a Changing World: Transnational Perspectives in Curriculum Inquiry. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 303–323.
29.
McLarenPJandricP (2014) Critical revolutionary pedagogy is made by walking: in a world where many worlds coexist. Policy Futures in Education12(6): 805–831.
30.
MisiaszekGW (2022a) Ecopedagogy: freirean teaching to disrupt socio-environmental injustices, anthropocentric dominance, and unsustainability of the Anthropocene. Educational Philosophy and Theory55: 1–15.
31.
MisiaszekGW (2022b) Ecopedagogy: critical environmental pedagogies to disrupt falsely touted sustainable development. In: The Palgrave Handbook on Critical Theories of Education. Springer International Publishing, 301–317.
32.
MisiaszekGW (2023) Ecopedagogy and ecopedagogical literacy. International Encyclopedia of Education4 th Edition: 601–612.
33.
MorganJ (2021) From the fossil curriculum to the post-carbon curriculum: Histories and dilemmas. Curriculum challenges and opportunities in a changing world: Transnational perspectives in curriculum inquiry. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 325–345.
34.
MorrowRA (2019) Paulo Freire and the “Logic of Reinvention” Power, the State, and Education in the Global Age. The Wiley handbook of Paulo Freire, 445–461.
35.
MorrowRATorresCA (2019) Rereading Freire and Habermas: philosophical anthropology and reframing critical pedagogy and educational research in the neoliberal Anthropocene. The Wiley Handbook of Paulo Freire. Wiley Online Library, 239–274.
36.
MouffeC (2011) On the Political. Routledge.
37.
MouffeC (2013) Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. Verso Books.
38.
Myren-SvelstadPE (2020) Sustainable literary competence: connecting literature education to education for sustainability. Humanities9(4): 141.
39.
OECD (2018) Preparing our youth for an inclusive and sustainable world: the OECD PISA global competence framework. Paris: OECD.OECD.
40.
OliverioS (2020) The end of schooling and education for “calamity”. Policy Futures in Education18(7): 922–936.
41.
OziewiczM (2022) Planetarianism now: on anticipatory imagination, young people’s literature, and hope for the planet. In: Pedagogy in the Anthropocene: Re-Wilding Education for a New Earth. Springer International Publishing, 241–256.
42.
PaynePG (2022) Environmental education and the critical social sciences. In: Relational and Critical Perspectives on Education for Sustainable Development: Belonging and Sensing in a Vanishing World. Springer International Publishing, 95–111.
43.
RhodesRAW (2018) What is decentred analysis? In: Narrative Policy Analysis: Cases in Decentred Policy. Springer International Publishing, 1–21.
44.
RieckmannM (2017) Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. UNESCO Publishing.
45.
RobertsonSL (2021) Provincializing the OECD-PISA global competences project. Globalisation, Societies and Education19(2): 167–182.
46.
RobertsonSLSorensenT (2018) Global transformations of the state, governance and teachers’ labour: putting Bernstein’s conceptual grammar to work. European Educational Research Journal17(4): 470–488.
47.
SalonenAOIsolaAMJakonenJP, et al. (2024) Who and what belongs to us? Towards a comprehensive concept of inclusion and planetary citizenship. International Journal of Social Pedagogy13(1): 1–13.
48.
SellarSLingardB (2014) The OECD and the expansion of PISA: new global modes of governance in education. British Educational Research Journal40(6): 917–936.
49.
SlimaniM (2021) Towards a Political Education Throught Environmental issues. LondonHoboken, NJ: ISTEWiley.
50.
SlimaniMBarthesALangeJ M (2023) Environmental Issues in the Mirror of the Anthropocene Event: political Trend and Educational Heterotopia. In Political Education in the Anthropocene. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 87–99.
51.
SørensenG (2021) The future of the state. In: Routledge International Handbook of Contemporary Social and Political Theory. Routledge, 421–431.
52.
SorensenTBYdesenCRobertsonSL (2021) Re-reading the OECD and education: the emergence of a global governing complex–an introduction. Globalisation, Societies and Education19(2): 99–107.
53.
SundPLysgaardJG (2013) Reclaim “education” in environmental and sustainability education research. Sustainability5(4): 1598–1616.
54.
SusenS (2015) The Postmodern Turn in the Social Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan.
SwyngedouwE (2011) Depoliticized environments: the end of nature, climate change and the post-political condition. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement69: 253–274.
57.
SzkudlarekT (2020) What and what for? Theorizing ontology and instrumentality of education. Policy Futures in Education18(7): 824–833.
58.
TorjussenLPS (2022) Ecopedagogy in the Anthropocene: a defence of the classical paideia. In: Pedagogy in the Anthropocene: Re-Wilding Education for a New Earth. Springer International Publishing, 313–327.
59.
VaccariVGardinierMP (2019) Towards one world or many? A comparative analysis of OECD and UNESCO global education policy documents. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning11: 1.
60.
VliegheJZamojskiP (2020) Redefining education and politics: on the paradoxical relation between two separate spheres. Policy Futures in Education18(7): 864–877.
61.
WatersCNWilliamsMZalasiewiczJ, et al. (2022) Epochs, events and episodes: marking the geological impact of humans. Earth-Science Reviews234: 104171.
62.
WiekAWithycombeLRedmanCL (2011) Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science6: 203–218.
63.
ZalasiewiczJWatersCNEllisEC, et al. (2021) The Anthropocene: comparing its meaning in geology (chronostratigraphy) with conceptual approaches arising in other disciplines. Earth’s Future9(3): e2020EF001896.
