Critical Race Theory (CRT) has recently been positioned as a serious problem requiring urgent policy response among partisan media outlets. Making a case for pressing policy demands, several policy makers have proposed federal, state, and local level legislation and other measures to restrict how race, racism, or American history in general can be taught in K-12 schools, higher education institutions, and state agencies. Anti-CRT rhetoric in media and policy proposals have also propagated the notion of CRT as being divisive as well as ubiquitous in public education. Given this, it is critical to examine whether policy opinions regarding reactionary legislation is based on a real understanding of CRT. We conduct a conceptual and theoretical inquiry into anti-CRT rhetoric relying on the sociological concepts of moral panics and folk devils. Then, we examine familiarity, knowledge, ideology, policy beliefs, and policy opinions regarding CRT in education using nationally representative survey data. The analysis showed that most parents are not familiar with CRT, and the average parent neither opposes nor supports teaching of CRT. The opposition to teaching of CRT is largely driven by political affiliation and related ideological beliefs and positions.
Bonilla-SilvaE (2015) More than prejudice: restatement, reflections, and new directions in critical race theory. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity1(1): 73–87.
8.
CohenS (2002) Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers. London & New York: Routledge. [First published 1972 by MacGibbon and Kee Ltd.
9.
CrenshawWilliamsK (2010) Twenty years of critical race theory: looking back to move forward. Conn. L. Rev43: 1253.
DelgadoRStefancic (eds) (2013) Critical Race Theory: The Cutting Edge. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
13.
DelgadoRStefancicJ (eds) (2017) Critical Race Theory: An Introduction. New York, NY: NYU press, Vol. 20.
14.
DembyGKungJDonnellaL, et al. (2021, September 1) Code switch. National Public Radio. [Audio podcast episode with sociologist Zuleyka Zevallos, historians Adam Laats and Gillian Frank, and law professor Khiara Bridges as guests]https://www.npr.org/2021/08/20/1029775224/the-folk-devil-made-me-do-it.
15.
DurnovaAFischerFZittounP (2016) Discursive approaches to public policy: politics, argumentation, and deliberation. In: PetersBGZittounP (eds) Contemporary Approaches to Public Policy: Theories, Controversies and Perspectives. London: Palgrave-McMillan, 35–56.
ErtasN (2015) Policy narratives and public opinion concerning charter schools. Politics & Policy43(3): 426–451. doi: 10.1111/polp.12120.
18.
ErtasNMcKnightA (2019) Clarifying and reframing the neoliberal critique of educational policy using policy analysis theories. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education40(3): 234–247. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2019.1569881.
FreireP (1970) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.
23.
GillbornD (2005) Education policy as an act of white supremacy: Whiteness, critical race theory and education reform. Journal of Education Policy20(4): 485–505. doi: 10.1080/02680930500132346
PolikoffMSilverDRapaportA, et al. (2022, October) A House divided? What Americans Really Think about Controversial Topics in Schools. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California. https://uasdata.usc.edu/education
RufoC (2020b, July 20). Separate but Equal: City of Seattle holds Racially Segregated Civil Rights Training—In the Name of Social Justice. https://rufo.substack.com/p/separate-but-equal
