Educational equity remains a pressing challenge in the Global South, particularly for students affected by conflict and migration. In Myanmar, disruptions to formal schooling have led many students to seek alternative education pathways that offer flexibility and international recognition. This study examines the role of General Educational Development (GED) programs as an alternative model for fostering educational resilience and equity among Myanmar students. Drawing on qualitative data from focus group discussions with educators and administrators, the study highlights key barriers, including language difficulties, legal constraints, and resource shortages, and explores community-driven strategies to overcome these challenges. By framing the discussion within post-colonial and decolonial perspectives, this research underscores the significance of flexible, non-traditional education models in ensuring access to learning for marginalized students. The findings contribute to broader discussions on education policy in the Global South, offering insights into how alternative credentialing programs can bridge educational gaps in conflict-affected regions.
ChinnPWU (2007) Decolonizing methodologies and indigenous knowledge: the role of culture, place and personal experience in professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching44(9): 1247–1268.
8.
ClarkeVBraunVHayfieldN (2015) Thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods3: 222–248.
9.
CreswellJWPothCN (2016) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Singapore: Sage publications.
10.
CulbertsonSConstantL (2015) Education of Syrian Refugee Children: Managing the Crisis in Turkey, Lebanon, and Jordan. California: Rand Corporation.
11.
Darian-SmithE (2019) Decolonizing global studies. The Oxford Handbook of Global Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press Oxford, 251–276.
Dryden-PetersonS (2018) Refugee children’s experiences of education in countries of first asylum. Learning and Teaching Around the World. London: Routledge, 19–27.
GirouxHA (2024) Teachers as Intellectuals: Toward a Critical Pedagogy of Learning. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
16.
HajirB (2024) Between ‘the paradox of liberalism’ and ‘the paradox of decoloniality’: education for peacebuilding in conflict settings. Globalisation, Societies and Education22(3): 433–445.
HutchinsonYOchoaAACPaulsonJ, et al. (2023) Decolonizing Education for Sustainable Futures. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
20.
KessiSMarksZRamugondoE (2021) Decolonizing knowledge within and beyond the classroom. Critical African Studies13(1): 1–9.
21.
MakarovaEBirmanD (2015) Cultural transition and academic achievement of students from ethnic minority backgrounds: a content analysis of empirical research on acculturation. Educational Research57(3): 305–330.
22.
MansbachRWPirroEB (2023) Decolonization and the Global South. In: Introduction to Global Politics. London: Routledge, 142–177.
23.
MayerBS (2004) Beyond Neutrality: Confronting the Crisis in Conflict Resolution. John Wiley & Sons.
24.
McGlynnCZembylasMBekermanZ, et al. (2009) Peace Education in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies: Comparative Perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
25.
MendenhallMRussellSGBrucknerE (2017) Urban Refugee Education: Strengthening Policies and Practices for Access, Quality, and Inclusion. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/161456469.pdf
26.
MerryfieldMM (2008) Decolonizing social studies and global education. Decolonizing Democratic Education. Leiden: BRILL, 87–95.
27.
MignoloW (2011) The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options. North Carolina: Duke University Press.
28.
MowryA (2023) Documenting factors contributing to the emergence of migrant learning centers in Thailand. Asian Review36(2): 4–26.
29.
NovelliMCardozoMTAL (2008) Conflict, education and the global south: new critical directions. International Journal of Educational Development28(4): 473–488.
30.
PodderS (2012) From recruitment to reintegration: communities and ex-combatants in post-conflict Liberia. International Peacekeeping19(2): 186–202.
ShahjahanRAEsteraALSurlaKL, et al. (2022) “Decolonizing” curriculum and pedagogy: a comparative review across disciplines and global higher education contexts. Review of Educational Research92(1): 73–113.
33.
SmithLT (2021) Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
34.
SmithLTTuckEYangKW (2018) Indigenous and Decolonizing Studies in Education. New York, NY: Routledge.
35.
SteadmanS (2021) Conflict, transition and agency: reconceptualising the process of learning to teach. Teaching and Teacher Education107: 103475.
36.
TiklyLBarrettAM (2011) Social justice, capabilities and the quality of education in low income countries. International Journal of Educational Development31(1): 3–14.
YinRK (2018) Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
41.
ZembylasM (2018) Con-/divergences between postcolonial and critical peace education: towards pedagogies of decolonization in peace education. Journal of Peace Education15(1): 1–23.
42.
ZembylasMCharalambousCCharalambousP (2016) Peace Education in a Conflict-Affected Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
