This study unearthed the dissonance between policymaking and reality and how these incongruences contribute to furthering racial injustices in New York City’s (NYC) Universal Pre-K (UPK). As one of the most ambitious initiatives of its kind, NYC’s UPK expansion provides a valuable model for other systems, offering important lessons from its implementation. Through an examination of early childhood and care teacher compensation discourse, policymaker rhetoric is juxtaposed with the on-ground perceptions of teachers, advocates, and administrators. Utilizing Critical Policy Analysis and drawing on both Bronfenbrenner’s (1979) ecological systems theory and Schneider and Ingram’s (1993) social construction and policy design theory, we critically analyzed 66 documents, including hearings, media reports, and advocacy documents, as well as 240 social media posts from 2014 to 2022. Our analysis revealed a disconnect between policymakers’ narratives and the realities that educators faced under inequitable compensation policies, highlighting the widespread impact of these policies across every layer of NYC’s early care and education ecosystem. Findings exposed policymakers’ bias towards specific groups, perpetuating racial disparities in NYC’s highly segregated early childhood system, and signaling UPK’s role in amplifying existing inequities.
BallSJ (2003) The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy18(2): 215–228.
2.
BravemanPAArkinEProctorD, et al. (2022) Systemic and structural racism: definitions, examples, health damages, and approaches to dismantling. Health Affairs41(2): 171–178.
3.
BronfenbrennerU (1979) The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
BrownCAWrightTS (2011) The rush toward universal public Pre-K: a media analysis. Educational Policy25(1): 115–133.
BushouseBK (2009) Universal Preschool: Policy Change, Stability, and the Pew Charitable Trusts. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
7.
Campaign for Children and United Neighborhood Houses (2016) Losing the Best. New York, NY: Campaign for Children and United Neighborhood Houses.
8.
CollinsPH (2000) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. 2nd edition. New York: Routledge.
9.
CumboTreygerLevin, et al. (2018a) Resolution Calling Upon the City of New York to Eliminate the Disparity in Compensation Paid to Teachers, Staff, and Directors at Community-based EarlyLearn NYC Centers, as Compared to the Compensation Paid to Department of Education Instructors for Similar Employment. Washington, DC: Human Services Division.
10.
CumboLTreygerMLevinM, et al. (2018b) Resolution no. 358. Resolution Calling Upon the City of New York to Eliminate the Disparity in Compensation Paid to Teachers, Staff, and Directors at Community-based EarlyLearn NYC Centers, as Compared to the Compensation Paid to Department. of Education Instructors for Similar Employment. Washington, DC: Human Services Division.
11.
Day Care Council of New York (2023) Why New York City must Complete the Path to Parity for the Community-based Early Childhood Education Workforce. New York, NY: DCCNY.
12.
DiemSYoung (2015) Considering critical turns in research on educational leadership and policy. International Journal of Educational Management297: 838–850. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-05-2015-0060.
13.
DiemSYoungMDWeltonAD, et al. (2014) The intellectual landscape of critical policy analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education27(9): 1068–1090.
14.
EdelmanM (1985) The Symbolic Uses of Politics. 2nd edition. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
15.
Education Committee Oversight Hearing on Teaching Recruitment and Retention in the New York City Public School System (2017) Hearing before the committee on education, council of the city of New York.
16.
Education Committee’s Hearing on Fiscal 2019 Preliminary Budget (2018) Hearings before committee on education, council of the city of New York.
17.
EppleyK (2009) Rural schools and the highly qualified teacher provision of no child left behind: a critical policy analysis. Journal of Research in Rural Education24(4): 1–11. Available at: https://jrre.psu.edu/articles/24-4.pdf.
18.
Executive Budget Hearing 2020 on Finance, Education, and Economic Development (2019) Hearings before committee on finance jointly with the committee on education with committee on economic development, council of the city of New York.
19.
FolbreN (2006) Measuring care: gender, empowerment, and the care economy. Journal of Human Development7(2): 183–199.
20.
FraserN (1995) From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a ‘Post-Socialist’ age. New Left Review212: 68.
21.
FraserN (1997) Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the ‘Postsocialist’Condition. New York, NY: Routledge.
22.
GouldKBoydJTesarM (2023) Equity, inclusion and belonging for teachers in early childhood education in aotearoa New Zealand. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood24(2): 176–188.
23.
KarchA (2013) Early Start: Preschool Politics in the United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
24.
KeddieA (2012) Schooling and social justice through the lenses of nancy fraser. Critical Studies in Education53(3): 263–279.
25.
KirpDL (2007) The Sandbox Investment: The Preschool Movement and Kids-First Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26.
LunaMGreyLJ (2018) Navigating the policy directive of child autonomy in universal pre-kindergarten practice. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood20(3): 282–293.
27.
Mavrides CalderonM (2022) Policy effects on New York City early education centers: ecological case studies. CUNY Academic Works. Available at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/hc_sas_etds/1000.
28.
NAEYC and Ed Trust (2019) Increasing Qualifications, Centering Equity: Experiences and Advice from Early Childhood Educators of Color. Washington, DC: NAEYC.
OvertonJ (2009) Early childhood teachers in contexts of power: empowerment and a voice. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood34(2): 1–10.
35.
PattonM (2015) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
PotterH (2015) Lessons from New York City’s Universal Pre-K Expansion. New York, NY: The Century Foundation (accessed 19 July 2019).
37.
ReidJLMelvinSAKaganSL, et al. (2019) Building a unified system for universal Pre-K: the case of New York city. Children and Youth Services Review100: 191–205.
38.
Roberts-HolmesGBradburyA (2016) The datafication of early years education and its impact upon pedagogy. Improving Schools19(2): 119–128.
39.
RobertsonSL (2012) Placing teachers in global governance agendas. Comparative Education Review56(4): 584–607.
40.
SabatierPAMazmanianD (1980) The implementation of public policy: a framework of analysis. Policy Studies Journal8(4): 538–560.
41.
SabatierPAIngramHSchneiderA, et al. (2007) Social construction and policy design. In: SabatierPA (ed) Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 93–129.
42.
SaldanaJMilesMB (2013) The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers + Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
SchneiderAIngramH (1993) Social construction of target populations: implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review87(2): 334–347.
44.
ShoreCWrightS (2011) Conceptualizing policy: technologies of governance and the politics of visibility. In: ShoreCWrightSPeròD (eds) Policy Worlds: Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
45.
ShpancerNDunlapBMelickKM, et al. (2008) Educators or babysitters? Daycare caregivers reflect on their profession. Child Care in Practice14(4): 401–412.
46.
StemlerSE (2015) Content analysis. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences1–14.
WeingartnerEAaseMPaigeM (2018) Join the Fight for Early Childhood Equity. New York, NY: University Settlement.
51.
WhitebookMMcLeanC (2017) A Proposed Framework for Understanding and Advancing Policy and Practice. Berkeley, CA: Center for the Study of Child Care Employment, University of California.
52.
WhitebookMMcLeanCAustinL, et al. (2018) The Early Childhood Workforce Index 2018. Berkeley, CA: CSCCE.
